[X] - YES - I would like to see at least the most used Wicket Stuff
projects structured so that they mirror Wicket, and a release is
produced for each Wicket release.
This should be a no-brainer ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
I think the idea behind this is that size will be called first. If the
size is zero there is no need to proceed with the call to get the items.
I don't necessarily agree with this approach because a lot of service
calls can capture the data in one call (even down to the database level-
some
We use the same workaround :o)
-Original Message-
From: Michael O'Cleirigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 9:43 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is there any other way? DataProviders must hit the Db twice
for (possible) large datasets
Hi Wayne,
If you need to do these kind things at least utilize
java.util.concurrent.*
class MyCallable implements CallableMyReturnObject {
final public MyReturnObject call() {
// calling the another thread; do something and return
your object
}
}
final ExecutorService es =
[mailto:mcgreg...@e-card.bg]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 12:53 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: How much this graph is accurate?
Add GWT to the comparison
El lun, 05-01-2009 a las 09:32 -0500, Hoover, William escribió:
I think this:
http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=Seam%2C+Grails%2C+Tapestry
If you don't mind having the gwt compiler dependency ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Hoover, William [mailto:whoo...@nemours.org]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 1:20 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org; mcgreg...@e-card.bg
Subject: RE: How much this graph is accurate?
Yeah sure- mostly due
Not sure as to why you cannot use setDefaultFormProcessing?
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/conditional-validation.html (see
Alternative Approach)
-Original Message-
From: ywtsang [mailto:ywts...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 9:46 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re:
@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: How much this graph is accurate?
What does this mean?
:-/
Hoover, William wrote:
I think this:
http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=Seam%2C+Grails%2C+Tapestry%2C+Wicket
%2
C+Stripesl=relative=1 is more accurate ;o)
-Original Message-
From: HHB [mailto:hubaghd
submitted fields values
Hoover, William wrote:
Not sure as to why you cannot use setDefaultFormProcessing?
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/conditional-validation.html (see
Alternative Approach)
-Original Message-
From: ywtsang [mailto:ywts...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January
I think this:
http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=Seam%2C+Grails%2C+Tapestry%2C+Wicket%2
C+Stripesl=relative=1 is more accurate ;o)
-Original Message-
From: HHB [mailto:hubaghd...@yahoo.ca]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 9:24 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: How much this graph is
You should use the same label and just replace the model object:
final Label label = new Label(text, new Model());
...
label.setModelObject(processing...);
...
label.setModelObject();
-Original Message-
From: Yazeed Isaacs [mailto:yaz...@switch.tj]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 8:27
+1
-Original Message-
From: s...@meiers.net [mailto:s...@meiers.net]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 7:47 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why you should not override isVisible
Ok, IMHO it's a bug that wicket calls isVisible() after detachment.
Thus caching isVisible()
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/conditional-validation.html see
alternative approach
-Original Message-
From: Kaspar Fischer [mailto:fisch...@inf.ethz.ch]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 5:19 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Turn off form validation
On 19.12.2008, at 13:45,
Is there any active projects for Wicket and ExtJS out there? I know of
the one that used to be at wickettools.org, but it looks like a dead
project (no updates for over a year). There was also talk about adding
it to wicketstuff around that same time period, but it doesn't seem like
that
Seems like a little wicketization should be in order:
http://www.infoq.com/news/2009/01/java-ee6-draft
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.apache.org;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/SCHEMA/xhtml11.xsd
http://wicket.apache.org;
Just out of curiosity... Are there any plans to push a JSR that Wicket
could follow. I think there would be a lot more acceptance of Wicket if
this was to happen :o)
-Original Message-
From: martijn.dasho...@gmail.com [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Martijn Dashorst
Sent:
:
And then come into the horrible voting/administive stuff? Long Release
cycles that are controlled, features that are discussed over and over.
Hmm
On 12/02/2009, Hoover, William whoo...@nemours.org wrote:
Just out of curiosity... Are there any plans to push a JSR that
Wicket could
of a
standard
offers us.
-igor
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Hoover, William
whoo...@nemours.org
wrote:
Judging by the responses (or the lack thereof), It seems as though
there
isn't enough support from the Wicket community to push for something
like this :(
-Original Message
-mindedness...
Hoover, William wrote:
I hear the arguments and I completely agree with the notion that
innovation usually happens elsewhere and a JSR/JCP would slow that
process down. I just want to objectively view the other side of the
spectrum :o)
From a developers point-of-view
First of all, thank you for entertaining this idea :o)
See comments below...
