E-Cat world reporting another delay from the TIP testers... early autumn
Soon we will probably know a little bit more. The group of scientists from
Uppsala and KTH has expanded with more scientists from other countries and
the second independent test is about to get published early autumn. The
Well, this is a good sign.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
A few weeks ago, Jed Rothwell said that professors have a very casual
relationship with deadlines. A better round of adjectives would be
thoughtless, supercilious, aloof.
There is not much doubt in my mind that this report will eventually be
positive. If it had been a blowout, they'd have
I'm a little disappointed, but as Daniel and others have suggested, at the
very least, this seems to suggest that nuclear levels of excess heat have
been measured yet again. Why bother with delaying the report for the sake
of isotopic analysis otherwise?
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Kevin
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
Why bother with delaying the report for the sake of isotopic analysis
otherwise?
***For exactly the reason I just detailed: they are using this
information selfishly.
Kevin, maybe you're right, who knows, but for the most part that suggestion
is pure innuendo. It's like making the argument that Gamberle has some
shadowy partner who wants to steal DGT's technology, and so he broke his
NDA and issued a fraudulent statement to make DGT look bad. Possibly, but
Andrea Rossi
June 21st, 2014 at 9:18 AM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=848cpage=7#comment-969885Giuliano
Bettini and Gentle Readers:
Please disregard any rumor, whisper, noise, voice, whistle, chant, music
or whatsoever acoustic waves vibration regarding the date of
Jones sez:
... sounding like a scratched vinyl record
Perhaps so. However I'm inclined to speculate that two inescapable
conclusions have been drawn:
(1) Spurious anomalous heat continues to be recorded.
(2) They can not accurately predict and/or control the generation of
spurious
Steven,
Yes ... and there could be a third and more important inescapable
conclusion.
You do not delay a report for an isotopic analysis if there has been no
excess heat ! You simply issue a negative report.
IOW if the report was indeed delayed for this reason, it is a slam-dunk that
Sorry to sound like that scratched record myself - as I see others have said
the same thing.
Steven,
Yes ... and there could be a third and more important inescapable
conclusion.
You do not delay a report for an isotopic analysis if there has been no
excess heat ! You simply issue a
http://boingboing.net/2014/06/21/huge-crop-circle-in-italy.html
This magnificent crop circle appeared last night in Poirino, Italy. Known
as the LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions) Clock crop circle, it's either
the result of extraterrestrials, a beam weapon, or master crop circle maker
Francesco
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a little disappointed, but as Daniel and others have suggested, at the
very least, this seems to suggest that nuclear levels of excess heat have
been measured yet again. Why bother with delaying the report for the sake
let us imagine the unimaginable...
It work.
now, the swedish scientist have measured heat... positive.
they re mesure... delay...positive...
impossible.
so the look for nuclear ashes... delay...
interesting but uncmmon...
they remeasure... delay...
they prepare a paper a report...
since it is
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
A few weeks ago, Jed Rothwell said that professors have a very casual
relationship with deadlines.
Douglas Adams:
“I love deadlines. I love the whooshing noise they make as they go by.”
On the other hand, imagine you
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin, maybe you're right, who knows, but for the most part that
suggestion is pure innuendo.
***No, it's not pure innuendo, it is partial innuendo. If I had posted
that on April 3rd because the report was due in April,
***So... then... what is your speculation? You spent a bunch of energy
using exaggeration fallacies to knock mine down. Where's yours?
Kevin, you were the one who responded to my original post -- which had
nothing to do with your speculations whatsoever. You decided to initiate
this
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
. However I'm inclined to speculate that two inescapable
conclusions have been drawn:
(1) Spurious anomalous heat continues to be recorded.
(2) They can not accurately predict and/or
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
You do not delay a report for an isotopic analysis if there has been no
excess heat ! You simply issue a negative report.
***And conversely, you simply issue a positive report ask Rossi publicly
for permission to do
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin, you were the one who responded to my original post -- which had
nothing to do with your speculations whatsoever.
***That is simply not the case. Your post was a response to mine, and
included a wholesale copy of my
tom clarke wrote:
*The previous post does not address the matter of limited Q at ultra-high
power density. The field concentration you can get is therefore also
limited.A simple way to look at it is that while hyper-high intensity em
radiation could do many things - the
Kevin -- My very first message was a response to Jones' OP. Here it is
again in case you forgot:
I'm a little disappointed, but as Daniel and others have suggested, at the
very least, this seems to suggest that nuclear levels of excess heat have
been measured yet again. Why bother with delaying
Jones,
I have little reason to disagree with you assessment.
