On Mon, Mar 30, 2020, 05:02 Luigi Tagliafierro
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> we are experiencing an error : The bitbucket log
> (/var/atlassian/bitbucket_home/log/launcher.log) constantly repeats this
> error:
>
> "java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: An invalid domain
>
[.code.doxee.com] was
Hi,
We've had this error and it turned out to be due to the cookie processor.
According to RFC6265, the domain attribute of the cookie must not start
with a dot, so the new cookie processor rejects those cookies. Either
remove the starting dot from the domain attribute or use the legacy cookie
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 1:02 PM Luigi Tagliafierro
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> we are experiencing an error : The bitbucket log
> (/var/atlassian/bitbucket_home/log/launcher.log) constantly repeats this
> error:
>
> "java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: An invalid domain [.code.doxee.com]
>
On 16/11/2019 09:29, Alexander Norz wrote:
> Am 15.11.2019 22:23, schrieb Mark Thomas:
>
> That is the point:
>
>> Because Oracle changed the directory layout and names of the standard
>> registry entries and the installer probably hasn't been updated to take
>> account of that yet.
>
> The
сб, 16 нояб. 2019 г. в 12:08, Alexander Norz
:
>
> Am 15.11.2019 22:23, schrieb Mark Thomas:
> >
> >
> > Patches welcome.
> >
> > Mark
> >
>
> A patch is nearly ready. I will sent a pull request asap.
I think that you should start with a real reproducible description of
the issue (in Bugzilla).
Am 15.11.2019 22:23, schrieb Mark Thomas:
That is the point:
Because Oracle changed the directory layout and names of the standard
registry entries and the installer probably hasn't been updated to take
account of that yet.
The environment variable JAVA_HOME isn't supported actually.
I
Am 15.11.2019 22:23, schrieb Mark Thomas:
Patches welcome.
Mark
A patch is nearly ready. I will sent a pull request asap.
Alexander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 15/11/2019 15:50, Alexander Norz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there a good point why the Windows Service Installer
> (apache-tomcat-9.0.27.exe) did not support Oracles Java JDK (11 without
> JRE) out-of-the-box especially for silent installation?
Because Oracle changed the directory layout and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Munzer,
On 8/10/19 18:31, Munzer Khatib wrote:
> I noticed i made some typos in the commands i listed here because i
> was testing.. I started testing with Tomcat10 keystore and then the
> last rekey was for Tomcat14 keystore. All the commands
Hi Peter,
Thank you for your reply.
I noticed i made some typos in the commands i listed here because i was
testing.. I started testing with Tomcat10 keystore and then the last rekey was
for Tomcat14 keystore. All the commands reference the Tomcat 14 keystore.
I did export the certificate to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Munzer,
On 8/5/19 20:42, Munzer Khatib wrote:
> Here are the steps I used to create the keystore and import
> certificate to it.
These steps look okay, with the exception that Peter (logo) pointed
out: you have used two different keystores in your
Munzer,
Am 2019-08-07 09:19, schrieb Peter Kreuser:
Hi Munzer,
I guess we‘re going a slightly awkward way here, but to fix your
problem with the new cert in the first place, you could use this:
If your keystore is the old proprietary format, convert it to PKCS12:
keytool -importkeystore
Hi Munzer,
I guess we‘re going a slightly awkward way here, but to fix your problem with
the new cert in the first place, you could use this:
If your keystore is the old proprietary format, convert it to PKCS12:
keytool -importkeystore -srckeystore keystore.jks -destkeystore keystore.p12
Hi Peter
I dont have the private key file. That is created when I create the keystore. I
dont know if it can be extracted.
Munzer
On Tuesday, 6 August 2019, 4:35:51 PM UTC, Peter Kreuser
wrote:
Hi,
> Am 06.08.2019 um 02:42 schrieb Munzer Khatib :
>
> Hi
> Can you help me with this
Hi,
> Am 06.08.2019 um 02:42 schrieb Munzer Khatib :
>
> Hi
> Can you help me with this problem.
> Problem: Installing SSL certificate on Apache Tomcat 8.0.36 fails
> I am trying to install a new SSL certificate into Apache tomcat 8.0.36.I ran
> same steps ran successfully in 2013 and 2016 on
On 24 Aug 2012, at 07:33, Geet Chandra gee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody know about Tomcat (6.x or 7.x) support for Windows 8 and
Windows Server 2012.
If it is there, then which version, if not when can we expect.
