On 26 Sep 2007, at 12:26, Doug Leeper wrote:
- All images and resource links are to be accessed via HTTP
irregardless if
the page itself is to be displayed in HTTP/HTTPS
Most browsers will complain when non-secure elements are included on
a secured page.
This page contains both
Hi,
I want to build a custom url encoder fro bookmarkable pages and have
been looking at BookmarkablePageRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy. Can
someone quickly contrast the responsibilities of
IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy and WebRequestCodingStrategy. From a
quick look it seems like
Hi,
I want to build a custom url encoder fro bookmarkable pages and have
been looking at BookmarkablePageRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy. Can
someone quickly contrast the responsibilities of
IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy and WebRequestCodingStrategy. From a
quick look it seems like
pages only and
it delegates the encoding/decoding for mounted pages to
IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy.
-Matej
On 10/9/07, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to build a custom url encoder fro bookmarkable pages and have
been looking
of
this area.
John.
On 9 Oct 2007, at 01:24, Matej Knopp wrote:
IIRC WebRequestCodingStrategy is used for non-mounted pages only and
it delegates the encoding/decoding for mounted pages to
IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy.
-Matej
On 10/9/07, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want
Nice one. Cheers for your explanations. I am getting there slowly.
On 9 Oct 2007, at 14:25, Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi, see the response below
On 10/9/07, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As I am figuring out how to create my own IRequestCodingStrategy I
have come across a few
Hi,
I seem to be making progress with my custom URL scheme but have hit a
small wall. I have subclassed WebRequestCodingStrategy because I
want to keep the mountable page behaviour but just enhance it to
return my own target if no mounts are found and default processing
does not apply.
IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy encoder = getMountEncoder
(requestTarget);
... here getMountEncoder() is not final.
Cheers,
John
On 9 Oct 2007, at 15:37, John Patterson wrote:
Hi,
I seem to be making progress with my custom URL scheme but have hit
a small wall. I have subclassed
it references some package
protected classes).
-Matej
On 10/9/07, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a bit more info on the problem... encoding allows me to override
the equivalent method:
rg.apache.wicket.IRequestTarget)
*/
public final CharSequence pathForTarget(IRequestTarget
there.
On 9 Oct 2007, at 16:01, Matej Knopp wrote:
Thinking about it, probably better (and more solid) approach would be
for you to copy the entire class (unless it references some package
protected classes).
-Matej
On 10/9/07, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a bit more info
final. But we do
remove the final if someone has a good reason for it. :)
Could you please create a jira issue with the finals you need to
have removed?
Thanks.
-Matej
On 10/10/07, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, there is special case code in WebRequestCodingStrategy
Hi,
I have created a page and setStatelessHint(true) and made sure all
the child components are stateless but an http session is still being
created. The method isPageStateless() returns true.
Here is the trace where the SEssion is created:
page (triggers session creation if not already done so)
Something is going on here.
On 10 Oct 2007, at 18:24, John Patterson wrote:
Hi,
I have created a page and setStatelessHint(true) and made sure all
the child components are stateless but an http session is still
being created
stateless page
go to a stateful page (triggers session creation if not already
done so)
Something is going on here.
On 10 Oct 2007, at 18:24, John Patterson wrote:
Hi,
I have created a page and setStatelessHint(true) and made sure all
the child components are stateless but an http session
Hi,
I am having problems deploying my app on Jetty getting this message:
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Application class
com.hello.site.HelloApplication must be a subclass of WebApplication
at
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.ContextParamWebApplicationFactory.create
Ooops! Posted too soon... I had simply removed wicket from my pom by
mistake and Eclipse had not shown any build errors but did remove the
import statement from my Application. Might have to change this
setting!
On 11 Oct 2007, at 14:37, John Patterson wrote:
Hi,
I am having problems
Is there a JIRA issue for the broken stateless support so I know when
to update my application?
Cheers,
John.
On 11 Oct 2007, at 00:57, Matej Knopp wrote:
Yeah, it's a bug introduced by me recently. Will look at it ASAP.
-Matej
On 10/11/07, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also
There is now:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1072
On 12 Oct 2007, at 11:28, John Patterson wrote:
Is there a JIRA issue for the broken stateless support so I know
when to update my application?
Cheers,
John.
On 11 Oct 2007, at 00:57, Matej Knopp wrote:
Yeah, it's a bug
HI,
Is there anyway to have stateless pages that live in the application
scope so I can use AJAX behaviours and other listeners? Failing
that, can I turn off storing all pages except for the current active
page?
Cheers,
John.
