[Vo]:Processed Raney is safer Event Horizon Terminology
. I am pretty sure that the Sodium-Hydroxide processed Raney Nickel- the stuff . that is good to go, is pretty safe, especially since it is packed in a liquid . that limits oxidation and must actually be dried out to use. . Actually, they treat a very fine powder. Of course for LPD, I do need a solid . block. Scott, I am pretty sure that in solid form the sodium hydroxide is what makes it pyrophoric by Leaching Al pores into the surface areas and leaving Nickel plated cavities it becomes immediately dangerous- The powder is a little more complicated because fine metal powders form Casimir geometry between particles due to dissimilar packing geometries even without activation. Rayney Nickel powder combines both methods and must be stored as a slurry after activation. I could see them shipping the solid alloy and letting us leach it out ourselves or possibly larger powders that are not pyrophoric but anything else would have to be restricted due to safety concerns. . I use the term Event Horizon to simply define a dividing line between process-time . inside the cavity versus outside of it. Apparently someone else besides you and . I are talking about this stuff since in my original exposure to this idea--that . individual used the term Event-Horizon, comparing the altered Space time inside . the cavity to the gravitationally accelerated Space time inside a . Black hole---except in this we are on the opposite side of the border since our . events appear to happen slower to the folks living inside the cavity. Scott, I used event horizon to describe the maximum of equivalent acceleration, any large mass will actually produce Equivalent acceleration but time dilation accumulates so slowly you need an event horizon or dead star to make comparisons on the same scale with dilation due to luminal velocities. In both cases we are talking relative rates of change between space and time but in one case time is constant relative to change in spatial position while in the other time rate changes relative to a stationary spatial position. I have read that equations not involving C should not be called relativistic such as the Casimir formula but the dynamic Casimir force does involve C so I think my terminology is on solid ground since it is change in Casimir force that develops catalytic action. This said the event horizon was used to demonstrate equivalent acceleration and the point was that at the mesoscopic scale the Casimir plates are to a hydrogen atoms what an event horizon is to a spaceship -in fact it would also slow down hydrogen caught in the pressure zone or outside the plate material (think billowed sail) just like the astronaut -it is only in the tiny segregated area we call the cavity that it accelerates time. . I am quite taken with your interpretation that the oscillation along the time-line might . mean it is traveling forwards then backwards in time. Maybe . . . but here is . the problem: The relativistic astronaut has been traveling more slowly along . his time line---less time has elapsed for him, nonetheless, when he emerges from . his Spaceship Back on Earth he emerges into his brother's point in history. I am not certain if matter can actually leave the present or just does a 4D transformation where one spatial dimension trades places with time such that a different inertial frame simply means the present is wider or thinner than our frame. This gets into a weakness I have always had regarding velocity and acceleration where some people insist you need acceleration to produce time dilation while my take is that you only need a luminal difference in velocity to accumulate dilation. -maybe someone will chip in and explain it to me- . Likewise, when the catalyzed reactants emerge from the cavity, they are not . emerging from our future---if they are then you and I have got to send . ourselves the lottery numbers from fifteen minutes in the future---how about . it??? (I actually tried a similar thing with the Electron Einstein-Bose . Condensate inside a superconductor disk, positing that the condensate locked in . the electron zombie state over time as well as over physical distance---no . results yet!!!) See articles about Professor Ron Mallet http://www.physorg.com/news63371210.html who intends just that using powerful circulating laser beams. He hopes to receive messages from the future when they turn on their prototype. I have written him without reply and have considered exactly the scenario you describe but even looping a transmission while inside the other inertial frame or between frames still undergoes a translation every transmission between frames. Though experiment: Say you had a macro scale Casimir cavity sitting in front of you on a table. The
[Vo]:IBM Trumps Nanosolar
With a printable cell which does not use tellurium nor indium: http://www.physorg.com/news185093054.html
RE: [Vo]:Theory of Little Pops Evidence in A Growing Earth!
