Popper at:http://noble.scienceontheweb.netTiny
Horrible and absurd nonsense.
Giovanni
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Patrick Ellul ellulpatr...@gmail.comwrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/28/soul-after-death-hameroff-penrose_n_2034711.html
How far fetched is this?
According to Dr. Hameroff, in a near-death experience, when
I think Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff have the best explanation of
consciousness to date. It's called Orchestrated Objective Reduction,
or Orch-OR. The two actually developed the idea separately, Sir
Penrose being a physicist and Hameroff being a physician who
specialized in anesthesia and
If Neurons can sense Neutrinos it makes sense to me we could synch up
Stewart
darkmattersalot.com
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff have the best explanation of
consciousness to date. It's called Orchestrated
Ouellette closed the discussion section of the article. (At least, she
closed it to me.)
I was going to tell her I summarized our discussion in the news item.
- Jed
She did close and George end up defending cold fusion!
2012/10/31 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Ouellette closed the discussion section of the article. (At least, she
closed it to me.)
I was going to tell her I summarized our discussion in the news item.
- Jed
--
Daniel Rocha -
The county I live in (Marin Co. CA) is not large in population - but does
have 18 branch libraries with magazine sections. I suspect that all of them
subscribe to Sci-Am.
I am going to write to the head Librarian to request cancelation of all
subscriptions to Sci-Am except for one or two to
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
I am going to write to the head Librarian to request cancelation of all
subscriptions to Sci-Am except for one or two to archive. I will cc to the
mag. editors.
I think that is going too far!
They are not the only ones attacking cold fusion, after
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
She is arrogant. Pride goes before the fall. I would say this column is a
gift to us, except that it is very well written. McKubre pointed that out.
He suspects it is a concerted effort by several leading members of
Terry sez:
Lately Robert Park seems to be more interested in politix than fizzix:
http://bobpark.org/
I have been unable to reach the website. Tried from two different
locations and at different times. Both failed
DId Park forget to pay the rent???
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
From the references Alain posted earlier in the thread, it looks like
conformity trumps everything. It must be in our genes - dissidents are
probably at a Darwinian disadvantage. Violating the pecking order is a
career-ender, for sure.
The case of Stanley Ovshinsky, inventor of amorphous
Yeah whatever you might want to consider keeping your animals out of
plain sight should BO visit your neighborhood, because it's a given that his
appetite isn't limited to just Dog yummy!. Oh!, don't forget that BO's
IQ is so HI that it's literally off the charts (actually, it never
I love Roger Penrose great thinker. Hameroff is too out there. I think
Penrose has dissociated from Hameroff because he went too far.
Orch-OR is not the best theory of consciousness. It has been debunked in
many different ways.
Giovanni
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:37 AM, ChemE Stewart
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Giovanni Santostasi
gsantost...@gmail.com wrote:
Orch-OR is not the best theory of consciousness.
So, who wins that prize?
I like Penrose. IMO he is the most philosophically sophosticated
physicist in academia today. I wonder ...did Penrose ever say anthing
about CF?
Harry
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Giovanni Santostasi
gsantost...@gmail.com wrote:
I love Roger Penrose great thinker. Hameroff is too out
Maybe your browser wants to see the www:
http://www.bobpark.org/
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:04 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry sez:
Lately Robert Park seems to be more interested in politix than fizzix:
http://bobpark.org/
I have been unable to
interesting you quote semiconductors, because LENr and semiconductors look
very similar in behavior, and in quantum nature. Mess in the lattice.
unreliable components at the beginning. ignored results at the beginning,
assumed experimental errors discarded
My school was training us to make a MsC
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder [
I like Penrose. IMO he is the most philosophically sophosticated
physicist in academia today. I wonder ...did Penrose ever say anthing
about CF?
I don't know if he specifically addresses LENR in the modern context, but
even he was negative on CF
Terry sez:
Maybe your browser wants to see the www:
http://www.bobpark.org/
Yup! That was the problem.
I find Park's rants on political machinations much more appealing. I
suspect he should know.
Incidentally, I noticed that when Carl Sagan became acutely aware of
his own approaching
I agree with that statement.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:06 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry sez:
Maybe your browser wants to see the www:
http://www.bobpark.org/
Yup! That was the problem.
I find Park's rants on political machinations much more
Almost a day, and two entries on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion are still standing.
(Prelas, ICCF-18 hosting and Duncan welcome message).
(Might be a Sandy side-effect, of course. Nope -- the main deleter is
Irish)
Lewis Larsen (Lattice Energy LLC) has posted a response to the recent
criticism of W-L theory by Ciuchi, et al, on Arxiv.org. See -
Response to Sept 2012 Univ of Rome arXiv Preprint-Oct 30 2012
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Almost a day, and two entries on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion
are still standing. (Prelas, ICCF-18 hosting and Duncan welcome message).
Adding stuff to Wikipedia is building a house of cards, or a sandcastle
when the tide is coming in. You know
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
McKubre pointed that out. He suspects it is a concerted effort by several
leading members of the opposition.
This is why I refer to her as a pawn and wonder what was the point of
this sacrifice.
This will not hurt her. Even if cold fusion triumphs,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Giovanni Santostasi
gsantost...@gmail.com wrote:
Orch-OR is not the best theory of consciousness.
So, who wins that prize?
Well, while we await Giovanni's response, for those Vorts
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:06 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally, I noticed that when Carl Sagan became acutely aware of
his own approaching mortality, it seemed to me that his willingness to
speculate on topics previously considered taboo became much
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah. You know what they say, There are no atheists in the foxhole.
See:
Military Association of Atheists
Atheists in Foxholes, in Cockpits, and on Ships
http://militaryatheists.org/atheists-in-foxholes/
- Jed
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Military Association of Atheists
Atheists in Foxholes, in Cockpits, and on Ships
http://militaryatheists.org/atheists-in-foxholes/
Thanks, Jed; but, it was not meant to be a literal, quantitative
statement. It was
From Terry:
Thanks, Jed; but, it was not meant to be a literal, quantitative
statement. It was meant to express a general willingness to
be open toward the end.
I second that.
I have an anecdotal story regarding someone I knew who once
encountered Sagan in a casual setting. A group of
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Jed; but, it was not meant to be a literal, quantitative
statement.
Hey, I am a literal-minded guy. What can I say?
- Jed
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Jed; but, it was not meant to be a literal, quantitative
statement.
Hey, I am a literal-minded guy.
And we love you for being who you are!
Jed sed:
Hey, I am a literal-minded guy.
Yeah, we kind'a know that about you Jed!
No offense taken.
As for Sagan, I think he got the last laugh - posthumously. I think he
got even with his superiors when he wrote his speculative novel
Contact. If one reads the novel it's pretty obvious that
Any psychological/psychiatric/philosophical attempt to understand the soul
is doom to failure from the onset.
Let says you're a hardware/ASIC/Electronics/IC engineer who designed the
Pentuim chip. Without understanding of the software, can you discern the
operation of a PC from your
Since there have been results of consciousness effecting quantum level
events multiple times, why should it be so absurd.
Based on research and experimentation I am doing it is clear to me that
quantum waves aren't just probability waves but are real waves in an actual
gas/fluid/superfluid
If I studied close enough the inside of a computer that has MS Windows
installed on it, without ever switching it on, I can still see and
understand the expected behaviour. The software program is persisted as
ones and zeros on a memory device.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Jojo Jaro
35 matches
Mail list logo
