Hello Vortexlers,
Not sure if this was shared already.
From:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/13/usa-desalination-idUSL1N0C0DG520130313
Filter could sharply cut energy needed to remove salt from water
Officials say firm has patented process, looking for partners
Cheaper seawater
Well, Robin - this appears to be neither actual neutrino pair production (as
opposed to cosmological theory), nor relevant to LENR, since it is
hypothetical pair production in collapsing stars... therefore, IMHO -
nothing has changed and it still requires a major miracle to suggest that
that
DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
I don’t think that any of my work is secret and I have helped many others
in the field.
Your work is not secret but it is obscure. It deserves to be presented more
fully, in more detail, in professionally written papers.
You have helped many others. That
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net presented a long list of objections to
the W-L theory:
Miracle 1 - SPPs couple with photons of light to become activated. There is
little or no light in electrolysis LENR experiments - but some light exists
in plasma glow or Mills reactions. If W-L want to
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:56 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:59:19 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The standard model, I assume, is predicated on the conviction that QM
is correct and also necessary.
It is felt necessary because it explains the
Eric,
Great work. Thanks.
I was not aware that official data was imprecise. Nice to know that.
If the thermal neutron generation is actually occurring, it seems there
should be a small amount of radioactive ash (maybe short-lived) after the
reaction is stopped. I believe some of the
My impression is that NASA has done significant work with surface plasmon
effects and is absolutely convinced that they are such a breakthrough (in
other fields) that they are willing to overlook the problems as they pertain
to electrolysis LENR.
Separately, they believe LENR to be valid as a
Lou,
I wish it was great work. Unfortunately, there was an important flaw once
again. From Robin's Web site I obtained the total cross sections, and from
your Web site I obtained the neutron capture cross sections. It is the
total cross section, only one component of which is the neutron
Congratulations
on getting them to consider a demo when I could not solicit a response. I
asked around and I know of no one except
perhaps Celani that might be in a position to do a demo at a remote venue like
ICCF by July. It is too late in the game
now to get a system prepared and vetted
About the Yildiz engine - Interview with Dr. Duarte
http://www.pureenergyblog.com/2013/03/23/651/about-the-yildiz-engine-interview-with-jorge-duarte/
...
You should understand that I’ve already participated in more than enough
experiments with the machine; and all parts have been inspected [by
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 2:28 PM, DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
Right now I am struggling to learn how to use “lost wax” casting of Pd
+23%Ag alloys for making a toroid.
See [1], where they're using geometry involving a silver core and a thin
palladium shell to split water into
DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
Congratulations on getting them to consider a demo when I could not
solicit a response.
Actually, they have not responded to me yet, either, but informally
in conversation they said they would. You need to give them another chance,
for the sake of the
From: Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 2:30:00 PM
Maybe the fan method (blow air down a tube and measure the velocity) isn't as
simple as it might seem :
http://129.123.92.202/pubh5330/chap_12_Anemometers.pdf
One would have to be very careful to traverse the duct, to
It would be great if machines of this type were capable of running on magnets.
Call me old fashioned, but I must see a process that extracts energy from some
source to be converted into the output energy. I would even accept a process
that cools down the local environment as it extracts
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:43:34 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: only a perfect LENR theory should attack other
theories
From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
Congratulations
on getting them to consider a demo when I could not solicit a
DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
It was you that complained about my lack of writing ability.
That's easily fixed. I have written entire papers for people who speak
English as a second language.
Also, it was you that in times past (a few years back) said that demos
where not
I wrote:
I have said that to many other cold fusion researchers. They often kvetch
and moan about how unfair the world is and how oppressed they are. Then,
when you suggest they submit an abstract or write a paper, it's: Oh no, I
don't have time for that. People should believe me. . . .
I mean to say that Dennis did NOT set the stage properly, or follow up
properly.
Dennis or whoever it was who arranged that demo at Monte Carlo. No idea who.
It was a big fat wasted opportunity. Why go to all that trouble if you are
not going to publish a permanent record of the event? A handful
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:04 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sat, 23 Mar 2013 04:04:55 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The weak force doesn't actually present a barrier. It presents a chance that
something will occur. Electrons and protons don't normally combine into
Nokia developing phone that recharges itself without mains electricity
Prototype harvests radiowaves from TV, radio and other mobiles
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jun/10/nokia-mobile-phone
quote ...Nokia claims it is able to scavenge relatively large
amounts of power — around a
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 9:00 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Harry,
An electron would not spiral into the nucleus if it is a continuous charge
instead of a point source. Think of it as a steady DC current which
generates a magnetic field that does not radiate energy like an
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:36:40 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
It's actually classically forbidden. 1 baseball + a second baseball does not
make 3 baseballs.
I don't understand your analogy.
Aren't we talking about 1e combining with 1p to make 1n?
Yes, but that's the
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sun, 24 Mar 2013 22:21:19 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Nokia developing phone that recharges itself without mains electricity
Prototype harvests radiowaves from TV, radio and other mobiles
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jun/10/nokia-mobile-phone
quote
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:45 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
A very crude model that I constructed implied that the region of maximum
heating due to the passing particle would continue along the original
momentum direction.
Dave,
David Nagel has put together a paper on the topic
Harry, it is certainly true that the current flows in a loop. The important
issue is that each tiny portion of the loop radiates a signal as it
accelerates, but that the integration of all of the individual signals balance
out and results in no net radiation. A circular loop of current will
Thanks Eric, this is the type of information I am seeking as I attempt to
understand the chain reactions taking place. I still need to find the reason
why temperature or pressure waves associated with the nuclear events taking
place are able to trigger additional events. It is quite clear
The elimination of the far field radiation pattern in plexciton radiation
by the Fano resonant interference is what makes the hot spot in
Nanophotonics so energetic, up to a 500,000,000 enhancement factor without
optimization.
Cheers: Axil
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:26 PM, David Roberson
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:34 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I still need to find the reason why temperature or pressure waves
associated with the nuclear events taking place are able to trigger
additional events. It is quite clear that large temperatures are
generated, but it
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:35 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 23 Mar 2013 06:52:31 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder
According to Robin reduced-mass neutrons can form spontaneously, but
rarely, when an electron is captured
Dave,
I did not know that. So, for example, a uniformly charged circular
ring spinning like a wheel will not radiate?
Will it radiate if it is rotating about its diameter?
Harry
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:26 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Harry, it is certainly true that the
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:50 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:36:40 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
It's actually classically forbidden. 1 baseball + a second baseball does not
make 3 baseballs.
I don't understand your analogy.
Aren't we talking
The planet Saturn comes to mind!
The proton is the planet and the electrons are the rings.
Harry
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave,
I did not know that. So, for example, a uniformly charged circular
ring spinning like a wheel will not radiate?
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sun, 24 Mar 2013 23:56:51 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Actually, my intention was to explain how free neutrons could be
created, but I guess
this is not necessary. I will just focus on my argument that a proton
and electron can collide instead
forming a stable atom. The
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sun, 24 Mar 2013 23:26:56 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
For the above reasons there would be no energy loss as a result of the current
flow if it consisted of a continuous charge distribution orbiting a nucleus.
That is not true for a point charge following
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 24 Mar 2013 12:39:44 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Lou,
I wish it was great work. Unfortunately, there was an important flaw once
again. From Robin's Web site I obtained the total cross sections, and from
your Web site I obtained the neutron capture cross
In their report, DEFKALION said they did no isotope analysis, yet they said
there was no transmutation of Ni.
Also, they did not find Tritium, He3 or He4 among the light elements. They
found lithium, beryllium and boron, though.
It seems that each LENR reactor reflects a unique transmutation
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The reaction should be called cold fission.
Yes, it is tempting to think there is fission going on (or perhaps
cluster decay).
He4 being a gas will escape the nuclear active zone before a fusion
process can build on it so
I have always thought that He4 is also a product of increase alpha decay
caused by a slight coulomb barrier lowering and not a product of fusion.
It is fission all the way, Pd/D and Ni/H.
It is tragic that fusion has confused so many excellent minds for so long.
Cheers: Axil
On Mon, Mar 25,
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:13:10 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Classical EM theory says a charge undergoing acceleration should radiate
energy.
A charge with angular momentum is experiencing an acceleration (in the
classical mechanical sense
of angular menumtum) so it should
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 25 Mar 2013 01:21:53 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
It is fission dear fellows; clear your minds of confusion so forget about
fusion and neutron formation.
...something has to provide the energy to initiate the fission.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
This is provides a summary of eight distinct failed models of the
hydrogen atom which the preceded the Bohr model.
http://skullsinthestars.com/2008/05/27/the-gallery-of-failed-atomic-models-1903-1913/
As I have argued recently, I think the key to explaining cold fusion
phenomena depends on a
As the protons lose their charge, the neutrons in the nucleus become
repulsive and push the nucleus apart.
You cannot have a nucleus full of neutrons, it just won’t do.
Charge screening means neutron repulsion. There is a wide range of charge
screening levels that can happen and an associated
42 matches
Mail list logo
