I've done an upgrade of ovirt-engine tomorrow. There were two problems.
The first - packages from epel repo, solved by disable repo and
downgrade package to an existing version in ovirt-release40 repo (yes,
there is info in documentation about epel repo).
The second (and it is not only for cu
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Yura Poltoratskiy
wrote:
> I've done an upgrade of ovirt-engine tomorrow. There were two problems.
>
> The first - packages from epel repo, solved by disable repo and downgrade
> package to an existing version in ovirt-release40 repo (yes, there is info
> in docume
Title: Re: [ovirt-users] [Call for feedback] did you install/update to 4.1.0?
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:59 PM, wrote:
Updated from 4.0.6
Docs are quite incomplete, it's not mentioned about installing ovirt-release41 on centos HV and ovirt-nodes manually, you need to guess
Hello,
I upgraded my cluster of 8 hosts with gluster storage and
hosted-engine-ha. They were already Centos 7.3 and using Ovirt 4.0.6 and
gluster 3.7.x packages from storage-sig testing.
I'm missing the storage listed under storage tab but this is already
filed by a bug. Increasing Cluster and St
On February 3rd 2017 the oVirt team issued an async release of ovirt-engine
package including a fix for a single bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1417597 - Failed to update template
Who already updated to oVirt 4.1.0 will need to update ovirt-engine in
order to be able to edit templates.
Thanks,
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Ralf Schenk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I upgraded my cluster of 8 hosts with gluster storage and
> hosted-engine-ha. They were already Centos 7.3 and using Ovirt 4.0.6 and
> gluster 3.7.x packages from storage-sig testing.
>
> I'm missing the storage listed under storage
- Original Message -
> From: "Ralf Schenk"
> To: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 3:24:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [Call for feedback] did you install/update to
> 4.1.0?
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I upgraded my cluster of 8 hosts with gluster storage and hosted-engi
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Sandro Bonazzola
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Ralf Schenk wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I upgraded my cluster of 8 hosts with gluster storage and
>> hosted-engine-ha. They were already Centos 7.3 and using Ovirt 4.0.6 and
>> gluster 3.7.x packages fro
Hello,
in reality my cluster is a hyper-converged cluster. But how do I tell
this Ovirt Engine ? Of course I activated the checkbox "Gluster"
(already some versions ago around 4.0.x) but that didn't change anything.
Bye
Am 03.02.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Ramesh Nachimuthu:
>> 2. I'm missing any glust
- Original Message -
> From: "Ralf Schenk"
> To: "Ramesh Nachimuthu"
> Cc: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 4:19:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [Call for feedback] did you install/update to
> 4.1.0?
>
> Hello,
>
> in reality my cluster is a hyper-converged clust
On 02/03/2017 10:54 AM, Ralf Schenk wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I upgraded my cluster of 8 hosts with gluster storage and
> hosted-engine-ha. They were already Centos 7.3 and using Ovirt 4.0.6
> and gluster 3.7.x packages from storage-sig testing.
>
> I'm missing the storage listed under storage tab bu
Hi,
I tried to install and setup oVirt 4.1 but after I tried
|yum install http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/yum-repo/ovirt-release41.rpm|
|without any success I opened the direct link and I got a "Forbidden" ->
You don't have permissions error message.|
|Thanks
|
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix I
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Sergey Kulikov wrote:
>
> I've upgraded to 4.1 release, it have great feature "Pass discards", that
> now can be used without vdsm hooks,
> After upgrade I've tested it with NFS 4.1 storage, exported from netapp,
> but unfortunately found out, that
> it's not work
Hello,
attached is my vdsm.log from the host with hosted-engine-ha around the
time-frame of agent timeout that is not working anymore for engine (it
works in Ovirt and is active). It simply isn't working for engine-ha
anymore after Update.
At 2017-02-02 19:25:34,248 you'll find an error correspon
I forgot to cleanly detach the export domain from my previous cluster ( no
longer exists ), how can I import the domain into a new cluster ?
Any help appreciated
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hm... maybe I need to set any options, is there any way to force ovirt to mount
with this extension, or version 4.2
there is only 4.1 selection in "New Domain" menu.
Current mount options:
type nfs4
(rw,relatime,vers=4.1,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,namlen=255,soft,nosharecache,proto=tcp,port=0,time
Unfortunately I can't browse this bug:
"You are not authorized to access bug #1079385."
Can you email me details on ths bug?
I think that's the reason I can't find this fix for rhel\centos in google)
--
Friday, February 3, 2017, 14:45:43:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Sergey Kuli
I see there an ERROR on stopMonitoringDomain but I cannot see the
correspondent startMonitoringDomain; could you please look for it?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Ralf Schenk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> attached is my vdsm.log from the host with hosted-engine-ha around the
> time-frame of agent timeo
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Sergey Kulikov wrote:
>
>
> Hm... maybe I need to set any options, is there any way to force ovirt to
> mount with this extension, or version 4.2
> there is only 4.1 selection in "New Domain" menu.
> Current mount options:
> type nfs4
> (rw,relatime,vers=4.1,rsize
Managed to attach it by editing dom_md/metadata and removing
POOL_UUID
SDUUID
then updating the checksum...
