Den 01.02.2007 kl. 06:30 skrev Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
here's the exact wording:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/
Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by
the author or licensor.
No, Jay. The human-readable version is watered down to the point
Thanks for the clarification. I find the wording of that to be a bit
odd though - I read it as saying that the stuff labelled (ii) is only
applicable if you mention the 3rd parties to be attributed in your
copyright notice? And that the requirement to include a URL is only
valid if that URI
Den 01.02.2007 kl. 09:54 skrev Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks for the clarification. I find the wording of that to be a bit
odd though - I read it as saying that the stuff labelled (ii) is only
applicable if you mention the 3rd parties to be attributed in your
copyright notice?
The
On a serious note, the guys who set up the boards for Turner have
been charged and could face up to five years in prison.
From CNN: Peter Berdovsky, 27, a freelance video artist from
Arlington, Massachusetts, and Sean Stevens, 28, were facing charges
of placing a hoax device in a way that
fear 24/7
oh boy
i don't mind fear so much, but that we do irrational things when afraid
j
On 2/1/07, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a serious note, the guys who set up the boards for Turner have
been charged and could face up to five years in prison.
From CNN: Peter Berdovsky, 27, a
Or take it another step: send money for his defense fund.
J
On 2/1/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wanted to briefly remind everyone that the videoblogger, Josh Wolf
is still in jail for not handing over tapes to a Grand jury.
You can read about why he's in jail here:
Great idea the website / wiki, Jay :)
You're Open Source to the core.
Nice.
Jan
On 2/1/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As some of you may have read yesterday the reason for me subscribing
to this group is that I'm on the organising commitee for
www.BarCampUSA.org which is a
Canadian Content laws are probably the reason for the Canadian only
broadcast rules. Easier to control if it's all Canadian.
You need a PC (Doesn't work with Mac), IE 6 or above (Doesn't work
with Firefox) and a webcam (No option to upload a show).
I'll wait until after shaving my chest before
There are no Canadian content rules for the internet though. If memory
serves The CRTC (which regulates Canadian content) has tried and failed
to get jurisdiction over the Internet. I could see a CC issue if the
Bell New Media Fund was involved somehow, but that's doubtful. Even if
there was a
Jeff Jarvis just returned from Davos and here are his conclusions, which is
very interesting
stuff about the shift in power that you all have created.
http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/02/01/davos07-my-big-conclusion/
Long-tail that $40K and ship a bunch of vloggers to vlog the conference
rather than sponsor a hierarchical contest, hmmm?
The best advice ever Jan. Let's see if he takes it.
Peter
On 1/30/07, Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have had some bank-and-forth with Jeff and Chris Brogan.
wooo I can't wait to try it out!
I'm not an HTML newbie, but prefer the auto-javascript rewrite idea
because it will work on old posts without going back and editing them,
and leaves 'pure' links should I move to a different system in the
future.
On 1/31/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found a guy at http://www.fingertipsmusic.com who picks three
legal download songs (not just CC) that he likes every week.
There's an email mailing list and an RSS feed, and a list of past
picks on the site. Some good songs on there - lots of different stuff.
I'm a terrible repeat
OH please!
I regularly work in London, my son was half a mile
from the Aldgate bomb, the whole family passes through
London on a regular basis I know two things:
(1) I'd rather have my civil liberties than the
protection of the authorities, UK or US
(2) When there *are* problems I know just who
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As some of you may have read yesterday the reason for me
subscribing
to this group is that I'm on the organising commitee for
www.BarCampUSA.org which is a 'mega' barcamp being held in
Wisconsin
in August
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Tom Gosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome to the real world of post 9/11. There are real bad guys
out there
who would like nothing better than to kill you. And they are
working at
accomplishing that goal.
Tom Gosse, aka Irish Hermit
email:
This is all getting way OT, but yeah - my tube station - Shepherds
Bush, 1/2 mile away - was one of those chosen by the failed 21st July
05 bombers who got their explosive mix wrong and are currently on
trial. My regular route to work was bombed on 7/7 at the exact time
I would have
Hey group, I've just been lurking lately, as life for me has been way
to crazy to do any video stuff lately... (I hope that changes soon!)
Anyway, I had to move embedthevideo.com to a new server - has anyone
seen any problems with it in the last day or so?
http://embedthevideo.com/
I want to
RE: what Jay wrote about breaking the habit of using commercial
music... This discussion of using commercial music has changed a lot
from 2 years ago on this group, when from what I remember it mostly
seemed to revolve around whether or not you'd get busted for using it.
