Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread John Berry
Blaze, that kind of thing was one of the things I was alluding to. The stuff that is now openly admitted to as 'Old News' is horrific. But at the time it would have been considered an unreasonable conspiracy theory. And today similar things do happen, but they are dismissed as conspiracy theories

RE: [Vo]:New LENR patent application from STMicroelectronics

2013-09-23 Thread pagnucco
DJ Cravens, Here is another variable mass theory for LENR - "Theories of variable mass particles and low energy nuclear phenomena" http://www.scribd.com/doc/139182265/Theories-of-variable-mass-particles-and-low-energy-nuclear-phenomena I am not sure if it is related to Williams' approach. -- Lo

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread Blaze Spinnaker
oh yeah, for truly depressing caution & cynicism, read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States Sure as hell hope we don't do that sort of thing anymore On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > reasonable amount of caution: t

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread Blaze Spinnaker
reasonable amount of caution: the nsa has recruited double agents at american companies to insert back doors into internet tech so they can spy on both americans and those abroad. On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:24 PM, John Berry wrote: > > The

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread Eric Walker
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:24 PM, John Berry wrote: The most interesting and somewhat topic relevant portion of this discussion > is that of why belief systems that support trust in leadership, authority > and beliefs that support general social cohesion are likely to be strongly > selected in evo

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread John Berry
The most interesting and somewhat topic relevant portion of this discussion is that of why belief systems that support trust in leadership, authority and beliefs that support general social cohesion are likely to be strongly selected in evolutionary terms. If you are likely to go against the leade

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread Eric Walker
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:08 PM, David Roberson wrote: Perhaps someone might want to offer a location to which this topic could > be pursued. > Vortex-B? Southern Poverty Law Center? ;) Eric

RE: [Vo]:New LENR patent application from STMicroelectronics

2013-09-23 Thread DJ Cravens
You might notice that Pharis' theory that the patent was based on uses the neo-coulombic potential. Some observant person might notice that the name of my booth at NI Week was Neo- Coulombic- named after that potential. The same person might notice that I wrote the preface for Pharis' book (

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread John Berry
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > John Berry wrote: > > Jed, do you believe that if you were in countries that had insane >> governments, and you were raised in that culture and had a normal degree of >> faith in that government. Would you have seen them as insane? >> > > I

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
I agree with David Robinson that we should drop this discussion, but I would like to make a few more comments, and then I shall stop. Edmund Storms wrote: > The claim that the government was behind 9/11 is another example of how > willing people are to believe insane explanations of events. The

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread Edmund Storms
On Sep 23, 2013, at 3:43 PM, John Berry wrote: On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: John Berry wrote: That is a good point, but the some of the same could have been argued about the disruption of taking the WTC down and flying something into the Pentagon. Yet I and bas

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
John Berry wrote: > There isn't enough money in all the insurance companies in the world to >> cover the damages or pay off the policies. There are many wealthy people in >> Washington, DC. The population density is high. >> > > That is a good point, but the some of the same could have been argu

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread David Roberson
This discussion is getting a bit out of hand. Although I find it interesting to monitor the complex thoughts of my fellow vorts, I suggest that we attempt to move on to issues that are in line with our normal conversations. Perhaps someone might want to offer a location to which this topic co

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
John Berry wrote: Jed, do you believe that if you were in countries that had insane > governments, and you were raised in that culture and had a normal degree of > faith in that government. Would you have seen them as insane? > I might. Many Japanese people did think their government was crazy i

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread John Berry
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > John Berry wrote: > > >> I disagree, if you are twisted, and want the power of fear over people to >> control them with more draconian measures and to start a war because you >> want people to support for conquest, and lowering the populatio

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread Rob Dingemans
Dear Jed, On 23-9-2013 20:13, Jed Rothwell wrote: Furthermore, decreasing the cost of energy is likely to improve first world economies sooner than it improves third world countries or China, since we have more high tech, we have more ways to grow the economy, and we import more energy per cap

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread John Berry
Jed, do you believe that if you were in countries that had insane governments, and you were raised in that culture and had a normal degree of faith in that government. Would you have seen them as insane? Hindsight is 20/20, you would not fall for that would you? And if it was 1962 and operation N

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
John Berry wrote: > I disagree, if you are twisted, and want the power of fear over people to > control them with more draconian measures and to start a war because you > want people to support for conquest, and lowering the population, > overthrowing governments and because it would cause huge

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Edmund Storms wrote: The scary part is that intelligent people would consider this claim even > plausible when the idea is obviously the hallucination of an insane mind. > Of course the government lies, of course it does bad things, of course it > cannot be trusted. > To some extent. As Ed says,

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread John Berry
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Edmund Storms wrote: > The scary part is that intelligent people would consider this claim even > plausible when the idea is obviously the hallucination of an insane mind. > Of course the government lies, of course it does bad things, of course it > cannot be trust

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread Edmund Storms
The scary part is that intelligent people would consider this claim even plausible when the idea is obviously the hallucination of an insane mind. Of course the government lies, of course it does bad things, of course it cannot be trusted. But the government does operate in predictable ways

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
James Bowery wrote: > There is a similar unenlightened self-interest at work in preventing the > proper development and deployment of LENR. It is "intelligent" in that > sense and it has no incentive to become "enlightened" about its > self-interest. > > There are therefore two questions in mod

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread John Berry
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > This doesn't just "seem kinda far out." It IS far out. Far, far out. > Farther out than the Voyager 1 spacecraft. > Ok, but the problem here is that you have limits to what you will give serious consideration. While I know you do not believ

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Rob Dingemans wrote: Dear Jed, > > > On 23-9-2013 20:13, Jed Rothwell wrote: > >> Furthermore, decreasing the cost of energy is likely to improve first >> world economies sooner than it improves third world countries or China, >> since we have more high tech, we have more ways to grow the economy

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread James Bowery
Good... perhaps I can try my approach from the angle opened up by the problem of writing off capital investments in a "debt saturated" western economy: The bailout of the large financial institutions was an example of the kind of 'panic' that results when a massive write-off of capital investments

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread Edmund Storms
I agree with your description when applied to the details, Alain. However, the system is influenced by certain people based on their self interest and wisdom, or lack thereof. We see this situation play out throughout histoery. Some people use their power to improve while others use it to d

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Edmund Storms wrote: > For example, although the US is self-sufficient in energy, the cost is > controlled by the world market. The U.S. is not self-sufficient in energy. We consume 97 quads. We import 24 quads (mainly oil) and export 10 quads (oil and coal). See: http://www.eia.gov/totalene

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread Alain Sepeda
my sad vision is there is no vision... some people think they are right, using bad heuristics. some follow them by selfish interest to get chocolate medal or to earn their life some follow just because they feel right when they follow some get convinced because they have no culture some shut up be

[Vo]:Quark Charge

2013-09-23 Thread Axil Axil
There are loads of theories that describe the processes that go on inside the nucleus. In order to be taken seriously, each must be consistent with the observed behavior of the subatomic processes that they describe as far as the level of our understanding of those processes go. Fro example. one o

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread Edmund Storms
I agree Bob, the world is not managed in order to increase everyone's benefit. Jed tends to be an optimist about the future while I and apparently you as well are more of a realist. The world is in a mess. The West has created an unstable and unsustainable economic structure and many parts

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: > These improvements have been drastic in some cases. LED lighting takes > only about one-fifth of the electricity of incandescent lights. > Illumination is a large fraction of total energy use. See: http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=99&t=3 QUOTE: "How much electricity is used

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread James Bowery
Sorry, Ed, I should have clarified that I wasn't referring to you as having posited a conspiracy theory. My abstractions may have been a bit too for the present conversation... On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Edmund Storms wrote: > James, I have no idea what you mean to say here. No conspirac

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Edmund Storms wrote: Of course LENR is denied by the West. The technology is a real and profound > danger to the West. It would undermine the economics of the energy > industries, on which the West is built, and it would give the Third world, > including China and India, great advantage. > That

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread Edmund Storms
James, I have no idea what you mean to say here. No conspiracy is involved or implied. The effect of LENR on the world's economy is obvious to anyone who understands economics. This is reality, not some proposed crazy idea. On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:46 AM, James Bowery wrote: The homeostatic

