Iframe problem with jQuery 1.10.1 in IE
Hi, if iframe content (Wicket page) is loaded from external domain loading of jQuery 1.10.1 (and Wicket) fails due to a bug http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/13980 This has been fixed in jQuery 1.10.2 that we are now using by setting JQueryReference and it seems to work fine, -Heikki
Re: Is it possible to change MarkupStream ?
No, I used Firefox 21.0, with the app running in Tomcat 6. Any ideas, anyone ? thanks Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-change-MarkupStream-tp4659757p4659832.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Is it possible to change MarkupStream ?
hi,
the stacktrace is here: http://pastebin.com/Kgba3zxF.
I noticed I did not supply the code of getStringFromInputStream() -- I took
it from
http://www.mkyong.com/java/how-to-convert-inputstream-to-string-in-java/ and
it is
protected static String getStringFromInputStream(InputStream is) {
BufferedReader br = null;
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
String line;
try {
br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(is));
while ((line = br.readLine()) != null) {
sb.append(line);
}
}
catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
finally {
if (br != null) {
try {
br.close();
}
catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
return sb.toString();
}
Can you see why I get java.io.IOException: Stream Closed ?
thanks,
Heikki Doeleman
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-change-MarkupStream-tp4659757p4659769.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Is it possible to change MarkupStream ?
hello,
I'm using Wicket 1.5.9. I'm trying to do some string manipulation in a
MarkupStream, like this:
@Override
public IMarkupFragment getMarkup() {
IMarkupFragment fragment = super.getMarkup();
return manipulate(fragment);
}
protected IMarkupFragment manipulate(IMarkupFragment fragment) throws
Exception {
MarkupResourceStream markupStream =
fragment.getMarkupResourceStream();
InputStream is = markupStream.getInputStream();
String x = getStringFromInputStream(is);
//
// do some string manipulation here on string x
//
return createMarkupFragmentFromString(x);
}
protected IMarkupFragment createMarkupFragmentFromString(String s) {
IResourceStream resourceStream = new StringResourceStream(s);
MarkupResourceStream markupStream = new
MarkupResourceStream(resourceStream);
IMarkupFragment fragment = new Markup(markupStream);
return fragment;
}
Unit tests for those last two methods work fine; but when I run it in a
Wicket application, I get a
IOException: stream already closed.
Does anyone have an idea what is going wrong, and how could I achieve this?
Kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-change-MarkupStream-tp4659757.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Unit testing a repeater or data table by mocking its data
dear Paul, I've recently used Mockito and am quite happy with it. You can easily mock any class and make it behave as you need. Best regards Heikki Doeleman On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Paul Bors p...@bors.ws wrote: Up to recently we got away with running our unit tests fully integrated with the back end db by performing live queries via our DAOs. Due to recent changes to our product schema we run into the inevitable high cost of having to spend too much time on maintain our mocked unit test data straight into the db. To cut down on that cost I would like to start mocking most of our DAOs that back-up the data tables in our product (gradually over time). Which brings me to my question, what's the recommended approach from Wicket's team (or users) on mocking the DAOs that are used by the data providers of your data tables? Our advantage is that we are using Spring and thus we could rely on spring-test, its ReflectionTestUtils but I also took a look at Mockito, EasyMock and such. I'm more curious as to what has been your experience in the past and what would you consider to be the best approach? ~ Thank you, Paul Bors
AjaxEditableMultiLineLabel inside Link
hello, I have a Link, used in a menu to go to a different page. When a content editor is logged in, the link's text is rendered by an AjaxEditableMultiLineLabel. In that case, when you click on the link, the AjaxEditableMultiLineLabel opens an input textarea with the current value selected. Updating it works fine as long as the user doesn't click in it, because then the surrounding link takes you to another page. I would like to disable the link on onEdit() and re-enable it onSubmit(). I tried using link.setEnabled(true/false) for it, but that has the effect that the AjaxEditableMultiLineLabel no longer works, I guess because it is a child component of the link and also gets disabled. Do you have any tips ? Kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxEditableMultiLineLabel-inside-Link-tp4659348.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior complete handler
hello,
a simple question: I'd like that a certain javascript function is invoked,
after a Wicket Ajax call completes. I'm using Wicket 6.5.
I tried this:
// behaviour works fine except for the onComplete js that I'd like to
execute
public class MyAjaxBehavior extends AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior {
// this doesn't do anything
@Override
protected void updateAjaxAttributes(AjaxRequestAttributes attributes) {
super.updateAjaxAttributes(attributes);
IAjaxCallListener listener = new AjaxCallListener() {
@Override
public CharSequence getCompleteHandler(Component component) {
return alert('onComplete');;
}
};
attributes.getAjaxCallListeners().add(listener);
}
@Override
protected void respond(AjaxRequestTarget target){ ... }
}
Another thing I tried, but with the same result (no js executed on
complete), is client-side:
Wicket.Ajax.get({u:myListenerUrl + params, coh: myfunction });
(where myfunction is an existing js function).
Do you see what I'm doing wrong ?
Kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior-complete-handler-tp4659230.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior complete handler
Thanks for your replies.
Could it be that it has something to do with Wicket version ? Wicket
Examples seems to run on Wicket 1.5.10 ?
I also tried the suggested success handler, by adding this to my behavior
@Override
public CharSequence getSuccessHandler(Component component) {
return alert('success handler');;
}
but no luck, still no js executed..
And what about the coh parameter I tried in my Wicket.Ajax.get call ? Is
that supposed to have the same effect as overriding getCompleteHandler() ?
Any idea why it doesn't do anything, did I make some mistake ?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior-complete-handler-tp4659230p4659233.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior complete handler
thanks. I checked of course that there are no JS errors. I also checked if any of overridden onComplete(), getCompleteHandler(), and getSuccessHandler() are executed, and they are not. So I'm still a bit puzzled here. My behavior's respond() method works fine and does not throw exceptions or anything. Does anyone know if the coh param in Wicket.Ajax.get() should be able to do the same trick ? (although it also doesn't work for me, it'd be good to know). Adding target.appendJavascript() in my respond() method works, though. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior-complete-handler-tp4659230p4659236.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Re:aj Component twice in markup while ax refresh in Wicket 6.7 (migrated from 1.5.10)
Hi,
we had similar issue and could not find jira ticket for this, thus created
WICKET-5210 with quickstart.
Our workaround was changing our jQuery('#someid').. to jQuery('[id=someid]')..
to match all same (two) ids.
Rgds,
Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Nico [mailto:nico.kan...@gmx.de]
Sent: 15. toukokuuta 2013 11:07
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re:aj Component twice in markup while ax refresh in Wicket 6.7
(migrated from 1.5.10)
Hi,
thanks for you quick replies! I will create the quick start and attach it to a
jira ticket.
Thanks to your hint Martin, for the moment I will use jQuery#replaceWith() to
make sure my app runs as expected.
Best
Nico
Am 14.05.2013 um 16:56 schrieb Martin Grigorov-4 [via Apache Wicket]:
Hi,
We use
https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java
/org/apache/wicket/ajax/res/js/wicket-ajax-jquery.js#L1617
because
it is faster than jQuery#replaceWith().
So yes, there is a small period when both the old and the new are in
the DOM.
As Sven asked - please create a quicktart and attach it to a ticket so
we can see whether we will find a solution or we will have to use the
slower way to replace.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Sven Meier [hidden email] wrote:
Create a quickstart and attach it to a Jira issue please.
Sven
On 05/14/2013 04:37 PM, Nico wrote:
Hi
I migrated my application from Wicket 1.5.10 to 6.7
During testing I recognized that during an ajax update
(replacement) of a component, the markup of the component is twice
in the HTML markup (the old and the new markup). Thus the execution
of javascript inside a component may fail due to the fact, that two
components with the same id are present in the HTML markup.
EXAMPLE
*HTML:*
lt;a wicket:id=quot;testlinkquot;**gt;testlinklt;/agt;
lt;div wicket:id=quot;testboxquot; style=quot;width: 100px; height:
100px; border: 1px solid #ccc;quot;gt;
lt;script type=quot;text/javascript**quot;gt;
alert(#39;hello#39;);
lt;/scriptgt;
lt;/divgt;
*JAVA:*
final WebMarkupContainer testbox = new
WebMarkupContainer(testbox); testbox.setOutputMarkupId(**true);
add(testbox);
add(new AjaxLinkVoid(testlink) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
target.add(testbox);
}
});
So while the ajax update is processed the 'testbox' DIV and its
javascript are present twice (the old and new DIV). If the
javascript is a little more complex and for example changes stuff
inside the DIV, the javascript will change stuff in the old instead
of the new DIV container.
My javascript relies on the fact, that an id should always be
present just once.
Why is the old DIV not removed first, before the new DIV is
appended? Can I change this behavior somehow?
