Rick Monteverde wrote:
Jed wrote:
If you would like to argue that salt or CO2 in the wrong places in the
wrong amounts are not pollutants, let's see some reasons.
Hum, I assume the plan is to bury the NH3 (CO2)2. I wonder what happens
when it gets hot?
Wait a minute!
-
Hum, it's almost summer here in the great northwest, why am I wearing
this sweater? Oh yes, that's why they call it climate change.
and here in arizona , we hit 9 days of over 100 in a row sooner than
ever in recorded history.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:14 PM, thomas malloy
Rick Monteverde wrote:
Jed wrote:
If you would like to argue that salt or CO2 in the wrong places in the
wrong amounts are not pollutants, let's see some reasons.
Wait a minute!
- Anthropogenic contributions of CO2 to the atmosphere is warming earth's
climate (and we're at the
We recently constructed the first cat optical trap, a longwave
incoherent 1-D version of the laser cooled adiabatic ion trap.
Obtain a long spring-arm desklamp, lift it 10 high and aim its emitter
downwards, and place a bath towel just below it (cellulose preferred over
artificial fibers, aged
Rick Monteverde wrote:
Wait a minute!
- Anthropogenic contributions of CO2 to the atmosphere is warming earth's
climate (and we're at the tipping point now, etc.) If you say it's not,
show me some reasons.
In your version of a science forum, you can just make up pure scientifical
sounding
Give me the reference, even if its not peer-reviewed...
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: leaking pen [mailto:itsat...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 10:41 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Science of Greenhouse Effect...Time for some balance?
Im not too
Speaking of, did you see the article on particle interaction entanglement?
http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/090603-maco-entanglement.html
It's a first.
Terry
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:39 AM, William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
We recently constructed the first cat optical trap, a
From William B.
We recently constructed the first cat optical trap, a longwave
incoherent 1-D version of the laser cooled adiabatic ion trap.
Obtain a long spring-arm desklamp, lift it 10 high and aim its emitter
downwards, and place a bath towel just below it (cellulose preferred over
Terry sez:
Speaking of, did you see the article on particle interaction entanglement?
http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/090603-maco-entanglement.html
It's a first.
Terry
I just received another unexpected response from an unknown point of reference:
-
All this talk
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:30 PM, OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
What is, well... what you will
eventually discover is that this so-called entanglement phenomenon
is nothing more mysterious than a fundamental characteristic of
unified consciousness randomly generating a new batch of
Terry sez:
Could we all agree to an environment where I have won the lottery? :-)
I wuz contemplating the same request.
Well... there ya go!
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
http://www.hplusmagazine.com/articles/bio/spooky-world-quantum-biology
What does this all mean? Not only does quantum phenomena occur in
living systems, but the basic processes of life we take for granted
rely on the transfer of information backward in time. Life is so
magical because it cheats.
Nice shot on the messenger, well done!
(got anything on his message? )
-Original Message-
From: Nick Palmer [mailto:ni...@wynterwood.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 3:43 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Science of Greenhouse Effect...Time for
some balance?
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 3:34 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:first day in carbon capture
That may be incorrect, but it is not nonsense. It is
supported by some data and
Rick Monteverde wrote:
Nice shot on the messenger, well done!
(got anything on his message? )
The page in question was actually directed at his message, not the
messenger, despite the title. There was no ad hominem involved at all.
Anyone unclear on this should go read the page to which
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Terry Blanton wrote:
Speaking of, did you see the article on particle interaction entanglement?
http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/090603-maco-entanglement.html
Entanglement, followed by simultaneous altered behavior with a decoherence
time constant ...is phenomena
Rick Monteverde wrote:
The assertion made by
Fink -- that high
CO2 levels do not affect human respiration therefore the
global warming hypothesis must be wrong -- is not supported
by data or theory. . . .
[Fink] may be incorrect, but it is not nonsense. It is supported by some
data and
A clarification:
I was responding to Leaking pen, when he challenged me to survive in a room
full of CO2 as proof that CO2 is not pollutant. To that I responded that
even at twice ambient atmospheric levels of CO2, I would not even notice.
In a subsequent post I backed up my response with some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
His actual assertion here seems to be that carbon capture is impractical and
demanding it will, in practical terms, block use of the fuels for which
Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Rick Monteverde wrote:
Jed wrote:
Joking aside, why is it that so many people refuse
to face the fact that the main reason for our
current economic problems is simple theft? The
thieves managed to get the law (and the rules)
changed so that they could not be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
Balance? Science is not political. Reality and facts do NOT bend to
political bias.
Is that a troll?
- --
Build the North America-wide General
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
Hum, it's almost summer here in the great northwest, why am I wearing
this sweater? Oh yes, that's why they call it climate change.
and here in arizona
Jed Rothwell wrote:
William Beaty wrote:
I had a large insight into my own psychology, and theirs. My inner
bigot tells me exactly what's going on: CF-haters respond to CF
supporters in the same way that racists respond to non-whites: with
intolerance, with very strong feelings of
Jed -
What Jeff said later. I was just having fun with your response, no harm
intended.
- Rick
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 10:21 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:first day in
The message, despite the link, was clearly ad-hominem.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [mailto:sa...@pobox.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 10:13 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Science of Greenhouse Effect...Time for
some balance?
The page in
i am in agreement partially. since it included substance, it was
simply an insult, as it was not the basis of his arguement.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Rick Monteverde r...@highsurf.com wrote:
The message, despite the link, was clearly ad-hominem.
-Original Message-
From:
::Falls over laughing:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:39 AM, William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
We recently constructed the first cat optical trap, a longwave
incoherent 1-D version of the laser cooled adiabatic ion trap.
Obtain a long spring-arm desklamp, lift it 10 high and aim its emitter
nor did i ever state that double co2 would do it. i suggested simply
turning up the co2 to higher and higher concentrations, you know, just
until you stopped breathing!
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Jeff Fink rev...@ptd.net wrote:
A clarification:
I was responding to Leaking pen, when he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, thomas malloy temall...@usfamily.net
mounted the barricade and roared out:
Joking aside, why is it that so many people refuse
to face the fact that the main reason for our
current economic problems is simple theft? The
29 matches
Mail list logo