Something I have noticed with renderOnLoad with my site is that it
stopped being called after I added some Javascript for banner ads.
Maybe their included script replaced the wicket function. I had to
revert to using onLoad which makes gives the impression that the maps
load more slowly.
You can also mount whole packages at a time. Or if you have too many
packages you can add your own IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy and
mount that and write your own logic for finding Bookmarkable pages
pages with nice URL's.
John
On 25 Oct 2007, at 09:09, martinf wrote:
Hi,
basically
Hi,
I am using the AutoCompleteTextField and can see that every keystroke
causes the entire page to be serialised and stored which seems a bit
excessive. Is there anyway to say that the page has not changed and
so don't store it?
John
knows the code better.
John
On 29 Oct 2007, at 16:56, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
autocomplete.setversioned(false) do it?
-igor
On 10/29/07, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am using the AutoCompleteTextField and can see that every keystroke
causes the entire page to be serialised
On 29 Oct 2007, at 17:37, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Is this really just that component that causes the page to serialize?
Sounds like a design flaw to me if that is the case...
Eelco
Definitely just that component causing the page to be marked
stateful. An auto complete field is not
it from Page.onDetach() should work. So you can set
a request cycle metadata if you don't want the page to be
serialized and then check for the meta data in page.onDetach().
-Matej
Igor Vaynberg wrote / napísal(a):
autocomplete.setversioned(false) do it?
-igor
On 10/29/07, John Patterson
For the AutoCompleteTextField I think it would make sense to never
store the page and simply make respond(target) final so that the can
not be changed. Does anyone really want to change the page state
for every key press? If so then that would seem to be the exception
rather than the
want there.
-Matej
On 10/31/07, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I notice that Pragma no-cache is set for every WebPage and I cannot
see how I can turn it off for my bookmarkable stateless pages could
would benefit from being cached.
Cheers,
John
On 1 Nov 2007, at 02:38, Johan Compagner wrote:
you are right thats not handy.
I made it just like we do with resources
have a special overridable protected method that is called
setHeaders() on
WebPage
Can you open an jira issue for this so that this is being shown as
a change?
HI,
I was wondering why the
IHeaderResponse.renderOnBeforeUnloadJavascript was removed. Is the
recommended way to do this now to call renderOnEventJavascript ?
Cheers,
John
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello users,
I am in the process of deploying a wicket site and found that the
cool scriptalicious effect I am using does not work when I am in
Deployment mode. In the Safari console it shows:
SyntaxError: Parse error
http://www.blahblah.com/resources/
Hi,
I am developing components similar to the EditableLable and noticed that
when I replace in the code TextField with a TextArea but the markup remains
input type=text no exception was thrown.
TextArea has:
@Override
protected final void onComponentTagBody(final MarkupStream
The check is not made because the tag was an OpenClose tag. When I change
the type of the tag to Open it is called.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/TextArea.onComponentTagBody-not-called-tp20916141p20916420.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at
Hi,
I use generated forms for a Contact Us page and have noticed that my email
address is not automatically filled in for me like on many sites. I guess
this is due to the name of the form input being something like
rows:0:row:input which Safari has not come across before. Is there any
way to
Craig McIlwee wrote:
2) the wicket web site now suggests the following code for generic
components:
@SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
public final T getModelObject()
{
return (T)getDefaultModelObject();
}
I am just starting to use the new form and it struck me as a little
Just started using the half-way approach and I really miss the type safety of
generified Component.
1) Generifying* Wicket
[X] Can best be done like currently in the 1.4 branch, where models
and components are both generified. I care most about the improved
static type checking generified
Why are only digits allowed? This stops me using a CompoundPropertyModel.
It seems to work fine apart from the warning.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007 2:55 PM, Edvin Syse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is container0 a non-safe id,
because it contains nondigits like the message
-igor
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 7:20 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are only digits allowed? This stops me using a
CompoundPropertyModel.
It seems to work fine apart from the warning.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007 2:55 PM, Edvin Syse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why
webmarkupcontainer(rv.newchildid());
rv.add(item);
item.add(componentwithwhateveridyouwant)
-igor
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 11:09 AM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I OK to continue ignoring the warning? Or will this bite me somewhere
else?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
there are a couple
Hi, this might be a really obvious question but... why are pages serialised
for every ajax request? I thought the latest page was always stored in the
PageMap?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Page-serialisation-tp19072319p19072319.html
Sent from the Wicket - User
.
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:13 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, this might be a really obvious question but... why are pages
serialised
for every ajax request? I thought the latest page was always stored in
the
PageMap?
