Jay dedman wrote:
Working at a community TV station in manhattan, I was excited to see
that a station in Mass has created a video feed of some of their
programs.
http://www.cctvcambridge.org/videorss
I got an email from these folks back in October about showing one of my
videos at an event
Eddie Codel wrote:
So I've got a little project I kicked off with my good friend Irina a
few weeks ago called Geek Entertainment Television.
I'd love any feedback you guys have. Production quality on the older
videos are let's say, not as robust as the newer stuff. We actually plug
the
Eric Rice wrote:
So, in short, publishing to M4V was a shortcut that sorta worked, minus the
brain fart I
had with editing the wrong server's MIME type. It was fast, had good quality
and I might
revisit it sooner, but in all actuality, I'll prolly do as much as I can to
mimic those
Bill Streeter wrote:
I wanna know what dictionary defines video blogs as personal?
I'm pretty sure it's the Verdi Dictionary. ;)
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
AIDS in India: A lurking
Frank Carver wrote:
Friday, December 9, 2005, 6:04:25 PM, Pete Prodoehl wrote:
If you don't feel comfortable editing a wiki, email me your review and I
will add it.
My main problem is that I simply don't have enough experience of big
name audio editing software to know what features might
Richard Bennett-Forrest wrote:
It is ironic that Apple and Microsoft are mainly to blame for holding
back the video revolution, by not joining hands on a single
compatable format that plays in QuickTime for Mac and Windows Media
Player for Windows.
It just plain sucks, and if they're not
Michael Sullivan wrote:
So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006?
Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ?
Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?)
Year of the Portable Vlog ?
Year of the Video Filters ?
Year of Grassroots Media ?
2006: Year of the Mundane...
Pete
bertrand wrote:
Hello,
I have set-up a new functionnality for the Podesk Server that limit the
number of download/viewing:
Get the rss custom feed from that page :
http://podesk.com/feed_generator.php (do not copy paste this adress in
iTunes or FireANT ! It will not work).
The feed
Harold Johnson wrote:
One solution is to go with Liberated Syndication (LibSyn), which provides
unlimited bandwidth at a very low cost and is focused on serving podcasters,
vodcasters, videobloggers, and other media types like us. I posted some
info. about LibSyn yesterday:
Bill Streeter wrote:
Yeah I would contribute to that. I know that there are some open
source editing suites that are coming along too that might be useful
to some people that should probably get talked about some more. I
can't think of names off hand but I have links to them at home that
Frank Carver wrote:
Friday, December 9, 2005, 4:46:13 PM, Pete Prodoehl wrote:
I also wrote up my review of Audacity:
In your review of Audacity, though, would you (or anyone else with the
relevant experience) like to add a bit more detail about the things it
_can't_ do.
I've never used
Aaron Valdez wrote:
I'm thinking about getting a webcam for Xmas and was wondering if you
had any recommendations. I have a G4 Power Mac but I'd like to avoid
iSight (even I get tired of buying Mac stuff after a while) and get
something under $100. Any Mac users not using iSight? I need
Frank Carver wrote:
Best video editing software
problem 1, it's missing plenty of names
problem 2, best for what?
In short, I'm not sure a poll like this can ever get any useful
results.
Anyone want to rephrase it?
I think it should be What video editing software do you primarily use
Enric wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've also heard good things about dream host.
I've considered swithing in order to use wordpress since
You can pretty much load Wordpress on any hosting system as long as it
has mySQL available.
One
Chris Pirillo and Ponzi (of Lockergnome) have a videoblog:
http://ponzi.pirillo.com/
They even have two feeds, one with mp4:
http://feeds.pirillo.com/PonziAndPirillo
and one with WMV:
http://feeds.pirillo.com/PonziAndPirilloWMV
Pete
Yahoo! Groups
Randolfe Wicker wrote:
Doesn't watching videos in your phone count as cell phone minutes?
All depends on your provider. Some just charge for data
downloaded/uploaded. With my plan, if I were to download a 2 mb video
file, I would only pay for a 2 mb download, the video would be on my
phone,
Randolfe Wicker wrote:
Joan, did you get threatened or contacted by the
owners of the copyrighted music? So many vlogs use
copyrighted music and I haven't heard anyone ever
say they had to take that vlog down.
