[vchkpw] OT: How to make Qmail bounce only headers

Hi, thi is slightly offtopic of course, but: can i bounce only the headers of a rejected message? Right now qmail+vpopmail bounces the whole thing. It seems kinda pointless to bounce several megabytes of mail jus to say the user ... is over quota cheers. Kristofer

Re: [vchkpw] OT: How to make Qmail bounce only headers

On 3/3/2005 1:58 PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, thi is slightly offtopic of course, but: can i bounce only the headers of a rejected message? Right now qmail+vpopmail bounces the whole thing. It seems kinda pointless to bounce several megabytes of mail jus to say the user ... is over

RE: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration

I don't think vdelivermail or vpopmail in general should be calling spamc/spamassassin. Let that be handled elsewhere. Let's stick to delivering mail and deciding where it goes. However, lets remember that if spam is only scanned at the MTA level, SpamAssassin user

[vchkpw] spamassassin development was spamassassin configuration

Charles J. Boening [EMAIL PROTECTED] said So let me see if I can summarize where this might be going. A lot has been talked about on this topic. Use the pw_uid/pw_gid to check and see if a user wants their mail filtered. I'd also suggest setting another bit for delivery. So we'd have a

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration

On Thursday 03 March 2005 08:59 am, Nick Harring wrote: I don't think vdelivermail or vpopmail in general should be calling spamc/spamassassin. Let that be handled elsewhere. Let's stick to delivering mail and deciding where it goes. However, lets remember that if

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin development was spamassassin configuration

This would handle both the problem of if the user wants their mail scanned and the disposition of the scanned mail. Yep. If using SQL settings for Spamassassin, the user could also whitelist all senders to avoid spam processing. I also think spamc options should be stored in the same

RE: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration

Simscan isn't replacing qmail-smtpd, so this isn't strictly an smtp limitation. Perhaps I'm just not getting it, but why wouldn't the following work: Email comes in for users A, B and C. A and B have an SA threshold of 5, C has a threshold of 9. The message scores at 7. Delete A and B

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin development was spamassassin configuration

Ken Jones wrote: Charles J. Boening [EMAIL PROTECTED] said snip I also think spamc options should be stored in the same place. Currently the spamc options can be set on the configure line. We thought that would be a good place since the spamc options are site wide. I think all the user

RE: [vchkpw] spamassassin development was spamassassin configuration

vdelivermail would call spamc. Personally, I don't think we should offer the ability to call Spamassassin directly. It's just not as efficient. I think when people talked about calling spamassassin they meant calling spamc to talk to spamassassin. At least, that's how the development

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin development was spamassassin configuration

Dave Goodrich wrote: Ken Jones wrote: Charles J. Boening [EMAIL PROTECTED] said snip I also think spamc options should be stored in the same place. Currently the spamc options can be set on the configure line. We thought that would be a good place since the spamc options are site wide. I

[vchkpw] Inter7 listed in SORBS and SpamHaus?

http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?domain0=64.119.194.44;bl0=0 Snipped from my spamassassin report. I found a message from Jeremy Kitchen my spam folder. Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 4.0 required) pts rule name description --

[vchkpw] How to get local mail?

Hello: After years of using vpopmail I feel this question a bit stupid, but there should be a better way to do it. I have configured vpopmail to use only virtual accounts. How do I do to get internal local mail in the operators accounts? Or I can redirect those mails (comming usually from

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration

On Mar 3, 2005, at 8:54 AM, Nick Harring wrote: No, it wouldn't require this. It would require that you edit the recipient list prior to queueing. There's nothing 'ugly' that I can see about that process. I think Nick's method would work for those who want to block anything that scores as spam

Re: [vchkpw] Inter7 listed in SORBS and SpamHaus?

http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?domain0=64.119.194.44;bl0=0 Snipped from my spamassassin report. I found a message from Jeremy Kitchen my spam folder. [snip] That's not inter7's IP, at least not the one the list comes from. My headers from your message show inter7 sent their

Re: [vchkpw] Inter7 listed in SORBS and SpamHaus?

On Thursday 03 March 2005 11:57 am, Dave Goodrich wrote: http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?domain0=64.119.194.44;bl0=0 Snipped from my spamassassin report. I found a message from Jeremy Kitchen my spam folder. Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 4.0 required) pts rule

Re: [vchkpw] How to get local mail?

Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote: Hello: After years of using vpopmail I feel this question a bit stupid, but there should be a better way to do it. I have configured vpopmail to use only virtual accounts. How do I do to get internal local mail in the operators accounts? Or I can redirect those

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration

How many messages come into a server for multiple recipients in the same domain? I guess if someone was mailing multiple people at the same company, it would happen. But with most mailing lists using custom bounce messages for each recipient, they wouldn't be affected. How about the

Re: [vchkpw] How to get local mail?

On Mar 3, 2005, at 2:20 PM, Dave Goodrich wrote: I have several scripts that output data from my mail servers and I just add a .qmail-? file to /var/qmail/alias. I had an odd situation where this wasn't working for the output of some cron jobs. Instead of a .qmail-fred in ~alias, I had to put

Re: [vchkpw] autoresponder supposed to cause message loss?

- Original Message - From: Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Nov 23, 2004, at 11:01 AM, David Hubbard wrote: In a vpopmail 5.4.6 site with autoresponder 2.0.4, the behavior we're seeing is that when a user sets a vacation message, vpopmail sets up the autoresponder with a 3

[vchkpw] Forward+Copyself bypasses quota ?

Hi, It seems that if a user has a forward and a copy to self in his .qmail file as Qmailadmin makes it, he will get no warning on 90% full and the mail bypasses quota. It is delivered nicely in his mailbox. I can bounce the message with CHKUSER though (CHKUSER_MBXQUOTA). My vpopmail is 5.4.8

Re: [vchkpw] OT: How to make Qmail bounce only headers

All i have found, is a way to trim the bounces at certain number of bytes. It would make much more sense to bounce only headers. If i put the limit in bytes, say 2048, it is theoretically possible that headers are longer than that. And if they are less, the bounce includes an arbitrary number

RE: [vchkpw] Inter7 listed in SORBS and SpamHaus?

Bill Wichers wrote: http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?domain0=64.119.194.44;bl0=0 Snipped from my spamassassin report. I found a message from Jeremy Kitchen my spam folder. [snip] That's not inter7's IP, at least not the one the list comes from. My headers from your message show

Re: [vchkpw] Forward+Copyself bypasses quota ?

On Mar 3, 2005, at 7:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems that if a user has a forward and a copy to self in his .qmail file as Qmailadmin makes it, he will get no warning on 90% full and the mail bypasses quota. It is delivered nicely in his mailbox. I can bounce the message with CHKUSER

Re: [vchkpw] OT: How to make Qmail bounce only headers

Hi Kristofer I am using spamcontrol http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/spamcontrol.html It is ver powerfull collection patches. It has a bounce control very customizable and work with vpopmail. On Thursday 03 March 2005 07:58 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, thi is slightly offtopic of course, but: