Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread VDR User
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Gero geronimo...@gmx.de wrote: I can't stand when things are installed all over the place. Let's take a quick look at real life: if you need to exchange the tooth belt on your motorcycle - will you perform that task in your living room? if you visit your

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Mikko Tuumanen
In real life we all spread our things all over the house to keep them in order. Exactly. And the point of spreading files all over the directory tree (not filesystem) is to be able to easily: - split the tree into several filesystems that have different properties such as size, speed,

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Gero
On Saturday 07 April 2012 - 08:43:40, VDR User wrote: I don't spread things all over my house ... All my bathroom items are in the bathroom. All my kitchen items are in my kitchen. All my office items are in my office. But you use all that items on different tasks in different places. I

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Stefan Taferner
Am 2012-04-07 04:05, schrieb VDR User: On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Gerogeronimo...@gmx.de wrote: Well, *I* think, that there's a big difference between keeping things in order compared to spreading things all over the place. I can't stand when things are installed all over the place.

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
[ ... arguments about pros and cons of FHS ... ] The purpose of this thread is not to discuss the pros and cons of the FHS vs. having all files of an application in one place. Clearly these two approaches are so fundamentally different that there will never be a common ground. And any

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.27

2012-04-07 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 06.04.2012 22:13, Juergen Lock wrote: In article4f6f0570.7050...@tvdr.de you write: VDR developer version 1.7.27 is now available at ftp://ftp.tvdr.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-1.7.27.tar.bz2 A 'diff' against the previous version is available at

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Udo Richter
Am 06.04.2012 15:01, schrieb Christopher Reimer: could someone please review the attached patch? It's originally posted by Maniac in this thread -- On the original topic, I see room for one improvement: The defaults of the new --cachedir and --resdir parameter are the defaults set by

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Christopher Reimer
2012/4/7 Udo Richter udo_rich...@gmx.de Am 06.04.2012 15:01, schrieb Christopher Reimer: could someone please review the attached patch? It's originally posted by Maniac in this thread -- On the original topic, I see room for one improvement: I tried to fix this on my own. So be careful

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.27

2012-04-07 Thread Juergen Lock
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: On 06.04.2012 22:13, Juergen Lock wrote: In article4f6f0570.7050...@tvdr.de you write: VDR developer version 1.7.27 is now available at ftp://ftp.tvdr.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-1.7.27.tar.bz2 A 'diff' against the

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Anssi Hannula
FHS patch This change would be welcome (I'm the VDR package maintainer of Mageia distribution), though it hasn't really been a big issue for me. A couple of comments regarding the INSTALL part: 06.04.2012 16:01, Christopher Reimer kirjoitti: +CACHEDIR = /var/cache/vdr +CONFDIR =

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Steffen Barszus
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 19:24:17 +0300 Anssi Hannula anssi.hann...@iki.fi wrote: FHS patch This change would be welcome (I'm the VDR package maintainer of Mageia distribution), though it hasn't really been a big issue for me. A couple of comments regarding the INSTALL part: 06.04.2012

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 07.04.2012 20:03, Steffen Barszus wrote: ... +VIDEODIR = /srv/vdr/video0 ... video0 , because it allows for easy extension of storage space, without reconfiguring vdr, video1, video2 and videoX will be used autmatically by vdr at next start. Note, though, that after version 2.0 this