Randolfe, you are more than welcome to be the one that tests things out
in a court
robert a/k/a r wrote:
A new hosting company on my radar that might be worth a look, it's
called BoltFolio. (Disclosure: I have NO relationship with them.)
http://www.boltfolio.com/
Added to the list here:
http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Posting_Your_Videoblog
Please add any others you know
Enric wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but ... who needs an award series, anyway?
Award shows are so centralized media.
So we should all just create our own videoblogging awards, and do so in
our individual videoblogs, and then everyone can
C.C. Chapman wrote:
Steve told me that some questions have come up on this list about use of
music from the PMN by members of this list so I thought I'd jump in and
share my thoughts and answer any questions that you might have.
If there are any other questions please ask away. I'd be
Michael Sullivan wrote:
An audio recording posted online, much like a short radio show.
http://podcasts.yahoo.com/
http://podcasts.yahoo.com/start
No it's not.
(Let the 'War on Audio' begin!)
;]
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 02:32:51 +0100, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
this is interesting.
its a list of known blogs circa 2000:
http://www.jjg.net/retired/portal/tpoowl.html
I'm not on it! I got my first Blogger blog in October 2000, and if I had
Jay dedman wrote:
there is a difference between the personal videoblogs and the show
videoblogs.
personal videoblgs cant really be categorized because they are about
anything the person wants (like blogging).
the show videolbogs are easy to categorize becasue they are like
mini-tv shows (a
Steve Garfield wrote:
Quoting Wikipedia:
Podcasting is a term used to describe a collection of technologies for
automatically distributing audio and video programmes over the Internet
using a publisher/subscriber model. It differs from earlier online
collections of audio or video works
Jay dedman wrote:
In the US, does anyone do anything on their phone other than talk on it.
I send a SMS message maybe once every six months.
I take photos with my phone, use it as an alarm clock and calendar, play
games on it, shoot video, get my AIM messages forwarded to me when I'm
not
Ted Tagami wrote:
what phone do you use Pete?
Nokia 7610
http://www.nokiausa.com/phones/7610
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk
LeanBackVids.com wrote:
Podcast will be defined as a digital recording of a radio broadcast
or similar program, made available on the Internet for downloading to
a personal audio player.
radio broadcast or similar program ???
Argh...
Well, I suppose this might work for the millions out there
missbhavens1969 wrote:
Just poking my head in. Mouthing off. Don't wish to offend.
[rant, rant, rant]
Ok. I'm done. No attacking, please.
Any time someone says I don't get it I can't help but think a few
things...
- They are not using their imagination, or thinking creatively.
- They
BevSykes wrote:
Really, really coming in late to this thread, but I started keeping
an on-line journal before the term blog had been created, much less
vlog.
When I first began writing a journal in 2000, I began checking out
the journaling world and found journals I am still reading today,
petertheman wrote:
Hey Jay,
yes, I noticed it as well. It was inevitable, I am actually surprised
it took this long..
Any comments?
Well, it's sad, but as a directory, I suppose it's something you have to
deal with. Some ideas...
I wouldn't go with G, PG, X type ratings... As mentioned,
Brad Webb wrote:
are we forming voltron (or would that be vlogtron..)??! I didn't get the
memo :/
I've had perpetual issues with any vid + firefox when scrolling for
awhile.. window blacks out, etc etc. I've kinda learned to not touch my
browser when viewing :)
Yeah, I have somewhat
petertheman wrote:
What it does is put a 'parental advisory thumbnail on feeds that we
have flagged as porn (it is surprisingly easy to catch most porn feeds
and flag them manually). If you subscribe to this feed or queue its
videos, you get the real thumbnails.
Of course this is just my
petertheman wrote:
know that I'm sometimes not even sure if I should want videos in
FireANT
when my kids are in the room.
Yep. It's a complex issue. I just want to make sure we provide
solutions that scale and that work, but don't censor. There is enough
censorship out there.