As controversial as the subject is, the Wiki article is balanced, if not leaning towards the minority viewpoint: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expanding_earth Here is what is said about Adams: One prominent present day advocate of an expanding Earth is comics artist Neal Adams,[34] who calls his ideas Growing Earth Theory. He believes that an Earth with half its present radius would allow the continents to fit together perfectly, completely closing both the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Adams has made video animations that graphically illustrate his hypothesis. His divergence from older versions of Expanded Earth is his proposed mechanism of expansion, in which new mass is created by some sort of electron/positron pair production within the core of the Earth.[35][36][37] From: Wm. Scott Smith You don't even need a Big Bang if you have enough Little Pops Evidence that this is so!!! The Earth Grows!!! http://www.nealadams.com/nmu.html http://www.nealadams.com/nmu.html _
[Vo]:What about the Little Pops?
My point is that the Growing Earth thing is not so farfetched if we have an actual mechanism whereby more matter than antimatter arises from many Mini-Bangs just as we attribute to the Big-Bang. I think the Growing Earth thing is pretty compelling---you can tear as many pieces of paper in half as you want, but never match up the wrong two-halves. If I presented you with a box of broken Glass and we laboriously reassembled all of the pieces an arrived at a perfect sphere---how much credence would we give to someone who insisted But no, it really is a bowl, in fact it can be assembled into several different bowls! ??? Scott _ Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469227/direct/01/
RE: [Vo]:Theory of Little Pops Evidence in A Growing Earth!
Scott, One thing I meant to add to the previous - about the methodology for an expanding earth - and it is not mentioned in the Wiki piece - is the assertion of Dr. R. Mills of large scale hydrino T formation in the solar corona. Side note: Due to trademark concerns, we are usually calling the below-ground-state hydrogen: f/H for fractional hydrogen. Mills was not the first to suggest the species, but he has put many man-years of effort into his evolving theory, and is generally given credit for adding substance to the basic concept, despite the flaws that have turned up in the mathematics (according to critics on the HSG forum). Anyway, given that Mills could be partially correct - and has opined that as much as half of the energy output of the Sun is generated in the solar corona, in the form of EUV from ongoing deep f/H shrinkage (as opposed to fusion) - if true, then that would amount to millions of tons per second of neutral material (or even Rydberg matter) being spewed outwards, and over time this can provide some mass accretion for an expanding earth hypothesis (so long as all planets expand, and not just earth). It also explains the Oort cloud and possibly even a proportion of dark matter in the big picture. The downside of the viewpoint is the side-effect of the sun losing more mass over time than with fusion, and consequently that should mean that the earth's orbit would expand gradually over time. Global cooling would be the result of that . g . and this winter seems to be one that bolsters the Anti-Algore contingent. Let's don't go there. BTW - This view of a solar origin for large amounts of cosmological f/H does not necessarily negate Fran's view of a Casimir cavity based species, which is transient, as opposed to permanent. There could easily be a middle ground, or more inclusive mega-approach which anyone might wish to consider at some point: for instance, one in which the cavity origin is a subset of the broader phenomenon. Perhaps the first few fractional levels are always transient (and Mills is wrong on that) but after a certain fractional threshold is reached, or energy-depletion level is reached, the species shrinks all the way to Rydberg matter. This could explain some of the recent pycnodeuterium (Arata, et al) results rather elegantly since that only happens after lots of heat has been given up over several days in the experiment. A most enticing feature is that it all (cosmological, macro-scale and nanoscale) can be tied into a revised ZPE hypothesis with quantum flux as the common denominator (as explained via the Dirac epo). R. Mills, to his extreme discredit, is a ZPE denier ;-) Jones
RE: [Vo]:Processed Raney is safer Event Horizon Terminology
I am not certain if matter can actually leave the “present” or just does a 4D transformation where one spatial dimension trades places with time such that a different inertial frame simply means the “present” is wider or thinner than our frame. This gets into a weakness I have always had regarding velocity and acceleration where some people insist you need “acceleration” to produce time dilation while my take is that you only need a luminal difference in velocity to accumulate dilation. –maybe someone will chip in and explain it to me- I am not sure that this makes any difference since a different speed always represents a certain amount of acceleration between the frames. · Likewise, when the catalyzed reactants emerge from the cavity, they are not · emerging from our future---if they are then you and I have got to send · ourselves the lottery numbers from fifteen minutes in the future---how about · it??? (I actually tried a similar thing with the Electron Einstein-Bose · Condensate inside a superconductor disk, positing that the condensate locked in · the electron zombie state over time as well as over physical distance---no · results yet!!!) See articles about Professor Ron Mallet http://www.physorg.com/news63371210.html who intends just that using powerful circulating laser beams. He hopes to receive messages from the future when they turn on their prototype. I have written him without reply and have considered exactly the scenario you describe but even looping a transmission while inside the other inertial frame or between frames still undergoes a translation every transmission between frames. I have also had trouble getting him to respond---my recommendation to him was to cause a circular shadow inside the beam, thus creating a perfect, continuous tube of light. Is any one set up to try such a thing? Scott _ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469228/direct/01/
RE: [Vo]:Theory of Little Pops Evidence in A Growing Earth!