--
View this message in context:
http
Hi, I need to store some kind of multi-request transaction data somewhere and
I guess that the PageMap is a better place than the session. I don't see
much talk of custom page maps on the list. Are they still a recommended way
to store things for a browser window?
John
--
View this message in
It happens in the same thread.
jwcarman wrote:
Shouldn't the serialization be happening in another thread. Are you
seeing performance hits because of it?
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:30 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is that the only reason? I imagine most sites
, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that the only reason? I imagine most sites will be running on one
server
with no failover. Is there a way to switch the serialisation of the
current
page off if failover support is not required?
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Failover support
Time for some coder booty! Yes wicket needs more action.
Yiannis Mavroukakis-3 wrote:
Girls can be coders too you know :-)
Michael Sparer wrote:
Sounds cool :-) But I think I wouldn't go further than a mug ... because
talking to girls might become a darn lot more difficult if you wear
reason for it
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:30 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is that the only reason? I imagine most sites will be running on one
server
with no failover. Is there a way to switch the serialisation of the
current
page off if failover support
Johan Compagner wrote:
Ajax request for page A: alter the page in memory (still only in memory,
no
new version)
yes page is altered so new version (ajax version)
Normal request for page B: serialise A to disc and place B in memory
No now you first do a request to A that can
.
Regards,
Erik.
John Patterson wrote:
Hi, I need to store some kind of multi-request transaction data somewhere
and
I guess that the PageMap is a better place than the session. I don't see
much talk of custom page maps on the list. Are they still a recommended
way
to store things
Any object stored in a model must be serializable and your object
com.tvh.website.application.external.ApplicationPage$ExternalApplicationBean
is not.
You can either make it serializable or use a model that finds your
ExternalApplicationBean when it loads e.g. LoadableDetachableModel. You can
Why don't you just cache your hits in your dataprovider in the constructor
and access it for both size() and iterator(int, int)?
I use Lucene for a DataView this way without a problem.
rgoodwin wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to solve a variation on a standard problem regarding running
If you cannot make your application object serializable - which is normal -
you need to use my other advice regarding a detachable model to load the
ExternalApplicationBean
Marieke Vandamme wrote:
I'm little confused now. How can I make java.util.RandomAccessSubList
Serializable?
I'm not
Erik van Oosten wrote:
The data is not serializable and is needed in several pages as a part of
one transaction
- Not serializable:
Well that is a hick up. This of course also means that you can not do
clustering. I would put the data directly in the HTTP session, or in
your own sub
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
If you don't want to make the session contain the objects explicitly,
because the multistep process is only a small part of your
application, you could use session metadata to store the data
(temporarily). This does mean that it is serialized with the session,
but
Johan Compagner wrote:
in 1.3 with the new Disk based store we dont need by default the window
detection yes
so it is turned off by default.
OK, and how do I turn it on?
Johan Compagner wrote:
Also the detection is pretty good but not completely solid!
It will always be very hard
and expects to see the previous page as it was
after the *last* ajax request, so we need to save and serialize it.
-Matej
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 7:29 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Compagner wrote:
Ajax request for page A: alter the page in memory (still only
Thanks for the explanation Matej. Makes perfect sense.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
I was thinking about implementing it like this.
But, it would make code that is already complicated even more
complicated. What's worst, it wouldn't work in clustered environment
where you need to send the page
Hi fellow wicketeers, I was wondering why Application.setMetaData() is
defined to take an Object and not a T or ? extends T. I'm sure there's
probably a good reason for it... just wondering.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/MetaData-Type-tp19091075p19091075.html
Sent from
) but with limited backbutton support (no page
versioning, only certain amount of pages in memory).
I hoped for full back button support for ajax...
-Matej
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 7:14 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But all access to the session is serialised? I don't
That can't be the markup that generated that error because there is no tag in
it with a wicket:id=label which the error message is complaining about.
But you also do not add a tag for exampleTitle which you add here
add(new Label(exampleTitle, exampleTitle));
Basically, every
Hi, I have a ListView in a table that can have rows dynamically added with
AJAX. When I add a row and enter a value, then add another row the first
row is reset to an empty value.
Do I need to submit the form for each AJAX request to send the new values to
the server?
Thanks,
JD
--
View this
to the server and server should be able to identify
such request and do the needful.
So in your AJAX request handler, you need to get the new values and add
them, however you need to. Its that simple.
John Patterson wrote:
Hi, I have a ListView in a table that can have rows dynamically added
.
I don't really understand why ListView uses the same id for each item.