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 9:38 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
From a
. I know of companies that have switched from
Hiberante to OpenJPA to do just that. Other reasons may include, but are
not limited to: better support from one vendor to the next, discounted
support through partner programs, light-weight implementation, etc.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 16:59, Hoover
: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
Hmm...
some time ago (approx 1,5 year ) was attempts to marry JBoss Seam and
Wicket. Was it successful? May be this is an example, why wicket should
to be treated as a standard?
Oleg
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Hoover, William
whoo...@nemours.orgwrote
, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Hoover, William
whoo...@nemours.orgwrote:
First of all, thank you for entertaining this idea :o)
See comments below...
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 9:38 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Hoover, William
whoo...@nemours.orgwrote:
First of all, thank you for entertaining this idea :o)
See comments below...
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 9:38 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
I am using a behavior that is dynamically added/removed from a TextField
based upon another components state (in order to avoid extra round trips
to the server):
final AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior afcub = ...
final TextField textField = new TextField(some-id, new Model()){
protected
A simple solution is to hold on to the actual choices list until you can
match the selection:
public abstract class AbstractAutoCompleteTextFieldCHOICE extends
TextField {
private static final Logger LOG =
LoggerFactory.getLogger(AbstractAutoCompleteTextField.class);
private
did you try
getRequestCycleSettings().setGatherExtendedBrowserInfo(true); in your
WebApplication?
-Original Message-
From: Kaspar Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 6:35 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: How to get the remote address (IP)
I try to
What about formComponent.processInput()
-Original Message-
From: Ritesh Trivedi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:52 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Conditional Form Validation
Hi,
I am trying to implement conditional form validation according to the
Seems strange that Component#modelChanging and Component#modelChanged
are never called when IModel#setObject is called...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1764
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
: Thursday, July 31, 2008 6:01 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Component#modelChanging and Component#modelChanged when
IModel#setObject
how should we handle that?
-igor
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Seems strange that Component#modelChanging
is changed through the component.
there is no way for us to really intercept a setobject call on an
arbitrary model instance, figure out which components it is currently
attached to, and call modelchanging methods on them.
-igor
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED
to pay for it.
2008/7/31 Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, it does seem to be a difficult task to accomplish unless the
model itself is component aware. Nonetheless, it seems relatively
useless to have the onchanging/onchanged methods if they cannot do
what they claim they can do
Why do you use propertiesList.setReuseItems(true)?
-Original Message-
From: Markus Haspl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:20 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: ListView in Forms
hi,
first, i'm a very newbie to wicket... I want to add a ListView in a
If there are errors try setting this strategy on your list view:
public class ReuseOnFeedbackMessageStrategy implements
IItemReuseStrategy {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private static final int LEVEL_NA = 0;
private int feedbackMessageThresholdLevel;
That is an issue in itself ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 1:00 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: ListView in Forms
listviews dont use item reuse strategies...
-igor
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Hoover
Try HiveMind.unregisterHive(hiveKey);
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 1:56 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Turning off SWARM for testing?
sorry, i dont know anything about swarm itself. maybe during test
PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Turning off SWARM for testing?
HiveMind?
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Try HiveMind.unregisterHive(hiveKey);
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Turning off SWARM for testing?
Way to poach a name! :)
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, the same org.apache.wicket.security.hive.HiveMind used to
HiveMind.registerHive(getHiveKey(), factory) the factory
or you can use this one-
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Autocomplete+using+a+W
icket+model
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan
Gravener
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:17 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re:
or you can go with this solution:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/autocomplete-using-a-wicket-model.html
-Original Message-
From: Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 6:15 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re:
or you can use:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk/wicket-velocity/ in which
case you could have a separate js/vm file that can inject the values for
you:
myscript.vm
script language=JavaScript
function removeBlur(checked) {
if(checked) {
Subject: RE: Compatibility of objectautocomplete
Hoover, William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or you can go with this solution:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/autocomplete-using-a-wicket-model.html
Hi William,
I have tried it but not successfully. I can select a choice from the
choicelist
for the choice
in the autocomplete list
}
};
autoCompleteField.add(afcub);
-Original Message-
From: Hoover, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:03 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Compatibility of objectautocomplete
then override
requestcycle.onruntimeexception(runtimeexception e)
-igor
On Jan 8, 2008 10:07 AM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't see any methods in FeedbackMessages for:
pageContext.getErrorData().getStatusCode();
pageContext.getErrorData().getThrowable();
...
Am I missing
Add/Edit if necessary http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/siEB
-Original Message-
From: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 8:26 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: calling javascript function on wicket component's onclick
something like:
Add/Edit if necessary http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/3CIB
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Liu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:07 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to write Json response in the
AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.response(ajaxtarget)
Does anyone know when the links will be fixed for
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ (Internet Exploder 6)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
Gerolf
On Jan 16, 2008 2:25 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know when the links will be fixed for
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ (Internet Exploder 6)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Jan 16, 2008 2:25 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know when the links will be fixed for
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ (Internet Exploder 6)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Add/Edit if necessary http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/FSMB
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 12:06 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to logout and redirect
almost but not quiet
onclick() {
In your WebApplication...
getApplicationSettings().setPageExpiredErrorPage(PageExpiredErrorPage.class);
getApplicationSettings().setAccessDeniedPage(AccessDeniedPage.class);
getApplicationSettings().setInternalErrorPage(InternalErrorPage.class);
// show internal error page rather than default
On 1/16/08, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry, i checked the wrong window (running the examples on my machine).
what version of examples are deployed. anything = 1.3.0-final should work.
gerolf
On Jan 16, 2008 3:39 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cleared cache/temp
or even http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia.html
-Original Message-
From: Florian Sperber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 2:36 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: wicket + CMS
Hi Igor,
have you seen: http://cocoondev.org/daisy/index.html ?
Maybe
, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add/Edit if necessary http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sGw
-Original Message-
From: Boon Aik Chew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 8:33 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get page URL
It worked
very nice!
-Original Message-
From: Scott Swank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 12:57 PM
To: Wicket User List
Subject: CompoundModel based on proxies
One of our more clever developers created a CompoundPropertyModel that
uses a cglib proxy to strongly bind
integration comming along?
Like i said then, i don't have a solution ready for how you would do
such a thing, and frankly it doesn't bother me enough if sometimes i
have to implement ISecurePage myself.
But i welcome a contribution that could do it :)
Maurice
On Feb 12, 2008 1:29 PM, Hoover, William
I still think that a more elegant and non-obtrusive solution would be
mountSecurePage(MySecureWebPage.class)
discussed previously in:
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@wicket.apache.org/msg09129.html
That way you could have one basepage because they would not have to extend
SecureWebPage
If you would like to have custom Http error pages you can update the wicket
filter-mapping in your web.xml to the following (notice the dispatchers):
filter-mapping
filter-nameWicketFilter/filter-name
url-pattern/*/url-pattern
Add getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true); to your WebApplication class
-Original Message-
From: Kaspar Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 5:25 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Strict XHTML validation
I am trying to validate my page using
What about using the CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy? In your WebApplication:
@Override
protected IRequestCycleProcessor newRequestCycleProcessor() {
return new WebRequestCycleProcessor() {
protected IRequestCodingStrategy
According to the
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html
they should reside in src/main/webapp
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Czerwonka
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 9:43 AM
To:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html
they should reside in src/main/webapp
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
It looks like the datetime component has major issues of its own that make it
virtually unusable (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1412).
-Original Message-
From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 12:13 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Anyone know of a good kitchen sink application for Wicket (preferably one
application)? We need something robust enough to test most of the Wicket
features in our current environment.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Can you add this to the wiki
(http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/dropdownchoice-examples.html)? It seems like a
commonly asked question :o)
-Original Message-
From: Erik van Oosten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 9:35 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to
+1
-Original Message-
From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 4:13 AM
To: Wicket Development; Wicket Users
Subject: [vote] Release 1.4 with only generics and stop support for 1.3
This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
Anyone know what repository that the wicket-suckerfish menus are available in
(non-svn)?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: wicket-suckerfish
Hoover, William schrieb:
Anyone know what repository that the wicket-suckerfish menus are available in
(non-svn)?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
Shouldn't it be available through a public repository?
-Original Message-
From: Kai Mütz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 12:59 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: wicket-suckerfish
Hoover, William schrieb:
Thanks, but I was looking for a way I could
a release yet. It's at 1.0-SNAPSHOT still.
On 3/17/08, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't it be available through a public repository?
-Original Message-
From: Kai Mütz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 12:59 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
FYI...
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/repeater/
OrderedRepeatingView, RefreshingView, and Contacts Editor all throw Internal
errors
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Try the following:
if (!continueToOriginalDestination()) {
setResponsePage(getApplication().getHomePage());
}
-Original Message-
From: Jörn Zaefferer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:13 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mounting and
I was looking into providing a ListSortParam in a ISortState/IClusterable
(multiple version of SingleSortState) for a SortableDataProvider. Does the list
within the sort state need to be IClusterable?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
should be fine.
