: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
Hmm...
some time ago (approx 1,5 year ) was attempts to marry JBoss Seam and
Wicket. Was it successful? May be this is an example, why wicket should
to be treated as a standard?
Oleg
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Hoover, William
whoo...@nemours.orgwrote
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
From a developers point-of-view standardization can often be a
thorn in our side, but for management it can offer a
vendor-independent/implementation-independent solution.
Maintaining/upgrading infrastructure is difficult, expensive
, February 13, 2009 4:05 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
Hmm...
some time ago (approx 1,5 year ) was attempts to marry JBoss Seam and
Wicket. Was it successful? May be this is an example, why wicket should
to be treated as a standard?
Oleg
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
From a developers point-of-view standardization can often be a
thorn in our side, but for management it can offer a
vendor-independent/implementation-independent solution.
Maintaining/upgrading infrastructure is difficult, expensive
Please change the subject of this thread.
Erik.
--
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
I totally agree that the JSR process is horrid. However, Wicket could really
use some more corporate credibility (which a JSR would provide).
The problem, I guess is that there are simply no corporate interests behind
Wicket that would push the agenda
for something like
this :(
-Original Message-
From: tomlist0...@gmail.com [mailto:tomlist0...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Thomas Mäder
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:57 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
I totally agree
Hi all
I'm new to this list (and Wicket), and was interested in this
discussion.
On 12/02/2009, at 11:32 PM, Hoover, William wrote:
Just out of curiosity... Are there any plans to push a JSR that Wicket
could follow. I think there would be a lot more acceptance of Wicket
if
this was to
[mailto:tomlist0...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Thomas Mäder
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:57 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
I totally agree that the JSR process is horrid. However, Wicket could
really use some more corporate
source code they represent :o)
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 4:10 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
and what would a wicket standard give you?
Except that those idiotic
I am not sure what you would like to standardize. Given your JPA
example, I would guess that you want to push a JSR for a web framework
or something. But there is already something like that: JSF. Just let
Wicket be Wicket and instead of changing Wicket (and it's community) in
the wrong way,
Compagner [mailto:jcompag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 4:10 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
and what would a wicket standard give you?
Except that those idiotic managers then say its standardized.. now you can
use it why
From a developers point-of-view standardization can often be a thorn in our
side, but for management it can offer a
vendor-independent/implementation-independent solution.
Maintaining/upgrading infrastructure is difficult, expensive and time
consuming. From the point-of-view of management a
Hi,
I can't really think of any specification which would make sense to build -
there is just no need for that IMHO.
If managers need something like that - there's JSF. And knowledge is growing
that JSF isn't the ultimate answer. There are other open source projects
embraced by managers as well
necessary intended to imply
that anyone would not be open-minded if they did not support a JSR :o)
-Original Message-
From: Dave Schoorl [mailto:mailli...@cyber-d.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 9:21 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
I am
Unfortunately, those 'idiotic managers' (and I'm not disagreeing with you)
hold the purse strings. The move to Apache was a big step towards acceptance
by the business types. If you try to sell a new technology with a weird name
to your manager, it's not helping that there are just some guys from
First of all, thank you for entertaining this idea :o)
See comments below...
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 9:38 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
From
[mailto:jcompag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 9:38 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
From a developers point-of-view standardization can often be a thorn
in our side, but for management it can offer a
vendor-independent
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
swing like?
are there multiply implementations for swing?
Can i choose one from Sun and one from X?
or better said are there any desktop UI frameworks that do have multiply
implementations (for the same platform??) not that i know of . There
could
the push... I didn't necessary intended to imply
that anyone would not be open-minded if they did not support a JSR :o)
-Original Message-
From: Dave Schoorl [mailto:mailli...@cyber-d.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 9:21 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU
for entertaining this idea :o)
See comments below...
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 9:38 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
From a developers point-of-view
: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
From a developers point-of-view standardization can often be a thorn
in our side, but for management it can offer a
vendor-independent/implementation-independent solution.
Maintaining/upgrading infrastructure is difficult, expensive and time
: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:33 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
We're happy to announce a lot of Wicket involvement at the upcoming
ApacheCon in Amsterdam (23-27 March 2009)
First of all we have 2 training sessions available:
- Introduction
at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
We're happy to announce a lot of Wicket involvement at the upcoming
ApacheCon in Amsterdam (23-27 March 2009)
First of all we have 2 training sessions available:
- Introduction to Wicket by Martijn Dashorst on Mon 23 March
(http://tinyurl.com/aceu09wicket1
Message-
From: martijn.dasho...@gmail.com [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Martijn Dashorst
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:33 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
We're happy to announce a lot of Wicket involvement
if
this was to happen :o)
-Original Message-
From: martijn.dasho...@gmail.com [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Martijn Dashorst
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:33 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
We're happy to announce a lot
, 2009 12:57 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
I totally agree that the JSR process is horrid. However, Wicket could really
use some more corporate credibility (which a JSR would provide).
The problem, I guess is that there are simply no corporate
for something like
this :(
-Original Message-
From: tomlist0...@gmail.com [mailto:tomlist0...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Thomas Mäder
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:57 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
I totally agree
I guess there are advantages to being a committer ;-) But I maintain, Wicket
is well established on the technical front, but it could use a push on the
corporate side. Of course, I'm now waiting for the inrush of offers to prove
me wrong ;-)
Thomas
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Johan
We're happy to announce a lot of Wicket involvement at the upcoming
ApacheCon in Amsterdam (23-27 March 2009)
First of all we have 2 training sessions available:
- Introduction to Wicket by Martijn Dashorst on Mon 23 March
(http://tinyurl.com/aceu09wicket1)
- Behavior-Driving Your Apache Wicket
30 matches
Mail list logo