Thanks in advance
Nico
--
View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.**
n4.nabble.com/Component-twice-**in-markup-while-ajax-refresh-**
in-Wicket-6-7-migrated-from-1-**5-10-tp4658789.htmlhttp://apache-w
icket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Component-twice-in-markup-while-ajax-re
fresh-in-Wicket-6-7-migrated-from-1-5-10-tp4658789.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--**--**---
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org[hidden email] For
additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
--**--**
- To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org[hidden email] For additional
commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
--
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training Consulting
http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Component-twice-in-markup-w
hile-ajax-refresh-in-Wicket-6-7-migrated-from-1-5-10-tp4658789p4658791
.html To unsubscribe from Component twice in markup while ajax refresh
in Wicket 6.7 (migrated from 1.5.10), click here.
NAML
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Component-twice-in-markup-while-ajax-refresh-in-Wicket-6-7-migrated-from-1-5-10-tp4658789p4658813.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
JQuery contribution question
hello list, the way things work with Wicket-provided contributions confuses me a bit. I'm using Wicket 6.5. What I'd like to achieve is: a single jQuery library available in my page. Whether or not my page includes jQuery-contributing Wicket components like the Ajax components: I need jQuery for non-Wicket-related clientside stuff too. Ideally a jQuery version of my choice, not contributed by Wicket but a simple local or remote link, although if it's more easy to simply always contribute jQuery through Wicket that would be fine too. Any suggestions ? Kind regards, Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/JQuery-contribution-question-tp4658999.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Wicket returning XML or JSON ?
hello list, has anyone implemented a WebServicePage using Wicket 6+, by which I mean that the Page has no associated markup and returns an XML or JSON document ? I've seen wicket-rest, but it doesn't seem that works with current versions of Wicket, the latest info about getting that to work that I found is for Wicket 1.5 (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12138115/wicket-rest-does-not-work-with-wicket-1-5). thanks in advance, kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-returning-XML-or-JSON-tp4658271.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket returning XML or JSON ?
thanks, that example does indeed work fine, but I'd rather have *no* markup file, just generate the XML or JSON myself and send that back in the response. So I need a mounted IResource to do that ? Any tip how to go about it for this use case, e.g. use a ByteArrayResource ? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-returning-XML-or-JSON-tp4658271p4658273.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
How to force user to select from AutoComplete choices
hello, I've an autocomplete textfield (this one: com.googlecode.wicket.jquery.ui.form.autocomplete.AutoCompleteTextField) and I'd like to restrict users to select one of the values presented in its choices. As it is, you can also input values that are not in the choices. Is there an easy way to do this ? Kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-force-user-to-select-from-AutoComplete-choices-tp4658033.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to force user to select from AutoComplete choices
thanks for your replies, @Igor : trying it, however when loading the page I get: TypeError: $(...).select2 is not a function. Can you give some instruction as how to wire things together? From the wicket-select2-examples, it is not obvious to me where any JS gets included. @Sebastien: sure, a validator can refuse input (doesn't even need to be a String I guess?), but that is also too late (after you already put in a free text value and submitted). I'm looking for a way to prevent unwanted input client-side; the validator will be there as last resort server-side. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-force-user-to-select-from-AutoComplete-choices-tp4658033p4658041.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to force user to select from AutoComplete choices
hi, the js loading issue was apparently due to having both my own and a select2-contributed jquery library in the same page. Solved. This select2 solution does exactly what I was looking for, thanks ! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-force-user-to-select-from-AutoComplete-choices-tp4658033p4658049.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior response handling
hi Sven, thanks ! I see now how it works. The basic thing is that AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior does not write anything to responses, you have to subclass it and write to the response according to your needs, in this subclass. kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior-response-handling-tp4657714p4657790.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior response handling
hello,
I've a question about using AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior. I can succesfully
create some dynamic script that calls Wicket.Ajax.get(), and its respond()
is correctly invoked. However I'm not sure what's with the results of the
ajax call, I can't get to it. It seems that I receive an empty response.
My page has a list with a number of spans that have some number for their
text; I'm trying to add an onclick to the spans that invokes the Ajax call,
passing the number of the clicked span into the Ajax URL. (This works fine.)
The Ajax response should be a (a JSON version of) the input parameterm but
it is always ajax-response/ajax-response.
My page has a ListView with a number of labels, like this
div id=myContainer wicket:id=myContainer
div class=myUser wicket:id=myList
/div
div id=aResult wicket:id=aResult /div
/div
and this JS
Then, my Page class has:
public TestPage(final PageParameters parameters) {
super(parameters);
// create some numbers to display in the list
IModel myListModel = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
protected Object load() {
ListInteger nrs = new ArrayListInteger();
nrs.add(100);nrs.add(200);nrs.add(300);
return nrs;
}
};
ListView myView = new ListView(myList, myListModel) {
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
final Integer i = (Integer) item.getModelObject();
item.add(new Label(myLabel, i));
}
};
WebMarkupContainer myContainer = new
WebMarkupContainer(myContainer);
myContainer.setOutputMarkupId(true);
myContainer.add(myView);
// I expect the Ajax result to go here
myContainer.add(new Label(aResult, TEXT BEFORE AJAX));
div.add(behave());
add(div);
}
// this reference is so I can put the URL in a js var, in
renderHead() below
private AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior bh ;
private AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior behave() {
if(bh == null) {
bh = new AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior() {
protected void respond(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
String id =
getRequest().getRequestParameters().getParameterValue(myId).toString();
Gson gson = new Gson();
String json = gson.toJson(id);
System.out.println(json:\n + json);
Label label = new Label(aResult,json);
label.setOutputMarkupId(true);
// throws NPE
//getParent().replace(label);
target.add(label);
}
protected void
updateAjaxAttributes(AjaxRequestAttributes attributes) {
super.updateAjaxAttributes(attributes);
// doesn't seem to make a difference for me
//attributes.setDataType(json);
}
};
}
return bh;
}
public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response){
bh = behave();
String url = var aUrl=' + bh.getCallbackUrl() + ';;
response.render(JavaScriptHeaderItem.forScript(url,
wicket-ajax-aUrl));
}
What I expected is that the div 'aResult' text would get replaced with the
contents of the Ajax call. It doesn't happen. And as I said the Ajax
response is empty (when viewed in Firebug).
Does anyone see what I'm missing here ?
thanks and kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior-response-handling-tp4657714.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior response handling
thanks for your response, but I'm not quite sure what you mean. How so is my response a non-Ajax response ? I'd have thought that when doing an Ajax request, I'd get an Ajax response; and the way to set up that response, from what it says on https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/calling-wicket-from-javascript.html, is to stick it in some page element in the behavior's respond() method. (that does seem a bit strange indeed, I would have expected more there existed a method like request(Request, Response) where I could add stuff to a response object. I guess this is exactly what I'm not getting about AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior). -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior-response-handling-tp4657714p4657717.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior response handling
Eventually I'd probably do something with it other than only displaying it :-) So maybe my approach is not ideal ? In short, and more generally put, I want to be able to construct a URL client-side dynamically to do an Ajax request using Wicket.Ajax.get(), and then do something with the response. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior-response-handling-tp4657714p4657723.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Repeaters and AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior
hello, I've a question about using AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior and a RepeatingView (or ListView). I have a repeater, with AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior set on its parent, so that it can update the list in the page with the latest list items that were added (or removed) on the server side. This works just fine, as such. However, instead of repainting the whole repeater with all its items, I would like to only add newly added items. Sure I've seen http://wicketinaction.com/2008/10/repainting-only-newly-created-repeater-items-via-ajax/ where it is achieved by scripting, and using target.prependJavascript(). But that's in the context of an AjaxButton that has an onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form ? f) method -- so you actually have a reference to the target to put your scripting to. But in the case of using AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior, I have no clue how to go about this. Is there some callback method in this case, similar to AjaxButton.onSubmit(), that gives a reference to the target? Hopefully I made my question clear, and it's obvious and I just missed something.. All help greatly appreciated, kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Repeaters-and-AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior-tp4657456.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
How to prevent form input appended as URL parameters ?
hello,
I have a form on my page, which when submitted goes the next page, but all
the form's fields appear as URL parameters in the resulting page. I'm using
Wicket 6.5.0.
My code is like
StatelessForm? form = new StatelessFormVoid(myForm) {
protected void onSubmit() {
final String txtValue = txt.getModelObject();
PageParameters pageParameters = new PageParameters();
pageParameters.add(txt, txtValue);
setResponsePage(NextPage.class, pageParameters);
}
In the markup the form is declared like
form wicket:id=myForm method=post
input wicket:id=txt type=text size=20 /
input type=submit value=submit /
/form
After submitting the result is the next page, but with a URL like
mywebapp/mountedpagepath?txt=userprovided. I don't want to have the posted
form fields appended to the URL. How can I do that ?
Kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-prevent-form-input-appended-as-URL-parameters-tp4655843.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to prevent form input appended as URL parameters ?