It will be interesting to see what happens when they finally get around to
reporting on their findings.
Well... ahem... What we have here is a failure to analyze the data
properly... Uh, well, that is my professional opinion on this
Oh ye with little patience:
A WATCHED POT NEVER BOILS.
Bob
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin, you were the one who responded to my original post -- which had nothing
to do with your speculations whatsoever.
***That is simply not the
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
A few weeks ago, Jed Rothwell said that professors have a very casual
relationship with deadlines. A better round of adjectives would be
thoughtless, supercilious, aloof.
I agree. They know that people are waiting anxiously. They should publish
an
:53:25 -0700
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20140621
I'm a little disappointed, but as Daniel and others have suggested, at the
very least, this seems to suggest that nuclear levels of excess heat have
been measured yet again. Why bother with delaying the report
Or another possibility: some men in black suits and mirror shades told
them you can't publish this as written, matter of National, NATO, EU,
World security, top secret ( pick one or more). We will tell you what
you can say, and when, or else...and don't tell Rossi we were here.
That's how it
just a nasty question ...
who opposed Cold Fusion research ? DoD,Navy ? Commercial/Military Nuke labs
?
or rather : APS, , DoE, NYT, Swedish Public Radio, INFN, CERN,
scientific journals...
was the aggression like commando and killing, or academic execution,
insults, peer-review blocking,
They could have decided they just wanted to put some time and space between
the swedish radio thing and their report.
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
E-Cat world reporting another delay from the TIP testers... early autumn
Soon we will probably know a
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
just a nasty question ...
who opposed Cold Fusion research ?
M.I.T. for one. Read Dr. Mallove's extensive report:
http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/mitcfreport.pdf
Has anyone done a more complete job of chronicling the institutional
incompetence
http://jimbowery.blogspot.com/2011/07/institutional-incompetence-conspiracy.html
than Charles Beaudette in Excess Heat
http://www.amazon.com/Excess-Heat-Research-Prevailed-Edition/dp/0967854830
?
On Sat, Jun 21,
Hi guys,
I'm not too sure how it would work, but here it goes anyway.
I don't think that there is anyone in this world who would bet that the
reported COP will be 2, not even the skeptics, as they believe that the
report will be wrong or faked.
Hi guys I am a Swede at least I lived there until 1988.
There are no black suits in Sweden. There are nobody informing friends to
make them rich. It is a small and relatively homogeneous country no big
lies survive for long.
I am absolutely sure that it is a combination of inconclusive result and
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
just a nasty question ...
who opposed Cold Fusion research ? DoD,Navy ? Commercial/Military Nuke
labs ?
or rather : APS, , DoE, NYT, Swedish Public Radio, INFN, CERN,
scientific journals...
All of them opposed it, and they still do. See, for
It is so. Even now, they will not turn the Hubble telescope on the active
galaxies that need the most study, instead wasting time pointing it at the Moon
and Pluto. (A spacecraft will soon be at Pluto.) HST has a limited lifetime and
capabilities that no Earth-bound telescope will ever have.
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
E-Cat world reporting another delay from the TIP testers...
I feel that someone should volunteer to write a Vortex beerhall song. We
can while away the time to the TIP report by loudly singing the song and
clinking beer
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
Hi guys I am a Swede at least I lived there until 1988.
There are no black suits in Sweden. There are nobody informing friends to
make them rich.
***Then are Swedes somehow immune to the human condition?
It is a
Vortex Beerhall song.
IN MERCATU VERITAS by Matt Robinson *
Composed with contingency dependent on the positive outcome of a certain
report allegedly being prepared for publication, and a slight nod to T. S.
Eliot’s ‘Macavity’
A word of caution ‘fore you read,
this is based on
Hello Kevin,
No Swedes are not immune to any bad things. I was hesitating before I
wrote my post as I could hear that protest. However, it is a small and
homogeneous country where the head of (the CIA of Sweden) is forced to
explain himself. He is criticized for having collaborated with the US
I believe that LENR is many centuries ahead of its time. Let us understand
this paradigm changing device through an like example.
Let us put ourselves back to the year 1014 AD. Imagine that a smart phone
was given to a monk who toiled for most of his cloistered life coping one
book and you told
39 matches
Mail list logo