I notice that a RepeatingView does not have the same issue as ListView of
re-using the same id. Is it possible to use AJAX to insert a sibbling
element into the list?
John Patterson wrote:
Hi, I have a ListView in a table
We should also link from the t-shirts to the wiki... hang on I'm confusing my
realities again. Real world right?
Nino.Martinez wrote:
I guess we should link to the merchandise page from the wiki also?
James Carman wrote:
The proceeds should benefit the ASF, not a random charity.
On
Hi, in almost all my pages I set a model for the page and then need to
retrieve it using the un-typesafe getDefaultModel(). Or I implement a
typesafe getModel(). I was just wondering if others really normally use
pages without models? If not maybe Page should be generified?
JD
--
View this
Yeah guess I will do that. was just wondering if I was in the minority using
models in my pages.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
you can always create your own subclass that is generified, and use that
-igor
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:17 AM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, in almost
aditsu wrote:
Anyway, everything is working now, but I wanted some answers to those
questions.
I am very interested in what you have achieved here. Is there any chance
you could summarise what you had to do to get stateless AJAX links to work?
Perhaps just a post to this topic or even
ptrash wrote:
Hi,
can you explain a liitle bit what exactly you mean?
nino martinez wael wrote:
you could do something like composition by doing inheritance and
repeaters...
For your composite pages to know where to put their components in the flow
of the page you either
Why would you use IComponentBorder instead of IBehaviour?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
use IComponentBorder and then simply add it to each form component or
subclass formcomponents and add it in the constructor,
eg textfield.add(new fieldborder());
-igor
public class FieldBorder implements
Good point! I had never seen IComponentBorder before so was just poking
around and saw that to me it seems to do the same thing as IBehaviour... but
less. So I thought I am probably missing some key difference.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
why not?
-igor
--
View this message in context:
I disabled session ids on links so that bots wouldn't index every page with a
sessionid.
I read somewhere that although googlebot can and does index pages with
session ids, it doesn't really like them and will probably index less of
them than it otherwise would. Perhaps this is no longer the
I have already tried setting the stateless hint to true, which is the same as
using a Bookmarkable link. The problem is that if any behaviour has a
stateless hint of false, it overrides your links hint.
Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote:
Is your Ajax link redirecting you to another page? Or is it
urls would be a better solution.
John Patterson wrote:
I disabled session ids on links so that bots wouldn't index every page
with a sessionid.
I read somewhere that although googlebot can and does index pages with
session ids, it doesn't really like them and will probably index less
I guess, like you say, it would not be so useful. I was thinking that when
googlebot reads the link and comes back to index the page a week later it
would not get a Page Expired message if the link was bookmarkable. But
probably best to only index the original page anyway and provide another
I just tried it out on 1.4 with no problems. It took about 2 minutes to edit
the source - mainly by changing getModel() to getDefaultModel() etc
Dan Syrstad-2 wrote:
I think Daniel was going to start work on the Wicket 1.4 migration on the
trunk sometime in the near future. Currently the
Martin Funk-3 wrote:
not to my knowledge it works in trunk just like that.
I have trunk and still cannot add an attribute to the body tag.
In my page constructor I have
add(new BodyTagAttributeModifier(class,
Model.of(johniscool), this));
but the attribute
I can see what I was doing wrong now. I simply needed to add a wicket:id
attribute to the body and create a webmarkup container for the body tag.
For some unknown reason I assumed the body tag was already attached to the
Page.
JD
--
View this message in context:
Hi, I have a single text box which I wan to be submitted by ajax when
either the enter key is pressed or a submit button clicked. Is there
an easy way to submit the form or just the input when the return key
is hit?
Thanks,
John
Thanks, I can see now that the presence of the AjaxButton intercepts the form
submit and does exactly what I need.
vineet semwal wrote:
you can use AjaxButton,AjaxFallbackButton,IndicatingAjaxButton.
--
View this message in context:
script to capture the enter key and... do something.
But is there an easy out of the box way?
John Patterson wrote:
Thanks, I can see now that the presence of the AjaxButton intercepts the
form submit and does exactly what I need.
vineet semwal wrote:
you can use AjaxButton
Just to add some closure to this traumatic coding problem
I added a simple inline event handler like this
findTextField = new TextFieldString(query)
{
@Override
protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag)
The first handler, which works for most cases, is missing the .click() method
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Submit-form-with-ajax-on-enter-tp24196732p24216221.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It is being used indirectly through AjaxButton. Unfortunately
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior cannot be used directly on the form to listen for
onsubmit
Emanuele Gesuato-2 wrote:
Why not using AjaxFormSubmitBehavior ?