Checking with Firebug, when I click the submit button it appears to do a POST followed by a GET: POST http://localhost:8080/webappname/mountedpagepath;jsessionid=0F040B88573ADE2932D8D41DF3845DA1?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-myFormtxt=userprovided GET http://localhost:8080/webappname/mountednextpagepath?2txt=userprovided Any ideas ? thanks Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-prevent-form-input-appended-as-URL-parameters-tp4655843p4655847.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to prevent form input appended as URL parameters ?
yes, they are: txt=userprovided. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-prevent-form-input-appended-as-URL-parameters-tp4655843p4655850.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
How to prevent duplicates when using HeaderContributor
hello,
I'd like to be able to use a fixed title for my pages, that gets overridden
for some of the pages.
To do that, I have a fixed title element in my base HTML page:
Then in the pages that should have a different title, I override
renderHead() like this:
@Override
public void renderHead(final IHeaderResponse response) {
String title = title + getTheDynamicTitle() + /title;
response.renderString(title);
}
The result is that my rendered page has 2 title elements in its header,
the fixed one and the dynamic one.
I would have thought that Wicket would be smart enough to replace an
existing header element; the IHeaderResponse javadoc says Implementation of
this interface is responsible for filtering duplicate contributions (so that
for example the same javascript is not loaded twice) during the same
request. Well.
Do I need to write my own implementation of IHeaderResponse for this ?
It would seem like a pretty common use case to me, did anyone already solve
it ?
Kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-prevent-duplicates-when-using-HeaderContributor-tp4605975.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to prevent duplicates when using HeaderContributor
OK, that's a good solution, thanks ! Just in case that quickstart becomes unavailable, for reference I'll summarize the method here: the base HTML page has The corresponding base Java class has and any pages with an overridden title, override getTitle() Kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-prevent-duplicates-when-using-HeaderContributor-tp4605975p4606959.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
How to prevent linebreaks after radio input ?
hello, Wicket inserts br / after radio input elements generated by RadioChoice. How can I prevent that ? My code: RadioChoiceString optionsRadioChoice = new RadioChoiceString(option, new PropertyModelString(this, option), optionsList); add(optionsRadioChoice ); This generates this HTML: input name=option type=radio checked=checked value=0 id=options-0/ label for=options-0some value/labelbr / input name=option type=radio value=1 id=options-1/ label for=options-1another value/labelbr / Obviously I want to control my HTML layout and I don't want automatically generated br / elements. How can I do that ? thanks in advance Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-prevent-linebreaks-after-radio-input-tp4568121p4568121.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5)
As expected KB2675157 fixed this IE9 issue, nice timing though. -Original Message- From: Heikki Uotinen [mailto:heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com] Sent: 12. huhtikuuta 2012 10:18 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5) Ok, it seems that time takes care of this problem and leak is not wicket-ajax problem: Tests with IE 10 (consumer preview) shows no leaking, gc seems to work and browser refresh clears the memory. There were no leaking with Opera, Firefox and Chrome. Furthermore previous JS debugging did not show that anything was piling in dom, so it must be IE9 inner problem. Only leaking is this IE9 in IE9 document mode, can't see any point filing a ticket. Anyway quickstart is available at http://uploading.com/files/51fc2bcb/ie9memory.zip/ Easy way to check Process Explorer - select iexplore.exe- Properties..- Performance Graph - Private bytes -Original Message- From: Heikki Uotinen [mailto:heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com] Sent: 11. huhtikuuta 2012 14:38 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5) Hi, 1) Process Explorer and IE developer tools 2) ok -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: 11. huhtikuuta 2012 14:14 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5) Hi, From your mails I still don't understand how exactly you measure the memory consumption. You have two options: 1) google for javascript memory leak. You can add Internet explorer in the search term too I'm not sure whether IE has tools to deal with that but you can use and see whether it helps somehow 2) create a ticket in Wicket Jira with a quickstart and detailed description how to reproduce and how to measure and let someone else to debug it for you. On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Heikki Uotinen heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com wrote: Hi, I tested against apache-wicket-6.0.0-beta1 with that simple example in the first mail. Application still leaked memory on IE9 document mode, same behavior as with 1.5.5. Confirmed that it is using jQuery: script type=text/javascript src=../resource/org.apache.wicket.resource.JQueryResourceReference/jq uery/jquery-ver-1334139767559.js/script script type=text/javascript src=../resource/org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior/re s/js/wicket-event-jquery-ver-1334139767559.js/script script type=text/javascript src=../resource/org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior/re s/js/wicket-ajax-jquery-ver-1334139767559.js/script Suggestions ? -Original Message- From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com] Sent: 11. huhtikuuta 2012 11:47 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5) how exactly did you solve it with jQuery ? Since this leak seems to be caused by wicket-ajax calls then solution would be bypassing those, this would be the last resort. Wicket 6 uses jQuery for its AJAX backhauling. I wonder if, therefore, if your app were ported to Wicket 6 if the IE9 problem goes away. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5)
Ok, it seems that time takes care of this problem and leak is not wicket-ajax problem: Tests with IE 10 (consumer preview) shows no leaking, gc seems to work and browser refresh clears the memory. There were no leaking with Opera, Firefox and Chrome. Furthermore previous JS debugging did not show that anything was piling in dom, so it must be IE9 inner problem. Only leaking is this IE9 in IE9 document mode, can't see any point filing a ticket. Anyway quickstart is available at http://uploading.com/files/51fc2bcb/ie9memory.zip/ Easy way to check Process Explorer - select iexplore.exe- Properties..- Performance Graph - Private bytes -Original Message- From: Heikki Uotinen [mailto:heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com] Sent: 11. huhtikuuta 2012 14:38 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5) Hi, 1) Process Explorer and IE developer tools 2) ok -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: 11. huhtikuuta 2012 14:14 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5) Hi, From your mails I still don't understand how exactly you measure the memory consumption. You have two options: 1) google for javascript memory leak. You can add Internet explorer in the search term too I'm not sure whether IE has tools to deal with that but you can use and see whether it helps somehow 2) create a ticket in Wicket Jira with a quickstart and detailed description how to reproduce and how to measure and let someone else to debug it for you. On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Heikki Uotinen heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com wrote: Hi, I tested against apache-wicket-6.0.0-beta1 with that simple example in the first mail. Application still leaked memory on IE9 document mode, same behavior as with 1.5.5. Confirmed that it is using jQuery: script type=text/javascript src=../resource/org.apache.wicket.resource.JQueryResourceReference/jq uery/jquery-ver-1334139767559.js/script script type=text/javascript src=../resource/org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior/re s/js/wicket-event-jquery-ver-1334139767559.js/script script type=text/javascript src=../resource/org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior/re s/js/wicket-ajax-jquery-ver-1334139767559.js/script Suggestions ? -Original Message- From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com] Sent: 11. huhtikuuta 2012 11:47 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5) how exactly did you solve it with jQuery ? Since this leak seems to be caused by wicket-ajax calls then solution would be bypassing those, this would be the last resort. Wicket 6 uses jQuery for its AJAX backhauling. I wonder if, therefore, if your app were ported to Wicket 6 if the IE9 problem goes away. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5)
Hi,
it seems that IE9 leaks memory heavily when updating components with Ajax in
IE9 document mode.
can anyone confirm if this is Wicket related issue ?
Forcing IE8 document mode will cause some problems in the future.
Our use case is process displays where data comes from automation or other
systems and data
is updated frequently and those monitoring displays are open 24/7. Large
customers have their
own standards for browsers and versions they are using.
If there are 50 simple text divs on the screen, then updating those every 10
seconds
browser window consumes memory 3Mb in a minute in IE9 document mode, refreshing
browser
does not release memory. Normally updates happens more irregular and updating
all fields
at once makes user experience less comfortable 'cause there are other actions
connected
to those fields (links, tooltips, graphics).
how exactly did you solve it with jQuery ?
Since this leak seems to be caused by wicket-ajax calls then solution would be
bypassing
those, this would be the last resort.
-Original Message-
From: Heikki Uotinen [mailto:heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com]
Sent: 5. huhtikuuta 2012 18:50
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5)
Hi,
maybe there is some gc problem with closures in IE9 document mode.
Simple test page leaks memory in IE9 mode even if first suspect
Wicket.replaceOuterHtmlIE is commented out. Test with plain XMLHttpRequest does
not leak memory in any case.
This Wicket Ajax example also slowly grows if IE9 document mode is set manually
but is not seemingly leaking in IE8 mode
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax/world-clock
-Original Message-
From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
Sent: 4. huhtikuuta 2012 9:19
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5)
Hi,
Can you share your findings ?
What exactly you think caused the memory leak and how exactly did you solve it
with jQuery ?
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Heikki Uotinen heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com
wrote:
Ok, this leak can be avoided by updating rapidly changing components
with jQuery before upgrading to Wicket 6,
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Heikki Uotinen [mailto:heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com]
Sent: 3. huhtikuuta 2012 16:17
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket
1.5.5)
Hi,
it seems that IE9 leaks memory heavily when updating components with Ajax in
IE9 document mode.
There is no leak after setting document to IE8 mode
meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible content=IE=8/
Any ideas to resolve this without forcing IE8 mode ?
There have been past issues, but found no current issue related to this,
quick start code is very simple, Opera, Firefox, Chrome work fine.
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters)
{
Label testDiv = new Label(testDiv, new
PropertyModel(this, data));
testDiv.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(testDiv);
AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior timer = new
AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior(Duration.milliseconds(200));
testDiv.add(timer);
}
public String getData()
{
Date now = new Date();
return now.toString();
}
html
head
!-- No leak if this is set
meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible
content=IE=8/
--
/head
body
div wicket:id=testDiv/div
/body
/html
-Heikki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
B CB [
X ܚX KK[XZ[
\ \ ][ X ܚX P X ]
\X K ܙ B ܈Y][ۘ[ [X[ K[XZ[
\ \ Z[ X ]
\X K ܙ B
RE: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5)
Hi, I tested against apache-wicket-6.0.0-beta1 with that simple example in the first mail. Application still leaked memory on IE9 document mode, same behavior as with 1.5.5. Confirmed that it is using jQuery: script type=text/javascript src=../resource/org.apache.wicket.resource.JQueryResourceReference/jquery/jquery-ver-1334139767559.js/script script type=text/javascript src=../resource/org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior/res/js/wicket-event-jquery-ver-1334139767559.js/script script type=text/javascript src=../resource/org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior/res/js/wicket-ajax-jquery-ver-1334139767559.js/script Suggestions ? -Original Message- From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com] Sent: 11. huhtikuuta 2012 11:47 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5) how exactly did you solve it with jQuery ? Since this leak seems to be caused by wicket-ajax calls then solution would be bypassing those, this would be the last resort. Wicket 6 uses jQuery for its AJAX backhauling. I wonder if, therefore, if your app were ported to Wicket 6 if the IE9 problem goes away. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5)
Hi, 1) Process Explorer and IE developer tools 2) ok -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: 11. huhtikuuta 2012 14:14 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5) Hi, From your mails I still don't understand how exactly you measure the memory consumption. You have two options: 1) google for javascript memory leak. You can add Internet explorer in the search term too I'm not sure whether IE has tools to deal with that but you can use and see whether it helps somehow 2) create a ticket in Wicket Jira with a quickstart and detailed description how to reproduce and how to measure and let someone else to debug it for you. On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Heikki Uotinen heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com wrote: Hi, I tested against apache-wicket-6.0.0-beta1 with that simple example in the first mail. Application still leaked memory on IE9 document mode, same behavior as with 1.5.5. Confirmed that it is using jQuery: script type=text/javascript src=../resource/org.apache.wicket.resource.JQueryResourceReference/jq uery/jquery-ver-1334139767559.js/script script type=text/javascript src=../resource/org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior/re s/js/wicket-event-jquery-ver-1334139767559.js/script script type=text/javascript src=../resource/org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior/re s/js/wicket-ajax-jquery-ver-1334139767559.js/script Suggestions ? -Original Message- From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com] Sent: 11. huhtikuuta 2012 11:47 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: RE: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5) how exactly did you solve it with jQuery ? Since this leak seems to be caused by wicket-ajax calls then solution would be bypassing those, this would be the last resort. Wicket 6 uses jQuery for its AJAX backhauling. I wonder if, therefore, if your app were ported to Wicket 6 if the IE9 problem goes away. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5)
Hi,
maybe there is some gc problem with closures in IE9 document mode.
Simple test page leaks memory in IE9 mode even if first suspect
Wicket.replaceOuterHtmlIE
is commented out. Test with plain XMLHttpRequest does not leak memory in any
case.
This Wicket Ajax example also slowly grows if IE9 document mode is set manually
but is not
seemingly leaking in IE8 mode
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax/world-clock
-Original Message-
From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
Sent: 4. huhtikuuta 2012 9:19
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5)
Hi,
Can you share your findings ?
What exactly you think caused the memory leak and how exactly did you solve it
with jQuery ?
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Heikki Uotinen heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com
wrote:
Ok, this leak can be avoided by updating rapidly changing components
with jQuery before upgrading to Wicket 6,
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Heikki Uotinen [mailto:heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com]
Sent: 3. huhtikuuta 2012 16:17
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket
1.5.5)
Hi,
it seems that IE9 leaks memory heavily when updating components with Ajax in
IE9 document mode.
There is no leak after setting document to IE8 mode
meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible content=IE=8/
Any ideas to resolve this without forcing IE8 mode ?
There have been past issues, but found no current issue related to this,
quick start code is very simple, Opera, Firefox, Chrome work fine.
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters)
{
Label testDiv = new Label(testDiv, new
PropertyModel(this, data));
testDiv.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(testDiv);
AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior timer = new
AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior(Duration.milliseconds(200));
testDiv.add(timer);
}
public String getData()
{
Date now = new Date();
return now.toString();
}
html
head
!-- No leak if this is set
meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible
content=IE=8/
--
/head
body
div wicket:id=testDiv/div
/body
/html
-Heikki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5)
Ok, this leak can be avoided by updating rapidly changing components with
jQuery
before upgrading to Wicket 6,
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Heikki Uotinen [mailto:heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com]
Sent: 3. huhtikuuta 2012 16:17
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5)
Hi,
it seems that IE9 leaks memory heavily when updating components with Ajax in
IE9 document mode.
There is no leak after setting document to IE8 mode
meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible content=IE=8/
Any ideas to resolve this without forcing IE8 mode ?
There have been past issues, but found no current issue related to this, quick
start code is very simple, Opera, Firefox, Chrome work fine.
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters)
{
Label testDiv = new Label(testDiv, new
PropertyModel(this, data));
testDiv.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(testDiv);
AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior timer = new
AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior(Duration.milliseconds(200));
testDiv.add(timer);
}
public String getData()
{
Date now = new Date();
return now.toString();
}
html
head
!-- No leak if this is set
meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible content=IE=8/
--
/head
body
div wicket:id=testDiv/div
/body
/html
-Heikki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
IE9 Memory leak when updating component with Ajax (Wicket 1.5.5)
Hi,
it seems that IE9 leaks memory heavily when updating components with Ajax in
IE9 document mode.
There is no leak after setting document to IE8 mode
meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible content=IE=8/
Any ideas to resolve this without forcing IE8 mode ?
There have been past issues, but found no current issue related to this, quick
start code is very simple,
Opera, Firefox, Chrome work fine.
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters)
{
Label testDiv = new Label(testDiv, new
PropertyModel(this, data));
testDiv.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(testDiv);
AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior timer = new
AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior(Duration.milliseconds(200));
testDiv.add(timer);
}
public String getData()
{
Date now = new Date();
return now.toString();
}
html
head
!-- No leak if this is set
meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible content=IE=8/
--
/head
body
div wicket:id=testDiv/div
/body
/html
-Heikki
Re: What real life scenario calls for page ID?
What's the point in refreshing if it returns exactly the same page as before ? On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote: No this is bad, i agree with Igor, the latest page should be refreshed, not reset! By the way, the hybrid in 1.4 what we are using does look at the mount if the page doesn't exists any more. And we depend on that, am i reading it right that we lost that in 1.5? On Mar 22, 2012 11:12 PM, Pointbreak pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 14:34, Igor Vaynberg wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Pointbreak pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 12:30, Igor Vaynberg wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Pointbreak pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 12:05, Igor Vaynberg wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Pointbreak pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 11:42, Igor Vaynberg wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Pointbreak pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 10:56, Igor Vaynberg wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Pointbreak pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 09:49, Igor Vaynberg wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Pointbreak pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 08:23, Igor Vaynberg wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Pointbreak pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote: On Sun, Mar 18, 2012, at 20:00, Igor Vaynberg wrote: i think there is some confusion here. wicket 1.4 had page ids. it also had page versions. in 1.5 we simply merged page id and page version into the same variable - page id. this made things much simpler and also allowed some usecases that were not possible when the two were separate. you dont have to go very far to come up with an example where page id is useful. 1. suppose you have a page with panel A that has a link 2. user hits a link on the page that swaps panel A for panel B 3. user presses the back button 4. user clicks the link on panel A now if you turn off page id and therefore page versioning it goes like this 1. wicket creates page and assigns it id 1 2. page id 1 now has panel B instead of panel A 3. page with id 1 is rerendered 4. wicket loads page with id 1. user gets an error because it cannot find the link component the user clicked since the page has panel B instead of panel A This is imho not what happens with NoVersionMount. What happens is: 1. wicket creates page and assigns it id 1 2. page id 1 now has panel B instead of panel A 3. wicket creates new page and assigns it id 2; depending on how the page keeps state either a page with panel A and link, or a page with Panel B is created. Hence, there is nothing broken in this scenario. we were talking about something else here. the NoVersionMount has the problem of losing ajax state when the user refreshes the page. I believe the OP's question was for use-cases were Wickets default behaviour would be preferred over using a strategy like NoVersionMount. But if I understood that incorrectly, it's now my question ;-). Imho the natural behaviour a user expects for a page-refresh is a fresh up-to-date version of the page. This is exactly what NoVersionMount does as it forces a newly constructed page for a refresh. For OP's (Chris Colman's) shopping card example this seems perfectly reasonable behaviour. it is undesirable in applications that perform navigation using ajax panel swapping. in this case a page-refresh will essentially take you back to the homepage. Fair enough I have never had to build a website were it was a problem when the ajax state was lost on page refresh. but you also have not built every wicket application... Obviously... to be honest, for your use case (one page ajax application that performs navigation by swapping page components) I have always chosen other frameworks, that are (imho) better suited for these usecases. When wicket shows older versions of a page (e.g. due to back button, bookmarking older versions, etc.), you have to be really careful with how a page version and a model interact to not run into trouble. You
Re: Apache Wicket is a Flawed Framework
I have tried out the Wicket framework and many things I really like about it. Some observations: - Wicket changes drastically between versions, and even between minor versions / release candidates, things suddenly disappear from the API, sometimes without having been flagged as deprecated ; - as a result, many times the example code you find on the web or in books like 'Wicket in Action' does no longer work as is - the Javadoc of the source is quite OK for some classes, but for the great majority any textual explanations there are either sparse or absent - luckily the mailing list is nothing short of fantastic ! - I agree that it is rather too easy for Wicket to make things stateful, when you don't want it - and in my opinion the stuff you need to do to achieve normal URLs (no ?, no version number, no nothing) is just a pain. *Every* URL, for stateless or stateless pages or whatever, should be normal, otherwise it is just not acceptable -- users never want to see those complicated-looking URLs under any circumstance - did not yet try out Ajax with Wicket, so I have no opinion on that Just my 2¢. In all, a great framework that is much easier to use than e.g. things based on JSP. Keep up the good work, guys ! Kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-is-a-Flawed-Framework-tp4080411p4082988.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
How to have a list of iframes ?
