On 05/30/2018 09:34 AM, Grant Taylor wrote:
Now to see what sort of DMARC notifications (if any) I get for this reply.
I have received four DMARC auth-failure notifications (thus far) in
response to my message to the SpamAssassin Users mailing list.
It looks like the reports are indicating
On 05/30/2018 08:43 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
Note that changing the From header would break all DKIM signatures and
forcing a Reply-To would break many.
That's where validating & striping DKIM signatures as the message enters
the list comes into play. Preferably followed up with DKIM signing as
On Wed, 30 May 2018 11:45:12 -0600
Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 05/30/2018 09:34 AM, Grant Taylor wrote:
> > Now to see what sort of DMARC notifications (if any) I get for this
> > reply.
>
> I have received four DMARC auth-failure notifications (thus far) in
> response to my message to the
On 30 May 2018, at 13:54, Bill Cole wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 14:51 (-0400), Grant Taylor wrote:
Since Qualcom transferred the Eudora IP to the Computer History
Museum and open sourced the source code, I expect that we will be
seeing movement there in. I think I've seen some references to
On 30 May 2018, at 14:47 (-0400), Charles Sprickman wrote:
All email clients “generally suck”. Thunderbird is not even
actively developed anymore last I checked,
Check again. That's not been true for quite a while. I just dusted off
TBird for the first time in 2 years and was treated to an
On 05/30/2018 12:47 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
If I had a better option than some old command-line mess, I’d use it.
Every 3-4 years I go on a hunt for a new Mac mail client and I always
come up empty. I’ve tried MailMate, Thunderbird, Postbox and just keep
coming back to the (neglected)
On 30 May 2018, at 14:51 (-0400), Grant Taylor wrote:
> Since Qualcom transferred the Eudora IP to the Computer History Museum and
> open sourced the source code, I expect that we will be seeing movement there
> in. I think I've seen some references to projects to resurrect the code base
>
On Wed, 30 May 2018 12:47:42 -0600
Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 05/30/2018 12:08 PM, RW wrote:
> > SPF passes on the rewritten envelope address, so it's not aligned
> > and it's just a matter of whether there's an aligned dkim pass.
>
> It depends on what the Forensic Report ("fo") option is set
On 05/30/2018 12:08 PM, RW wrote:
SPF passes on the rewritten envelope address, so it's not aligned and
it's just a matter of whether there's an aligned dkim pass.
It depends on what the Forensic Report ("fo") option is set to in the
published DMARC policy. Domain owners / record publishers
> On May 30, 2018, at 10:25 AM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> On 30 May 2018, at 10:00, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
>
>>> On 30 May 2018, at 16:48, Antony Stone
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 30 May 2018 at 15:33:13, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
>>>
> On 30 May 2018, at 16:06, Matus UHLAR -
On 30/05/2018 17:37, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it seems that spamcannibal blacklist is dead, or at least its DNS has
> expired:
>
> Domain Name: SPAMCANNIBAL.ORG
> Updated Date: 2018-05-30T03:16:26Z
> Name Server: NS1.RENEWYOURNAME.NET
> Name Server: NS2.RENEWYOURNAME.NET
>
>
On 30 May 2018, at 14:30, Bill Cole wrote:
And if you can imagine this, both Thunderbird and MailMate choke on
large mailboxes *even more* than Mail.app does.
I haven't had MM "choke" on large mailboxes in recent years. I wish
Benny would just declare a 2.0 release to make it clear that MM
On 30 May 2018, at 17:19 (-0400), Luis E. Muñoz wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 13:54, Bill Cole wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 14:51 (-0400), Grant Taylor wrote:
Since Qualcom transferred the Eudora IP to the Computer History
Museum and open sourced the source code, I expect that we will be
seeing
On 05/30/2018 04:02 PM, RW wrote:
OK, but when you said "The failure seems to be a result of how DMARC
amalgamates the two with published policies" I thought you were claiming
some kind of anomalous behaviour.
Ah. Sorry for the confusion.
It's surely obvious that rewriting the envelope
On 2018-05-30 15:49, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
> Why does this list apparently use the original From header of the
> poster’s message and doesn't set a Reply-To header at all?
Because that is the only right way.
A list manager has no business modifying the contents of posted
messages. It
On 05/30/2018 07:59 AM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
You prefer the blind-fold solution: the Microsoft way where you click click and
click again here and there and feel good that you have solved the problem.
