Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-17 Thread Dave Goodrich
Jon LaBass wrote: Interested in knowing how well it works for you though. DAve -- Systems Administrator http://www.tls.net Get rid of Unwanted Emails...get TLS Spam Blocker! It works quite well. I'm surprised you don't take advantage of the FreeBSD ports. Install vpopmail with the SA flags and

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-17 Thread Jon LaBass
> Jon LaBass wrote: > > >>Jon LaBass wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Compile vpopmail with SPAM_THRESHOLD=10 and any message scored at 10.0 > > > > or > > > >>>above will not be delivered. > >>> > >>>Jon > >> > >>I just upgraded four servers this morning to 5.4.6, that is not a > >>configure option tha

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-17 Thread Dave Goodrich
Ken Jones wrote: On Friday 17 September 2004 09:02 am, Dave Goodrich wrote: Jon LaBass wrote: Jon LaBass wrote: Compile vpopmail with SPAM_THRESHOLD=10 and any message scored at 10.0 or above will not be delivered. Jon I just upgraded four servers this morning to 5.4.6, that is not a configure o

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-17 Thread Ken Jones
On Friday 17 September 2004 09:02 am, Dave Goodrich wrote: > Jon LaBass wrote: > >>Jon LaBass wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Compile vpopmail with SPAM_THRESHOLD=10 and any message scored at 10.0 > > > > or > > > >>>above will not be delivered. > >>> > >>>Jon > >> > >>I just upgraded four servers this

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-17 Thread Dave Goodrich
Jon LaBass wrote: Jon LaBass wrote: Compile vpopmail with SPAM_THRESHOLD=10 and any message scored at 10.0 or above will not be delivered. Jon I just upgraded four servers this morning to 5.4.6, that is not a configure option that I know of. What vpopmail do you use? DAve Well, I use vpopmail on

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-16 Thread Jon LaBass
> Jon LaBass wrote: > > > > > > > Compile vpopmail with SPAM_THRESHOLD=10 and any message scored at 10.0 or > > above will not be delivered. > > > > Jon > > I just upgraded four servers this morning to 5.4.6, that is not a > configure option that I know of. What vpopmail do you use? > > DAve > >

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-16 Thread Brian Millar
Hi, We started with Spamassassin called from users .qmail file (with user prefs), clamd with qmailscanner and /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -b -C \ -r 'relays.ordb.org:Your message was rejected because the mail server you use is configured to allow OPEN RELAY - More detailed information regarding

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-16 Thread Dave Goodrich
Jon LaBass wrote: Compile vpopmail with SPAM_THRESHOLD=10 and any message scored at 10.0 or above will not be delivered. Jon I just upgraded four servers this morning to 5.4.6, that is not a configure option that I know of. What vpopmail do you use? DAve -- Systems Administrator http://www.tls.

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-16 Thread Dave Goodrich
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection Oh, yes. I have to second the ClamAV (or /any/ antivirus, really). On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:58:13 -0500, Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 16 September 2004 11:40 am, Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote: I

RE: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-16 Thread Joseph B Schmitt II
> -Original Message- > From: Jon LaBass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 10:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection > > > > Hi, > > > > how can I use SA globa

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-16 Thread Jon LaBass
r > mailbox. > > Greetings > Jan > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matthew Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 7:06 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejec

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-16 Thread Joe Boyce
http://www.surbl.org/ We use it here too (Also a public DNS server for them), by far the best spam filtering we do. A would recommend again :-) Regards, Joe Boyce --- InterStar, Inc. - Shasta.com Internet Phone: +1 (530) 224-6866 x105 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, September 16, 2004,

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-16 Thread Christopher Grello
Courtesy of Google: http://www.google.com/search?q=SURBL&sourceid=firefox&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 - Chris On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:31:01 +0200, Jan Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I forget to add we also use spamcop, but not in SpamAssassin, I let > > qmail do it. I would also hi

RE: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-16 Thread Jan Lange
> I forget to add we also use spamcop, but not in SpamAssassin, I let > qmail do it. I would also highly recommend the SURBL in > SpamAssassin. If > I use no other tests, SURBL would catch 70% of my current caught spam. what is SURBL? have you an URL? Jan

RE: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-16 Thread Jan Lange
Message- > From: Matthew Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 7:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection > > Oh, yes. I have to second the ClamAV (or /any/ antivirus, really). > > >

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-16 Thread Dave Goodrich
Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote: I am doing a major upgrade to our mail server and I am looking for recommendations for programs and qmail patches to limit the amount of spam that gets through. What are you guys using that has great success? I forget to add we also use spamcop, but not in SpamAssa

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-16 Thread Matthew Walker
Oh, yes. I have to second the ClamAV (or /any/ antivirus, really). On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:58:13 -0500, Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thursday 16 September 2004 11:40 am, Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote: > > I am doing a major upgrade to our mail server and I am looking for > > rec

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-16 Thread Dave Goodrich
Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote: > I am doing a major upgrade to our mail server and I am looking for > recommendations for programs and qmail patches to limit the amount of > spam that gets through. What are you guys using that has great success? > > > SpamAssassin without a doubt. Depending on how

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-16 Thread Ken Jones
On Thursday 16 September 2004 11:40 am, Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote: > I am doing a major upgrade to our mail server and I am looking for > recommendations for programs and qmail patches to limit the amount of > spam that gets through. What are you guys using that has great success? I would reco

Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection

2004-09-16 Thread Matthew Walker
SPF/RBL/SpamAssassin is a great combo. I merely flag with SPF and SpamAssassin right now, but I actively reject based on the ORDB RBL. I've also added some custom SpamAssassin rules to watch for the SPF flags, and adjust the score accordingly. If you're interested, I can provide them. On Thu, 16