hello list,
I'd like to have a dynamically generated list of iframes in my page, where
each iframe has the same attributes except for its src attribute, which
should dynamically be inserted.
The iframes are embedded Youtube videos and I have a list of the urls to be
stuck in their src attributes. But my implementation does not work. The
error I get is
Last cause: A child with id 'videoframe' already exists:
[VideoListView [Component id = videoList]]
WicketMessage: Error attaching this container for rendering: [Page class =
my.package.page.VideoPage, id = 2, render count = 1]
In my VideoPage I have
public VideoPage() {
super();
videoListView = new VideoListView(videoList, new
LoadableDetachableModelListlt;String() {
protected ListString load() {
ListString urls = new ArrayListString();
// fill list with youtube urls
// ..
return urls;
}
});
add(videoListView);
}
private class VideoListView extends ListViewString {
public VideoListView(String name, final IModelListlt;String
urls) {
super(name, urls);
}
protected void populateItem(ListItemString listItem) {
final String url = listItem.getModelObject();
final WebMarkupContainer videoFrame = new
WebMarkupContainer(videoframe);
videoFrame.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(src, url));
// .. put other non-changing attributes here too
add(videoFrame);
}
}
and in my page I have
div wicket:id=videoList
iframe wicket:id=videoframe class=dance-video
width=425 height=349 src= frameborder=0 allowfullscreen/iframe
/div
Anyone has an idea how to achieve this ? I've also looked at InlineFrame (to
use instead of WebMarkupContainer) but it seems most concerned with
instantiating a Page to render in an iframe, if I'm correct.
thanks in advance,
kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-have-a-list-of-iframes-tp4080744p4080744.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Mounting page to mutliple urls with different pageparameter
thanks !
Adding a second IRequestMapper like that, rather than replacing the default
with a dual-function like I tried above, is so much simpler and works like a
charm.
That being said, it turns out that it has no effect whether or not I
override getCompatibilityScore(). See my implementation below. If I do not
override mapRequest() to check the url and return null, it accepts all URLs
like /xyz (using Wicket 1.5.2).
In any case, everything works fine now for me. Thanks a lot !
for reference, my code :
in Application:
mount(new AnotherPageRequestMapper(/${param}, AnotherPage.class));
and the impl:
import org.apache.wicket.request.IRequestHandler;
import org.apache.wicket.request.Request;
import org.apache.wicket.request.component.IRequestablePage;
import org.apache.wicket.request.mapper.MountedMapper;
public class AnotherPageRequestMapper extends MountedMapper{
public AnotherPageRequestMapper(String mountPath, Class?
extends IRequestablePage pageClass) {
super(mountPath, pageClass);
}
public IRequestHandler mapRequest(Request request) {
String url = request.getUrl().toString();
if(url.startsWith(b)) {
return super.mapRequest(request);
}
else {
return null;
}
}
/**
* it does not make a difference, in practice, what this
method returns (?!).
*/
public int getCompatibilityScore(Request request) {
String url = request.getUrl().toString();
if(url.startsWith(b)) {
return 1;
}
else {
return 0;
}
}
}
kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Mounting-external-pages-to-root-tp3890756p3998358.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Mounting page to mutliple urls with different pageparameter
hi,
thanks for your explanation. As I want to restrict the possible paths to
AnotherPage to /b and /c and not /xyz, I went for the IRequestMapper
implementation.
I now have an implementation that seems to work perfect, but I'm afraid it's
not thread-safe and I'm not sure if I've understood things correctly. So
please, if you could help me answer the following questions ?
I need to return different URLs from mapHandler() for AnotherPage and for
any other URLs I have in my application. This is because I need the b or
c as PageParameter to AnotherPage, but it should not happen for other
URLs. So I implemented IRequestMapper such that it wraps the default
RootRequestMapper to be used for all requests except /b and /c, which are
handled by a different IRequestMapper that uses a path variable. In my
Application:
setRootRequestMapper(new RootRequestMapper(getRootRequestMapper(),
new MountedMapper(/${param}, AnotherPage.class)));
Then in my IRequestMapper implementation, in mapRequest() the request url
segments are checked and if it's /b or /c, use the second one.
To get things to work with the correct URL for both cases, I also check in
mapHandler() which IRequestMapper should return the URL. However I found no
way to remember which case (/b, or anything esle) is being handled between
the mapRequest and mapHandler() methods, so I stored this in a class
variable. This is what I think is not thread-safe.
Please see my implementation here http://pastebin.com/h0rhtFLz.
Surely there's a better of way dealing with this ?
thank you and kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Mounting-external-pages-to-root-tp3890756p3996292.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Mounting page to mutliple urls with different pageparameter
hello,
I still find URL mapping to be far from easy. I can't get the following
mapping to work; all advice very much appreciated:
intented mapping is:
/ -- map to IndexPage.class
/b-- map to AnotherPage.class with pageparameter
param=b
/c-- map to AnotherPage.class with pageparameter
param=c
I tried creating a custom RootRequestMapper but I could not get it to work.
The closest I've come to achieving the above url mapping is with this in my
Application
protected void init() {
super.init();
mount(new MountedMapper(b, AnotherPage.class, new
CustomPageParametersEncoder(b)));
mount(new MountedMapper(c, AnotherPage.class, new
CustomPageParametersEncoder(c)));
}
public Class getHomePage() {
return IndexPage.class;
}
where CustomPageParametersEncoder creates the pageparameter from the url in
method decodePageParameters().
What doesn't work here, is that requests to /b are turned into requests to
/c, with pageparameter c.
So I end up, when requesting /b, with /c in my browser address bar, and the
page saying Hello, c, where I want to end up with /b in my address bar and
the page saying Hello, b.
Your advice is very much appreciated,
kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Mounting-external-pages-to-root-tp3890756p3989966.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Mounting page to mutliple urls with different pageparameter
hi,
thanks for your hints, but still I didn't get it to work. I have a
RootRequestMapper that extends MountedMapper, and it overrides mapRequest()
like so
@Override
public IRequestHandler mapRequest(Request request) {
ListString segments = request.getUrl().getSegments();
if(CollectionUtils.isEmpty(segments)) {
System.out.println(mapRequest to Index page);
return new RenderPageRequestHandler(new
PageProvider(IndexPage.class));
}
else {
System.out.println(mapRequest to Another page);
return new RenderPageRequestHandler(new
PageProvider(AnotherPage.class, new PageParameters().add(param,
segments.get(0;
}
}
Now, with this in Application:
mount(new RootRequestMapper(/, Index.class));
mount(new RootRequestMapper(b, AnotherPage.class));
mount(new RootRequestMapper(c, AnotherPage.class));
Result: / ends up correctly in IndexPage, but /b and /c end up serving an
empty HTML page (?!).
If I only put this in Application (without the root mapping)
mount(new RootRequestMapper(b, AnotherPage.class));
mount(new RootRequestMapper(c, AnotherPage.class));
Result: / serves an empty page, and /b does end up in AnotherPage, but
renders this in the address bar: /c?param=c (again, replacing b with c, and
now adding the param as a visible url parameter).
Then I tried using a 'wildcard' like this
mount(new RootRequestMapper(/, Index.class));
mount(new RootRequestMapper(/${param}, AnotherPage.class));
Result: / serves correctly the index page, /b serves an empty HTML page.
In all cases, the System.outs in my RootRequestMapper correctly say either
to Index page or to Another page -- even in those cases above where a
blank HTML page is served, though constructor of said pages is not invoked
then.
So I guess I'm missing some small but essential detail somewhere .. if you
would have any further advice, thanks very much, in advance.
Kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Mounting-external-pages-to-root-tp3890756p3990222.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Mounting page to mutliple urls with different pageparameter
sorry, just saw your reply about pastebin after posting. Here it is: http://pastebin.com/uRNyxZbV. Thanks and kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Mounting-external-pages-to-root-tp3890756p3990244.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Mounting external pages to root
hi, I have a similar question, not sure if quite the same though. The pageflow is like this: (1) my app's homepage goes to a page with a loginform, SignInPage. On logging in the user gets to a page SignedInPage. (2) SignedInPage has a logout form, which logs out the user and should go back to SignInPage. (3) any other URL should be accepted and go to a page MainPage, which detects which URL path was used by checking PageParameters and could take action depending on its value. What is working fine are (1) and (3). However on the SignedInPage, when submitting the logout form, an exception occurs indicating that it's trying to find the logout form on MainPage: Of course it isn't on MainPage, the logoutform is on SignedInPage. Can anyone tell me how to achieve a setup like this ? My current code is like this : In my Application init() I have and I have this method The logoutform on SignedInPage has this in onSubmit() : Thanks in advance for your response, kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Mounting-external-pages-to-root-tp3890756p3894477.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Mounting external pages to root
hi,
forgive me for re-posting this, but it seems my code snippets in lt;raw
tags are invisible in email ..
I have a similar question, not sure if quite the same though. The pageflow
is like this:
(1) my app's homepage goes to a page with a loginform, SignInPage. On
logging in the user gets to a page SignedInPage.
(2) SignedInPage has a logout form, which logs out the user and should go
back to SignInPage.
(3) any other URL should be accepted and go to a page MainPage, which
detects which URL path was used by checking PageParameters and could take
action depending on its value.
What is working fine are (1) and (3). However on the SignedInPage, when
submitting the logout form, an exception occurs indicating that it's trying
to find the logout form on MainPage:
Last cause: Could not find component 'logoutform' on page 'class
my.package.page.MainPage
Of course it isn't on MainPage, the logoutform is on SignedInPage.
Can anyone tell me how to achieve a setup like this ? My current code is
like this :
In my Application init() I have
mountPage(/${username}, MainPage.class);
mountPage(/secure, SignedInPage.class);
mountPage(/, SignInPage.class);
and I have also this method
public Class getHomePage() {
return SignInPage.class;
}
The logoutform on SignedInPage has this in onSubmit() :
setResponsePage(SigninPage.class);
Thanks in advance for your response,
kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Mounting-external-pages-to-root-tp3890756p3894513.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Reloading i18n on demand
hi Martin, thanks for the pointer. Having taking a quick look at the source, it looks like one very easy way to preserve reloading on the fly is to add a line like this in my Application's init() method: getResourceSettings().setResourcePollFrequency(Duration.minutes(2)); this'll serve my purpose for the moment just fine -- as soon as I have time I'll investigate more how to achieve actual on demand reloading (without polling). thanks and kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Reloading-i18n-on-demand-tp3798545p3801694.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Reloading i18n on demand
hello, I've read that Wicket in Development Mode reloads changes to property files on the fly, but not in Production Mode, when they are heavily cached. Is there a way to reload property files such as those used for i18n in Production Mode, either on the fly or on demand ? I would suppose it could be possible that they're re-loaded on demand, after which the heavy caching could take place again. But I haven't found any information on this. Anyone have a suggestion ? thanks in advance Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Reloading-i18n-on-demand-tp3798545p3798545.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Stateless pagination
hello, I've noticed that rather many Wicket components cause the page to become stateful, something which I wish to avoid. In particular I'm wondering if there is some way to use the Pagination* components (or similar alternative ones) to create a page that has pagination over a repeater, without making the page stateful. Sure, I suppose some info about the collection and current page etc. must be remembered on the server, but we still have good old HttpSession that could maybe be used for it ? Any hints appreciated ! thanks and kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Stateless-pagination-tp3726950p3726950.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: URLs without counter parameter
OK, it turned out that a form in my base page with links to change the language was the stateful component. I've now changed things so it is a stateless form and it works like a charm. Thanks for hinting at StatelessChecker ! Kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/URLs-without-counter-parameter-tp3724144p3724820.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: i18n for html header elements
hi Martin, thanks for your suggestion, but it made no difference. I tried html xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.apache.org/; wicket:head titlewicket:message key=title.galleryBienvenue à Braziland/wicket:message /title /wicket:head body and it's the same, no translated title shown, but instead the wicket:message... appears as the title. What am I doing wrong here? Surely it must be possible to use i18n for header elements ? Kind regards, Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/i18n-for-html-header-elements-tp3722490p3723142.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: i18n for more than attribute
hi, thanks, but that doesn't work; only the first in the comma-separated list gets translated. Anyone have an idea how to do this ? thanks kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/i18n-for-more-than-attribute-tp3722544p3723525.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: i18n for html header elements
hi Dan, you're right ! The translation as such is working fine, it's just the preserved wicket:message.. element that is also displayed in the page's title. Am I right that in non-development mode, the wicket elements are stripped from the page? In that case I can live with them while developing, now that it's clear that the translation as such is done correctly. thank you and kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/i18n-for-html-header-elements-tp3722490p3723536.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: i18n for more than attribute
Hmm I don't have Wicket source at hand, just using the compiled libraries. Could it be that it works differently in the Wicket version I'm using (1.5 M3) ? I tested this: input wicket:id=french type=image src=images/flags/france_small.png name=image alt=français title=français wicket:message=title:french, alt:french style=border-style: none;/ and this (reversed order in comma-separated list): input wicket:id=french type=image src=images/flags/france_small.png name=image alt=français title=français wicket:message=alt:french, title:french style=border-style: none;/ and the result is really as I described, only the first of the comma-separated attributes gets translated. thanks kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/i18n-for-more-than-attribute-tp3722544p3723591.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
URLs without counter parameter
Hello, I'm using Wicket 1.5M3 and I'm trying to have nice-looking URLs in my web app. The URLs produced by the code as below are almost perfect, except for one detail: always, there is a counter appended, reflecting the number of requests made in this session. For example I get http://localhost:8080/myapp/contact?3, when I would prefer to have just http://localhost:8080/myapp/contact. All my pages are stateless -- at least that is what I think they are, many do not even have any code in their corresponding Java class. I also tried using setStatelessHint(true); but the results are the same. The code I use is: in MyApplication.java's init() method mountPage(/contact, ContactPage.class); etc., for all pages; and when creating links to the pages in the site's menu, I do add(new BookmarkablePageLink(contact-link, ContactPage.class)); with # contact in the HTML. Is it possible to get rid of those ?x that are appended to the URLs ? thank you in advance for your answers kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/URLs-without-counter-parameter-tp3724144p3724144.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: URLs without counter parameter
sorry, did not escape html in my post. That should be: with # contact in the HTML. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/URLs-without-counter-parameter-tp3724144p3724147.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: i18n for more than attribute
Yes, from looking at the code it certainly seems as if it should work.. As for your suggestion to attach the sources, well, often I use quite many libraries (Lucene, Hibernate..) and it would generally speaking get rather impractical to attach the sources of all of them. Also kind of defies the idea of a /library/.. but maybe for Wicket it makes sense indeed, as it is the core framework to run my application -- and also because it seems the changes in the API between 1.4 and 1.5 are often quite radical. Although for this particular problem the changes do not seem too great. For the moment I'll live with translated 'title' attributes and non-translated 'alt' attributes, due to time constraints -- but I do intend to find out what's happening exactly and when I do, I'll post my results here. Thank you for your replies, kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/i18n-for-more-than-attribute-tp3722544p3724170.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: i18n for more than attribute
What I meant with 'radical' changes is that there are many classes that for example have disappeared from the API, or have become abstract where before they were not, things like that.. in some cases these classes were not marked 'deprecated' in 1.4 and yet they're gone in 1.5. As a result, many of the example code that is around on the web, doesn't just work if you're using 1.5. I did not mean to offend by using that word -- if I did, my apologies. I'm still quite new to Wicket and I find it an excellent framework and also a very responsive mailing list. kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/i18n-for-more-than-attribute-tp3722544p3724205.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Repeating form on a page
OK ! Indeed, this solves it, and now all's perfect. Thank you so much ! Kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Repeating-form-on-a-page-tp2002098p378.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
i18n for more than attribute
Hello, I'm trying to make my site available in several languages, and mostly things work fine. But I'm wondering how to apply translations to more than one attribute in an element. For example: input wicket:id=some-id type=image src=images/my-image.png name=image alt=the alt text to be translated title=the title text to be translated wicket:message=title:translationkey/ this works fine to have the 'title' attribute properly translated. But I want the 'alt' attribute also properly translated; I can't put in a second 'wicket:message' attribute for that, because it causes a runtime exception complaining that the same attribute appears twice. How can I have i18n translations for more than one attribute in the same element? thanks in advance for your help, kind regards Heikki Doeleman -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/i18n-for-more-than-attribute-tp3722544p3722544.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Repeating form on a page
hello,
despite searching around I haven't found a good working example/explanation
of how to create a page where a form is repeated for each element in a
collection. (I found some info on using repeaters inside forms, but that is
a reverse situation).
