civilzation) might actually get out of
the PetroAge and completely free of OPEC, the Middle East, the
PetroMafia, before we self-destruct...
Jones
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
For all those watchers from the woods that are want-a-be hydrogen
inventors,
please have your wills in order :-)
http
]:This is a must see, please
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Mistakes are human nature and will always exist, yet overt stupidity should
not be allowed. In my opinion I actually feel YouTube should look into
censoring as they do Porn, those that abuse H2+O2 in the way they are.
Perhaps it should
Actually the hydrogen series that is truly a must see is just underway
on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHP35py9uxg
Since Jones posted this I may might as well keep you advised on when a new
part is added and Part#3 is now up. Not indexed yet, but search for MRH2O2.
For those who
Here is a link;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj_HM-i9KZM
-Original Message-
From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 11:50 AM
To: Vortex-L
Subject: [Vo]:Part3 approaching OU?
Actually the hydrogen series that is truly a must see is just
is
controversial.
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 1:19 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Part3 approaching OU?
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Compared to the same 'Constant DC Current' without CRE, the cell with CRE
showed
For all those watchers from the woods that are want-a-be hydrogen inventors,
please have your wills in order :-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isoR_Jfw1hg
Harry!
I followed this for awhile, heard about it some two months back, but I did
not find data on the input power levels to do this so how different could it
be from electrolysis? Have you seen such data anywhere?
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Maybe we should de-politicize DoE - make it closer to a private entity,
and fund it independently by forcing an excess-profits tax on the oil
companies, to pay for a completely independent department, which oil of
partisan politics cannot influence in either staffing or in decision
making.
Yeah!
In case anyone is interested...
A micro reactor for recombining H2 and O2
http://www.fzk.de/fzk/idcplg?IdcService=FZKnode=2741lang=en
Hydrogen Gas Standards
http://www.utahehs.org/index.php?tier=5id=125
If you have not seen this early electrolyzer it somehow got to YouTube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFA1aKos6LM
It was powered by 12 vdc at 100mA max current on a 50% duty cycle. What
should be noted here is the evolution of gas external of the electrodes (far
removed from the electrode
This was an early video and has gone thru many conversions to get it to the
tube. Come 9/6 or 9/7 we will try to get the first CREC vids up there. The
first ones will be only to show that it is real and no hidden #00 wires or
secret stuff to drive the cell. After that a vid will show a 3amp auto
with real rubber tubing.
*Just kidding, the above is my latest rant.
-Original Message-
From: thomas malloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 12:16 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:interesting developments
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Awaiting your replication
]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 8:52 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:interesting developments
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
gas burning in calorimeter to determine actual
output/input.
Speaking of burning a common manifold potentially explosive gas (BG or
equivalent), does anyone
Horace;
You said...
The two designs (1)utilize a capacitive interface to the electrolyte
for part of the electrolysis current, thus bypassing the resistance
of one of the electrode-electrolyte interfaces, and thus also (2)
recovering the capacitive energy on each cycle, while (3) utilizing a
, at 7:14 AM, Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Horace;
You said...
The two designs (1)utilize a capacitive interface to the electrolyte
for part of the electrolysis current, thus bypassing the resistance
of one of the electrode-electrolyte interfaces, and thus also (2)
recovering the capacitive energy
Awaiting your replication and gas burning in calorimeter to determine actual
output/input.
That is the method I think you decided upon?
-Original Message-
From: thomas malloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 1:19 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject:
Something that has always bothered me, can someone trained in science or
gifted in, objectively look at fringe ideas without subconsciously rejecting
the feasibility before analysis?
It's a question that others have been asking for decades. So could one step
back and say ignore the current Laws
Change from 'Hydrogen Outlook' thread.
Horace;
Your conceptual diagram;
(a)
|
---
| |
Z1|
| |
R1C1
|
and not waste bandwidth on theory. I firmly feel theory can follow
duplication.
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 1:51 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:CREC electrolyzer update
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
From the above
Jones!
You have posted reference to 'Splitting the Positive' as you were able to
find on the great www, which is sparse at best for some reason and what is
available is far from what I was shown decades ago. In my case I was able to
observe a system in which two primary cells were connected as (
Horace has it right, but I would like to add a few coins to it if I may?
There are two sides to the issue of what goes on in a cell (two sides that I
care about anyway) one is the side that says that every entering (e-)
becomes involved in a electrochemical reaction in order to reach its exit
Richard said:
Hmm.. thinking about imposing a vacuum and/or a separate sonic transponder
adjustable for resonance frequency studies give me a giddy feeling.
