On 2011-12-17 05:10, David ledin wrote:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/16/shells-interest-indicates-major-shift-for-lenr/?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=NewEnergyTimesBlog
In the comments:
Steven B. Krivit says:
December 17, 2011 at 00:21
Received via e–mail:
I ask you take down the
On 2011-12-17 17:38, Terry Blanton wrote:
[...] Me, I wouldn't want to be a part of a group who would have me as a
member. :-)
Personally I think I would find very interesting to even just read (I
don't think I'd even dare trying to post, to be honest!) what's going on
there, even if I wou
On 2011-12-18 17:18, Terry Blanton wrote:
It wouldn't hurt to fill out this form:
http://www.shell.com/home/content/innovation/innovative_thinking/game_changer/submit_idea/
This might actually be a good idea.
By the way, until Krivit leaked that email from the ISCMNS mailing list,
I've never
On 2011-12-20 21:09, Jed Rothwell wrote:
The expert has examined the machines and discussed their business plans.
He has made an independent in-depth evaluation lasting several days. He
Do you mean that this person actually went there an examined the
machines in person? Sorry if I'm being pic
Hello group,
It looks that Tarr and Romney aren't the only US politicians seemingly
open on LENR. From now, you can add to the list Randy Hekman, US Senate
candate from Michigan.
Have a read at this article from "Cold Fusion Now" blog. It contains an
original interview to Hekman. He appears
On 2011-12-21 20:48, Jed Rothwell wrote:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFsviluppodi.pdf
Thanks. This has also been posted on 22passi blog some time ago, but
it's good to see it on lenr-canr.org as well. By the way, in the last page:
Ahern e Rossi lavorano insieme in USA, DoD, progetto
On 2011-12-22 12:08, Daniel Rocha wrote:
McKubre's M4 bogus experiment index:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/McKubre-Experiment-M4.shtml
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/20111221ToWhomItMayConcern.shtml
In the above link it appears to me that Krivit is not just attacking
On 2011-12-22 14:09, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
Dear Sterling Allan:
The work of Celani (congratulations) shows that in my patent
application I gave enough information to allow to an expert to
reproduce the effect.
What Rossi is implying here is that the information disclosed in his
patent applic
On 2011-12-22 16:44, Jed Rothwell wrote:
See:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4956#p4956
On a side note, speaking of Defkalion GT, while reading E-Cat related
comments on a different website I found this image originating from PESN
[1]:
http://i.imgur.com/lFWUT.gif
I
Hello group,
Have a read at this. I can't tell whether these emails are to be trusted
or not (personally I believe they're authentic), but it appears that
some individuals in the US Department of Energy believe that LENRs are
possible, after all.
Might this be a good thing? McKubre recently
On 2011-12-26 19:23, Mary Yugo wrote:
Want respect, not mention tons of fame and fortune? Close the loop and
make them self running except for (rare) refueling. You'd be the
first. That's for sure.
With a small thermal excess power it's not trivial to close the loop in
my opinion. It would
On 2011-12-27 02:31, Ahsoka Tano wrote:
Looks like it may have been a fake letter. The original site about the
September letter has already taken it down:
The URL you provided appears to be wrong. This one works:
http://coldfusionnow.wordpress.com/2011/09/20/department-of-energy-policy-contin
On 2011-12-30 01:34, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
In Italian, and no transcript that I can see. Anything interesting?
As far as I know, there was nothing new or worth of particular attention
for informed people who have closely followed this since at least last
January, hence no transcripts.
Chee
On 2011-12-30 22:05, Jed Rothwell wrote:
See:
http://randyhekman2012.com/_blog/Blog/post/Energy_America's_Next_'Space_Race'_/
From the link above:
[...] It took a man I met at a conference in France five years ago to discover
the answer. Lewis Larsen, now CEO of Lattice Energy LLC in Chica
On 2011-12-31 15:56, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Someone, without my authorization, leaked my email to Randy Hekman since
today I got a spam from him. I am posting this here because given his
recent comments on cold fusion, I suspect someone in one of the CF
website gave him my email.
I received one to
On 2011-04-24 14:39, Michele Comitini wrote:
Christos Stremmenos talks about work done with Focardi on Ni-H.
http://ow.ly/4FS1H
*very interesting*
On Passerini's 22passi blog people are organizing a group work to
transcribe that interview in italian. A human translation in English
will prob
On 2011-04-25 14:54, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Has there been any news about this test? Where did you hear about this?
I would love to hear more!
According to Daniele Passerini (22passi), who knows some inside
information he is not allowed to divulge right now, something quite
important happened o
On 2011-04-25 15:38, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Well, I hope no one was hurt. I mean blown up or irradiated.
When I hear about "something quite important" in cold fusion I get a bad
feeling.
Er, I mean... positively important!
Citing the original source, "an important step further for the
scientifi
On 2011-04-26 16:20, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Rossi claims that the nickel will have to be changed out periodically,
every six months or so. I doubt it.
Not only the powder, it's the whole reactor vessel that has to be
replaced periodically. In my opinion this is probably also a safety
measure in
On 2011-04-27 17:50, Harry Veeder wrote:
from the Rossi E-Cat facebook page:
On May 3 at 20:37 from Rainews24 channel the Italian state television RAI will
broadcast on Andrea Rossi E-Cat
internet live streaming http://www.rainews24.it/it/canale-tv.php
Rainews24 channel doesn't reach a very l
On 2011-04-28 20:07, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Did Rossi really admit to this?
Just the other day I thought he said it exploded 32 times, but now I
cannot find the original source. This is annoying! My e-mail search
feature does not work well.
Here:
* * *
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.co
On 2011-04-28 20:23, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Thank you Akira!
So it was 37 times, not 32. No wonder I could not find it.
We should add this to the Wiki.
Maybe it's off-topic here, but some more interesting answers have been
posted on his blog, although they are not very technical this time:
ht
Hello group,
Have a look here:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/
In particular this new logo:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/images/logo%20Def.jpg
It might not be much, but I think this is a positive sign.
Cheers,
S.A.
Hello group,
In a recent interview in italian by Radio24, Francesco Celani mentioned
that it is Yoshiaki Arata who first introduced in 2008 a few very
important innovations in LENR research in order to increase Pd-D
reactivity in a dry reactor cell (not using electrolysis).
(for the record,
On 2011-04-30 04:44, Rich Murray wrote:
Uh, so far all known magnets have two poles and attract each other,
unless held in a lattice that confines them strongly in a repulsive pattern.
On the nanoscale, this would store huge amounts of energy.
You're absolutely right here, of course.
I regret
On 2011-04-30 05:07, Axil Axil wrote:
As documented in the Cat-E patent, Rossi ash contains no element heavier
the zinc. I have also looked at the waste documented in publically
available spectrographs that have been produced by the Piantelli’s
process and have not seen heavy elements there eithe
On 2011-04-29 02:32, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Rossi never ceases to amaze me! There have not been this many cold
fusion reactors in operation since Stan and Martin were open for
business in Nice, France, and they ran 64 cells at a time. And those
were only ~100 W each.
Partially unrelated with the O
On 2011-04-30 15:01, Michele Comitini wrote:
I would have said 0.5MW/ton
Whoops, of course you're right!
It's 0.5 MW/ton.
Yet another case of my fingers typing faster than my mind thinks.
S.A.
On 2011-04-30 20:34, Axil Axil wrote:
It is this internal heater that forms the H- ions (like a cathode)
needed to make the Rossi reaction function so productively. This
internal heater acts as a spill over catalyst to create H- ions. Rossi
calls this his secret catalyst.
Also, this is why you
On 2011-04-30 23:37, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I have been wondering about this. My guess is that Rossi means his
device uses gas-loaded cold fusion, rather than the original
Fleischmann-Pons electrolysis loading.
I agree that here Rossi probably means that.
The method of producing hydrogen outside
On 2011-05-01 00:43, noone noone wrote:
Has anyone read this before? It was posted on the Rossi blog a long time
ago. I think it is a big clue about the function of the catalyst.
Also, please don't run up to his blog and suggest he delete it to
protect his IP. The world needs all the info they c
On 2011-05-01 01:30, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
...surely, a DC electrolysis cell will only create Oxygen at one electrode and
only Hydrogen at the other? In short, it is quite simple to produce pure
Hydrogen?
Even I know that oxygen and hydrogen are generated separately at each
electrode, what
On 2011-05-01 01:34, Jones Beene wrote:
[...]
Even so, it is very likely that the Rossi breakthrough is a spillover catalyst
that gives far more than the 10x the effect of Arata/Zhang.
Interesting, thanks very much for the info. So in the end Rossi didn't
really reveal anything special, sinc
On 2011-05-01 02:23, Axil Axil wrote:
As I stated before in the Cat-E patent, Rossi ash contains no element
heavier the zinc. Rossi has stated that he does not use precious metals
in the Cat-E.
Do you think the patent can be trusted? After all it's written in the
least useful possible way (pro
On 2011-05-01 03:30, Axil Axil wrote:
[...]
*The H-ion is the active agent in both the Piantelli and Rossi process
which itself is just a variation of the Piantelli process.[...]
Wow.
I've never read Piantelli's patent (and now I realize I should have),
which is quite clear and descriptive. It
On 2011-04-29 02:02, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
[...]
Followup on the same issue:
* * *
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473&cpage=4#comment-36179
Dear M.Rossi
Recently you said,on this blog, that 97 E-cats were already built in 4
different locations. Each one of them would be able to
On 2011-04-30 23:57, Alan Fletcher wrote:
[...]
Even more answers:
* * *
I’m not a professional in nuclear reactions theory, but I’m curious
about the physical phenomenon, I’ve seen you measured the transmutation
rates of Nickel into Copper over a few months now, have you also
measured the c
On 2011-05-01 23:52, Michele Comitini wrote:
Prof. Stremnos "astonished" by blog comments after his interview,
wrote a letter to the radio.
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/05/il-professor-stremmenos-ribadisce-il.html
Christos E. Stremmenos is a retired nuclear physics professor from the
Univ
On 2011-05-02 00:35, Michele Comitini wrote:
Chemistry not Physics ;-)
Oops, sorry. I must have picked the wrong source.
from JONP (http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=185#more-185)
That is better than I could have written, thanks.
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2011-05-03 18:47, Michele Comitini wrote:
www.rainews24.rai.it/canale-tv.php?id=23074
I've watched the video, and uninformed viewers (regarding recent E-Cat
developments) can't possibly get a good impression with all the inserts
about Rossi's old Petroldragon affair. The message I personal
On 2011-05-03 18:47, Michele Comitini wrote:
www.rainews24.rai.it/canale-tv.php?id=23074
Here's three interesting video screenshots, from comments on 22passi
blog [1]:
1: http://i.imgur.com/RaBOI.jpg
2: http://i.imgur.com/uiPRH.jpg
3: http://i.imgur.com/zDziy.jpg
It appears they come from a
On 2011-05-05 00:14, Jed Rothwell wrote:
97 some time ago. Not sure when, or how many were in the lab being lined
up for the 1 MW reactor.
105 on May 1, 2011
(http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473&cpage=6#comment-36179)
147 today, May 4, 2011
Add this. Discrepancy?
* * *
http://w
On 2011-05-05 02:43, Jed Rothwell wrote:
ANOTHER mind-boggling claim. I can understand why Beene gets so worked
up by stuff like this.
This has to be uppermost limit for an oxide, just before it melts and
stops working completely.
Whatever else Rossi may be, and whatever it is he is drinking (
On 2011-05-03 18:46, Michele Comitini wrote:
www.rainews24.rai.it/canale-tv.php?id=23074
Now available in English:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzL3RIlcwbY
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/it/video.php?id=23096
Cheers,
S.A.
Hello group,
An English translation of a recent radio interview to Christos
Stremmenos, honorary vice-president of Defkalion Green Technologies,
retired professor at the University of Bologna and former Greek
ambassador in Italy, has finally been posted on 22passi blog:
Stremmenos: "cold fus
On 2011-05-06 16:51, Peter Gluck wrote:
Nano-nickel can be manufactured by different physical and chemical
methods (a very complex area of research) and it seems here has Rossi
succeeded to make a breakthrough.
I'm not to what extent this could be relevant (if at all) or if this
information c
On 2011-05-06 17:26, Peter Gluck wrote:
Thanks, I also noticed that but "tessitura" is open to interpretation,
it is morphology on more levels.. If it is true than Ni has not to be
"prepared" or processed for being active.
Yes, I think you're right. With that word he was probably referring more
On 2011-05-06 23:55, Axil Axil wrote:
[...] This is standard powder coating technology. The SSS will be very soft
and the NiO powder will sink into the SSS. The NiO powder will remain
strong and intact on the hot surface and will not melt until the
temperature of 2000C is reached
Do you think t
Hello group,
This is straight from Wikipedia:
* * *
http://www.uibm.gov.it/uibm/dati/Avanzata.aspx?load=info_list_uno&id=1610895&table=Invention&#ancoraSearch
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ufficio_italiano_brevetti_e_marchi
TITLE: "processo ed apparecchiatura per ottenere reazioni esotermiche,
On 2011-05-07 17:55, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Mats Lewan says "This means the EU patent is granted."
Not necessarily, I'm afraid. Or does he know more about this matter?
By the way, it looks like Defkalion Green Technologies is aware of
people's response to E-Cat related news. Have a look at their
On 2011-05-07 23:11, Jones Beene wrote:
The axial wires look like typical leads to a cartridge heater
http://www.tempco.com/new/products5.html
They do look like those.
A long version off this kind of heater could contact the reactor at the end,
and then it could transfer some heat to it, but
On 2011-05-08 00:47, Axil Axil wrote:
If you missed this old post, here is s repeat:
[...]
So, are you suggesting there is a core surrounded by water, like this?
http://i.imgur.com/pwZW2.png
(Both versions together: http://i.imgur.com/Kf7mO.png )
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2011-05-08 21:29, Terry Blanton wrote:
Our favorite blogger implies today that UoB is about to speak . . .
or, at least, that's how I interpreted it.
http://22passi.blogspot.com/
About to speak *soon*, apparently.
As for *how* soon, however, we aren't allowed to know yet.
It's speculated th
On 2011-05-10 01:42, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
So Rossi let us go ahead and think the cu was outside the SS reactor
while it was actually the sealed inner reactor filled with Ni powder and
a resistive heater. Water flows around the copper reactor inside a SS
jacket. The SS is a jacket not a reacto
Hello group,
On a thread about Rossi-Focardi's Energy Catalyzer in the Italian forum
EnergeticAmbiente.it [1], skeptic users are puzzled by a statement
coming from people involved in the latest E-Cat calorimetry measurements
(it's assumed it's from either Rossi or Levi), which in English reads
Hello group,
Have a read here:
https://register.epo.org/espacenet/application;jsessionid=540A3872CC4B88F0AD00B0BC9241BCE3.RegisterPlus_prod_1?number=EP08873805&lng=en&tab=doclist
In specific, at these entries:
29.04.2011 Citation filed by a third party
29.04.2011 Observations by third parties
On 2011-05-13 20:06, Harry Veeder wrote:
Another possibility is that Defkalion knows that Rossi's patent claims
are very weak or even futile. The 1mW plant will serve to impress investors
and *secure* loads of money quickly so that they can stay ahead of the
competition, at least for a while.
On 2011-05-15 21:44, Axil Axil wrote:
[...]
Levi reply:
Please note that he is professor Sergio Focardi, not Levi.
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2011-05-17 20:52, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
or where the "peer review" comes from.
Still can't find that one
That was my speculation based on what I read between the lines of a
short poem in a blog post there [1], supposed to explain in a purposely
very cryptic manner what happened on April
On 2011-05-25 19:37, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Dear Mr Alessandre Casali: you are right, 300 is not the exact number,
is an order of magnitude. Actually, the configuration of the 1 MW plant
is complex, and confidential. I can’t give details: of course you are
right: 2,5 x 300 makes 750. We will pro
On 2011-05-30 20:51, Alan Fletcher wrote:
2- There will be a new public test somewhere (Greece, or Italy, or
USA, or Sweden, etc): again, no more public tests will be made,
the sole tests we make are the tests of the modules of the 1 MW
plant which will go in operation in
On 2011-06-06 23:02, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
This is why we are very conservative regarding the sale of single
modules. We are engineering a system that will destroy automatically the
confidential parts if the reactor is open. The reactors will be open
only in our factory to replace the charge. T
On 2011-06-06 23:02, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Andrea Rossi
He added this today:
* * *
Dear Dr. Rossi,
thank you for your reply. You write you are being conservative regarding
the sales of single modules. But if Defkalion/AmpEnergo plans to produce
300 000 units per year do you think you will
On 2011-06-07 00:27, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Andrea supposes?>8D He can't be serious.
I doubt he is. How are they going to have total control on hundred of
thousands of devices supposedly going to be manufactured, anyway?
Motivated people and organizations will crack them open
On 2011-06-08 02:13, Jed Rothwell wrote:
[...]
I do not believe that is possible in any case. As I said, I assume this
material destroys itself when it is exposed to air. I doubt this is not
something Rossi designed; it is in the nature of a highly reactive catalyst.