Earlier in this thread there's the advice to use RefreshingView instead of
ListView. Is this good advice? What is the difference between them in this
scenario where forms should be repeated?
I tried doing it as below, but it causes a runtime exception. Can anyone
point out what I'm doing wrong and how it should be done?
The exception I'm getting is
Last cause: Unable to find component with id 'aForm' in [ListItem [Component
id = 0]]
Expected: 'a-list:0.aForm'.
Found with similar names: 'a-list:aForm'
The code is
div wicket:id=a-list
form wicket:id=aForm
input wicket:id=myproperty type=text/
div
input wicket:id=save type=submit value=Save/
input wicket:id=remove type=submit value=Remove/
/div
/form
/div
private ListView aList = new ListView(a-list, aDAO.retrieveAll()) {
@Override
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
final A a = (A) item.getModelObject();
add(new AForm(aForm,
new CompoundPropertyModel(new
LoadableDetachableModel() {
@Override
protected Object load() {
return a;
}
})
));
}};
private class AForm extends Form {
public AForm(String id, IModel m) {
super(id, m);
TextField myProperty= new TextField(myproperty);
add(myProperty);
add(new Button(save) {
public void onSubmit() {
A selected = (A) getForm().getModelObject();
ADAO.save(selected);
setResponsePage(APage.class);
}
});
add(
new Button(remove) {
@Override
public void onSubmit() {
A selected = (A) getForm().getModelObject();
ADAO.delete(selected);
setResponsePage(APage.class);
}
});
}
}
thanks in advance for your reply,
kind regards
Heikki Doeleman
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Repeating-form-on-a-page-tp2002098p3703919.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched via Wicket/Ajax
Thanks,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2457
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Matej Knopp [mailto:matej.kn...@gmail.com]
Sent: 9. syyskuuta 2009 0:10
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched
via Wicket/Ajax
Hi,
can you create jira issue with problem description? The code indeed
looks wrong I can fix it once the issue is created.
-Matej
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Heikki
Uotinenheikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com wrote:
There is a bug in wicket-ajax.js:268 (1.4.1) that breaks
IE+Flash/ExternalInterface:
// place all newly created elements before the old element
while(tempParent.childNodes.length 0) {
var tempElement = tempParent.childNodes[0];
tempParent.removeChild(tempElement);
parent.insertBefore(tempElement, element);
tempElement = null;
}
Calling removeChild is not needed because insertBefore moves element from its
original place.
If you remove removeChild line and check tempParent.childNodes.length you
can see that it is
decreased by one after insertBefore.
This removeChild breaks Flash/ExternalInterface in IE. If removeChild is
removed then everything
works fine. IE is more strict here than other browsers.
Demonstration is still at (there is no need for Flash CS4 to test this)
http://download.syncrontech.com/public/quickstart_noname.zip
Could someone confirm this and suggest how to proceed ?
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Heikki Uotinen [mailto:heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com]
Sent: 7. syyskuuta 2009 9:21
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched
via Wicket/Ajax
There is a problem with IE/ExternalInterface if movie is added to DOM f.ex
appendChild
JavaScript functions are called but they do not return any value.
This is clearly MS problem but could IE specific function in wicket-ajax.js
be adjusted somehow ?
Simple test case has
var flashMovie = 'OBJECT id=testId codeBase=http://fpdownload..
// Works in IE and FF
document.getElementById(testdiv).innerHTML = flashMovie;
// ExternalInterface.call calls JS but does not return value in IE.
Works in FF
var tempDiv = document.createElement(div);
tempDiv.innerHTML = flashMovie;
document.body.appendChild(tempDiv);
Here is complete code (ajax.swf can be found in zip files)
http://pastebin.com/fbc0aa9a
Here is AS3 code in ajax.fla
http://pastebin.com/d4efd47b
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Mikko Pukki [mailto:mikko.pu...@syncrontech.com]
Sent: 4. syyskuuta 2009 15:33
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched via
Wicket/Ajax
Hi,
This example demonstrates that ExternalInterface fails with IE only if movie
is fetched via Wicket/Ajax.
ajaxtest.zip:
(http://download.syncrontech.com/public/ajaxtest.zip)
Page first.html fetches second.html page via Ajax. Second.html has Flash
movie
that calls JavaScript methods with ExternalInterface and produces output
Start...
ExternalInterface.available:true
ExternalInterface.objectID:testId
fromJs:text from js (first.html)
This works both FF 3.5 and IE 7/IE8
quickstart_noname.zip:
(http://download.syncrontech.com/public/quickstart_noname.zip)
Same demonstration with wicket. This fails with IE
Start...
ExternalInterface.available:true
ExternalInterface.objectID:null
fromJs:null
ObjectId is null and JavaScript call does not return any value.
We are aware about EI/IE problems in past, but any of those does not seem to
fit here.
Wicket 1.4.1, Flash Player 10, IE 7/8, FF 3.5
Has anyone encountered any similar behavior and/or has found any workaround?
Should I create a Jira issue?
--
Mikko Pukki
Syncron Tech Oy
Laserkatu 6
53850 Lappeenranta
+358 400 757 178
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched via Wicket/Ajax
There is a bug in wicket-ajax.js:268 (1.4.1) that breaks
IE+Flash/ExternalInterface:
// place all newly created elements before the old element
while(tempParent.childNodes.length 0) {
var tempElement = tempParent.childNodes[0];
tempParent.removeChild(tempElement);
parent.insertBefore(tempElement, element);
tempElement = null;
}
Calling removeChild is not needed because insertBefore moves element from its
original place.
If you remove removeChild line and check tempParent.childNodes.length you
can see that it is
decreased by one after insertBefore.
This removeChild breaks Flash/ExternalInterface in IE. If removeChild is
removed then everything
works fine. IE is more strict here than other browsers.
Demonstration is still at (there is no need for Flash CS4 to test this)
http://download.syncrontech.com/public/quickstart_noname.zip
Could someone confirm this and suggest how to proceed ?
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Heikki Uotinen [mailto:heikki.uoti...@syncrontech.com]
Sent: 7. syyskuuta 2009 9:21
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched
via Wicket/Ajax
There is a problem with IE/ExternalInterface if movie is added to DOM f.ex
appendChild
JavaScript functions are called but they do not return any value.
This is clearly MS problem but could IE specific function in wicket-ajax.js be
adjusted somehow ?
Simple test case has
var flashMovie = 'OBJECT id=testId codeBase=http://fpdownload..
// Works in IE and FF
document.getElementById(testdiv).innerHTML = flashMovie;
// ExternalInterface.call calls JS but does not return value in IE.
Works in FF
var tempDiv = document.createElement(div);
tempDiv.innerHTML = flashMovie;
document.body.appendChild(tempDiv);
Here is complete code (ajax.swf can be found in zip files)
http://pastebin.com/fbc0aa9a
Here is AS3 code in ajax.fla
http://pastebin.com/d4efd47b
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Mikko Pukki [mailto:mikko.pu...@syncrontech.com]
Sent: 4. syyskuuta 2009 15:33
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched via
Wicket/Ajax
Hi,
This example demonstrates that ExternalInterface fails with IE only if movie is
fetched via Wicket/Ajax.
ajaxtest.zip:
(http://download.syncrontech.com/public/ajaxtest.zip)
Page first.html fetches second.html page via Ajax. Second.html has Flash
movie
that calls JavaScript methods with ExternalInterface and produces output
Start...
ExternalInterface.available:true
ExternalInterface.objectID:testId
fromJs:text from js (first.html)
This works both FF 3.5 and IE 7/IE8
quickstart_noname.zip:
(http://download.syncrontech.com/public/quickstart_noname.zip)
Same demonstration with wicket. This fails with IE
Start...
ExternalInterface.available:true
ExternalInterface.objectID:null
fromJs:null
ObjectId is null and JavaScript call does not return any value.
We are aware about EI/IE problems in past, but any of those does not seem to
fit here.
Wicket 1.4.1, Flash Player 10, IE 7/8, FF 3.5
Has anyone encountered any similar behavior and/or has found any workaround?
Should I create a Jira issue?
