Re: [Vo]:Physicists Have Officially Smashed The Record For High-Temperature Superconductivity

My freezer claims it can go to that... On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:35 PM Axil Axil wrote: > > https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-have-officially-smashed-the-record-for-high-temperature-superconductivity > > > Physicists Have Officially Smashed The Record For High-Temperature >

Re: [Vo]:test2

icle On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 4:23 PM William Beaty wrote: > > test > > -- > > ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) ) > William J. Beatyhttp://staff.washington.edu/wbeaty/ > wbeaty, uw edu Research Engineer > billb, amasci com UW

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

Thanks God! Good job we can dispense with the experimenting and theory, we just have to ask you! On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:12 AM Brian Ahern wrote: > Room temp SC is impossible > > -- > *From:* Axil Axil > *Sent:* Friday, February 22, 2019 11:25 PM > *To:*

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

Vibrator, do you have a machine that generates energy, a device that powers itself? If so, then yes it is beyond question that you have done it, call me captain obvious. Then it is a question of if you are honest, personally I would be willing to consider that is possible as I believe that CoE

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

: > On 5/06/2018 1:51 PM, John Berry wrote: > > Actually, I have another one... > > Take a large loop apply a current, we see that each side of the loop > experiences a pushing outwards. > > Now, we remove one side, from the loop and replace it with capacitor > plates. > >

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

broken or incomplete, maybe the loophole would work on reality, maybe it wouldn't, but either way we can with logic find such flaws. On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 5:51 PM, John Berry wrote: > Actually, I have another one... > > Take a large loop apply a current, we see that each side of

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

as if you can put a current, if space can be polarized, then it can also be thrust against! On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 5:42 PM, John Berry wrote: > > > > > > *On 5/06/2018 12:30 AM, John Berry wrote:John, there might be the odd > exception.I can give you an example that s

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

*On 5/06/2018 12:30 AM, John Berry wrote:John, there might be the odd exception.I can give you an example that seems to break the CoM and CoE, it isn't practical. Now there might be an explanation, MAYBE it produces a photos that explains the propulsive effects... But I doubt it.Now, the easiest

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

John, there might be the odd exception. I can give you an example that seems to break the CoM and CoE, it isn't practical. Now there might be an explanation, MAYBE it produces a photos that explains the propulsive effects... But I doubt it. Now, the easiest way to explain (though there is a

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

Vibrator, there are a number of claims involving violation of CoM and CoE, and it involves an asymmetry in the rate a acceleration/deceleration. I wonder if that fits your description. Also sometimes this seems to include a influence or energy field exiting the mass. Is this maybe the case? On

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

es, >>> and then delivering them - but usually the address to deliver to is ON the >>> package, so, for me, that's just about the right amount of >>> 'responsibility'. I can pretty much totally handle it (and they say one >>> day i might even get paid). THI

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

ON the > package, so, for me, that's just about the right amount of > 'responsibility'. I can pretty much totally handle it (and they say one > day i might even get paid). THIS on the other hand.. it's too hot a > potato for little old me. But it also doesn't have an ad

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

Yes, but that is hard to do. And scammers have sold stuff in the past... On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > The best way to sell an idea is to produce a product based on the idea > that can make money and lots of it. > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 8:15 PM, John

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

correction: Ideally film the construction On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:13 PM, John Berry wrote: > Hi vibrator. The "right" people are hard to fine. > > Very few people will consider that the CoM or the CoE could possibly be > violated and won't even humor you. > &g

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

Hi vibrator. The "right" people are hard to fine. Very few people will consider that the CoM or the CoE could possibly be violated and won't even humor you. Actually, that's not true, a lot of people who don't know what that even means will happily believe you, but they will not be of any use

Re: [Vo]:Meshugganons

e has always been a combination of inspiration and perspiration > though it is in the sweating in the performance that the donnas are > separated from the primadonnas. > > > > Watch and wait or join me and make a difference. > > > > The greatest threat to the world is wa

Re: [Vo]:Meshugganons

ntentionally produced and reduced with prescribed changes in the > experiment. So far so good. Of course this must be repeated with ever more > precision and care, an effort in process at this moment. > > > > *From:* John Berry <aethe...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, April 16, 2018

