Thanks for the kind words, Schlomo—and for signing up!
M
On Feb 19, 2006, at 11:44 PM, johngaltsjournal wrote:
This does look promising-- could become a really good resource for people. Looking
forward to watching it bloom.
schlomo
http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
http://vloggercon.com
-
You continue to amaze me very cool!On 2/19/06, JD Lasica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of the side benefits of being a citizen journalist/vlogger is thatyou sometimes run into opportunities you wouldn't normally have if youweren't lugging along a camcorder. Such was the case Friday night wh
This does look promising-- could become a really good resource for people.
Looking
forward to watching it bloom.
schlomo
http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
http://vloggercon.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jay dedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you find any of this of interes
Thanks, Kunga—and Enric.
That was definitely the start of things. The rest is ancient vlogger secret! ;-)
No mystery really, just lots of hard work and little sleep.
M
On Feb 19, 2006, at 7:38 PM, Enric wrote:
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" id="sixapart-standard">
;)
--- In videoblogg
> Wee: http://api.mefeedia.com/ >
>
> - Andreas
We're working on the API. In a month or so, I might open it for some
folks to play with, and provide feedback on the further improvement of
the API.. a while later perhaps I'll open it further for more
people...
Cheers!
Peter
Yahoo! Groups Links
I guess it's just a matter of getting started. mefeedia has RSS feeds for
just about anything. Last I checked they also had Media RSS feeds with
thumbnails. It's just a matter of putting them to good use (you need a
man-in-the-middle on your server, since you can't pull the feeds directly
v
Hi, Vloggers.
I'm building a list of items to include in my on-the go vlogging
backpacking kit. Please edit this list as you see fit, to make an OTG
videokit for the pedestrian or hiking videographer.
No need for a space for a camcorder, my Xacti c-6 goes in my pocket or
on my neck.
tripod -- I
This is excellent JD. Nice work on the edit with screencast of the
Creative Commons site.
I'm going to do a 20 minute talk at the April 1st meeting of San
Francisco Indie Club, http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SFindieclub/ , on
"Using New Media Features on the Internet to Promote Film Work." I'll
One of the side benefits of being a citizen journalist/vlogger is that
you sometimes run into opportunities you wouldn't normally have if you
weren't lugging along a camcorder. Such was the case Friday night when
I asked actress Elisabeth Shue to say a few words about Creative
Commons.
Here's the
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; id="sixapart-standard">
;)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Kunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah Melanie Rocks! What did you use to lay that out Melanie?
> --
> Taylor Barcroft
> New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Podcaster, Futurecaster
>
Yeah Melanie Rocks! What did you use to lay that out Melanie?
--
Taylor Barcroft
New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Podcaster, Futurecaster
Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley
URL http://FutureMedia.org
RSS http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia
iTunes http://tinyurl.com/8ql87
I only know Blip because of this group and only for a couple of weeks
and, still, I want to see them succeed. Why? They're friendly and
concientious. They're offering a good service. They're ahead of the
curve. They're not Time Warner. Go Blip. Go see my videos on Blip
at:
http://www
Thanks Peter,
Definitely got to check out Mefeedia for potential profile candidates.
M
On Feb 19, 2006, at 3:56 PM, Peter Van Dijck wrote:
I really like the vlogger interviews too. Good stuff.
Peter
--
http://mefeedia.com
On 2/19/06, Melanie Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for
When I asked the question that started this thread my thinking was
this:
The cooperative would not be competition for Blip or Ourmedia. I,
personally, want Blip to survive and thrive -- more competition for
big commerical media, more better in my view. The purpose of the
cooperative would be
I really like the vlogger interviews too. Good stuff.
Peter
--
http://mefeedia.com
On 2/19/06, Melanie Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for checking out the site, Jay! I always appreciate your input.
>
> We definitely have to see how this can all fit into Node 101. Any
> suggestions wou
Thanks Clint!!! Imagine. Just a stupid, interfering quotation mark? Duh.
Sometimes you need
a fresh set of eyes.
Thanks for lending yours.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
<*> To unsubscribe from this gro
Thanks for checking out the site, Jay! I always appreciate your input.
We definitely have to see how this can all fit into Node 101. Any suggestions would be welcomed and appreciated.
