The status report, about line 1077, in function list_users is missing
the '+'.
On Monday 05 April 2004 11:09 pm, Rick Widmer wrote:
When I login, the following information is returned:
vpopmail_dir /mail
uid 77
gid 72
name postmaster
comment Postmaster
quota NOQUOTA
dir /mail/domains/test.com/postmaster
encrypted_password
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 12:58 am, Rick Widmer wrote:
The status report, about line 1077, in function list_users is missing
the '+'.
got it.
Ken
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 12:36 am, Rick Widmer wrote:
Do I have any better way to obtain information on the catchall status
than reading .qmail-default myself?
That's all we have for now.
Do I need one?
You'll need to parse it to determine if it calls anything
special and/if it uses the
I have a bit of an object for vpopmaild working. It will login and
retrieve the list of users, and domains. The tarball includes an
example program. On my system (a 500MHz PII) running both the daemon
and this program it retrieved 3108 users from a single domain in 10.23
seconds, and 1563
- Original Message -
From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it works pretty nicely. A single . on a line by itself
represents End of File when sending or receiving multiple
lines of infomation.
Nice idea.
[cut]
Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier
from
- Original Message -
From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 05 April 2004 8:08 pm, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
Sounds good to me, this is getting
- Original Message -
I see you have different error messages during login for:
invalid email address
user does not exist
invalid password
It might be better to return the same message for all so the hostile
hacker can't learn as much about your users.
Good point.
- Original Message -
From: Rick Widmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 6:09 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] vpopmaild - return from login, and others
When I login, the following information is returned:
vpopmail_dir /mail
uid 77
gid 72
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier
from the client program's point of view?
a) full paths
b) relative based on user or command
+1 for b) First, it would be a bit like
- Original Message -
From: Rick Widmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier
from the client program's point of view?
a) full paths
b)
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
Either I am missing something or... If we use full path then same operations
would look like:
Sys Admin would send same as
The Domain admin would send same as
And the user would send:
write_file /path/to/vpopmail/home/domains/test.com/user/VacationMessage
And
Hello from France
I'm using vpopmail 5.4.0 and vqadmin 2.3.2 and it's doing fine (good job
!) but...
I think there's a little problem with quota update in vpopmail and vqadmin :
When i change a user's quota via commandline using the 'vsetuserquota'
program, the quota is changed in the vpasswd
I just uploaded a new PHP object to interface to the vpopmaild daemon.
http://kimberly.developersdesk.com/vpopmaild-php.tar.gz
vpopmail.pobj is the source code for the actual object.
README lists all available methods in the object.
example.php is a command line PHP program that tests the
At 02/04/04 21:38 (), Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Hello Devendra,
On Friday, April 2, 2004 at 7:26:47 AM you wrote (at least in part):
This gives me a clue that perhaps we should be able to do it using
qmail-scanner-queue.pl code. Let me try it out. If anyone else too can give
some pointer on
- Original Message -
From: Rick Widmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 12:49 PM
Subject: [vchkpw] vpopmaild - PHP object
I just uploaded a new PHP object to interface to the vpopmaild daemon.
Although logged as SA_ADMIN user cannot get user_info from oter domains.
Here is a patch:
--- vpopmail-5.5.2-orig/vpopmaild.c Tue Apr 6 01:03:22 2004
+++ vpopmail-5.5.2/vpopmaild.c Tue Apr 6 16:47:50 2004
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@
return(-1);
}
- if ( (AuthVpw.pw_gidQA_ADMIN)
On Apr 6, 2004, at 10:57 AM, Marcin So³tysiak wrote:
BTW. Since vpopmaild is very young it will need a heavy develoopment.
It
would be resonable to create a separate category in bugtraq.
I'll put my vote in for initial development to take place in a separate
CVS repository from the main vpopmail
Tom Wrote:
At the very least, vpopmaild discussion should be on vpopmail-devel
instead of the vchkpw list. I am sure that there are others, like me,
who aren't interested in following the early stages of development and
would prefer not to receive 20-30 messages a day discussing it.