Richard don't quite follow the resonance part if you are referring to an EC.
I think S. Meyer and his pulsed cell was way to high in
it somewhat clear.
-Original Message-
From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 12:06 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [VO]: Hydrogen outlook?
Richard said:
Hmm.. thinking about imposing a vacuum and/or a separate sonic transponder
adjustable
. As a result,
nothing special is created.
Ed
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Aug 26, 2007, at 9:06 AM, Stiffler Scientific wrote:
A
conversion (in some) way takes place by interaction of this control
electrode and the ions which allow electrons to flow in the control
electrode without gas
Covered on a number of sites and the national news;
http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/19142/?a=f
A flashlight that appears to work through the visual cortex and causes a
disruption in the brain. Not to surprising when I look back many years when
experiments were done using LF created by
thomas malloy said;
I share your enthusiasm Jones. Ever since I read the article about the
Boyce electrolyzer, I've gotten the itch to find out if it works. BTW,
the efficiency claimed is 1000 times the Faradaic efficiency, more than
enough to close the loop.
Of course 1000% would be world
it be;
Cathode 2e- + 2H2O -- H2 + 2OH-
Anode 2H2O -- O2 + 4H+ + 4e-
or just what is the chemistry?
-Original Message-
From: thomas malloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 12:53 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: High efficiency electrolysis
Stiffler Scientific
Some interesting links on Faraday electrolyzers and the principle of
operation
http://www.chemsoc.org/timeline/pages/1833.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday's_law_of_electrolysis
http://www.ausetute.com.au/faradayl.html
-Original Message-
From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL
How are you powering the demon door?
PM fields.
-Original Message-
From: thomas malloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 10:41 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Maxwell's Demon, naw!
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Maxwell's Demon, How to know he is working
Maxwell's Demon, How to know he is working?
Ambient Ta ~ 23.5 'C (input air temp)
Air pump @ 4 PSIG, adds ~ 0.5 'C to air temp., giving working air temp of Tq
= 24 'C
Outlet (1) T1 = 24 'C
Outlet (2) T2 = 24.6 'C (Demon door installed)
Outlet 12 are both @ 4 PSIG and only difference is the
Here is a like to one of the first setups that showed a T increase.
http://www.stifflerscientific.com/images/dd01.jpg
THis may help in showing the basic approach.
-Original Message-
From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 8:10 AM
To: Vortex-L
, July 21, 2007 8:54 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: Maxwell's Demon, naw!
Photo is nice but captions/diagrams would be welcome.
Water vapor condensation heat could be involved if the two outlets have
different humidity.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Stiffler Scientific
: Maxwell's Demon, naw!
Do post your calculation Ron, if there is an error there is a chance that
someone here will spot it.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Stiffler Scientific [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 3:58 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: Maxwell's Demon
A man on the street muse of the universe and of which it is made.
Mans science seems determined to find the root particle of our existence,
the smallest thing that all that exists can be broken down to. But what if
this entity does not exist? What if all particle manifestations are just
that?
Harry
I always thought that the 'Twilight Zone' was natures dividing zone between
'I think I can' and 'I guess I can't' otherwise known as 'I wish I could
still think I can' :-)
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 4:23 PM
To:
Have one of the Harbor Tool devices in hand and will disassemble it today to
see if Paul and Jones are right on how they are doing it or if the wiki
article is correct.
Will not be hard to get an answer with a couple of pull scales and a yard
stick.
Will post the results and make available a
We have done some preliminary work on this device and will within an hour
post a link to some pictures.
Wiki Article Won!
It does indeed use Al and Fe on the On/Off Switch.
The pictures are self captioned with text and I will post actual test
results as soon as the unit can be reassembled. They
HERE IS A LINK TO THE INSIDES OF THE UNIT.
www.stifflerscientific.com/magtool.asp
-Original Message-
From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 1:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:How are they doing this
We have done some
Message-
From: Paul Lowrance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 2:44 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How are they doing this
Looks like a nice unit.
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
HERE IS A LINK TO THE INSIDES OF THE UNIT.
www.stifflerscientific.com/magtool.asp
Turn the magnetic field on and off with a slight movement of a switch,
unless I am drawing a blank here this device could be interesting?
Here is a link to it.
http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/displayitem.taf?function=Search
The link dd not work after pasting it here,
use the following item# to search for it; 93329-2NDA
-Original Message-
From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 12:31 PM
To: Vortex-L
Subject: [Vo]:How are they doing this
Turn the magnetic field
this:
Sorry, the item number is not a valid item.