Agreed. I'm
Jay dedman wrote:
Maybe the opposite approach would be logical?
Instead of filtering the not for kids stuff, filter the kid friendly
stuff.
And include a warning on site stating that there may be adult content
within, but check out our kid-friendly zone here
You can then have
ryanne hodson wrote:
ok i don't know if this is fixed
i viewed the source of this feed
http://feeds.feedburner.com/OnTheRoadToRuin
and i don't see that video as an enclosure
will the next post be correct?
Well, the feed is valid now.
But there are no enclosures it in.
How about adding
Susan wrote:
Ryanne--
Mom's RSS feed doesn't seem to be working right... my itunes didn't
like it...
As always, the feedvalidator.org works wonders!
URL:http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FOnTheRoadToRuin
ERROR: Missing recommended iTunes channel
Steve Garfield wrote:
I've been using music from the Podsafe Music Network,
http://podsafemusicnetwork.com which ends up at
http://music.podshow.com
Let me tell you why this is such a great resource for vloggers.
I'm not a big fan of their license though:
Eric Rice wrote:
Opsound.org is one of my favorite sources. Much of it also can be used for
commercial
purposes, too. And of course, lots of helpful people at musicpodcasting.org
Also, I operate that podsafe = vlogsafe, with the caveat that taking music
and putting it to
video falls
greg wrote:
Greetings all, after lurking on the list for a couple informative
weeks, here's my first post:
As directed in step 6, i enter in the same URL into my browser:
http://eklektro.net/blogs/eklektropod.xml
but the results i get are not those expected.
Any advice or links
duncan wrote:
usually i stay out of these talks these days but this one...
I suffer the same problems as Adrian (plus I teach video classes
regularly)...
-but in terms of working creatively I've never found it prohibitive, ...
sampling of other material is one method, but not using it
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
As for setting a poster frame... yes, do that. Its generally good practice,
though most people tend to disregard.
What is required to set a poster frame? Does it require QuickTime Pro?
Can it be done with iMovie or Metadata Hootenanny or some other apps?
Pete
--
Jen Simmons wrote:
Well, since King Kong is done and the marketing hype has officially
begun, we watching people launch a film that has been promoted through
a videoblog for a long time now. And there are bits of people, very
famous people, talking about the behind-the-scenes videoblog
Bill Streeter wrote:
I think MythTV does have a video aggregator.
Bill Streeter
If I had the time and money, I would build a MythTV box and write
a
video aggregator for it, and I'd have one heck of an accessory for
my
big TV set... This is completely possible to do today, you just
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
Isn't it insanely difficult to hook together Myth TV.
My understanding is that its not for the faint of heart.
A friend of mine who has built PC's in the past (both Windows and Linux
based) said it took him a weekend to put it all together following a
very detailed
Steve Watkins wrote:
Is it possible to create a system that doesnt need to download the
entire video in order to create a thumbnail, but only a little bit of
the start of the file?
Here is some wild thinking, that may be completely off-base.
I believe HTTP requests can use a range, so in
Randolfe Wicker wrote:
A clear cut case of gender prejudice. Not sure you would understand the
issues involved
- Original Message -
From: Pete Prodoehl
My friend once did an interview with the vocalist from the band Plaid
Retina, it consisted of one question
Joan Khoo wrote:
Personally, I would do what I want regardless of the audience.
I hope this idea sticks around videoblogging for a long time. :)
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast
Steve Watkins wrote:
The creative commons license on Steves blog is still version 2.0 I
think, though I havent checkd to see if that makes any difference.
The simple version of the license states that 'You must attribute the
work in the manner specified by the author or licensor.'
I
Joan Khoo wrote:
Thanks for the link Steve! I'm sure the basic principles will apply in
Australia as well.
Randolfe, just for your info, its is also prohibited to take pictures within
the secure part of the airport. I almost had my camera confiscated in Sydney
Airport, won't be doing that
Are you ready for the Rush Limbaugh videoblog, er, video podcast?
