Jones,
I tried to express a similar concept in a more 'popular' way in this blog post:
http://animpossibleinvention.com/2015/02/10/time-to-dispel-the-streetlight-paradox-of-energy/
Bottom line -- sooner or later, efficient access to energy stored in matter
will make scarcity of energy be a
From: Stephen Cooke
* That nucleons may actually disintegrate is nothing short of
astonishing! Is this what they are actually saying? Did they really observe
such huge amounts of energy?
Yes precisely. This is why it will be more controversial than cold fusion
until replicated. Many
What amazes me is that Gary T. Horowitz and Eva Silverstein make
theoretical predictions based on their theories and when these predictions
turn out to come true in the real world, they can't believe it. Very
strange.
You would think that these people would be excited by the prospect of using
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
Does anyone else find these just too incredible to believe?
>
Very much so. I should spend some time looking at the raw data. Holmlid
may have something interesting. His interpretation may have sufficiently
Hi Mark,
Please ask about the lifetime of dense hydrogen, once formed, and the time
frame for production (rate per mass of catalyst ??). Those are important
details which are apparently not answered in Holmlid’s papers.
Also the magnetic properties. My guess (in answer to Bob’s question)
Why does it take so long for the Holmlid effect to manifest?
When you have to pump energy into a population of black holes that stores
huge amounts of energy, it take time and a lot of EMF power to do this. But
once these solitons are well formed and their power storage threshold is
reached, they
During a typical replication run of the Rossi effect, the pressure of the
hydrogen gas goes down over a relatively short timeframe. This might mean
that hydrogen Rydberg matter(HRM) has formed in major part because gas is
transformed into a solid. But the reaction does not take off immediately.
Dear Jones,
please allow me to offer this to my readers on EGO OUT, citing you. Thanks!
Peter
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Very interesting presentation this morning. Ólafsson was both low key and
> optimistic that Holmlid is onto something
thank you, it is fine, few things happen these days, at leats so we know.
Peter
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> OK
>
>
>
> *From:* Peter Gluck
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Jones,
>
> please allow me to offer this to my readers on EGO OUT, citing you. Thanks!
>
>
OK
From: Peter Gluck
Dear Jones,
please allow me to offer this to my readers on EGO OUT, citing you. Thanks!
Peter
Thank a lot Jones Beene for this great and interesting report.
If Holmlid process was some how creating dense material that enhanced the
Stella type proton proton chain reaction, from deuteron proton reactions
onwards that would already be amazing. That nucleons may actually disintegrate
is
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
On Friday, October 23, 2015 9:40 AM, "harv...@yahoo.com [teslafy]"
wrote:
Is time an illusion or reality?
||
|||| Is time an
A provocative question:
If we accept Holmlid's research suggesting dense metallic hydrogen can be
disintegrated by a laser pulse; and therefore - that this reaction can
return mass-energy of about 6x10^23 GeV per mole of hydrogen, then what is
the value of this fuel? This amounts to about 10^14
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/oct-23-2015lenr-info-two-stories-of.html
there are some doses of desperation there. but constructive
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
More...
See
http://pieeconomics.blogspot.com/p/cavitation-radiation.html
The reason why radiation is seen in cavitation is that there is not enough
heat available in a water envirnment to setup a entangled ensemble of SPP
black holes to counter the radiation produced in the spp formation
It is more complicated that just hydrogen rydberg matter. The same rydberg
matter principle applies to any alkali metal. There is even more element
that this principle applies to. And water can form this stuff too. Remember
that Holmlid uses the tried and true potassium catalyst that thermicore
Here are the slides for Sveinn’s presentation, courtesy of Sveinn:
http://tempid.altervista.org/SRI.pdf
Bob Greenyer or some one: Please create a mirror and provide the link (via
QuantumHeat.Org), as some may not be able to DownLoad
from this site, easily.
Thanks,
Mark Jurich
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Mark Jurich wrote:
> Here are the slides for Sveinn’s presentation, courtesy of Sveinn:
>
> http://tempid.altervista.org/SRI.pdf
I'm keeping track of every time potassium is mentioned, as it was in these
slides.
Eric
Why does the LeClair reactor produce radiation and neutrons and the device
invented by James Griggs does not?
It’s a matter of temperature. The James Griggs device runs at an operating
temperature of 400F, whereas, the LeClair reactor is not pressurized and
does not.
Since the Hydrogen Rydberg
If we are going to consider small black holes why don't we consider small
supernova explosions. We could even throw in the kitchen sink.