Harry
On 11/7/2007 12:30 PM, Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Turn the magnetic field on and off with a slight movement of a switch,
unless I am drawing a blank here this device could be interesting?
Here is a link to it.
http://www.harborfreight.com
are they doing this
I believe the switch merely pulls the magnet back away from the face.
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
The link dd not work after pasting it here,
use the following item# to search for it; 93329-2NDA
-Original Message-
From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
www.jameco.com they are listing a 75W diode @ 905nm for range finding // and
'ignition', all for (#1623584) $37.55. I am waiting for a return email from
them, this is a high power dude for a consumer item.
: Harry Veeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 2:12 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How are they doing this
might the switch move some sort of magnetic shielding?
Harry
On 11/7/2007 1:00 PM, Stiffler Scientific wrote:
That was my thought, but 44lbs of pressure
'.
Okay how can a company like Jameco goof like this??
-Original Message-
From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 1:15 PM
To: Vortex-L
Subject: [Vo]:75W Laser Diode
www.jameco.com they are listing a 75W diode @ 905nm for range finding
the application you have in mind.
Harry
On 11/7/2007 1:18 PM, Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Would that not be great? Can you see the application?
The $16 is small, but the drive to the store is 1hr each way so I thought
I
could save a trip if someone had the answer that said 'nothing new here'.
Never
on Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_base
Explains how you can switch on and off this powerful
magnetic base.
G
--- Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you'll have to describe the application you have in
mind.
Harry
On 11/7/2007 1:18 PM, Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Would
Don't bite Harry, those Irish squirrels in the cage do.
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 2:31 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How are they doing this
Harry Veeder wrote:
By simply rotating the switch on and off
Paul, don't you have a computer simulation to run this idea?
I do and do not trust it as I have been able for 9 years now to fool both
the magnetic and electronics programs to show OU.
From you past posts I trust you can simulate this?
-Original Message-
From: Stiffler Scientific
LMAO
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 3:58 PM
To: vortex
Subject: [Vo]:An Irish Swing...
You can see from the Wiki entry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_base
that the switch goes about 45 degree each way for a 90
Well Said
Or shall I say for those with an IQ above 5?
-Original Message-
From: William Beaty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 3:10 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Newman, Hutchison, Bearden, Steorn
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Harry Veeder wrote:
My real reply.
It is totally ironic in my mind how so many people are sucked in on such
cr__ and have been for so long.
Take a look at one of the big commercial sites www.overunity.com and see how
the subject matter is like a skipping record...
A shame that Steorn did not produce, but really,
What is the Energy Fringe? Well the Energy Fringe is composed of people that
(Hope, Fantasize or Theorize) that there is a way to tap into some ultimate
energy source that will provide FREE ENERGY for all and create a New and
Un-Shackled unlimited energy source. Well after saying this, I
wonder if
Jed;
What you said makes sense, except;
Unless the device is so costly and complex that you can only afford 'one' or
have only managed to get 'one' to work, I would think it prudent that you
have another in the wings to be rushed in for just this type of problem.
If the device is so expensive
I would not get the cork puller out yet. The whole thing appears a bit
obscure and the size from the below link looks large enough to be a Farris
wheel in an amusement park :-)
I want to be pointed out as the biggest pessimist yet, but I do not think
its going to be this device.
-Original
Interesting concept, 'no time', so if I travel from Point A to Point B under
the condition of no gravity and no time, how will I in advance determine
when I will arrive at Point B? It would seen that without time I could never
arrive as I could not quantify my arrival?
Guess I just missed
In my last post I did not include my view on that great biological system
called man.
Einstein in his glory did not take into consideration the bio-system in his
presentation of the twin paradox.
The bio-system of man is very dependant on the conditions under which it
evolved (on earth). It is
I would like to gain insight to the Vort's view on the following question.
If the US could Seal all borders, nothing IN from anywhere, could we survive
without anarchy?
Would we become a starving, unable to self support nation?
Far from a new idea indeed, what is new is that it is moving closer to being
a viable technology. A thermo acoustic refer has been developed and tested
in HOT undeveloped parts of the world and found to work. The device is
placed in the sun during the day and it produces ice, then it is moved
Harry,
I cut most of your posting out but left the meat. I am surprised it took so
long for this to get to vortex and I was going to post out work but thought
there may be no real interest.