URL:http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_112805/content/coming_soon.guest.html
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get
Jay dedman wrote:
Audio and video are a more natural medium than text for most humans.
i keep thinking of my (unborn)kids who will go online and SEE and HEAR
the world through their computers.
And by then we'll be able to use h.264
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Randolfe Wicker wrote:
It's just not good net-etiquette to copy and paste entire articles.
The article is not yours to publish.
I'm not great on etiquette. I subscribe to the New York Times.
Anyone can access articles from the last five days for free. If I
am creating a discussion thread
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
What's the deal here? You walk up to a guy after some presentation and ask
some completely random question that isn't related to what he was talking
about. I would be pretty annoyed by that too. He even answered your
question with a wink in his eye.
Steve Hill wrote:
For the last couple weeks, none of my Yahoo readers have
been showing up in my Feedburner circulation which
makes me look like a real loser on the vlog
scoreboard since most of my readers use Yahoo RSS.
Now I've just posted a big new entry and when I
pinged Yahoo I got
Randolfe Wicker wrote:
Remember, if you respect your fellow humans the terrorists have won.
What does this remark mean? It seems to me that it's just a random
irrelevant question.
I assume it's a joke... Like my original reply It's breaking the
rules! was meant to be,
Steve Garfield wrote:
Over on the podcasting side of things Adam Curry has completley stopped
using any music that he doesn't have the rights to and has removed old
podcasts with copyrighted music from his archives.
http://music.podshow.com is one of the places I get music from.
And I
Ronen wrote:
Am I incorrect that a 'cover' version of a song requires that a deal must be
arranged with the performer, but that a fixed percentage exists to be paid
to the writer? And that if we're dealing with non-profit distribution, the
only issue is arranging a deal with the performer who
Verdi wrote:
Hey Nick,
Even though the site says 10MB, it can really do up to 20MB. About
the videos that seem lost - they probably are. Usually, if my videos
don't show up in 15 - 30 minutes, I just upload them again and it
usually works.
Verdi
Yup, I've managed to do a 20mb
petertheman wrote:
If you're looking for extremely high amounts of people watching video,
go with the professionals. Check out
http://www.limelightnetworks.com/solutions.video.html, for example.
You might also talk with Doug Kaye from ITConversations, his blog is at:
Michael Meiser wrote:
Thanks Andrew, I'd love to here some more from you or chat with you,
you're perhaps one of the few that is really dealing with this scale
of traffic yet. Not that this client will get that big, but I need to
give them some idea of how this thing scales. Are you
See below... I had a question for Magnatune about using it's music in
videoblogs, and they replied with the following...
John Buckman wrote:
Hello, I was reading the license at:
https://magnatune.com/artists/license/podcast
and I'm not sure if it properly addresses the needs of
Christian Wach wrote:
On 15 Nov 2005, at 17:10, Pete Prodoehl wrote:
You could write code that allows people to subscribe to a feed that
spits out a new item every X number of days. Give each user a
unique URL
so they can control the experience and get the 'trickle effect' you
are
after
Christian Wach wrote:
There is an RSS 2.0 feed available for the 2002 blog, but what's the
point? It will never change again. I could provide an XML file with the
entire blog history, but that wouldn't replicate the experience that I
like most about the vlog - the excitement of the
Steve Watkins wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Paul Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello... I have succesfully uploaded a video, created the xml file
and downloaded it into
itunes. It all works!
If you have no blog and no desire for one, and are just interessted in
LeanBackVids.com wrote:
In my opinion, there is nothing better than paid hosting.
I'm a big fan of Dreamhost (as are many others here). The best part
is they have a referral program that can eliminate your costs. Given
all the time we spend on vlogging, what is $10 each month to have
Steve Garfield wrote:
I try to keep track of most of them at http://feevlog.com
We could also point people here:
http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Vlogosphere_FAQ#Free_Media_Hosts
or here:
http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Posting_Your_Videoblog
and of course, update those pages when you hear
Who needs an iPod or PSP? The VuGo is coming:
http://vugo.com/
If you've heard of the VideoNow, Juicebox, etc. it looks quite similar,
only this one follows the model of the iTunes store where you buy
content online and download instead of buying discs or chips.
It says it supports: WMV,
Michael Sullivan wrote:
maybe I was mistaken.
upon logging in, it takes me to the analytics welcome page which asks me to
agree to terms and conditions. i checked it and saw:
*Personal Use Only*
The Google Services are made available for your personal, non-commercial
use only. You may not
Randolfe Wicker wrote:
Which vlog host do you like and why?
I like Ourmedia because I'm a big fan of the idea behind it, and I think
they do the right thing in promoting CC licensed material, and they seem
like good guys.
I like Blip.tv for pretty much the same reasons though... I probably
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to remember a toy called the PXL2000. It was a video camera
that could record to audio tape. They tried to sell it to the kids
market $100 but video artists got a hold of it and fell in deep love.
It had a wonderful
andrew michael baron wrote:
I believe the most obscure statistic that hasnt been mentioned, which
is desirable, especially when one has multiple feeds, is an aggregate
of the amount of actual video downloads
To some degree, that's pretty much the only number I look at nowadays. I
run a
David Meade wrote:
Rather than parse log files, I wrote a few php functions that are called
each time the feed is acccessed. It then writes (or updates) a record of the
request to the databse. I have another table of rules that the system
checks these requests against to determine how it
Hooray! I win!
(As I add another one.)
Actually, I think I should be more ashamed than proud...
Tisk...
Yeah I wouldn't necesarily be proud...maybe just try to make is more
signal to noise...
Naw, I think I'll just quit posting instead...
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, wazman_au [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there's little point in holding out against QT7 and H.264.
If people are prompted to install it to watch a vid, most people
WILL install it. And it's out for both Mac and Windows.
What about poor playback
Josh Leo wrote:
looking at the google-groups backup group...i thought it woul dbe fun to see
who, out of all of us, is sending the most emails to everyone...
-1st place with 42 posts in the past 30 days - Pete Prodoehl
-in a close 2nd with 41 - Enric
-in 3rd, with 31 - Andreas
Hooray! I
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
But wait... I thought news organizations were all flesh-eating hounds who
has to twist the truth of every story to gain profit for the Bavarian
Illuminati. :o)
Only when they disagree with us or get something wrong... ;)
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
Markus Sandy wrote:
lol - my wife has far more free space on her iPod than I do on my
Powerbook's 100GB drive!
I'm struggling right now because I've got just a few gigs for podcasts
and videoblogs that get downloaded on a nightly basis... I've got a 120
gig drive waiting to be dropped into
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
On 11/8/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
The thing that I really don't understand about thee sites receiving
funding is that the barrier to entry for competition is so slim. It
wouldn't be too difficult for a developer to replicate
havilahland33 wrote:
TV sucks. I've heard it nicknamed as 'time vaporizer'. Go vid blogs!
Is it fair to use such a blanket statement? There is plenty of good
stuff on television, most of it is not on the major networks. (Though
Arrested Development nearly made me laugh my *ass* off last
Gena wrote:
Well, this is fairly cut and dry to me. You need permission from the
original owners. You might not have a hard time if you contact the PR
or promotions department of the film. Some movie producers are
actively looking for bloggers to spread the word about their movie.
The
Because RSS is built on top of XML, any RSS feed is presumably
ALREADY well-formed XML.
Oh man... sorry... finally stopped laughing long enough to post this.
I'm going to go work on the lyrics to my 'Funky RSS' theme song now.
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
The term the Flickr of video gets used again, this time with reviews,
and comments:
http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/06/the-flickrs-of-video/
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Fair play?
David Meade wrote:
On 11/3/05, printaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is a feed meant to be reassembled? Its meant to be read and its
covered by copyright for a reason. Are you saying that all RSS feeds
are free of copyright and can be reused however you please?
RSS isn't a particularly
Jan McLaughlin wrote:
This seems like likely material to add to the voxmedia wiki since
you've put time into it, Steve. :)
How about everyone add at least one thing to the wiki today:
http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Video
I've already done my part. ;)
It would be cool if we could all add to
Deirdre Straughan wrote:
On 11/2/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please define big success as the term may have different meanings to
different people.
Used by millions of people worldwide. Whether anyone is making money off
it or not is immaterial (to me, anyway).
Ok... We
David Meade wrote:
I dunno I have a hard time with the You're stealing this content
argument if you are in fact providing a feed on your site. A feed is
MEANT to allow people to take and reassemble content.
I think where we hit a gray area, is in the republishing of the content.
If I publish
Steve Watkins wrote:
Just got an email from Sony saying that they now have some (PC only)
software thats $20 and actually allows you to manage your PSP files,
encoding transfers ina sane way.
Make sure it doesn't contain one of those Sony rootkits that will kill
your PC if you try to remove
I don't read NetGuide, but they have an article on videoblogging:
URL:http://www.netguide.co.nz/magazine/pulp/104/
New crazes: Video blogs
If you go here:
URL:http://www.netguide.co.nz/magazine/mag_links/links.php?issue=104
In the drop-down menu select 'page 13' and click the 'Get Links'
Deirdre Straughan wrote:
On 11/1/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What will happen is that videoblogging will change from being a nice
friendly little community we are used to seeing here, into one where
people treat it like a competition for viewers, become obsessed with
stats
Jake Ludington wrote:
In the context of companies who use video blogging to further their cause
without giving anything back to the video blogging community; Microsoft
already does that with Channel 9. The upside of Channel 9 to Microsoft the
corporate entity is creating a warm fuzzy feeling
Verdi wrote:
On Oct 31, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Christopher Ivanyi wrote:
My question to you -- my challenge to you would be, to stop vlogging
altogether. If you don't need an audience, and you vlog in order
achieve the pleasure of having done them, and you don't need the
validation of an audience
Deirdre Straughan wrote:
On 11/2/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL. Seems to me it has already happened, as it was bound to. A
technology
can either be a big success or can be a nice little community - not both
at the same time.
Please define big success as the term may have
Steve Garfield wrote:
Your file extensions are .m4v so when I click on your video it's asking
me to open it in iTunes.
I'd prefer that it opens up on the browser page with QuickTime.
Can you make your files have a .mov extension?
On Nov 1, 2005, at 7:18 AM, Digital wrote:
Hey Gang!
Jay wrote:
I have been trying to create a podcast using feed burner to make the RSS feed
it does not
seem to work I have video files stored on .mac and ourmedia. I keep coming
up with
invalid feed everytime. From reading how it is done I think I am doing
everything right
must be
Gena wrote:
I'm not angry at the guy. But it does say a lot about how one group
will do the figuring out and others come by to adapt and appropriate.
It is capitalism 101. Not saying it is good or bad.
I can honestly say that sometimes I get really sick of always being in
the first group,
Jake Ludington wrote:
In the NerdTV http://www.pbs.org/cringely/nerdtv/shows/ Show #6
Interview with Dave Winer, http://www.pbs.org/cringely/nerdtv/shows/ , Dave
talks about how Netscape first took his idea of RSS and didn't compeletely
implement it and then Dave released a new, better
Verdi wrote:
I just got a new iPod yesterday and I've been doing some tests with
it. Here's what I've figured out so far. Please feel free to add to
this.
Videos encoded with 3ivx and Apple's mpeg4, with AAC or mpeg4-audio
(QT 6) all seem to work following the tutorials that we've
Christopher Ivanyi wrote:
I think alot of vloggers are absolutely fooling themselves! Every
vlogger wants/needs an audience - that's the absolute truth. But
here's the trick. When that someone gets their audience, there is
this ineffable something that creeps into the pyche -- the desire to
Irish Hermit wrote:
2. Vlogs are nothing more than homemade television on the internet.
Get over it folks. I've been around too long to think of it as
nothing more than another installment in a long line of the next
great thing that will change how we all communicate. Email and
Jay dedman wrote:
what I realized was that i could record my life.
unlike many podcasts and all TV shows where I would seek for a large
audience, im bascially making a digital scapbook for myself(in the
future) and my friends.
in 100 years, this will be gold because you will see what people
201 - 300 of 496 matches
Mail list logo