--
Mikko Pukki
Syncron Tech Oy
Laserkatu 6
53850 Lappeenranta
+358 400 757 178
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched via Wicket/Ajax
There is a problem with IE/ExternalInterface if movie is added to DOM f.ex appendChild JavaScript functions are called but they do not return any value. This is clearly MS problem but could IE specific function in wicket-ajax.js be adjusted somehow ? Simple test case has var flashMovie = 'OBJECT id=testId codeBase=http://fpdownload.. // Works in IE and FF document.getElementById(testdiv).innerHTML = flashMovie; // ExternalInterface.call calls JS but does not return value in IE. Works in FF var tempDiv = document.createElement(div); tempDiv.innerHTML = flashMovie; document.body.appendChild(tempDiv); Here is complete code (ajax.swf can be found in zip files) http://pastebin.com/fbc0aa9a Here is AS3 code in ajax.fla http://pastebin.com/d4efd47b -Heikki -Original Message- From: Mikko Pukki [mailto:mikko.pu...@syncrontech.com] Sent: 4. syyskuuta 2009 15:33 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Flash/ExternalInterface does not work in IE if movie is fetched via Wicket/Ajax Hi, This example demonstrates that ExternalInterface fails with IE only if movie is fetched via Wicket/Ajax. ajaxtest.zip: (http://download.syncrontech.com/public/ajaxtest.zip) Page first.html fetches second.html page via Ajax. Second.html has Flash movie that calls JavaScript methods with ExternalInterface and produces output Start... ExternalInterface.available:true ExternalInterface.objectID:testId fromJs:text from js (first.html) This works both FF 3.5 and IE 7/IE8 quickstart_noname.zip: (http://download.syncrontech.com/public/quickstart_noname.zip) Same demonstration with wicket. This fails with IE Start... ExternalInterface.available:true ExternalInterface.objectID:null fromJs:null ObjectId is null and JavaScript call does not return any value. We are aware about EI/IE problems in past, but any of those does not seem to fit here. Wicket 1.4.1, Flash Player 10, IE 7/8, FF 3.5 Has anyone encountered any similar behavior and/or has found any workaround? Should I create a Jira issue? -- Mikko Pukki Syncron Tech Oy Laserkatu 6 53850 Lappeenranta +358 400 757 178 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: How to Show Error Of Page In Deployment MOde
Maybe this helps http://www.nabble.com/How-to-catch-the-error-in-custome-error-page--td9645296.html -Heikki -Original Message- From: carlo c [mailto:carlo.camer...@gmail.com] Sent: 25. helmikuuta 2009 7:16 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: How to Show Error Of Page In Deployment MOde hi everyone, I know that this might sound a little strange. but i need to be able to show the error of the system even during deployment mode. I have to show them the stacktrace. The Thing that's preventing us from using development mode is that the application always gets an outofmemoryerror when deployed on websphere. It just shwo internal error. Is there a way that I can override this behavior? carlo -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-Show-Error-Of-Page-In-Deployment-MOde-tp22196513p22196513.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: textfield to take only numnbers
Pass the field type in the TextField's constructor http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/compref/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:org.apache.wicket.examples.compref.TextFieldPage -Heikki -Original Message- From: miro [mailto:miroconn...@yahoo.com] Sent: 29. tammikuuta 2009 17:52 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: textfield to take only numnbers I s there any textfield which takes only numbers, I dont want user to enter letters only numbers so I want a textfield which takes only numbers is there any such textfield ? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/textfield-to--take-only-numnbers-tp21729554p21729554.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: How to get DropDownChoice value without commit form?
Override method wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications :
dropDownChoice = new DropDownChoice...{
@Override
protected boolean wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications() {
return true;
}
@Override
protected void onSelectionChanged(Object newSelection) {
...
}
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: wch2001 [mailto:wch2...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 30. joulukuuta 2008 9:59
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: How to get DropDownChoice value without commit form?
Dear all,
I have a project to have year dropdown choice (2008,2009, 2010 and so on),
I need its value after it changed but b4 commit the form. How can i do ?
thanks,
Wch2001
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-get-DropDownChoice-value-without-commit-form--tp21214143p21214143.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: feedback message without a form
Refresh feedback panel after setting the message:
final FeedbackPanel feedback = new FeedbackPanel (feedback);
feedback.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(feedback);
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
if(assignProgramsDTO.getGrantsAssigned().size()==0){
getPage().error(Please assing grants);
target.addComponent(feedback);
return;
}
...
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Vance Fellers [mailto:nvfellers...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 30. joulukuuta 2008 21:38
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: feedback message without a form
Have you tried without redirecting to the response page?
miro wrote:
here is my code
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
if(assignProgramsDTO.getGrantsAssigned().size()==0){
getPage().error(Please assing grants);
return;
}
getStgAuditProcessService().startProcess(assignProgramsDTO);
setResponsePage(HomePage.class);
setRedirect(true);
}
miro wrote:
yes
jWeekend wrote:
Did you add a FeedbackPanel to your page?
Regards - Cemal
http://www.jWeekend.co.uk jWeekend
miro wrote:
adding message is simple but how to display this message , who is
rendering the added message ?,
in my case I am adding the message to the page , getPage().info(This
is a test message ) , now what in html i have to do to display this
message ?
James Carman-3 wrote:
Component.info(String message)?
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:24 PM, miro miroconn...@yahoo.com wrote:
How to add feed back messages to page with out a form ,
in my case when the link is clicked I call some external service and
that
might return me some message and I want to show this message as a
feedback
message
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/feedback-message-without-a-form-tp21206285p21206285.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/feedback-message-without-a-form-tp21206285p21222096.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Dynamically show and edit a textarea in a table
Hi,
if you put extra div around textarea and add it to the target it should work
final TextArea rejectComment2 = new TextArea(rejectComment2, new
Model(aaa));
rejectComment2.setEnabled(false);
rejectComment2.setVisible(false);
rejectComment2.setOutputMarkupId(true);
final WebMarkupContainer rejectComment2Div = new
WebMarkupContainer(rejectComment2Div);
rejectComment2.setOutputMarkupId(true);
final AjaxFallbackLink enableRejectComment = new
AjaxFallbackLink(enableRejectComment, new Model(
Enable comment textarea )) {
@Override
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
rejectComment2.setEnabled(true);
rejectComment2.setVisible(true);
target.addComponent(rejectComment2Div);
log.debug(AjaxFallbackLink onClick);
}
};
item.add(rejectComment1);
rejectComment2Div.add(rejectComment2);
item.add(rejectComment2Div);
-Heikki
-Original Message-
From: Claudio Miranda [mailto:clau...@claudius.com.br]
Sent: 29. joulukuuta 2008 3:50
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dynamically show and edit a textarea in a table
To let you know, the AjaxEditableMultiLineLabel.onEdit and
AjaxFallbackLink.onClick are called and debug messages logged.
Tried with wicket 1.3.5, same results, no textarea displayed.
Claudio Miranda wrote:
I need to dynamically show a textarea in a row of a table.
The textarea should only be displayed if the user wants to, as he needs to
click at some link.
I developed 2 tests using an AjaxEditableMultiLineLabel and a not visible
textarea. See the runnable code below, to take a look at.
The wicket id is: rejectComment1 and rejectComment2
HTML Code (lines 53 and 60,61)
http://pastebin.com/m2492afac
Java Code (lines 33 and 48)
http://pastebin.com/m490aa72b
But none of them works!
If I click at any of them, the textarea is not displayed.
Are there issues to use them inside a table ?
My system:
Wicket 1.4 RC1
Firefox 3.0.4
Glassfish v2 ur2
Java 6 u11
-
Claudio Miranda
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/claudio
http://www.claudius.com.br/blog
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Dynamically-show-and-edit-a-textarea-in-a-table-tp21197799p21198096.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Assigning an Action to an onClick handler
Maybe MetaDataRoleAuthorizationStrategy.authorize(link3, Component.ENABLE, ADMIN); -Heikki -Original Message- From: Arie Fishler [mailto:arie@gmail.com] Sent: 18. joulukuuta 2008 16:08 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Assigning an Action to an onClick handler We are using the AnnotationsRoleAuthorizationStrategy class and place @AuthorizeInstantiation(ROLE_USER) on restricted Wicket pages. We need finer-grained authorisation control - we have a class that has 3 AjaxLinks each with their own onClick() handler. 2 of the onClick() handlers are accessible to everyone but 1 requires an authorised user. We have seen it's possible to define a *org.apache.wicket.authorization.Action*class and allocate it to a given role BUT how do we associate the given *Action *to the given onClick() handler? Many thanks Arie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Assigning an Action to an onClick handler
Maybe something like MetaDataRoleAuthorizationStrategy.authorize(link3, Component.ENABLE, ADMIN); -Heikki -Original Message- From: Arie Fishler [mailto:arie@gmail.com] Sent: 18. joulukuuta 2008 16:08 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Assigning an Action to an onClick handler We are using the AnnotationsRoleAuthorizationStrategy class and place @AuthorizeInstantiation(ROLE_USER) on restricted Wicket pages. We need finer-grained authorisation control - we have a class that has 3 AjaxLinks each with their own onClick() handler. 2 of the onClick() handlers are accessible to everyone but 1 requires an authorised user. We have seen it's possible to define a *org.apache.wicket.authorization.Action*class and allocate it to a given role BUT how do we associate the given *Action *to the given onClick() handler? Many thanks Arie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