RE: [Vo]:New LENR patent application from STMicroelectronics

2013-09-23 Thread pagnucco
*** Resend of last partial email *** Jones, By a nonsingular potential, he means that the 1/r term must be incorrect as r --> 0. I have not read his theory so I have no opinion. The "De Haas-van Alphen effect" is a new one for me. Interesting. I need to research it. Whether it relates to Willia

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread Edmund Storms
I agree, stupidly is certainly at the core of the problem. I think the atom bomb provides a useful example of the situation. Early during WWII, scientists understood that Germany was working on the atom bomb and if they were successful, the power structure of the world would change. Only

RE: [Vo]:New LENR patent application from STMicroelectronics

2013-09-23 Thread Jones Beene
Interview with Pharis Williams http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IB2wIBhAoVs _ -Original Message- From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com BTW, a recently published cold D+D f

RE: [Vo]:New LENR patent application from STMicroelectronics

2013-09-23 Thread pagnucco
Jones Beene wrote: > > -Original Message- > From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com > > BTW, a recently published cold D+D fusion patent application is - > Deuterium Reactor -- US 20130235963 A1 > > ABSTRACT > The Deuterium Reactor is a fusion reactor whose design is based upon a > non-singular elec

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread James Bowery
The homeostatic mechanisms of these systems embody a kind of intelligence that is all-too-frequently attributed to "conspiracy". This is complicated by the fact that genuine conspiratorial behavior is sometimes involved. It is further complicated by the vague definition of "conspiracy" as the wor

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread Alain Sepeda
It is hard for me to imagine that it is an intelligent desire to protect economic rent for few against the western population... Having worked in finance, in Internet bubble, I would rather blame it on individual weakness (selfishness, ambition, greed, self delusion, submission to easy) sewed to

RE: [Vo]:New LENR patent application from STMicroelectronics

2013-09-23 Thread Jones Beene
-Original Message- From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com BTW, a recently published cold D+D fusion patent application is - Deuterium Reactor -- US 20130235963 A1 ABSTRACT The Deuterium Reactor is a fusion reactor whose design is based upon a non-singular electrostatic required by the quantizat

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread Edmund Storms
Of course LENR is denied by the West. The technology is a real and profound danger to the West. It would undermine the economics of the energy industries, on which the West is built, and it would give the Third world, including China and India, great advantage. The people in charge in the W

Re: [Vo]:New LENR patent application from STMicroelectronics

2013-09-23 Thread pagnucco
Those are fairly old - filed in years 2000 and 1995, well before Rossi. I am not sure they were working with Celani that early. BTW, a recently published cold D+D fusion patent application is - Deuterium Reactor -- US 20130235963 A1 ABSTRACT The Deuterium Reactor is a fusion reactor whose desig

Re: [Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
This doesn't just "seem kinda far out." It IS far out. Far, far out. Farther out than the Voyager 1 spacecraft. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:New LENR patent application from STMicroelectronics

2013-09-23 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > I don't think they are related to Rossi. No, it was Celani.

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Years ago some Americans opposed to cold fusion tried to change this article, and they tried to ban LENR-CANR.org. A Japanese moderator asked them not to. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:New LENR patent application from STMicroelectronics

2013-09-23 Thread Daniel Rocha
They have 2 other applications: https://www.google.com/patents/WO2001029844A1 https://www.google.com/patents/WO1997020318A1 I don't think they are related to Rossi. -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com

[Vo]:Cold Fusion on Wikipedia japanes and chinese

2013-09-23 Thread Alain Sepeda
Did you notice that Cold fusion was treated much more in a balanced way in Chinese and japanese . https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%B8%B8%E6%B8%A9%E6%A0%B8%E8%9E%8D%E5%90%88 translated: http://translate.google.fr/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fja.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F%E5%B8%B8%E6%B

[Vo]:Was the Navy shooting far more significant than it seems?

2013-09-23 Thread John Berry
This is may seem kinda far out, but it claims that a nuclear false flag attack was going to take place in Washington to start a war with Syria. And the MP's were going to arrest Obama. http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2013/09/22/washington-dc-navy-yard-shooting-linked-to-attempted-arrest-of-obama-for