Regards,
Sebastiaan
Hoover, William wrote:
I was looking into providing a ListSortParam in a ISortState/IClusterable
(multiple version of SingleSortState) for a SortableDataProvider. Does the
list within the sort state need to be IClusterable
It seems as though this would be a good candidate for a replacement for
SingleSortState/SortableDataProvider. We really don't need the single sort
version if we have a multiple sort version (reduce bloat ;o)?
-Original Message-
From: Hoover, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
is that it is an incompatible change and a hassle for the
implementors of sortable data providers, because suddenly they need to
take into account many sorts instead of only 1.
Regards,
Sebastiaan
Hoover, William wrote:
It seems as though this would be a good candidate for a replacement
When using DataView/IDataProvider size() is called before iterator(int first,
int count) causing calls to DAOs to be duplicated. Our current framework that
is internally using Hibernate allows one call to be made to a DAO that returns
both the total result size and the actual records (based off
.
-igor
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When using DataView/IDataProvider size() is called before iterator(int first,
int count) causing calls to DAOs to be duplicated. Our current framework that
is internally using Hibernate allows one call to be made
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1449
-Original Message-
From: Toto Laricot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 3:29 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: './' appended to the main page url
Hi all,
Here is the situation I've been banging my head on all
defined in the data provider
interface to query/set the results.
* often users do:
new dataview() { isvisible() { return dataprovider.size()0; }
once again, datawindow size is not known.
[Will]: This would be accommodated by the above solution.
-igor
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Hoover, William
yes you can cache those values
IDataProvider does extends IDetachable
and in detach() you can clear those values.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
see below...
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March
be reused across the request.
johan
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wouldn't it be more flexible if this were the default behavior? The size()
method is called (sometimes multiple times- such is the case with pagination
or the check igor described) before
as a developer can know that but we as a framework, dont know about
that.
I thought the size was already cached in specific places
But you can easily make a wrapper ofcourse..
CachingDataProvider implements IDataProvider
{
IDataProvider delegate;
}
johan
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Hoover, William
{
result getdata(int first, int count); }
how do we handle usecases where we just need the size and dont know
first/count yet?
-igor
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
see below...
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 3:27 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: DataView size() iterator() call order issue
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) Although AbstractPageableView does ensure the cached item count is used
How can the offset in the AbstractPageableView - getViewOffset() be accessed
in a IDataProvider? Does the proposed solution make sense?
-Original Message-
From: Hoover, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 2:39 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That makes perfect sense in the scenario where rows are deleted, but it
doesn't make sense when all that is being done is clicking the next button
for a PagingNavigator. Why would do we need two calls to the size method
Message-
From: Hoover, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 7:55 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: DataView size() iterator() call order issue
The difference is that in the deletion scenario the state of the data has
changed. In the pagination scenario
params
dont have to be the same for the iterator call...
johan
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Also, you mention that all that is needed is to cache it (I assume you are
referring to the actual data) in the data provider. How can that be done
when
as a developer KNOW that it can cache it
Cache it if you can dont if you cant
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Okay, two issues... (1) combined call for size/data (2) multiple calls to
size() when paginating
I will avoid confusion by addressing only
the size is changed.
johan
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can you post code for an example data provider that would KNOW how to
cache the size?
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008
, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Perfect! detach was the missing piece of the puzzle, thank you! The only
issue remaining is the capability to combine the size/iterator call to
prevent duplicate DAO calls.
-Original Message-
From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
see http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Using+RadioGroups
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mehrle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 8:49 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Default selection in radio group?
I created a RadioGroup with three
see http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/using-radiogroups.html
-Original Message-
From: Sathish Gopal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 6:07 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RadioButton inside DataTable
Hi all,
I'm trying to build DataTable using the Wickets
Does anyone know how close we are to a release of wicket-minis?
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicketstuff-minis/
shows 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
I'm not sure why the built-in Wicket component doesn't support this feature
out-of-the-box, but here is a simple fix/solution:
// It solves your problem because the call to load will be made each
time your view renders
final LoadableDetachableModel articlesLoadableModel = new
LoadableDetachableModel() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
/**
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*/
Does anyone have an ETA when wicketstuff.org will be back up?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are looking for the examples, install them on your own box.
They're only a download away.
Martijn
On 5/2/08, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have an ETA when wicketstuff.org will be back up
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