Re: [Vo]:Meshugganons

Is there any difference when the tube, shielding and Geiger counter are vertically disposed as in the image, or horizontally? How can you be sure it isn't some capacitive coupling effect? Could you ground the shields? Could you apply voltage spikes to the plates without them being exposed to the

Re: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons

>From the patent... "a free electron has inertial mass but not gravitational mass." and "Thus, a free electron is not gravitationally attracted to ordinary matter. " Really? Can that really add up? Pretty sure this is not very much in agreement with conventional theor

Re: [Vo]:Cap Warp - McCandlish

est scientific breakthrough is sitting here waiting or me to build a competent and proper scale device with real energy input, or waiting for me to discover how to "Macgyver" it with a paperclip, a 9v battery and a magnet. John Berry On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:26 AM, David Roberson &

Re: [Vo]:Cap Warp - McCandlish

? There is a lot of evidence that circular things and circular arrays of things can do things that are extraordinary and unexpected by a single element. This is not out of reach, it can be explained. John Berry On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 1:10 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: >

[Vo]:Cap Warp - McCandlish

this group isn't interested? John Berry

Re: [Vo]:CERN Declares War On The Standard Model

and the most interesting thing that billions of dollars can do is find bulls#!+ like that! The huge gaps in understanding are ignored, but I'm glad they are tracking down tiny details. They are blind to so much! The standard model can eat our dust! John Berry On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Kevin

Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

for collecting data of failures to be a success :) John Berry On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> It might have limited application, but mostly, I don't see it, too often >> su

Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

So if that was done with cold fusion... IMO failures in experimental sciences are too specific for it to be meaningful. It might have limited application, but mostly, I don't see it, too often success and failure is just an inch apart. John Berry On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Nigel Dyer &l

Re: [Vo]:N.Y. Times report on corruption in academic science

Cancer is IMO easily treated. But the treatments don't lead to patented medicine or expensive treatments. I have zero fear of cancer. John On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com>

Re: [Vo]:N.Y. Times report on corruption in academic science

http://www.australiannationalreview.com/cancer-research-fraud-claims-nobel-prize-winner/ On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > I believe there is a great deal of corruption in academic science. Several > cold fusion researchers, biologists and others have

Re: [Vo]:Li batteries

The Samsung Galaxy has a serious battery fire issue. I don't think it is that size has a huge impact on the probability other than maybe scaling linearly obviously, but that it has a huge impact on the seriousness of a problem. John On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Jones Beene

Re: [Vo]:Unsubscribe me, please

"Bi Vort"., quite appropriate. On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Lawrence de Bivort > wrote: > >> Thanks. >> >> Lawrence de Bivort >> > > You have to do it yourself. > > To unsubscribe, send a

Re: [Vo]:Article: Researchers accidentally turn carbon dioxide into ethanol

But Jones, then you burn the Ethanol putting the CO2 back into the air! But if the Ethanol is used to make plastic, or something solid... On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jones Beene wrote: > Rant of the day: > > Oak Ridge needs ever increasing levels of public funding,

Re: [Vo]:Article: Electrons with no mass acquire a mass in the presence of a high magnetic field

"zirconium pentatelluride,ZrTe5, that provides strong evidence for the chiral magnetic effect:. My research is all based on chirality of coils that produce fundamentally different "currents". This is no doubt closely related to my work! On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 1:23 PM, John B

Re: [Vo]:Article: Electrons with no mass acquire a mass in the presence of a high magnetic field

"This is because in ZrTe5 the electrons responsible for the current have no mass." That itself sounds like a dramatic claim, electrons with no mass? I am able to produce a current of something that I believe is like an electron albeit not propperly physical, and I believe it gains something by

Re: [Vo]:Gain from wires and magnets?