Unfortunately it does not work that way. We blacklisted Microsoft IPs without
RDNS, out of
You prefer the blind-fold solution: the Microsoft way where you click click and
click again here and there and feel good that you have solved the problem.
Unfortunately it does not work that way. We blacklisted Microsoft IPs without
RDNS, out of evidence, while Zen has them whitelisted out of
Hello,
it seems that spamcannibal blacklist is dead, or at least its DNS has
expired:
Domain Name: SPAMCANNIBAL.ORG
Updated Date: 2018-05-30T03:16:26Z
Name Server: NS1.RENEWYOURNAME.NET
Name Server: NS2.RENEWYOURNAME.NET
and, of course:
114.95.168.62.bl.spamcannibal.org. 86385 IN A
Silly question or not, here goes:
I prepend my spam emails’ subject fields with a specific string to indicate
spam, like many do, I presume. Will that string get noticed by bayes and if so,
should I do something to prevent it?
--
Palvelin.fi Hostmaster
postmas...@palvelin.fi
On 30.05.18 15:12, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
I prepend my spam emails’ subject fields with a specific string to indicate
spam, like many do, I presume. Will that string get noticed by bayes and
if so, should I do something to prevent it?
most probably, yes.
However, not by your bayes,
What happens when your coitus with Spamhaus is interrupted by a man in the
middle? I mean someone that either cuts your link or plays the role of your
partner while delivering poisoned answers? Good luck...
Why does this list apparently use the original From header of the poster’s
message and doesn't set a Reply-To header at all?
Hitting reply sends the response to poster directly and DMARC failures occur
when posting to list. Not very elegant.
On 30.05.18 15:12, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
I prepend my spam emails’ subject fields with a specific string to indicate
spam, like many do, I presume. Will that string get noticed by bayes and
if so, should I do something to prevent it?
On 30 May 2018, at 15:21, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> On 30 May 2018, at 15:21, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 30.05.18 15:12, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
>> I prepend my spam emails’ subject fields with a specific string to indicate
>> spam, like many do, I presume. Will that string get noticed by bayes and
>> if so, should I do
> On 30 May 2018, at 16:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 30.05.18 15:49, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
>
>> Hitting reply sends the response to poster directly
>
> get a mail client that supports mailing lists. Mozilla should do.
I see, the 'Mozzilla or stfu' policy ;D
>> and
On Wednesday 30 May 2018 at 15:33:13, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
> > On 30 May 2018, at 16:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> > wrote:
> >
> > On 30.05.18 15:49, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
> >> Hitting reply sends the response to poster directly
> >
> > get a mail client that supports mailing lists.
Palvelin Postmaster schrieb am 30.05.2018 um 14:49:
Why does this list apparently use the original From header of the poster’s
message and doesn't set a Reply-To header at all?
Hitting reply sends the response to poster directly and DMARC failures occur
when posting to list. Not very elegant.
On 30.05.18 15:49, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
Why does this list apparently use the original From header of the poster’s
message and doesn't set a Reply-To header at all?
because it's the standard behaviour.
Hitting reply sends the response to poster directly
get a mail client that
> On 30 May 2018, at 16:48, Antony Stone
> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 30 May 2018 at 15:33:13, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
>
>>> On 30 May 2018, at 16:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 30.05.18 15:49, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
Hitting reply sends the response to poster
On 30 May 2018, at 10:00, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 16:48, Antony Stone
wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2018 at 15:33:13, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 16:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
On 30.05.18 15:49, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
Hitting reply sends
On 05/30/2018 02:35 PM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
What happens when your coitus with Spamhaus is interrupted by a man
in the middle? I mean someone that either cuts your link or plays the
role of your partner while delivering poisoned answers? Good luck...
doesn't happen. I only use lists which
On 30 May 2018, at 8:49, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
Why does this list apparently use the original From header of the
poster’s message and doesn't set a Reply-To header at all?
1. Traditional standard practice. Doing otherwise in either case would
offend more people than sticking with the
On 30 May 2018, at 10:25, Bill Cole wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 10:00, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 16:48, Antony Stone
wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2018 at 15:33:13, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 16:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
On 30.05.18 15:49,
33 matches
Mail list logo