Why not try the latest Tomcat 7 and let us know if it works?
p
--
On 30.7.2011 0:27, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2. Note that you can configure JarScanner element in context.xml.
Maybe it is worth to add a pair of such attributes (skip/include)
there?
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/jar-scanner.html
That makes sense. Most of the jar files are
2011/7/30 Michael Youngstrom you...@gmail.com:
I'm working with Tomcat 7 using web xml fragements and Servlet annotations.
When metadata-complete=false startup time is bad. It can be improved by
excluding jars using tomcat.util.scan.DefaultJarScanner.jarsToSkip. This is
great except now
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Bruno andrew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to setup Apache with JkMount to tomcat to dynamically
handle different contexts in Apache, but always use the same context
in Tomcat.
That statement doesn't make sense to me, given your example, but...
below...
On Jun 15, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Bruno andrew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to setup Apache with JkMount to tomcat to dynamically
handle different contexts in Apache, but always use the same context
in Tomcat.
That
2009/10/9 Steve Wade stevewadec...@yahoo.com:
I know this configuration works and that Apache states Tomcat 5.5.x support
for Java 1.5 and above, but I cannot find a statement for support of Java 1.6
with Tomcat 5.5.x. Anyone know where this support is documented?
As far as my personal
I can't find the JSP 2.2 specification, but if you look at JSR-316, you will
see that the basis for Java EE 6 is servlet 3.0, JSP 2.2 and JSF 2.0. I am
not sure it makes much sense to align JSP 2.1 with servlet 3.0.
Martin
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
-
From: Martin Dubuc [mailto:martind1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 6:23 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Support for JSF 2.0
I can't find the JSP 2.2 specification, but if you look at JSR-316, you will
see that the basis for Java EE 6 is servlet 3.0, JSP 2.2 and JSF 2.0. I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin,
On 3/9/2009 5:44 PM, Martin Dubuc wrote:
I am wondering if there are plans to support JSF 2.0 when it is released. I
assume that support for JSF 2.0 will require support for new servlet/JSP
specs (somehting like servlet 3.0/JSP 2.2). Would
Christopher Schultz wrote:
Martin,
On 3/9/2009 5:44 PM, Martin Dubuc wrote:
I am wondering if there are plans to support JSF 2.0 when it is released. I
assume that support for JSF 2.0 will require support for new servlet/JSP
specs (somehting like servlet 3.0/JSP 2.2). Would this be done in
It is my understanding that Java EE 6 will use JSP 2.2, servlet 3.0 and JSF
2.0. I am wondering if Tomcat 7.0 should also support JSP 2.2 in addition to
servlet 3.0.
I have seen on the Sun's JSF forum a poster claim that JSF 2.0 would work
with JSP 2.0 and servlet 2.5, so I guess Tomcat 6.0.x
Martin Dubuc wrote:
It is my understanding that Java EE 6 will use JSP 2.2, servlet 3.0 and JSF
2.0. I am wondering if Tomcat 7.0 should also support JSP 2.2 in addition to
servlet 3.0.
As far as I am aware, there is no JSP 2.2 spec in the works. If you know
different, a reference would be
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
The msvcr71.dll file (not msvci70.dll, whatever that is) is required to run
the Tomcat service launcher, but not needed when Tomcat is run via scripts.
The reason it didn't show up on JRE/JDK 5 is because installation of that JVM
version slams a copy of the DLL
@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Support
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
The msvcr71.dll file (not msvci70.dll, whatever that is) is required to run
the Tomcat service launcher, but not needed when Tomcat is run via scripts.
The reason it didn't show up on JRE/JDK 5 is because installation
- Original Message -
From: Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 2:37 PM
Subject: RE: Support
java jar bootstrap.jar works fine for me..
is there ANY possible workaround to this daemon bug?
Thanks,
Martin
- Original Message -
From: Caldarale, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 3:42 AM
Subject: RE: Support
From: Johnny Kewl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Support
Normally I always recomment lagging a JRE
which version ?
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:50 AM, Angelica Ardila
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Good afternoon, my question is this:
That version of JDK should I use for the Tomcat 6?
Thank you very much.
Angélica Ardila
--
Regards
Partha Goswami
President
Global Web-Tech Solution
The Apache Tomcat version 6
2008/10/2, Partha Goswami [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
which version ?
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:50 AM, Angelica Ardila
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Good afternoon, my question is this:
That version of JDK should I use for the Tomcat 6?
Thank you very much.
I asked which version of JDK ?
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Angelica Ardila [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
The Apache Tomcat version 6
2008/10/2, Partha Goswami [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
which version ?
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:50 AM, Angelica Ardila
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Good
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:50 AM, Angelica Ardila
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
That version of JDK should I use for the Tomcat 6?
Read the release notes:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Tomcat 6.0 is designed to run on JSE 5.0 and later.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY
Angelica Ardila wrote:
Good afternoon, my question is this:
That version of JDK should I use for the Tomcat 6?
Thank you very much.
Angélica Ardila
Whichever one you like, dear. ;-)
Seriously now :
JDK 6 would probably be best, and JDK 5 should work also.
But if it is only to run Tomcat,
ah, JDK 6.0 has some issue, in WIndows after installing JDK 6.0 Tomcat
6.0 u need to put msvci70.dll from Jdk folder to bin folder of tomcat ,
that's why i was asking. JDK 5 has no issue,
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:59 AM, André Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Angelica Ardila wrote:
Good
Good afternoon, my question is this:
That version of JDK should I use for the Tomcat 6?
Thank you very much.
Angélica Ardila
Whichever one you like, dear. ;-)
i'll wait for christopher schultz response to this answer
Martin Gainty wrote:
Good afternoon, my question is this:
That version of JDK should I use for the Tomcat 6?
Thank you very much.
Angélica Ardila
Whichever one you like, dear. ;-)
i'll wait for christopher schultz response to this answer
You are already a few off-list exchanges too
- Original Message -
From: Angelica Ardila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 12:20 AM
Subject: Support
Good afternoon, my question is this:
That version of JDK should I use for the Tomcat 6?
Thank you very much.
Angélica Ardila
And by her innocent question, Angelica has brought out the inherent
personality of a number of people on this list..
Any more takers ?
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: André Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 12:29 AM
Subject: Re: Support
Angelica Ardila wrote:
Good afternoon, my question is this:
That version of JDK should I use for the Tomcat 6
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Partha Goswami
Subject: Re: Support
ah, JDK 6.0 has some issue, in WIndows after installing JDK
6.0 Tomcat
6.0 u need to put msvci70.dll from Jdk folder to bin folder
of tomcat ,
that's why i was asking. JDK 5 has no issue
From: Johnny Kewl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Support
Normally I always recomment lagging a JRE version as well...
avoid bleeding edge...
JRE/JDK 6 has been around for almost two years now, so I don't think the
1.6.0_07 download is at all risky. On the other hand, the 1.6.0_10
Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
Hi,
So, I'm running an app which the development house say *has* to run on
4.1.31. I'm not especially happy about this, and will try running it
under 4.1.37, but the developers say they *might* be able to get it to
run under 5.5. I seem to recall a conversation in
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David kerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4.1.37 is probably your best short-term solution, and work toward 6.x in
the mid-to-long term.
That was my gut feeling. Could you explain why that is? Is 5.5 a
wasteland? I'll need to understand the rationale behind the
From: Stephen Nelson-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Support and development of versions
Is 5.5 a wasteland?
It's not a wasteland, whereas 5.0 is. However, the most attention goes
to the current level, while 4.1 and 5.5 activity is pretty much limited
to only serious bug fixes
Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David kerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4.1.37 is probably your best short-term solution, and work toward 6.x in
the mid-to-long term.
That was my gut feeling. Could you explain why that is? Is 5.5 a
wasteland? I'll need
Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David kerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4.1.37 is probably your best short-term solution, and work toward 6.x in
the mid-to-long term.
That was my gut feeling. Could you explain why that is? Is 5.5 a
wasteland? I'll need to
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David kerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4.1.37 is probably your best short-term solution, and work toward 6.x in
the mid-to-long term.
That was my gut
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current status is available from:
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatVersions
What does RTC, for the process field stand for?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-
From: Stephen Nelson-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Support and development of versions
Could someone help me understand the differences between the servlet
and JSP versions?
The servlet and JSP specs are the place to look. Each document includes
a section on what's changed
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 16:12
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Support and development of versions
From: Stephen Nelson-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Support and development
Jason Pyeron wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current status is available from:
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatVersions
What does RTC, for the process field stand for?
Review Then Commit. It means every patch must get at least 3 more
From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Support and development of versions
It might not be, but it should not be.
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/compatibility.html
and
http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/compatibility.html
Other than enum becoming a reserved word
55 matches
Mail list logo