Floyd Sweets device worked, but it is aetheric as well as electromagnetic. It has accounts of antigravity, freezing wires, and once when overloaded it made a vortex sound... Many of the more credible coils and magnets free energy devices have other anomalous effects besides mere overunity. And

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive powered by entangled photons

not sure I was being serious, but then again I'm not certain that I'm not being either. On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > *From:* John Berry > > Well, particles (electrons, protons, atoms, bucky balls, ignored cats) > fired at a sc

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive powered by entangled photons

Well, particles (electrons, protons, atoms, bucky balls, ignored cats) fired at a screen still produce an interference... So maybe protons could tunnel through a barrier if there is a wave from another proton that interferes? Could this be how tunneling works? On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 2:01 AM,

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive powered by entangled photons

This reminds me of a question I have had. Imaging we have 2 lasers putting out 2 coherent light beams along the same path, one frequency is very slightly higher than the other. Constrictive/destructive interference between the 2 beams mean that along the path at time they double in strength, but

Re: [Vo]:New force couples electron to neutron

I should have said: And that only as a group and or over time or at a distance does the fields become a smooth inverse square with no irregularities, perturbations or features. On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:56 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe I'm missing somet

Re: [Vo]:New force couples electron to neutron

Maybe I'm missing something here, but all this strong, weak and 5th force nonsense... Couldn't it simply be that the electric field from a single subatomic particle isn't a perfect inverse square law field on the micro-scale especially at a single point in time, but has perturbations. maybe an

Re: [Vo]:Re: Anyone can "steal" IP from a patent

The only way to steal IP from a patent (other than producing and selling in secret) is to make changes, possibly ones that give you a superior technology that is not protected by their patent that you then patent. ' Patents are about giving IP freely, but protecting the rights. Thinking about it,

Re: [Vo]:Re: Declaration from Eindhoven University of Technology related to M. Yildiz magnet motor

Including the energy contained in electric, gravitational and magnetic potential energy? Including chemical and nuclear energy? All energy is motion of the vacuum? In what sense can these types of energy be motion of the vacuum? On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:55 PM, wrote: >

Re: [Vo]:Re: Declaration from Eindhoven University of Technology related to M. Yildiz magnet motor

That gives his claim far more credit in my eyes. Gravitational anomalies (and others) occurring with free energy is common enough. And indicates there is something real behind it. John On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:41 AM, H Ucar wrote: > > Hi Robin, > > "My comment is that I

Re: [Vo]:Re: Declaration from Eindhoven University of Technology related to M. Yildiz magnet motor

It is easy to establish how much energy is in a magnetic field. Just see how much energy would need to be used up to establish such a magnetic field with a superconductor coil. Even a superconductor coil requires a voltage to establish a current due to the impedance involved. As such there is a

Re: [Vo]:Re: Declaration from Eindhoven University of Technology related to M. Yildiz magnet motor

Can anyone really argue though that the conservation of energy is not merely a general observation and a philosophical concept. It is fine to say "I can't see how it could be done" given the assumption that there is symmetry in the underlying mechanics of simultaneous creation of one energy and

Re: [Vo]:Bacteria able to eat plastic bottles discovered by scientists

I think the word "Trumps" is one that people might find a bit disconcerting at this juncture. Unless by "trumping" you mean to attract racists and incite violence. On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Russ George wrote: > Far better to just start replacing all of the

Re: [Vo]:Is Rossi sick?

Mats, are Muons hard to detect? Or just hard to distinguish from electrons? On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Mats Lewan wrote: > Yes Axil, > > I spoke to Holmlid, and one thing that he underlined was possible large > amounts of muons from the reaction, and that muons were

Re: [Vo]:Intelligent robots threaten millions of jobs

I do accept improvements have been made. Still, plenty of extremely dangerous jobs exist for men, I live in a logging town. Now that is up there with atlantic fishing in a small boat danger wise. John On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:16 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > That

Re: [Vo]:Intelligent robots threaten millions of jobs

; > Notice the cross over around 1836 for "feminine" and "masculine" and how > the usage of "feminist" begins to rise sharply around 1970. > > Harry > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:47 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Th

Re: [Vo]:Intelligent robots threaten millions of jobs

. And inequality is inequality no matter which way it is pointed. John On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think if as many women were killed at jobs, especially if it was the >> same bu

Re: [Vo]:Intelligent robots threaten millions of jobs

I think if as many women were killed at jobs, especially if it was the same but reverse of the actual m/f ratio, there would have long ago been a massive push to make these jobs safer. On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 3:23

Re: [Vo]:Article: Chiral magnetic effect generates quantum current

Ok, wow! So I have for about 20 years been collecting evidence of parallel electric and magnetic fields creating an anomalous voltage (they don't say voltage, but mention extracting energy from Dirac sea and a powerful increase in conductivity). I have been working with chiral effects for about 5

Re: [Vo]:Orbo- Battery _Steorn and Lockheed- Bushman Battery Patent

Here is a good video that shows he slot antenna effect and how some cheap aluminum tape can fix it up for a massive improvement in shielding. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3S2KDuVxaU On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: > It only has a 1 year

Re: [Vo]:North Korea... and the UDD "candle"?

UDD > to TNT is about one billion to one. The NK could even have used laser > triggering. > > > For a sardonic laugh, imagine 1,000 laser-pointers surrounding a tiny fuel > pellet like mini version of NIF. > > > *From:* John Berry > > Looking it up, Boosted Fission if a

Re: [Vo]:North Korea... and the UDD "candle"?

Given the features of UDD, assuming Holmlid is correct, then > there are options which could include Cohen’s claim of a ballotechnic > driven fusion device (no fission trigger) which was largely debunked > > > > *From:* John Berry > > > > Not sure what you mean by 'boost

Re: [Vo]:North Korea... and the UDD "candle"?

Not sure what you mean by 'boosted fission' but my understanding is that ALL Fusion bombs are either Fission-Fusion or Fission-Fusion-Fission. We don't publically have the technical ability to create mass fusion without fission first, if we did hot fusion power would be a reality. John On Fri,

Re: [Vo]:new images RAR Energia gravity motor

If it works.. And that's a big IF, I do suspect it is possible to get energy out of asymmetric inertial transformation. There is quite a bit of strong evidence that motion rectifiers do work (dean drive etc), and this is the other side of the same coil, that the acceleration profile with which

Re: [Vo]:new images RAR Energia gravity motor

Sheesh, that monstrosity is only meant to generate 30KW. So even IF it works perfectly, it is a terrible sounding investment! I can kinda understand that they might be having trouble with it even IF they are right about the concept, there are so many moving parts in that thing it would be easy

Re: [Vo]:Re: Magnetic moment .vs motion as source of magnetic field

hmmm I wonder... If spin is a spin of the electrons field, then maybe electrons are like earth moon, and for each revolution around the center, they revolve once so as to always show the same side to the nucleus. This way each orbit would produce one revolution. And it would mean spin only

[Vo]:Magnetic moment .vs motion as source of magnetic field

I tend not to agree with the belief of the author, but he has some good points http://educate-yourself.org/cn/ElectronBeamMagneticField.pdf Currently there are two explanations. One surely must be wrong.

Re: [Vo]:Re: Magnetic moment .vs motion as source of magnetic field

Robin, for what its worth I think you are probably right. A free electron having a magnetic moment makes no sense to me. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Bob Cook wrote: > > > Where does the photon get its angular momentum, when it and its twin > appear from

Re: [Vo]:Re: Magnetic moment .vs motion as source of magnetic field

Robin, the question and perhaps some of the following comments made here lend evidence to you being correct. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:34 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Robin, for what its worth I think you are probably right. > > A free electron having a magnet

Re: [Vo]:Re: Magnetic moment .vs motion as source of magnetic field

Strange, I pasted the link, but then the email accidentally sent prematurely without the link: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/126986/where-does-the-electron-get-its-high-magnetic-moment-from On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:38 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: &

Re: [Vo]:N. Y. Times article comment

Bob, you seem to agree there is warming... That CO2 is increasing, by humans... I presume you agree that increased CO2 heats things up with the greenhouse effect. I presume you understand that oil pays a lot of people a lot of money to make global warming look like some kind of conspiracy... I

Re: [Vo]:N. Y. Times article comment

internally believe (and did early on), the insurance industry, the military believes it is real. At least the last 2 are taking actions on the presumption rising seas. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:51 AM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bob, you seem to agree there is warm

Re: [Vo]:Electric Rocket-like Propulsion Patent Application by Banduric

Very similar to my ideas. This is the same line of thinking that can produce a conclusion of negative impedance in a non-inductive coil with a high negative charge. I had never studied the idea for propulsive forces. On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:05 AM, H Ucar wrote: >

Re: [Vo]:Electric Rocket-like Propulsion Patent Application by Banduric

, and a quick trip to Mars. John On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:20 AM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Very similar to my ideas. > > This is the same line of thinking that can produce a conclusion of > negative impedance in a non-inductive coil with a high negative charge. >