--
View this message in context:
Hi, I notice that when I have two ajax requests overlapping the
indicator is turned off when the first one completes.
Start AJAX request A - turns on the indicator
Start AJAX request B
Return AJAX request A - turns off the indicator
Return AJAX request B
Would a possible solution be to
paolo di tommaso wrote:
Yep, intercept the ajax call and inc/dec a counter
-- paolo
Although I could correct the indicator behaviour in all my own AJAX
components, it would probably make more sense to incorporate it into wickets
default AJAX behaviour. If people think it makes sense I
Erik van Oosten wrote:
This seems like something that warrants a new Jira issue.
Regards,
Erik.
Patch submitted https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2401
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Ajax-indicator-turning-off-tp24655744p24697620.html
Sent
MattyDE wrote:
Any other hints for this right now?
I want to submit an ajax-Form by hiting enter in Textfield, but i want
wicket to call the same Method as i defiend in AjaxButton ... any ideas?
Thanks a lot in Advance
If I remember correctly, my patch was applied so you can now
On 25 Nov 2007, at 13:01, Johan Compagner wrote:
If you virtual host in apache on a server (local ip 10.0.0.1)
it will rewrite the url and give it to tomcat
Then the request url is really
http://10.0.0.2:8080/myapp1context/XX
I use Apache as a proxy and have got past this issue by using
On 25 Nov 2007, at 15:26, Johan Compagner wrote:
also the port?
Yes the port is also contained in the host header so it works fine -
as if the proxy was not there at all. I know that Jetty always
respects the host header.
Hi,
I have a link tag in the head for a css file and the generated
link includes the locale. Sometimes this is mystyles_en_US.css and
sometimes mystyles_en_GB.css. When it is the later, the file is not
found. How should I configure this correctly? Can I disable the
locale from being
I have upgraded to the latest trunk and the problem still exists
On 30 Nov 2007, at 01:40, Johan Compagner wrote:
What kind of resource is that?
I have simply used a link tag in the head and wicket is creating
the resource. I can see that it is a PackageResource.
Normally package
Hi,
I haven't really thought this through but I was thinking that if the
id of a component was not a member of a Component but set by the
parent of the component then child components could be passed to the
constructor of the parent.
Instead of
Component a = new Component(aid);
On 2 Mar 2008, at 15:29, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
a) components need to know their ids, they use them to generate
markup id, etc.
it could be passed to child.render(id)
b) it is a space optimization. an array of components each with their
own id is cheaper on ram/serialization space then a
On 2 Mar 2008, at 16:13, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:43 AM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2 Mar 2008, at 15:29, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
a) components need to know their ids, they use them to generate
markup id, etc.
it could be passed to child.render(id
You would also need to setVisible(false) on the WMC or wicket would throw an
exception at the missing child components. I use a simple class
InvisibleComponent for this.
Eric Rotick wrote:
One more thing that was suggested in class.
Is it possible to define a Panel which had all suitable
Dan Kaplan-3 wrote:
Google jsessionid SEO for more. Most of the results tell you to get rid
of the jsessionid. Granted, it doesn't seem google has specifically
mentioned this either way so all these comments are rumors. But the fact
of
the matter is Google *DOES* index your urls with
Hi,
I am extending the PagingNavigatation and need to access some member
variables to create my page links. Because these links are created in
PagingNavigatation's constructor me subclasses newPagingNavigationLink()
method is called before my subclasses member variables are initialised. I
John Patterson wrote:
Hi,
I am extending the PagingNavigatation and need to access some member
variables to create my page links. Because these links are created in
PagingNavigatation's constructor me subclasses newPagingNavigationLink()
method is called before my subclasses member
you could
try and copy paste the classes into your own project and then modify
them.
Maurice
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:14 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John Patterson wrote:
Hi,
I am extending the PagingNavigatation and need to access
On 4/26/08, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool. I can see that you now and the links in onBeforeRender(). So is
this
the recommended approach for creating extendible components? What are
the
reasons to not to add all child components in this method?
igor.vaynberg wrote
Sorry, I did find a discussion which was related [1] which ended with Igor
saying:
yes, but its also easy to fix. Just don't call any overridible methods
inside constructors. And for everything else there is onbeforerender()
If this is the recommended way to write extendible components I could
John Krasnay wrote:
This rule is too strict. Another way to avoid calling overridable
methods from the constructor is to use a model:
Models are fine for providing dynamic values but do not help you customise
components by extension. For example, to provide a different type of link
to
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