I don't worry
Jose Gonzales might care that you're using his music in your video no
matter how few people watch your stuff. But he might not. You can
get in touch with him and ask him. But that's probably too much
work. Since there's so much music out there you can use under CC
license from artists who
I just signed up for the hell of it and did my first live broadcast
but their sound is frakked up (it doesn't always record). I sent an
email to let them know there's a problem because my MacBook Pro is in
mint condition.
It's not really my type of thing, but the site set up is very web
2.0...
A multi-camera shoot of something amazing produced / organized by BarCamp.
Jan
On 2/1/07, Dean Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As some of you may have read yesterday the reason for me
subscribing
to this
It depends sometimes at least for me, I use CC music but sometimes
you just wanna use X song from Y artist because well, I like it and
it fits the mood I am trying to conveybecause it's known
etcbut I am trying hard to get away from commerical music because
I believe in what CC stands
Anybody care to comment that the CNN coverage of this incident had
footer screentext declaring Suspicious Package Found Earlier Was
Detonated.
Well, that's pretty messed up right there, because, ummm, it was a
Lite-Brite and not a bomb.
Perhaps that most venerated news service really meant
Yeah thats a huge part of the reason why many people will want to use
non-cc material.
Music, TV shows, films and books that are well known become a huge
part of popular culture, and so become part fo the language and
framework in which people communicate with and relate to eachother.
Depending
This particular part of the equation will only change if people start
making media which has less-restrictive rights than copyright, part of
their everyday lives. I would guess this has only happened to a very
limited extent so far,
Sorry I didnt word that bit clearly. I meant people
DC Media Makers is a group of video blogging enthusiasts from the
greater DC area who get together twice a month to talk about video
blogging and participate in collaborative video projects. The group
was started in late 2006 and newcomers are welcome. This meeting is an
informal happy hour. So
There will also be another fundraiser at my bar here in San Francisco.
I *think* its on Feb. 6th... I'll make sure of the particulars and
post it here. It's all about raising awareness and money for the
cause.
Schlomo
http://schlomolog.blogspot.com
http://webshots.com/is/spotlight
Fascinating perspective. Thanks for the heads' up.
Jan
On 2/1/07, mcmpress [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Jarvis just returned from Davos and here are his conclusions, which
is very interesting
stuff about the shift in power that you all have created.
What do you want to do in the world of video blogging that was never
possible before today but you could implement at this event just
because of the scale (workshops on CC licenses and implementation of
machine readable license metadata for one would stop a lot of
bitching in this group
On 2/1/07, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There will also be another fundraiser at my bar here in San Francisco.
I *think* its on Feb. 6th... I'll make sure of the particulars and
post it here. It's all about raising awareness and money for the
cause.
good point.
It's funny, I have changed my reaction to what you said about six
times! But yeah, you're right. Using that resource and promoting
those who choose a different path from the regular system is a Good
Thing in my book, even if I don't feel passionately political about
it in my bones. And I
I saw footage which showed them using bomb disposal thing to blow up
one of the devices. Guess they blew up first one they looked at as
added precaution, but yeah they detonated something, it didnt detonate
itself. I think you are right to draw attention to the language used
with this sort of
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What do you want to do in the world of video blogging that was
never
possible before today but you could implement at this event just
because of the scale (workshops on CC licenses and
implementation of
Hey David-
Please don't take me out of context:
I see Lucas' argument that its crazy for a vlogger to whine when his video
is posted by another site.
But i think its important that we try to help educate on linking or giving
attributing.
I understand the argument that I cannot stop people from
NYC Blogger Summit
http://www.wnbc.com/news/10814198/detail.html
NEW YORK -- The world of media is ever changing, and WNBC.com has
taken unprecedented steps to embrace the future. Wednesday night, the
people who write more than 130 of New York's most-read blogs
Wow that was good, very intreguing perspective.
The wider stuff about power was great, and I though this bit was funny
and especially apt for this group:
1. First, big media let us interact with them, about their stuff.
2. Then big media beg us to give them our stuff.
3. Now we realize that our
Here it is, the first episode of Dare Me. This dare was sent in by
Rick Rey of www.rickrey.com.
Send your dares to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dare Me - Episode 001
http://www.idoitdigital.com/2007/02/01/dare-me-episode-01
New episodes every Thursday.
Clintus
[Non-text portions of this message have
Not sure what happen to the email address to send your dares to but
it's dareme[at]idoitdigital.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Clintus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here it is, the first episode of Dare Me. This dare was sent in by
Rick Rey of www.rickrey.com.
Send your dares to
Thanks, I got it totally wrong, cheers for the clarification.
Maybe I will now realise that my fixation with trying to understand
all the wording and small detail of these licenses is not very useful
compared to Jay and otehrs suggestions to do something.
If I manage to sort my dysfunctional
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jose Gonzales might care that you're using his music in your video no
matter how few people watch your stuff. But he might not. You can
get in touch with him and ask him. But that's probably too much
work. Since
Fuck you America.
Fuck the political status quo that keeps a guy in prison like this. Fuck the
Presidential
candidate that hugged Joshs mother, and that will make shit about it. Fuck´m
all. It is just
to twisted, and the state of denial you´re in is infuriating. So go vote,
and think
I've started making laughup mashups, creating dream inteviews for VJs whom
might never
see the likes of pop masters.
http://uncutvideo.aol.com/search/relevant/be6562f62e204c5b53fadea35c75b09a?value=JT
%20on%20DLindex=0
It's easy, it's fun, it's good editing practice. Check it out and I
Trust me, Tom. We are rolling our eyes in Europe, where suspected
bombs are diffused all the time (I've watched it happen in Paris) and
we know better than to give a non-situation more attention than it
deserves and just move on. Like real grownups.
Can we get back to vlogging now?
I just
Really? it looks like to me we are reliving the late 50's early
60's.says the guy who likes history.an unpopular war, groups
being singled out for being unamerican, social and polital unrest,
the threat of an evil nation doing us harm...yep, as always we
learn nothing from
Oh, I'm posting too much, but before I go to bed...
There's a lot of anti-Americanism in Britain since George was
elected, and since the war - and since before that, too, but less
poisonously. Obviously it can get even worse in France and some
other European countries, let alone the rest
Question for Blip: Somewhere in my blip profile I told it my itunes
URL is http://www.davidmeade.com/itunes and this is the itunes URL
that is shown on my 'show' page.
Is there some reason my show page doesn't similarly use my feed URL
(http://www.davidmeade.com/feed) that I've also specified?
Um, sorry, before anyone replies, I realised I made it sound like I
was saying Republican half: bad, Democratic half: good - and I
certainly didn't mean that, nor to specify a hard political or
religious group divide. Nor did I really mean to specify a 50% split
in terms of good/bad.
yes, but it's also the story of a major world city being put on red
alert (which could have been avoided), and also the story of some
people who - however stupid - may go to jail for a long time
unnecessarily for a guerilla marketing video stunt, which is how
all this got started.
You're right Jay, action is better than talk alone and your constant
pioneering and educating is admirable and has got to be more
effective than my chatter is on its own. Sincerely. Even
recognizing that, I will continue to voice my opinion because it's
what I've got since I don't have your
I sincerely doubt the charges that end up sticking on these guys will be
all that strong, but the truth of the matter is that they did disrupt the
public, and disrupting the public is a crime. Yes, the authorities
probably overreacted, but planting strange devices in public places, some
of them
The man on the street defense of their actions seems hauntingly
stupid ... they were just doing their jobs, following orders.
I want to see interviews with executives who approved this debacle.
That would be a laugh riot.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, J. Rhett Aultman [EMAIL
You wrote Half of you are crazy, thoughtless, greedy, parochial and
irrational, but only half. Dude the glass is half full. Only
half? And let's not forget that great swaths of the population of
other countries are also those things. The French may elect LePen
the next chance they get.
Le Pen fools no one but the usual right wing lunatic fringe, and most
people looking for an alternative to Royal and Sarkozy are supporting
the centrist François Bayrou. Le Pen has about as much chance as Pat
Buchanan did in the US. Please know exactly what you're talking about
before you
absolutely, of course you're right. i realised how simplistic i
sounded. ironically, i was trying to convey the opposite - so many
brits i talk to simplistically brand all americans as being like
george w bush dick cheney while considering their own political
landscape infinitely
18% it's not the half
too much but not 51%
In France the danger have a name
Nicolas Sarkozy Bush
I linked the josh's video on my website
I don't want to be the next vlogger in jail
Loiez
Le 1 févr. 07 à 23:42, David a écrit :
The French may elect LePen
the next chance they get.
[Non-text
I'd heard that the people who pulled this stunt were never actually
ordered to, but were instead hired on as consultants and told to be
creative. I can't find a source for that, though.