I need to make vpopmail recognize user#domain.com as the same way it
recognizes [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Is there a way to do it changing configuration files or I'll have to
edit the source code/include files and recompile?
[[]]'s
Eduardo M. Bragatto.
Eduardo M. Bragatto wrote:
I need to make vpopmail recognize user#domain.com as the same way
it recognizes [EMAIL PROTECTED].
A little explanation:
It's needed only when RECEIVING messages via SMTP.
[[]]'s
Eduardo M. Bragatto.
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
- Original Message -
I see you have different error messages during login for:
invalid email address
user does not exist
invalid password
It might be better to return the same message for all so the hostile
hacker can't learn as much about your users.
Hello Eduardo,
On Tuesday, April 6, 2004 at 8:31:17 PM you wrote (at least in part):
I need to make vpopmail recognize user#domain.com as the same way it
recognizes [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Is there a way to do it changing configuration files or I'll have to
edit the source code/include files and
Hello Eduardo,
On Tuesday, April 6, 2004 at 8:58:28 PM you wrote (at least in part):
I need to make vpopmail recognize user#domain.com as the same way
it recognizes [EMAIL PROTECTED].
It's needed only when RECEIVING messages via SMTP.
Than forget about my previous answer and forget about a
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Hello Eduardo,
On Tuesday, April 6, 2004 at 8:58:28 PM you wrote (at least in part):
I need to make vpopmail recognize user#domain.com as the same way
it recognizes [EMAIL PROTECTED].
It's needed only when RECEIVING messages via SMTP.
Sorry, Peter... your anwser has
- Original Message -
From: X-Istence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
- Original Message -
I see you have different error messages during login for:
invalid email address
user does not exist
invalid password
It might be better to return the same
- Original Message -
From: Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 6, 2004, at 10:57 AM, Marcin So³tysiak wrote:
BTW. Since vpopmaild is very young it will need a heavy develoopment.
It
would be resonable to create a separate category in bugtraq.
I'll put my vote in for initial
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
Although I am sysadmin I cannot list users in other domains.
I have already reported this to Ken.
What is funny, [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not appear in UserList array amd it
is only account that had quota set.
This may be a new bug.
Paul Oehler wrote:
Tom Wrote:
At the very least, vpopmaild discussion should be on vpopmail-devel
instead of the vchkpw list. I am sure that there are others, like me,
who aren't interested in following the early stages of development and
would prefer not to receive 20-30 messages a day
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
Although I am sysadmin I cannot list users in other domains.
I have already reported this to Ken.
What is funny, [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not appear in UserList array amd
it
is only account that had quota set.
This may be a new bug.
It seems to be the firt
- Original Message -
From: Marcin Soltysiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
Although I am sysadmin I cannot list users in other domains.
I have already reported this to Ken.
What is funny, [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not appear in UserList array
amd
it
is only
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
What is funny, [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not appear in UserList array amd
it
is only account that had quota set.
This may be a new bug.
It seems to be the firt entry on list_users..I've check od few domains and
everyoan behaved same way.
In the ListUsers() function try
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Rick Widmer wrote:
There is no need to send the ~vpopmail/domains/ part of the path,
because the user has no choice on that part. If we always send the full
path from that point down, then the path is always:
$Domain/$User/$whatever
or maybe
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 20:18, Ken Jones wrote:
One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
I'm sure there's going to be some people running the client on a box
seperate from the server. You looking at adding ssl support, or are you
thinking of just letting
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 17:06, Michael Bellears wrote:
Never used remote logging for multilog so I can't tell you
about that, but it looks pretty straight forward. NFS
settings can be tweaked to improve its performance/bandwidth
usage. I've only seen it chew up a ton of bandwidth
On Apr 6, 2004, at 3:44 PM, Eduardo M. Bragatto wrote:
Sorry, Peter... your anwser has already solved my problem.
My previous e-mail is wrong. I meant POP3 instead of SMTP. Thank you
very much for your attention and time spent. ;)
A commonly supported alternative is to use '%' instead of '@'.
36 matches
Mail list logo