Re: [Vo]:Electric Rocket-like Propulsion Patent Application by Banduric

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:31 AM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > BTW, presuming things scale linearly with velocity (but it could be > better) if you ran his test setup at 100,000 RPM and 500KV which still > would not be the limit of plausible engineering you would h

[Vo]:Antigravity started at Vortex - Fluxliner

Way back when multiple people apparently replicated the capwarp successfully, reporting their results in Vort. I recall one guy even made a capacitor using the pages of a book as the dielectric and claimed results. http://amasci.com/caps/capwarp.html Well now there is a fascinating claim that a

Re: [Vo]:The vacuum is the glue that keeps the universe together.

So then, are the radius that electrons orbit at, points where the 'uncertainty' of their position becomes evenly distributed around the atom, such that they exist in all those positions simultaneously? Essentially a maximization and perfection of their uncertainty. Also, if this is so, would it

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

It still seems to happen, but yeah you're right, way less energetic. But still an explosion: https://youtu.be/vRKK6pliejs?t=43 On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:35 AM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com>

Re: [Vo]:Re: Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

Good question. A cellphone app maybe? On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:40 PM, jjam...@gmail.com wrote: > > Even there would be a conventional way to explain the explosion, it may be > worth to check the presence of ionizing particles at this short moment. > Could be an affordable

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

Well this has to be testable. And if Beta decay or some funky electric current of unclear origin, it must be detectable and either way somehow useful. And again which it is can be discovered. This is very doable in a backyard manner. What test would verify the presence of electrical energy

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

And then try: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDlyg_9m7tk On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:24 AM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Perhaps because of this breakthrough? > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmlAYnFF_s8 > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:08 AM, jjam...@gmail.c

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

Perhaps because of this breakthrough? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmlAYnFF_s8 On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:08 AM, jjam...@gmail.com wrote: > I exploded two button batteries by heating through soldering iron. > Explosion is spectacular, maybe comparable to amno. When

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

, it is likely the anomalously energetic explosions are a result of melting electrodes. John On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:24 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Perhaps because of this brea

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

by a long way, then smashing this on the face of a strong magnet should create a powerful magnetic pulse. Very tempted to try that. John On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:01 AM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.

Re: [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through

Excuse my relative ignorance of nuclear physics (not my bag, baby), but if a Neutron is ejected by conventional means, it will exit with enough energy to pose a hazard in the ways mentioned previously. But being that Neutrons are not charged, if they are induced to be ejected with comparatively

Re: [Vo]:A model of the proton to describe Holmlid's results

If Protons are are made of Muons, then could Muons or anti-Muons fired at a Proton/atom not cause Proton Decay and atomic Transmutation/Fission? Particle physics isn't my bag, anyone know what results? On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5,

Re: [Vo]:A model of the proton to describe Holmlid's results

If Protons were composed of Muons and Anti-Muons, both short lived and annihilate with each other, how could there be no evidence of Proton Decay? I didn't even finish reading, so maybe this was explained later, but that's all I had the time or head space to observe. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:43

[Vo]:Why apathy and denial rules on threats of extinction!

If I asked people about the situation with climate change and similar questions I am sure I'd get 2 answers, apathy and denial. What I will show is that these 2 conditions come from factors of our biology that make us poorly equipped or indeed almost entirely unable to react with any power to

Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

orbit. John On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 4:10 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote: I suspect that a force of this nature will balance out in the long run due to the rotation of the Earth. Dave -Original Message- From: John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l

Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

I'm not mistaken about the gravitational impact of a fleet of flying cars suspended in the air by a reactionless propulsion, the earth would face many millions or billions of tons of net force pushing on it. The question is how long would this take to effect the earth's orbit significantly?

Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

Here is an interesting thought, if this did work to produce thrust that did not act against the earth, then the earth would be moved in the direction of the device due to attraction to the device (flying car) equal to the weight of the object (it is attracted to the whole mass of the earth, and

Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

, but it is not going to enable one to travel among the stars. Hovering gives us flying cars. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:50 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, the reaction mass is the earth. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:44 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Frank Znidarsic's message

Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

Or the reality of the conservation of energy. It is just a theory. On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:56 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote: It concerns me that an observer on Earth will notice that the mass and thus energy of the stationary car held up by the drive is becoming lower with

Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

Yes, the reaction mass is the earth. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:44 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Frank Znidarsic's message of Mon, 11 May 2015 18:58:16 -0400: Hi Frank, [snip] The video states that m drive obeys Newtow's laws. It has no reaction mass. It does not obey Newton's

Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

Ok, well if it is used for static thrust only, it is then a coin toss if it would work opposing gravity as static on the surface of the earth experiences 1G of acceleration. According to the equivalence principle... On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

A reactionless drive tends to break the conservation of energy by just existing. Since there is no equal and opposite energy does not balance, double the velocity would be achieved with double the energy but yield 4 times the stored energy, eventually that leads to excess energy out. Now in the

Re: [Vo]:vortex mass

I think they have Eric, if you put a bunch of photons in a reflective box, the resistance to acceleration of the box is increased by the presence of the photons just consider the blue/red shifting of the energy of the reflecting photons. And I believe it is considered likely that photons also

Re: [Vo]:doubling speed every 2 years for decades more, Intel silicon photonics now revolutionizing data centers, Michael Kassner: Rich Murray 2015.01.26

Programming could surely be improved a great deal, since some languages were designed to be bad to give programmers lots of work. And x86 architecture is baroque from an assembly language perspective. But while I am on the topic, let me go slightly off topic, there is a lot that I think is rather

Re: [Vo]:doubling speed every 2 years for decades more, Intel silicon photonics now revolutionizing data centers, Michael Kassner: Rich Murray 2015.01.26

BTW AFAIK Moores Law isn't that speeds increase but that transistor densities increase. On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com wrote: What James says is true about the radius of connection. However, two things have been driving that radius smaller - smaller gate

Re: [Vo]:Message that will not post

19, 2015 at 4:49 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Your vision of the LENR future is too limited. I am not talking about LENR. I am talking about the economics and cost efficiency of different energy systems, such as central generation, PV

[Vo]:Message that will not post

Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Your vision of the LENR future is too limited. I am not talking about LENR. I am talking about the economics and cost efficiency of different energy systems, such as central generation, PV and -- in the future -- LENR. Every technology has built-in

Re: [Vo]:Why cold fusion will not need any grid

Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Your vision of the LENR future is too limited. I am not talking about LENR. I am talking about the economics and cost efficiency of different energy systems, such as central generation, PV and -- in the future -- LENR. Every technology has built-in

Re: [Vo]:Toyota puts fuel cell patents in the public domain

Without some breakthrough, fuel cells are just a distraction. http://www.autoblog.com/2014/08/05/why-battery-electric-vehicles-will-beat-fuel-cells/ On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:35 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote: Misinformation? Toyota wants to make its competitors think it's

Re: [Vo]:Re: The MFMP replication effort live on youtube.

Under certain conditions the fine structure constant has been found to differ from the regular value. On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Doing science inside the dog bone can be like doing science inside another universe. There is no certainty that physics or

Re: [Vo]:Why smart people defend bad ideas

I think you mean to say science SHOULD BE driven by experiments over arguments. However if science were driven by experiments, this list would not need to exist. John On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 8:21 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote: Idiocy. Science is driven by experiment over

[Vo]:Does heat=collision=collapse of quantum wave function make sense?

When thinking about the importance of cold in many Quantum Phenomena, I wondered if the reason has to do with heat being microscopic motion and collision of atoms, and shouldn't a collision collapse a wave function? And would collapsing wave functions be a bit of an issue when trying to establish

Re: [Vo]:Why smart people defend bad ideas

I think that different countries of origin is an important thing, different first languages. These things have huge impacts on thinking. Which colours someone can see is effected by what language they are thinking in (proven in experiments). Qualified, and unqualified is another important one,

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic crystals

have not seen adequate evidence that BEC reactions have anything to do with LENR. I hope that the mechanism will be understood soon as a consequence of the recent increased replication activity. Dave -Original Message- From: John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic crystals

In this email I mull over and ponder things, if this strikes you as too long, please just read the below *bolded* and *italicized* *sentence*. And to clarify, by enhancing the signal in the quantum vacuum, I mean enhancing the wave function of the particle. To use boats as an analogy, enhancing

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >