Hi
Am 26.10.2006 05:08:33 schrieb Benji Fisher:
If you want someone to try to reproduce the problem, we need more
information. Where did you get your copy of vim; or, if you compiled
yourself, how did you do it? (In the first case, please give a link to
the download site. In the
Alexander 'boesi' Bösecke wrote:
[...]
From gvim --help
-u vimrc Use vimrc instead of any .vimrc
-U gvimrc Use gvimrc instead of any .gvimrc
[...]
Yes, but -u NONE means: no vimrc, no gvimrc, and no plugins (but viminfo will
still be used if you have 'nocompatible')
-u NORC means:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Aaron wrote:
[61 lines snipped]
Sorry for the long lines and top-posting in my earlier correspondence!
I prefer that to the crime that you just commited with THAT post!
--
.
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Aaron wrote:
Then it's no surprise that Windows text editors follow the theoretical
and probably broken approach, while the Unix ones do things the way
they've always been done.
It's not just MSWin editors - ZDE, Eclipse, and Scite are all broken in this
way (although
Hi
Am 26.10.2006 09:31:51 schrieb Alexander 'boesi' Bösecke:
Well something with the version on www.vim.org is wrong ... at least in
combination with my system/configuration.
I've just discovered, that ^ and ´ behave the same way with the orginal gvim
7.0. So it's maybe a generel problem of
Yakov Lerner wrote:
Let's say I edit file x (vim x) which is a symlink, x-y.
(Linux). How can I make a script that opens y
instead of x in the buffer (chases the symlinks and opens it)
I guess I don't understand exactly what you're doing here.
Let me explain:
echo junk1 file1
ln -s file1
Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
I wrote this snippet:
fun! Ffunchdr()
let date = strftime( %F )
put='/*-*/'
put='/**'
put=' *
Hi Bram and maintainers,
I encountered this bug when editing files:
1) Open a file, change something. The file is marked as modifed.
2) Use Ctrl-W,Ctrl-] to go to the definition of any symbol in a new
window. The newly opened file is unmodified, and the old one is still
modified.
3) Use Ctrl-T
Thanks, eveything soundes goo so far.
I'll just have to determine if I can create the language for more of the
difficult rules
-Original Message-
From: Peter Hodge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 6:04 PM
To: Billy Patton; vim@vim.org
Subject: Re: Need to
Hi,
On 10/26/06, Yongwei Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bram and maintainers,
I encountered this bug when editing files:
1) Open a file, change something. The file is marked as modifed.
2) Use Ctrl-W,Ctrl-] to go to the definition of any symbol in a new
window. The newly opened file is
Hi Yegappan,
On 10/26/06, Yegappan Lakshmanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 10/26/06, Yongwei Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bram and maintainers,
I encountered this bug when editing files:
1) Open a file, change something. The file is marked as modifed.
2) Use Ctrl-W,Ctrl-] to go to
Hi Yakov,
On 10/20/06, Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's say I edit file x (vim x) which is a symlink, x-y.
(Linux). How can I make a script that opens y
instead of x in the buffer (chases the symlinks and opens it)
You can try using the resolve() Vim function to resolve
the
If one searches for code that writes code OR programs that write
programs AND vim, one can turn up a number of references to this
kind of activity. Dynamic languages are often more concise than
those with static typing, and while I don't want to get into the
debate on which is better, sometimes
On 10/26/06, Yegappan Lakshmanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Yakov,
On 10/20/06, Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's say I edit file x (vim x) which is a symlink, x-y.
(Linux). How can I make a script that opens y
instead of x in the buffer (chases the symlinks and opens it)
You
Hi list,
On 10/26/06, Yongwei Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Yegappan,
On 10/26/06, Yegappan Lakshmanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 10/26/06, Yongwei Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bram and maintainers,
I encountered this bug when editing files:
1) Open a file, change
those with static typing, and while I don't want to get into the
debate on which is better, sometimes it makes sense to use a dynamic
language to generate code in a statically typed language.
It's like asking whether a hammer or a screwdriver is better.
Both are suited well to particular
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Tim Chase wrote:
those with static typing, and while I don't want to get into the
debate on which is better, sometimes it makes sense to use a dynamic
language to generate code in a statically typed language.
It's like asking whether a hammer or a screwdriver is
Hugh Sasse hgs at dmu.ac.uk writes:
So, we run into a problem: how does one syntax highlight mixed
language code?
This works well for me, but needs delimters to indicate the appropriate syntax.
http://www.vim.org/tips/tip.php?tip_id=856
So in my Python code, for example, I might have:
...
On 26/10/06, Hugh Sasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
So, we run into a problem: how does one syntax highlight mixed
language code?
[snip]
I don't know whether this is of any use, but I have often found
situations where I need to embed code from one language in the comments
of another. For
Am Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2006 18:12 schrieb Tim Chase:
for my font plug in I need to know which OS I am running on to
choose an appropriate font. Now when Sun Solaris where added
to the list of OS I use I run into a little problem: there is
only has('unix') - but that's not good enough
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, David S. wrote:
Hugh Sasse hgs at dmu.ac.uk writes:
So, we run into a problem: how does one syntax highlight mixed
language code?
This works well for me, but needs delimters to indicate the appropriate
syntax.
http://www.vim.org/tips/tip.php?tip_id=856
So
for my font plug in I need to know which OS I am running on to
choose an appropriate font. Now when Sun Solaris where added
[cut]
sure it would - but it also means calling an external program at startup.
Well, if all else fails...
Well, additionally, the 'guifont' option can take a
Hi Yakov,
* Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/06, Fabian Braennstroem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Yakov,
* Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/06, Fabian Braennstroem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Yakov,
* Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/06,
Alexander 'boesi' Bösecke wrote:
Hi
Am 26.10.2006 09:31:51 schrieb Alexander 'boesi' Bösecke:
Well something with the version on www.vim.org is wrong ... at least in
combination with my system/configuration.
I've just discovered, that ^ and ´ behave the same way with the orginal gvim
7.0.
On 2006-10-25, Martin Krischik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2006 18:12 schrieb Tim Chase:
for my font plug in I need to know which OS I am running on to
choose an appropriate font. Now when Sun Solaris where added
to the list of OS I use I run into a little problem:
Tim Chase wrote:
for my font plug in I need to know which OS I am running on to
choose an appropriate font. Now when Sun Solaris where added
[cut]
sure it would - but it also means calling an external program at
startup. Well, if all else fails...
Well, additionally, the 'guifont' option
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Tim Chase wrote:
for my font plug in I need to know which OS I am running on to
choose an appropriate font. Now when Sun Solaris where added
[cut]
sure it would - but it also means calling an external program at
startup. Well, if all else fails...
Well,
Peter Hodge wrote:
[...]
Hello,
As well as completing words, it would be very helpful if you wrote a syntax
file for your language. If your users see things in color, they can be sure
they have typed the commands correctly, but if the text is *not* colored, then
...or if it is highlighted as
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 at 11:33pm, Mikolaj Machowski wrote:
On ¶ro pa¼ 25 2006, Mikolaj Machowski wrote:
In Linux terminal and GTK2 versions cursor is stuck in command line
and don't at its real position making inserting of text almost random.
Getting stuck at
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, A. S. Budden wrote:
On 26/10/06, Hugh Sasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
So, we run into a problem: how does one syntax highlight mixed
language code?
[snip]
I don't know whether this is of any use, but I have often found
situations where I need to embed code
Yongwei Wu wrote:
Hi list,
On 10/26/06, Yongwei Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Yegappan,
On 10/26/06, Yegappan Lakshmanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 10/26/06, Yongwei Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bram and maintainers,
I encountered this bug when editing files:
1) Open a
Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, A. S. Budden wrote:
On 26/10/06, Hugh Sasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
So, we run into a problem: how does one syntax highlight mixed
language code?
[snip]
I don't know whether this is of any use, but I have often found
situations where I need to
On 10/25/06, Martin Krischik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2006 18:12 schrieb Tim Chase:
for my font plug in I need to know which OS I am running on to
choose an appropriate font. Now when Sun Solaris where added
to the list of OS I use I run into a little problem:
Vimmers,
I find gf very convenient, but with shell scripts, I'd like a different
behavior:
In shell scripts, there should be no spaces around =.
progname=/usr/local/txserver
Then if I do gf on /usr/local/txserver, vim thinks the whole line
(including progname=) is the pathname and gives
I don't seem to have this problem when I code because I would tend to
code your line thus:
progname=/usr/local/txserver
Russ
Ben K. wrote:
Vimmers,
I find gf very convenient, but with shell scripts, I'd like a
different behavior:
In shell scripts, there should be no spaces around =.
Hi Martin,
On 10/25/06, Martin Krischik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2006 18:12 schrieb Tim Chase:
for my font plug in I need to know which OS I am running on to
choose an appropriate font. Now when Sun Solaris where added
to the list of OS I use I run into a little
36 matches
Mail list logo