Jones, On the surface (no pun intended) this is an absolutely absurd hypothesis. ...and yet, I love it! Well shoot! We know stars expand and shrink during their epic life times. So... why not planets too? What mechanism has been theorized that would make planets like our Earth (and Mars) expand? Oh! I know! Bunches of hydrinos normalizing back to the normal ground state Yeah, that's the ticket! But I wants-ta know: where wuz all the ocean water before Earth expanded. Laying on top of everything? Maybe Earthj was originally WaterWorld. Watch out for those Smokers! Oh! I don't care! This is still an elegant hypothesis! :-) A+ Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 9:58 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Theory of Little Pops Evidence in A Growing Earth! As controversial as the subject is, the Wiki article is balanced, if not leaning towards the minority viewpoint: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expanding_earth Here is what is said about Adams: One prominent present day advocate of an expanding Earth is comics artist Neal Adams,[34] who calls his ideas Growing Earth Theory. He believes that an Earth with half its present radius would allow the continents to fit together perfectly, completely closing both the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Adams has made video animations that graphically illustrate his hypothesis. His divergence from older versions of Expanded Earth is his proposed mechanism of expansion, in which new mass is created by some sort of electron/positron pair production within the core of the Earth.[35][36][37] From: Wm. Scott Smith You don't even need a Big Bang if you have enough Little Pops Evidence that this is so!!! The Earth Grows!!! http://www.nealadams.com/nmu.html
RE: [Vo]:Theory of Little Pops Evidence in A Growing Earth!
OK Steven - first, let's be clear that I do not espouse this theory as it stands now. However, it deserves a fair hearing. It may not fly, but it has not been shot down effectively by the mainstream. In fact, the counter arguments are lame. In fact, there are parts of it that might fit quite well into the mainstream view - such as expansion being 'an initial stimulus' for starting and intensifying the process of continental drift / subduction. The end result is a bit of both. The earth may have been smaller 4.5 billion years ago, but instead of 400% smaller, only 25% (the numbers are meaningless except to express the point that even a small difference could be important if we acknowledge that both views can coexist). As for f/H normalizing after arrival ... yes, that is a good observation, and could be the major factor driving expansion ... yet, you ask the question about the water problem ... well, it can be observed that you may have answered the question with the setup, no? Most rock - granite, limestone, sandstone etc is an oxide. Shale contains lots of carbon. What happens when a neutral and very dense form of hydrogen, expelled from the solar corona... ... which may have been 100,000 times denser (if were Rydberg matter) first sinks to the core of earth and later, when it absorbs sufficient heat within the earth, expands and bonds chemically with its surroundings ... ... catch my drift :) If you said - it probably forms water, with some of it forms abiogenic oil (the Gold hypothesis), then go to the head of the class... There could have been far less water 4.5 billion years ago, and some of it has been manufactured by the ongoing solar f/H process. Some oil and natural gas may also have an inorganic origin. Jones -Original Message- From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson Jones, On the surface (no pun intended) this is an absolutely absurd hypothesis. ...and yet, I love it! Well shoot! We know stars expand and shrink during their epic life times. So... why not planets too? What mechanism has been theorized that would make planets like our Earth (and Mars) expand? Oh! I know! Bunches of hydrinos normalizing back to the normal ground state Yeah, that's the ticket! But I wants-ta know: where wuz all the ocean water before Earth expanded. Laying on top of everything? Maybe Earthj was originally WaterWorld. Watch out for those Smokers! Oh! I don't care! This is still an elegant hypothesis! :-) A+ Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 9:58 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Theory of Little Pops Evidence in A Growing Earth! As controversial as the subject is, the Wiki article is balanced, if not leaning towards the minority viewpoint: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expanding_earth Here is what is said about Adams: One prominent present day advocate of an expanding Earth is comics artist Neal Adams,[34] who calls his ideas Growing Earth Theory. He believes that an Earth with half its present radius would allow the continents to fit together perfectly, completely closing both the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Adams has made video animations that graphically illustrate his hypothesis. His divergence from older versions of Expanded Earth is his proposed mechanism of expansion, in which new mass is created by some sort of electron/positron pair production within the core of the Earth.[35][36][37] From: Wm. Scott Smith You don't even need a Big Bang if you have enough Little Pops Evidence that this is so!!! The Earth Grows!!! http://www.nealadams.com/nmu.html
[Vo]:Lead as a possible nuclear catalytic LENR agent
Earlier nuclear catalytic reactions in LENR were defined here: http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/dfRpt specifically in regards to Reports C and D. Report C, including 288 reactions in 20 pages, 44 kB, demonstrates 3- body nuclear catalytic LENR reactions, which can more simply just be be called “nuclear catalytic reactions”, or NCRs, a new class of LENR reaction proposed by this author. This class of reaction may provide a fundamental new understanding of how hydrogen fusion most often occurs in a lattice, by use of the lattice heavy element nuclei as catalysts. A given hydrogen atom is much closer to lattice element nuclei than to any other hydrogen atom in the lattice. If a hydrogen nucleus is in the deflated state, it is much more probable it will tunnel to a lattice nucleus than to the site of another hydrogen nucleus which is much further away. Tunneling distance is in an exponential term of the tunneling probability. The lattice nucleus can thus act as a catalyst for multiple simultaneous deuteron reactions which would otherwise not be feasible under less than extreme loading conditions. In that magnetic gradients are necessary to the tunneling of deflated state nuclei, and thus heavy element LENR, it is therefore also true that magnetic gradients are important to n-body heavy element catalytic LENR. High magnetic fields are also important to deflation fusion because it tends to spin align the deflated nucleus and thus improve spin coupling binding energy. While only 3-body reactions of the type: X + 2 D* -- X + Y were selected for Report C, it is also true that many more (n+1)-body catalytic reactions of the form: X + n D* -- X + Y can be found in Report A, and reactions solely of that type are in Report D. It is likely that 3-body catalytic reactions, rather than n- body reactions, n 3, dominate heavy element catalyzed LENR, so Report C was created to show only those reactions, though it is very boring as they are all exactly of the form: X + 2 D* -- X + 4He2 + 23.847 MeV What notably changes is the energy deficit due to deflated electrons. It appears elements heavier than tin can be expected to be capable of weak reactions and heavy element transmutation LENR. It is especially notable that no equivalent report is feasible for the strong force catalytic reactions: X + 2 p* --- X + Z because no such reactions are feasible producing stable Z, because pp is not a stable particle. This makes for a significant difference between light water and heavy water experiments. Light water experiments are not capable of heavy element catalytic LENR unless weak reactions follow the creation of the compound nucleus. This makes such reactions rare. It is feasible for X + n p* -- X + Z heavy element transmutation reactions to occur via strong force reactions, but only in the cases n 2, or the cases of reactions of the form X + 2 p* -- Y + H. It is important to note that X + 2 p* -- Y + H is energetically not the same as: X + p* -- Y because the negative energy due to the two catalytic electrons in the former greatly exceeds the negative energy provided by the single catalytic electron in the later reaction. Further, two additional bodies are available to carry off kinetic energy. For example, consider the two reactions: 26Mg12 + p* -- 27Al13 + 8.271 MeV [3.663 MeV] 26Mg12 + 2 p* -- 27Al13 + 1H1 + 8.271 MeV [-1.593 MeV] The trapping energy of the extra deflated electron provides a strong catalytic influence due to the initial negative reaction energy, i.e. due to deflated electron binding energy immediaely post fusion. Report D, 136 kB, including 2,016 reactions in 94 pages, provides all the energetically feasible X + n D* -- X + Z Reactions, for n = 1 to 4. These are in the set of all n-body heavy element nuclear catalytic LENR reactions, a new class of reaction. Note the preponderance of negative energies in brackets for the heaviest lattice elements. This indicates good prospects for subsequent weak reactions when these heavy elements are in the lattice. Such weak rections are covered in separate reports. It is notable that the above reports merely examined energetically feasible final products, without regard to the nature of the compound nucleus. If lead can be used productively as a deuterium to helium nuclear catalyst effectively then lead is an interesting candidate because it is cheap and plentiful, and because its various naturally occurring stable isotopes are terminal isotopes in a number of decay chains. Though lead does not make a useful CF lattice by itself, it might be co-deposited with deuterium and with Pd or Ni or other appropriate lattice forming element, including Ca. Deuterium can be diffused through lead layers to enable the reactions, or possibly diffused through a medium with lead nanoparticles or through a low conductivity lead alloy.
Re: [Vo]:Lead as a possible nuclear catalytic LENR agent
On Feb 14, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Horace Heffner wrote: The lead isotopes and natural abundances are: El.Abundance 204Pb 1.4% (1.4x10^17 y half-life) 206Pb 24.1% 207Pd 22.1% 208Pd 52.4% Note: pd above is a typo, and should be Pb. Unfortunately, of the above isotopes of lead, only 207Pb has a nuclear moment, which is useful in increasing tunneling probability. More interesting from the perspective of magnetic moment is 209Bi, which has a 100% abundance, and a large nuclear magnetic moment in comparison to 208Pb. The nuclear catalysis LENR reaction is: 209Bi83 + 2 D* -- 213At85 -- 4He2 + 209Bi83 (125 ns) Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
[Vo]:Muon-catalyzed Ignition
I finally recalled where I recently heard speculation about muons causing cold fusion. It was Duncan's lecture at ICCF-15. Slide 19: http://iccf15.frascati.enea.it/ICCF15-PRESENTATIONS/S1_O2_Duncan.pdf QUOTE: Muon-catalyzed Ignition? •Muons shower us at the rate of one per cm2per minute, with an average energy of 3 GeVand a rest-frame half-life of 2.2 s •Only low-energy muonscan form D--D •Estimated arrival rate at thermal energies is one per cm2 per hour (Cohen and Davies, Nature 338, 705 (1989)) •Must arrive in D-rich voids in the Pd, since muonsin the Pd will be K-shell captured by the Pd and hence not available to form D--D (Richard Garwin and others, discussions) •ET experiment: 10cm2, estimate 1% of D in voids, hence a once in 10 hr average arrival time of an ‘ignition muon’. –Qualitatively describes why onset time and extent of the excess heat release is highly dependent on Pd preparation –Does not describe how the chain reaction is sustained, or why neutrons and tritium are absent, or why the gamma is absent if the D+D gamma 4He + gis favored. Make of it what you will. The idea has been around from the beginning, as noted in item 3. Cohen and Davies published two short items in Nature, which I can send copies of to anyone who is interested. My copy is an image-only Acrobat file, so I cannot easily post the text. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Strong suggestion, Jed: don't send large files or serious graphical data or even tables requiring much formatting by email to a mailing list. There is no point to using any HTML formatted tables, because mail.archive.com squashes the life out of the tables, as Horace Heffner pointed out. That's a darn shame. I don't mind rudimentary formatting in electronic messages. Actually, I prefer that. But this is a little too rudimentary. But heck, I was using computers back when they were ALL CAPS WITH PUNCH CARDS AND PAPER TAPE AND ASR 33 TELETYPES (taka taka taka taka -- Japanese sound effect) so I can live with it. *** EOF *** (taka taka taka taka)
[Vo]:Little Pops Wheeler Quantum-Foam Whiteholes Blackholes
I was really hoping for more comment on the Theory of Little Pops. To me, part of the appeal is this: If one Big Bang can get around such annoying difficulties such as the creation of mass and energy---and (why not?) Spacetime itselfwhy not endow the Little Pops of the Quantum-Flux with the same capacity to create more matter than antimatter??? This is also a good route to explaining a growing Earth. To me the only obstacle to this theory is convincing people that new matter can arise within the Earth. Indeed, if one invokes Relativity's limitation on Mass-Density, one arrives at a minimum Quantum-Flux Wavelength that is close to the Planck-Length, according to Wheeler, (Geometrodynamics 1962) At this point, the smaller wavlengths always give rise to tiny black holes and whiteholes--which Wheeler called wormholes--I'm not sure whether he first created the t. (Which in my mind would go a long ways in explaining the Quasi-Local Nature of Space and Spooky Action at a Distance.) It is quite possible that large, dense gravitational bodies have more white-holes than blackholes with more particulates emerging from them than is disappearing. Hence a Growing Earth. Incidentally, we only have ocean floor data going back up to 200,000,000 years ago. All of our truly ancient fossils come from the Continents, remnants of the Early Sea that did indeed cover most of the Earth at that point! Interestingly, the Continents fit together on a Glob that is about Sixty percent its current size. Apparently, the volume of the Earth was small enough that the crust could stretch, crack and heal up until this point. It is really important to understand that Neal Adams did not assemble the continents on a smaller globe in the manner that one would assemble a puzzle. In one of his videos, he shows how he subtracted ten-million years of the most recent ocean floor formation, shrunk his Virtual Earth which then closed the gaps and did it again and again, in ten-million year increments. This process, naturally, moves the continents together until finally there are no gaps---200,000,000 years ago. Fossilized Flora and Fauna match across these lines, around the World! The GE model of mountain-range growth as a function of the Earth's Crust flattening out as the curvature decreases is a far better explanation for all the high-pressure-formed minerals that are lying around so close the surface in association with these mountain ranges. He makes quite a case for the same process happening on various planets and moons where photographic evidence is available. His video of our Moon is quite striking. Scott From: scott...@hotmail.com To: Subject: RE: [Vo]:Processed Raney is safer Event Horizon Terminology Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 08:44:44 -0800 I am not certain if matter can actually leave the “present” or just does a 4D transformation where one spatial dimension trades places with time such that a different inertial frame simply means the “present” is wider or thinner than our frame. This gets into a weakness I have always had regarding velocity and acceleration where some people insist you need “acceleration” to produce time dilation while my take is that you only need a luminal difference in velocity to accumulate dilation. –maybe someone will chip in and explain it to me- I am not sure that this makes any difference since a different speed always represents a certain amount of acceleration between the frames. · Likewise, when the catalyzed reactants emerge from the cavity, they are not · emerging from our future---if they are then you and I have got to send · ourselves the lottery numbers from fifteen minutes in the future---how about · it??? (I actually tried a similar thing with the Electron Einstein-Bose · Condensate inside a superconductor disk, positing that the condensate locked in · the electron zombie state over time as well as over physical distance---no · results yet!!!) See articles about Professor Ron Mallet http://www.physorg.com/news63371210.html who intends just that using powerful circulating laser beams. He hopes to receive messages from the future when they turn on their prototype. I have written him without reply and have considered exactly the scenario you describe but even looping a transmission while inside the other inertial frame or between frames still undergoes a translation every transmission between frames. I have also had trouble getting him to respond---my recommendation to him was to cause a circular shadow inside the beam, thus creating a perfect, continuous tube of light. Is any one set up to try such a thing? Scott Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now. _ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
[Vo]:Free Website Easy Link Generation for Papers Tables
Strong suggestion, Jed: don't send large files or serious graphical data or even tables requiring much formatting by email to a mailing list. The totally-free Open Office 3.1.1 allows you to EXPORT not save your documents as PDF files which display really nicely on a computer screen. yola.com offers completely free websites. I just use their page-building widgets to insert a link to a paper or table, upload the file, then I can copy the link and past the link into e-mails; it really helps to make your file titles short and all one word so that the links don't go to a second page; you can delete the http:// part and the link will still work: Example: Two-Page Summary http://z-pec.yolasite.com/resources/Nano-Box%20Rocket%20Array.pdf The benefits of this technology! http://z-pec.yolasite.com/resources/Benefits.pdf Detailed Technical Version http://z-pec.yolasite.com/resources/Self-Sheltering_Casimir-Plate.pdf _ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469228/direct/01/