--
Rhett.
http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime
The man on the street defense of their actions seems
jail sucks.
i know.
stop reading this thread and write a letter.
show the kid hes not alone.
nuff said
randy
On 2/1/07, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
absolutely, of course you're right. i realised how simplistic i
sounded. ironically, i was trying to convey the opposite - so many
brits i
[looks good, 24p too, I guess street price will be less]
Canon Coming Out with $1,300 HD Camera
High-definition cameras are slowly trickling down to the
point where they're affordable. And Canon, which makes
some of the best non-HD camcorders, now plays in that
market. The new camcorder
I just want an elph with a microhpone jack too... but it's not happening :(
Peter
On 1/31/07, Halcyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
funny, I have been using my canon powershot610 for most my videos lately
and
very happy with the results (especially for web).. But just picked up the
Xacti
Awesome! I was going to email you and Jay to let you know I'll be in
SF next week (Sun-Fri) for work training.
No matter what, lets try to hook up.
-Matt
http://vlogmap.org
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There will also be another
http://www.myfreelanceportal.com/openurl/index.php
I'm confused. What are we looking at?
Robyn
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of - Kenji - Lim Chee Wooi
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 7:59 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] That a look at this!
why?
please be more specific and/or avoid sending over 2000 people a link to
nothing of interest.
On 2/1/07, - Kenji - Lim Chee Wooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.myfreelanceportal.com/openurl/index.php
--
Sull
http://vlogdir.com (a project)
http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog)
Looks amazing. I love Canon cameras - i have an old Canon XL1.
colours, low-light and lens all amazing. (even though I mostly just
use my nokia or my kodak for vlogging.)
Also saw this JVC on Videomaker.com's weekly vlog last week,
announced at CES - costs more but full HD and 5 hours of
I am sure the al queda terrorists are down hearted right now and
thinking, hey why didn't we think of that It's just spin, it's
just fear. Something to get the rest of the world laughing at the
reactionary US. To be sure Cartoon Networt Work should have known
better but at the same
It will also come with an intelligent hot shoe, for adding
accessories, and a slot for using an external microphone.
Since when does someone call a jack a slot?
Has Canon developed a new slot for external microhones?
We'll have to wait and see. ;-)
On Feb 1, 2007, at 6:39 PM, WWWhatsup
lol - why not call it a 'hole'?? i checked that, because i got
geekily excited that they'd found some way to cram in an xlr input.
i should have known better with canon - even my xl1 doesn't have an
xlr. it's a 3.5mm mini jack. or slot. or hole.
On 2 Feb 2007, at 02:19, Steve Garfield
Wow. That was a lot of work. I just finished watching it.
Interesting to see/hear background information and philosophy behind
the evolution of blogging.
Nice work.
--
Bill C.
http://ReelSolid.TV
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Olsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of
No, Jay. The human-readable version is watered down to the point where it
doesn't make any sense. The exact wording is in the actual license at
URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode section 4.b:
so is the human readable license not true?
I guess this gives you an insight into the magnitude of the 'raw
space' we are providing and why we are so stoked about it.
Tickets go on sale next week; there are 'bonuses' for early ticket
purchases and in addition all people purchasing tickets before 1st of
May will get early access
SEEPROGRESS
Ive been experimenting with a sort of video blog for the Center for American
Progress
(which is a non-partisan progressive think tank in Washington DC).
You can (and I'd appreiate it you would) check out our stuff by googling
SEEPROGRESS and
it'll point you to the channels we've
That is great that you are making it available to the masses to
watch. Thanks!
-Lan
www.LanBui.com
On Feb 1, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Chuck Olsen wrote:
Speaking of copyright!
This week I put my entire documentary feature film online.
It's called Blogumentary and it
I'm speaking on user-gen and I need to know some large companies (especially
older brands) that are sponsoring podcasts/videoblogs. I have a list of a
handful now (Dove, Apple, Intel, Microsoft, IBM, BMW, etc), but I know
there are way more, right?
Who else is there?
Robyn
[Non-text
I've been messing with splashcast http://splashcast.com and I quite like it
Totally flash based - You can upload stills/vid/audio/text/youtube and record
voice-overs and add on rss feeds from youtube and make shows which you
then publish in a neat little flv player via multiple channels
One
Make sure you have open source and/or paper trail voting procedures or you will
probably get Le Pen.
Bush has still not won an election. Both elections were stolen. The abundance
of evidence is mind blowing.
http://www.fluxview.com/Vote-Fraud.htm
Josh is paying the price of decades of good
One mistake the article makes is to lump YouTube and Joost into a single
category. YouTube, AFAIK, is paying for the bandwidth to pump out all that
video, one stream per view. Joost is P2P, with reportedly heavy bandwidth
demands, potentially even when you are not actually viewing (if they use
77 matches
Mail list logo
