Dear Friends,
I am pleased to publish:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/09/abds-comments-to-my-paper-everything-i.html
It is fine, a CFauthorithy takes my paper seriously; together we will
discover the truth (first priority for Abd) and the solution (my primary
aim)
Peter
--
Dr. Peter
I wrote:
He says he waits up to 138 hours per step to be sure the temperature is
stable. That can't be right . . .
Off by an order of magnitude! It is 14 hours per step.
- Jed
Could this not be purely chemical given the level of output?
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote:
He says he waits up to 138 hours per step to be sure the temperature is
stable. That can't be right . . .
Off by an order of magnitude! It is
This may be an interesting development:
http://www.fromquarkstoquasars.com/new-discovery-simplifies-quantum-physics/
Ron
--On Thursday, September 19, 2013 8:12 PM -0400 Axil Axil
janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I am getting a bad feeling that LENR is still here way before its time.
Science is
Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
Could this not be purely chemical given the level of output?
There is no chemical fuel in the system. It is just D2 gas and Pd (or H2
and Ni). See:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTmethodofco.pdf
- Jed
See:
http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/NIWeekCravens.pdf
But doesn't hydrogen/deuterium absorption by palladium/nickel produce heat?
I'm not saying this is not LENR. I'm trying to see if there are
alternative explanations.
See:
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Jed Rothwell wrote:
http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/NIWeekCravens.pdf
Such a simple, magnificent demonstration. Can you make me a charger
for my Tesla car? Charming.
Indeed it is - and understated since the hot sphere transfers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-sdO6pwVHQ
Very funny.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
But doesn't hydrogen/deuterium absorption by palladium/nickel produce heat?
I'm not saying this is not LENR. I'm trying to see if there are
alternative explanations.
The absorption of hydrogen and deuterium by palladium
It is not clear how any form of energy gain is associated with this experiment.
The demonstration appears to generate LENR energy, but the input function is
not present. It would be educational to have a plot of energy generation
versus temperature.
Dave
-Original Message-
From:
From: Eric Walker
Jack Cole wrote:
But doesn't hydrogen/deuterium absorption by
palladium/nickel produce heat? I'm not saying this is not LENR. I'm trying
to see if there are alternative explanations.
Jed,
Thank you. Yes, that makes much more sense to me now, and would be well
above heat produced from absorption.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
But doesn't hydrogen/deuterium absorption by palladium/nickel
How much does it cost to get the NI demo device duplicated?
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:14 PM, DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
E vs. temp was not done at the demo.
However below are some typical (average) values from some old lab runs.
I did not calibrate at the demo. I only showed
Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
But doesn't hydrogen/deuterium absorption by palladium/nickel produce heat?
A tiny, TINY amount. There is only an itty-bitty amount of Ni (or Pd) in
the whole cell. The excess heat in the last 7 experiments has ranged from
16 to 4,880 kJ, which far exceed the
Arent the temperatures below in K instead °C? Im pretty sure the water
bath wasnt at 397°C
neither 292°C
_
From: DJ Cravens [mailto:djcrav...@hotmail.com]
Sent: vendredi 20 septembre 2013 23:14
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Cravens report on NI Week demo
E vs.
E vs. temp was not done at the demo.
However below are some typical (average) values from some old lab runs.
I did not calibrate at the demo. I only showed that the sample was warmer
than the control. That was the only point that was attempted there so there was
no claim of amount of energy but
oops you are right K
I convert them over as I was doing some kinetic fits.
Sorry
From: arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Cravens report on NI Week demo
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 23:51:13 +0200
Aren’t the
temperatures below in K instead °C? I’m
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:37:15 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I wrote:
He says he waits up to 138 hours per step to be sure the temperature is
stable. That can't be right . . .
Off by an order of magnitude! It is 14 hours per step.
13.8 ?
- Jed
Regards,
Robin van
Not yet. Just a quote from the IE article.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Fartphone
- Reply message -
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Cravens report on NI Week demo
Date: Fri, Sep 20, 2013 3:53 PM
-Original Message-
From: Terry
the costs is fairly significant.(pd, chemicals, specialized C...) The main
cost is opportunity costs. It takes a LOT of time in material preparations
that would detract me from my existing efforts which seem much more useful and
practical. You get much better results at elevated temperatures
the guy that said that was an owner of a Tesla and had billions. I have his
card and he said call him when I have a charger. :) I wish.
He said he wanted the first fusion car. I told him he could have the second
one. :)
I have one ready to just charge as soon as I start
Thanks for clearing that up. I was wondering how to compare this list of
numbers with the observation at the conference. This result makes me curious
as to whether or not the device reaches thermal run away at some drive
temperature. Perhaps the components you have chosen tend to fall apart
again, watch for Lett's IE article next month. There is a least that model
that helps suggests some operational conditions.
..heat and alloying to drop that energy of vacancy of formation are the
keys.
D2
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cravens report on NI Week
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:32 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I have begged Rossi to produce a curve of energy generated versus
temperature applied to his material to no avail. With that type of
information one can begin to actually engineer a device that functions on
demand
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
See:
http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/NIWeekCravens.pdf
Such a simple, magnificent demonstration. Can you make me a charger
for my Tesla car? Charming.
I was using Sm Co based magnetic powder. Curie point around 700C but it is
only useable up to about 250C. (I expect some degradation of the material in
hot H/D gas. Remember the old parking lot demo at ICCF-4 with the Samarium
cobalt? I can't remember the couple's name at the moment.
I am
I agree Jed. My comment was made to point out that the energy is being
produced internally as a result of elevated temperature. This is an ideal
indication of LENR activity. No input as such is required! Of course, the
best possible proof to those who fail to listen would be to witness a
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Off by an order of magnitude! It is 14 hours per step.
13.8 ?
Give or take. I have only seen one graph of a calibration step, but I doubt
he comes flying into the lab at 3 a.m. to stop it at 13.8 hours exactly.
To do a calibration, you step up the power in the
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It is not clear how any form of energy gain is associated with this
experiment. The demonstration appears to generate LENR energy, but the
input function is not present.
That's 'cause there is no input! It is all heat after death (as we call
it). It
The point about the heat transfer into the beads increasing with temperature
differential is well taken. Also, as you say, the beads offer an excellent
sink for any energy being internally generated and flowing through the surface
area of the spheres. The net result is that the sphere looks
Eric,
Rossi has done an excellent job of hiding the details of his catalyst. The
facts will come out before long if production begins in earnest on his system.
Do you have any idea what function is performed by his catalyst? My first
thoughts are that it facilitates the breaking up of the
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:41 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Do you have any idea what function is performed by his catalyst?
I can only guess. My guess at this point is that a beta emitter is
involved here. Perhaps it is stimulating rydberg states in the hydrogen,
or perhaps it
OK, dear Abd, you are more idealist than me.
I think to understand and to be able to apply in practice
are stages of knowledge.
Nature has no problems just solutions.
We have problems and it is our duty to work out solutions for them.
It is very bad (ineffective inefficient- see Peter Drucker
34 matches
Mail list logo
