On 10 Feb 2010, at 23:57, David Jones wrote:
Sure, but that whole argument is such a big red herring and so
entirely beside the point it's not funny!
His argument was not beside the point. It was about people using
videoblogging for more than talking to the camera. Which is what
quite a
Well, in the case of the restaurant, is the visual clearly showing the setting.
If so, I would say some subtle restaurant sound in the background will help
sell the story of the location.
now ideally, you would want to capture the speaking talent in the quietest
situation possible, and later
Dave you seem to have a lot of respect in this group so i'll refrain from
ripping you a new one wink and just say this.
If you bothered to read my original post before getting your pompous high and
might knickers in a twist you'd have noticed that I too share this marvelous
thing you call
Thanks everyone. I guess they are keeping that tech to themselves for a while eh
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joly MacFie j...@... wrote:
Yep that U2 show.. according to mashable there were a couple of others
http://mashable.com/2009/10/19/u2-youtube-live-stream/
On Wed,
When do you think WordPress will have a HTML5 video player? What would need to
be done for that to happen?
cheers
adam
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joly MacFie j...@... wrote:
I was seeing a litle jittery spot in the area where the control panel
shows up. Anyone else?
Apart from
hi all
On 11/02/2010, at 8:13 PM, adammerc...@att.net wrote:
Also there is the question of bandwidth and I've had this argument
with several people, and I'm often in the minority. But i believe my
position so I stand by it. Bandwidth is not free, contrary to
popular opinion. Someone
Good story :)
I used this argument last time we had the HD discussion - it died
without comment, except from Adam.
Apart from the waste of energy unnecessary cost that someone will
have to pick up somewhere, we *will* face repercussions from
unnecessary use of huge HD video files.
Cisco
My ISP here in our London office has started throttling our ADSL
broadband - presumably because we use lots of video. Upload speeds
have died - it took me 45 minutes to upload a 30mb video yesterday.
welcome to the Australian way..
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
hi Rupert
On 11/02/2010, at 9:36 PM, Rupert Howe wrote:
Certainly, in my book this is another big reason why it's not OK to
tell people they shouldn't be shooting in low resolutions. If you
don't need to use HD (and why do you need to use HD for personal /
family videoblogging like Adam I
You can get a Sima LED light. Not expensive.
I've got it listed in my book's store:
http://getseen.ning.com/store
It's rechargeable, but you also can't run it plugged in. So you have to plan
when using it to have it charged up.
--Steve
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, adammerc...@...
If you're in San Francisco, I've got to things planned for today in addition to
checking out MacWorld.
Wiley Meet the Authors at MacWorld
http://flic.kr/p/7C6RJB
I'll be at the Wiley booth at 2:00 today!
MacWorld Videobloggers Meetup Tweetup Drinkup: Today at 6:30 - 8:30 House of
Shields SF.
Actually if you use older camera technology and go above 320x240 then you are
at risk of running into interlacing issues. This isnt a problem if your editing
encoding software can deinterlace and you understand the issue, but certainly
when vloggers first started experimenting with 640x480 I
Originally (2006) I produced videos 320x240 @15fps. I was more conscious 4
years ago about file size. I imagined Blip blowing up with files being anything
larger. :)
Since then I've settled in on 480x272 as my standard output rez (16:9).
If I have 4:3 video I'll normally output to 480x360.
I
Originally (2006) I produced videos 320x240 @15fps. I was more conscious 4
years ago about file size. I imagined Blip blowing up with files being
anything larger. :)
Since then I've settled in on 480x272 as my standard output rez (16:9).
If I have 4:3 video I'll normally output to 480x360.
I would guess that its partly the extra work the publisher has to go through
like you say, but also some other technical issues to do with how the plugin
works in practice, along with whatever the story is regarding what happened to
ShowInABox and other video module plugins that it tried to
There is already at least one:
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/degradable-html5-audio-and-video/
I doubt it is perfect yet but this stuff isnt too hard to achieve so I expect
we'll get a variety of solutions in the years to come.
Cheers
Steve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:13 PM, adammerc...@att.net
adammerc...@att.net wrote:
Dave you seem to have a lot of respect in this group
I doubt it, I'm pretty much a newbie. I'm just loud and say what I
think, and well, some people don't like that. They don't like to hear
differing opinions to
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Jay dedman jay.ded...@gmail.com wrote:
That being said, David's work at http://www.eevblog.com/ is extremely
appealing to a very specific group of people. Someone who likes to
take apart electronics will wait to download the HD version if that's
their only
OK, this is my last post on this subject, because you haven't engaged
with any of my arguments.
But I must point out that you've changed your opinion from the
statement that started all this in the first place.
You just said to Adam:
Once again, I was speaking about low res in general, not
Hoping to meet some pros!PS--is it at 6 or 6:30?
http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100211/veoh-finally-calls-it-quits-layoffs-yesterday-bankruptcy-filing-soon/-
I never really used them, but thought y'all would find this
interesting
nonetheless...
David Lee King
davidleeking.com - blog
davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog
twitter | skype
http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100211/veoh-finally-calls-it-quits-layoffs-yesterday-bankruptcy-filing-soon/-
I never really used them, but thought y'all would find this
interesting nonetheless...
I dont know anyone who used them to host videos. Not exactly sure who
their users were. Kind
remember its name.
Cheers
Steve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Lee King davidleek...@... wrote:
http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100211/veoh-finally-calls-it-quits-layoffs-yesterday-bankruptcy-filing-soon/-
I never really used them, but thought y'all would find
By the way their website is still up as I write this, although when poking
around I note they havnt put a new press-release on their site since December
2008.
Did some brief trawling through the archives of this group circa 2005-2006 and
saw one reason why I remember Veoh - Their founder was
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Veoh is dead
http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100211/veoh-finally-calls-it-quits-layoffs-yesterday-bankruptcy-filing-soon/-
I never really used them, but thought y'all would find
Did some brief trawling through the archives of this group circa 2005-2006
and saw one reason why I remember Veoh - Their founder was active here when
they started, and the Halycon bloke with pink hair rather overpromoted them
on this group from time to time.
Those were the days when you
HD is not their only choice.
I use an embedded YouTube player which defaults to 360p, the user must then
manually chose 480p or 720p if they way higher res. If they subscribe to my
podcast with iTunes or whatever they get a
separate 480x272 version.
About half my audience subscribe and
If only YouTube offered uploading of custom thumnails and more options for
branding and player customization. Just having 3 thumbnails to choose from is
silly. Blip.TV doesn't have the same quality of flash embeds, but its
features still win out for me over YouTube. YouTube does have better
I would guess that its partly the extra work the publisher has to go through
like you say, but also some other technical issues to do with how the plugin
works in practice, along with whatever the story is regarding what happened
to ShowInABox and other video module plugins that it tried to
29 matches
Mail list logo