M
On Feb 18, 2006, at 12:05 PM, Jay dedman wrote:
> If you find any of this of interest, please check out the s
thought i would bump this message from Andrew back up... since i have been talking about it in the vlogger coop thread-- Forwarded message --From:
andrew michael baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Jan 26, 2006 10:11 PMSubject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Dreamhost $9.24/ yr is backT
http://missbhavens.blogspot.comlink
> http://idisk.mac.com/missbhavens-Public/star.jpg"url>
Where's my picture?title>image>See the extra quote at the end? Also, your image isn't showing up when you load up your FeedBurner page at
http://feeds.feed
As you and Sandy point out, it has more to do with software developer
properly understanding the limitations of the system and good
practices than a inherent problem with AJAX. One of the practices
that can offset this in some situations is to forward cache multiple
groups of data that the user is
hey,it's a discussion, bro.it's how realizations are formed. - who said blip etc were bad options? - who said paying for cheap shared server hosting was a bad option?its not a discussion so much about is option 3 better than option 1 and 2 or is option 1 worse than blah blah
it's about rev
see con's and crit's in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AJAX
to be sure, this is more of a programmer issue than an AJAX issue. any
tool or technique can be misused.
see also
http://sourcelabs.com/ajb/archives/2005/05/ajax_mistakes.html
Enric wrote:
Could you provide some references on
The server hardware largely determines how many simultaneous
connections can be handled, so CPU, RAM, hard drive setup start to
become big factors. Theres also options in webserver config files for
how many simultaneous connections are allowed, and how many
connections to database are allowed. Effi
Another way to view this (which makes more sense for me) is that
someone buys a server account. They need quite a bit of bandwidth,
but will only every use 40%-60% of the bandwidth. So they will always
have 40% available. They could bring in other people at a much lower
cost and offset the cost
Could you provide some references on this? I'd be interested to know
the impact of connections.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> one would hope so, but unfortunately this can be a significant problem
> AJAX apps: some servers are gett
Hmmm,
I still got nothing.
Bekah
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Joshua Kinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Changes in the FireAnt directory may not take effect immediately... it
> will take effect the next time our server grabs your RSS feed, which
> is roughly once an hour.
>
> We
On 2/19/06, Peter Van Dijck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In other words, Blip guys, why don't you charge for premium accounts? Everyone happy. That's what I said like 58 emails ago!I also think you guys are giving Clint a hard time for some things that he's right about. The idea of grouping a b
ok, now I'm excited again! :)
oops, i guess the ten min are up
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:31:56 +0100, Markus Sandy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
but now you have crushed my joy of AJAX hacking and I will not post here
ever again (or for at least
ah.. the silence. savour it! :)PeterOn 2/19/06, Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
you are right.
but now you have crushed my joy of AJAX hacking and I will not post
here ever again (or for at least 10 minutes).
;)
SPONSORED LINKS
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:31:56 +0100, Markus Sandy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but now you have crushed my joy of AJAX hacking and I will not post here
> ever again (or for at least 10 minutes).
Just wait for a REST-based mefeedia API. Then you can start to do build
really cool Ajax applicatio
you are right.
but now you have crushed my joy of AJAX hacking and I will not post
here ever again (or for at least 10 minutes).
;)
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
Oh please.
If all your users suddenly decide to run scripts from their desktop and
hammer your server with requests t
Oh please.
If all your users suddenly decide to run scripts from their desktop and
hammer your server with requests to the point where it can't handle it
give me a call.
Nice link, but not applicable to the current discussion.
- Andreas
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 15:51:51 +0100, Markus Sandy
<[E
However, you could in theory with those numbers aggregate 1000 vloggers
for $1000/mo. However, aggregating those means someone needs to
manage those 10 dreamhost accounts and manage all the users, transfers,
space etc (or a dedicated server depending on which route you've
chosen). This person
maybe. maybe not ;)
http://www.captain.at/howto-ajax-permission-denied-xmlhttprequest.php
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
>After all Ajax requests are limited to
>the originating server (for security reasons).
>
--
My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us
http://apperceptions.or
from dreamhost regarding throughputas expected of course but i wanted to hear it from them:
300-400 Megabytes per second is far beyond what any shared host would be able to provide you. Our shared webservers are connected via a 100 Megabit/second connections to four gigabit backbone connect
hey Andre,cool :) And thanks for the tioip.What is the Windows Media center experience like? Could you make a picture of it? How does it work?PeterOn 2/18/06,
André Sala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter,
Here's one way to get around this:
Create a smart playlist in iTunes and name it "New
With Ajax the server asked for it. After all Ajax requests are limited to
the originating server (for security reasons). BITS is still a completely
different thing.
- Andreas
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:50:27 +0100, Markus Sandy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> one would hope so, but unfortunately
one would hope so, but unfortunately this can be a significant problem
AJAX apps: some servers are getting hammered with lots of small
requests.
think "number of connections" for a server. in that case, size is not
really the issue.
Enric wrote:
Also, AJAX retrieves less information ove
Also, AJAX retrieves less information overall (sometimes
significantly), since the page display data usually isn't sent.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Except that with BITS the user experience doesn't change.
>
> - And