On 3 February 2017 at 12:19, Maton, Brett wrote:
> I forgot to cleanly detach the export domain from my previous cluster ( no
> longer exists ), how can I import the domain into a new c
On Feb 3, 2017 1:50 PM, "Nir Soffer" wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Sergey Kulikov wrote:
>
>
> Hm... maybe I need to set any options, is there any way to force ovirt to
mount with this extension, or version 4.2
> there is only 4.1 selection in "New Domain" menu.
> Current mount options:
Heya!
I´m trying to complete 'hosted-engine --deploy' but I´m stuck at:
Please indicate a nic to set ovirtmgmt bridge on: (eno1) [eno1]: eno1.1
[ ERROR ] Invalid value
As you can see it´s a vlan-tagged interface. If I type in just 'eno1',
the setup continues but fails obviously since it´s the wro
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 3, 2017 1:50 PM, "Nir Soffer" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Sergey Kulikov wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hm... maybe I need to set any options, is there any way to force ovirt to
>> mount with this extension, or version 4.2
>> there i
Thanks! I think now It's question to NetApp, when they'll make 4.2 available,
I've tried to manually mount v4.2 on host,
but unfortunately:
# mount -o vers=4.2 10.1.1.111:/test /tmp/123
mount.nfs: Protocol not supported
so, my NetApp is vers=4.1 max (
--
Friday, February 3, 2017, 15:54:54:
Hello,
I also put host in Maintenance and restarted vdsm while ovirt-ha-agent
is running. I can mount the gluster Volume "engine" manually in the host.
I get this repeatedly in /var/log/vdsm.log:
2017-02-03 15:29:28,891 INFO (MainThread) [vds] Exiting (vdsm:167)
2017-02-03 15:29:30,974 INFO (M
The hosted-engine storage domain is mounted for sure,
but the issue is here:
Exception: Failed to start monitoring domain
(sd_uuid=7c8deaa8-be02-4aaf-b9b4-ddc8da99ad96, host_id=3): timeout during
domain acquisition
The point is that in VDSM logs I see just something like:
2017-02-02 21:05:22,283 I
Running ovirt v4.0.5.5.1 and not planning to upgrade to 4.1 yet.
We are happy with stability of our production servers and wait for 4.1.1 to
come out.
The only real need to upgrade for us would be the added compatibility with
Windows server 2016 guest tools.
… and the trim, of course, but we can
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 12:31:49AM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Benjamin Marzinski
><[1]bmarz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > > I'm trying to mitigate inserting a timeout for my SAN devices but
> I'm not
> > > sure of its effectiveness as CentO
Hi,
I updated our oVirt cluster day after 4.1.0 went public.
Upgrade was simple but while migrating and upgrading hosts some vms was
stucked with 100% cpu usage and totally non responsible. I had to power
of them and start again. But it could be some problem with
CentOS7.2->7.3 transition or
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Ralf Schenk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> of course:
>
> [root@microcloud27 mnt]# sanlock client status
> daemon 8a93c9ea-e242-408c-a63d-a9356bb22df5.microcloud
> p -1 helper
> p -1 listener
> p -1 status
>
> sanlock.log attached. (Beginning 2017-01-27 where everything was f
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Simone Tiraboschi
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Ralf Schenk wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> of course:
>>
>> [root@microcloud27 mnt]# sanlock client status
>> daemon 8a93c9ea-e242-408c-a63d-a9356bb22df5.microcloud
>> p -1 helper
>> p -1 listener
>> p -1 st
Hi,
I have some questions about oVirt's high availability features for
VMs. My understanding is that it relies on the engine host to monitor
and manage the hypervisor hosts, so that in the case of a
unrecoverable failure of one those hosts, it will fence the host and
migrate any VM that is designa
Any body? :(
--
Fernando Fuentes
ffuen...@txweather.org
http://www.txweather.org
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017, at 02:56 PM, Fernando Fuentes wrote:
> Sandro,
>
> I did the update from the hosts tab on ovirt:
> The ovirt version is: oVirt Engine Version: 4.0.2.6-1.el7.centos
>
> All of
Il 30/Gen/2017 09:56 PM, "Fernando Fuentes" ha
scritto:
Sandro,
I did the update from the hosts tab on ovirt:
The ovirt version is: oVirt Engine Version: 4.0.2.6-1.el7.centos
Sorry Fernando I missed your email.
I would suggest to update your hosts to centos 7.3 and oVirt 4.1.
If you don't wan
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:42 PM, cmc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some questions about oVirt's high availability features for
> VMs. My understanding is that it relies on the engine host to monitor
> and manage the hypervisor hosts, so that in the case of a
> unrecoverable failure of one those hosts, i
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:42 PM, cmc wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have some questions about oVirt's high availability features for
>> VMs. My understanding is that it relies on the engine host to monitor
>> and manage the hypervisor hosts, so tha
Hello Everyone,
Having trouble implement FreeIPA authentication with GSSAPI SSO and ovirt 4.1.
I ran setup and it finished OK then it wrote the files bellow. Next I log to
web admin with internal user and added FeeIPA user as SuperUser role. Also I
added under System FreeIPA group authorized to
37 matches
Mail list logo