-Original Message-
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l
Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 4:39 pm
Subject: Re:
SPP's are one thing, small black holes another. Why is there any reason to
believe that a black hole is required to initiate LENR reactions? I suspect
that SPP's can do the job without extra help.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
One of the tell tail indications that a black hole is involved is the
cluster fusion mode in LENR reaction. This requires multiparticle
entanglement. Only black holes produce this sort of entanglement(see
ER=ERP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ER%3DEPR). Standard QM entanglement
is monogamous. Only
Lets pray that rapid, large scale energy release by this type of material is
not possible. I can not imagine the death and destruction that will follow if
some of the speculation on vortex is real.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
To:
My attitude is to wait and see proof. I have serious doubts that the evidence
will survive proper scrutiny.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Higgins
To: vortex-l
Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 10:57 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI
Mats,
Nice effort. Your piece will be poignant lesson to mainstream physics – should
Holmlid be shown to be correct - that physics is still in its infancy. Notice
that the focus could now be shifting to Holmlid and a few others, and away from
Rossi.
Rossi filled a void in a way that
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
That door could open to more than energy independence.
In this connection, if the induced-decay stuff that Robin and I were
discussing turns out to be a thing, there are definitely military
applications. First one that
Hi Bob (All):
I can answer some of your questions now, but we are going to be continuing
discussions of the talks at San Jose State University
in an open discussion headed by Ken Wharton in the Science Building at 10:30 AM
today (Friday) ... I will make sure all your
questions are
Does anyone else find these just too incredible to believe?
- That a dense hydrogen layer could form at all at room temperatures-
and with a catalyst that is not even on the surface? So these catalyzed
hydrogen atoms travel from the catalyst body to the receptor surface in
some magic
Believe it or not...
After I saw the presentation on tachyon tracks:
http://restframe.com/rf/home.html
I started to read this article:
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-pub-11616.pdf
The Inside Story: Quasilocal Tachyons and Black Holes
It explains how and why Lief Holmlid
Why does the LeClair reactor produce radiation and neutrons and the device
invented by James Griggs does not?
It’s a matter of temperature. The James Griggs device runs at an operating
temperature of 400F, whereas, the LeClair reactor is not pressurized and
does not.
Since the Hydrogen Rydberg
The rotation of polaritons in a vortex produces a ANALOG black hole. Any
wave structure in a vortex will produce a black hole even water.
See
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyMYcqxuZ_I
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:55 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> But SPP's can be coaxed into
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:02:02 -0400:
Hi Axil,
[snip]
>I got through to Holmlid but Holmlid does not believe in black hole LENR
>causation. I am now faced with the bleak prospect of learning black hole
>physics, string theory, tachyon physics and general relativity.
Done that
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:55 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:02:02 -0400:
> Hi Axil,
> [snip]
> >I got through to Holmlid but Holmlid does not believe in black hole LENR
> >causation. I am now faced with the bleak prospect of
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
On Friday, October 23, 2015 8:18 PM, "harv...@yahoo.com [teslafy]"
wrote:
Three October Teslafy you tube videos. I saw some contradictions so I
hesitated
But SPP's can be coaxed into generating enormous magnetic fields. It is not
too difficult to understand that these super fields can interact strongly with
nucleons. Is there reason to believe that magnetic interaction by SPP's is not
going to be adequate? The multiparticle entanglement
No, this analog light based black hole referenced in that video produces
hawking radiation.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 5:09 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> I believe you are referring to a simulation of a black hole.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil
See
https://physics.aps.org/synopsis-for/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.036402
http://www.nature.com/news/hawking-radiation-mimicked-in-the-lab-1.16131
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> No, this analog light based black hole referenced in that video produces
>
Axil, I am on your side man
On Friday, October 23, 2015, Axil Axil wrote:
> Also see:
>
>
> https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19508-hawking-radiation-glimpsed-in-artificial-black-hole/
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Axil Axil
Us against the world...
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 5:31 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote:
> Axil, I am on your side man
>
>
> On Friday, October 23, 2015, Axil Axil wrote:
>
>> Also see:
>>
>>
>>
I believe you are referring to a simulation of a black hole.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 5:00 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI
The rotation of polaritons in a vortex produces a
Bosenove were detected in the DGT testing. THis occurs at the end of black
hole evaporation. Also, tachyons have been detected inside these micro
black holes.
See
http://restframe.com/rf/home.html
It is well known in string theory, Tachyon condensation produces mesons
from which muons a
Also see:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19508-hawking-radiation-glimpsed-in-artificial-black-hole/
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> See
>
> https://physics.aps.org/synopsis-for/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.036402
>
>
In reply to David Roberson's message of Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:31:28 -0400:
Hi,
It occurs to me that lasers in plasmas have previously been used as bench top
particle accelerators. I wonder if that also applies in Holmlid's experiments?
(See e.g.
43 matches
Mail list logo