This is a great device and easy to build (The Prime Mover) portion and
either solar or resistance or
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Far from a new idea indeed, what is new is that it is moving closer to
being
a viable technology. A thermo acoustic refer has been developed and tested
in HOT undeveloped parts of the world and found to work. The device is
placed in the sun during the day
Stiffler Scientific computer time is -3 minutes of WWVH so where are you
seeing ~ 1/2 hour???
-Original Message-
From: Paul Lowrance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 1:35 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:wassup wid D2 ?
Could everyone please set
atomic clock in Denver, CO, USA.
If anyone wants to check their clocks:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Stiffler Scientific computer time is -3 minutes of WWVH so where are you
seeing ~ 1/2 hour???
-Original Message-
From: Paul
Isn't this similar to what the military uses for massive EMP generation?
-Original Message-
From: R.C.Macaulay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 8:40 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Explosively pumped flux compression generator - Wikipedia,
the free
Sorry for the double post, thought I was on the wrong account :-(
-Original Message-
From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 10:40 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Explosively pumped flux compression generator -
Wikipedia
I really don't know Harry, but it can be used for many other interesting
things.
As you most likely are aware most of my work has been labeled pseudoscience
or un-informed at best, therefore this work is no longer discussed in open
forum. You have asked before on the condition of this work and
Paul, Enjoyed reading the referenced overview, although what I am doing is
indeed 180' different.
Let me give you a short example;
H2O phase change from liquid to vapor, energy is added to the molecule
during the transition, (endothermic).
Now when the H20 molecule changes back from vapor to
I am most likely one of the least informed people on this planet about 'Cold
Fusion', yet I have a simple question from those that are in the know.
Okay it is proven that excess Heat can be obtained from one or more
reactions, great!, but would this not be 20-30 years from any application of
the
, good bad or indifferent?
-Original Message-
From: john herman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 5:14 AM
To: Stiffler Scientific
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kyle R. Mcallister;
vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]: Applied Sciences Group CAN YOU
Dear
I so hate to get involved in these types of discussions, but I do have first
hand knowledge on some of what is going on and I will state it, even though
I see already that many will dispute it.
1) Prior to ESS phone systems, the old relay banks did not work well for
covert monitoring. It did
Correct, but not totally.
The introduction was by the Family Friends feature. Where is my girl
friend, where is my husband, where is that bar where the boss wants to meet
me.
The E911 system was based on signal time domain to cell sites when first
introduced because the chips were not yet
: Thursday, March 08, 2007 2:51 PM
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Is Big brother watching?
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
1) Prior to ESS phone systems, the old relay banks did not work well for
covert monitoring. It did require intervention from the phone company that
controlled the switches
Jones; You are right about the unit being in a lab, yet one must be careful
as you say so you don't mix apples and oranges.
A number of off the street products do claim COP's greater than the LOX
production example, although one does indeed need to look farther than just
a statement of COP.
For
Michel;
Being an old lazy man I have found that all efforts to separate the men from
the boys, ends up in two subsets that don't equal the whole. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Michel Jullian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 11:56 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject:
At first blush, I would wonder the effect as being a result of
micro-fractures in the carbon structure. Increasing voltage would (could)
change the current path and result in many different paths, additionally
being impacted by thermal changes cased by the current flow. This experiment
have many
Are you not one of the lucky ones!. I retired some three years ago to do
pure research with the ideas I had but never had time to follow. Had a nice
bank account that should have lasted until the end, but with scopes costing
$kk.00 and on and on (you know), I now think I might join the crowd and
Jones;
Why play with him, he is only learning to spread his wings?
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 2:08 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]: Re: Loop closed? (was Re: High efficiency electrolysis)
Michel Jullian wrote:
You enjoy the MIB part don't you?
In all reality I don't believe they pay any attention to some one making
claims unless there is a device or their expert University advisors get
nervous. For the most part they sit back drink coffee and Red Bull, each
donuts and get a big chuckle from all the
This is right up the Jones alley :-)
Jones; you mention in the last post H2O2 again and I know that is your
preferred fuel? :-)
Is there, I have looked, a commercial method to produce peroxide via a water
electrolysis cell? What I see is that it is for the most part mass produced
by reaction?
Jones; That more or less answers what I was looking for, I guess the
concentrations are so low and the species does not exist long enough that an
Iodide Test offers great enough sensitivity?
One last question, at what point in your process are you able to detect the
product, right after
Jones; Nice, but I personally do not feel that the issue is that of OU H2
production to seal a Hydrogen fueled environment.
I have stated on vortex before that the problem is not in getting the
Hydrogen (nullifying Faraday), but what do you do with it when you get it?
I will stick my big fat
Yes and no.
I will not state a COP figure, but you are a pretty good man on guesses ;-).
okay I'm being a bit mean, you are close to factual.
Is not my point proven? We have the cart before the horse so to speak? If
someone were to present a technology that would offer what we are talking
about
Only a guess (maybe) but how about; Some See It and Some Don't ?
-Original Message-
From: thomas malloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 3:13 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]: Frolov update
In an email exchange Kiril Chukanov wrote:
Such people
I have been sitting back in total OH!! over this thread.
I have even had Night Mares ('Scientists Gone Wild')
SO if I understand what has been going on, (Maybe) It's felt the Bush Admin
is implementing a what? (State), Communist?
Okay if you all feel this (the ones that are so adamant about it,
FW: $25 million prize for greenhouse gas removalIsn't that a big funny?
If life is about to end because of global warming why is removal of Green
House Gasses only worth $25Mil, yet a way to produce or filter water is
worth $200 Billion?
I doubt I would even start for $25 Million when 60% goes
You are calling it right?
I have been in and out of groups for over 12 years now and it has not
changed. The hands on people are 1% of the listers. I have cried foul often
about the arm chair crowd and they just tell me to 'MOVE ON'.
I guess ego and self stroking gets them off more than doing
: [Vo]: Re: vortex-digest Digest V2007 #50
On 2/5/07, Stiffler Scientific [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are calling it right?
I have been in and out of groups for over 12 years now and it has not
changed. The hands on people are 1% of the listers. I have cried foul often
about the arm
John!
I have so many times on so many groups, voiced my view on what you question.
1) Free Energy will never exist.
Why? Because the governments will not freely give up the income from energy
consumption. So what will they do? Okay lets assume you disconnect from the
grid (everyone does,
I don't know where you all get your power or why you think there will be a
grid to sell power to, if we all get FE devices?
In Texas where I live, with all the charges and fees I pay ~ 38 cents/kwh.
Now in the summer when using AC I need a device with a capacity for a surge
of some 38kw, why,
This is my last comment on this thread as I for sure live in a different
world than the rest of you.
PV's Oh yes if you want a 35 year recover, unless you will settle for 10-20%
energy offset which can be wiped out in 2-3 years by increased utility cost.
SO what is the bottom line, a longer
BlankHello R.C.
This fellow does some great work in component construction, one of our weak
area's, (machine shop no we don't have). I spend some time looking over
Tesla and the big difference in what I am doing is the secondary is
floating, one lead of the secondary is open. No a good population
John, a stupid question if I may?
If I understand what you are saying, you assume the mag field creates a
spatial imprint which remains for some length of time after the magnets are
moved?
If this is corrected, then while the magnets are moving, do they still
retain a field? or is it latent and
A very interesting paper by two groups, Department of Physics, University of
Newcastle and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester.
For those that might have the slightest interest..
www.ips.gov.au/IPSHosted/STSP/meetings/aip/fred/fred.htm
Many of you may have seen this posting, I'm sure Jones staff did :-), its
far to similar to 'Circuit Cries Foul'. except that it has no electrical
driving force. On some group I posted my thought that because of the
physical size of the capacitors that the frequency of resonance must be in
the low
Terry,
Is it possible that you are picking up stray radiation from
e.g. your palmtop,
or other digital equipment (scope perhaps?).
Nice thought, but run the calculations and you will see the required field
strength/meter for me to extract this type of energy. Also if you have not,
look at
Okay already, for the people that are giving me the bad name (again), here
is a wave form. Now I have labeled certain points, the rest is up to you
that can tell, where it is taking place, (not why, but where).
www.stifflerscientific.com/images/avtrig4.jpg
No the pulse is not on the gate, the following pulls the display so you can
see clearly.
www.stifflerscientific.com/images/avtrig5.jpg
-Original Message-
From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 9:51 AM
To: Vortex
Subject: [Vo]: Waveform
Years ago there was buzz on the news groups about Avramenko's Plug and
proposed method of single wire transmission. During the period I did some
experiments with the Plug and HV driving Xeons etc., yet found it to be
going no where and JLN, Stefan Hartmann and Frolov got involved. JLN did a
demo
I just posted another picture of the free secondary end of the transformer.
Remember the secondary has a free end and this is the one shown with the
neon.
www.stifflerscientific.com/images/avtrig2.jpg
-Original Message-
From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