Read here:
http://lenr-can
Hello group,
The Google translation in English of this thread from 22passi blog is
remarkably clear:
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=it&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2F22passi.blogspot.com%2F2011%2F06%2Froy-virgilio-su-ventidue-passi-damore.html
Short
On 2011-06-10 16:13, Jed Rothwell wrote:
See:
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3194216.ece
Wasn't production originally supposed to start in November this year?
It's now planned for 2012.
Cheers,
S.A.
Hello group,
To tell the truth there is nothing particularly relevant here, but have
a look at what I found with Google Alerts:
http://www.davidniebauer.com/rossi-energy-catalyzer-the-new-fire/
Apparently, David Niebauer, a corporate and transaction attorney
recently met with Rossi (the phot
On 2011-06-11 01:12, Michele Comitini wrote:
Someone in U.S. Congress is getting informed?
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/userletter/?letter_id=6988991981
Probably not:
* * *
http://www.congress.org/faq#affiliated
Q. Is Congress.org affiliated with Congress?
A. No. We are a nonpart
On 2011-06-10 21:30, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Interesting. So it is fairly prestigious. A government-affiliated web
page, sort of like the U.S. National Public Radio.
This kind of positive statement about cold fusion would not be published
in any government-affiliated U.S. web site.
A short but int
On 2011-06-11 06:30, Harry Veeder wrote:
On facebook 'Rats Gautam' sent emails to all the individuals mentioned in Loris
Ferrari's
article but only received responses from Mauro Villa and Loris Ferrari himself.
He posted their responses here:
https://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/EnergyCatalyzer
On 2011-06-12 18:54, Andrea Selva wrote:
The link is broken.
Has this post been deleted too ?
It seems so.
But Google cache misses nothing (although it appears to lack a photo):
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:MBcRFUJgaNkJ:www.davidniebauer.com/rossi-energy-catalyzer-the-
On 2011-06-14 08:20, Peter Gluck wrote:
My friend Steve Krivit is in Italy investigating the E-cat
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/06/14/solving-the-mystery-of-the-energy-catalzyer/
The E-cat has more unknowns, hopefully after Steve's visit their number
will be smaller
Daniele Passerini (2
On 2011-06-14 11:55, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Daniele Passerini (22passi) is also in Bologna today.
Hopefully we will have interesting news soon.
A "week of news" is incoming, apparently:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/06/e-cat-settimana-di-novita-in-arrivo.html
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2011-06-15 00:47, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
A "week of news" is incoming, apparently:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/06/e-cat-settimana-di-novita-in-arrivo.html
More photos in this Google-translated link of the latest Blog entry from
22passi. For additional information it looks li
On 2011-06-16 02:37, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
The black wrapping first appeared on the vertical column the "mini eCat"
-- see the March experiment by Kullander and Essén.
It's shown partly unwrapped at
http://lenr.qumbu.com/110406-c-Img+4+OUTPUT.jpg Looks like fancy duct tape.
It looks quite thic
On 2011-06-15 00:47, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
A "week of news" is incoming, apparently:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/06/e-cat-settimana-di-novita-in-arrivo.html
A couple more photos from the latest blogpost there:
Short link: http://goo.gl/x50lj
http://translate.google.com/tran
On 2011-06-16 22:53, Jones Beene wrote:
[...]
The device is drawing 800 watts electrical and producing 2.5 kW heat with an
investment of $5000 and a lifetime before refueling of 5000 hours. This
makes the cost of low grade heat about triple the cost of solar electricity
(or much more), if you ext
On 2011-06-16 23:00, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jones: I don't follow what is being said here. I am having difficulty
understanding the Google-translation. Can you briefly summarize what
Daniel said & did here, and why you draw these conclusions?
I see from the photo it has to do with a meter but I ca
On 2011-06-16 23:41, Jed Rothwell wrote:
[...]
So this high power input is a concern but we cannot draw a firm
conclusion from it yet.
Do I have that right?
Yes, basically the point is that the meter shows a high power draw (~800
W) compared to last time (~350 W, see the April reports by Ny
On 2011-06-16 23:53, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Yes, basically the point is that...
Passerini just added a clarifying note in the comments:
- Only one E-Cat was being tested
- Rossi was testing special settings which could have determined the
increased power consumption. Reportedly, during
Hello group,
Have a look here: http://goo.gl/Q348o
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/06/press-conferece-defkalion-il-230611.html
Daniele Passerini (22passi) received today an invitation for a Defkalion
press conference, to be held on June 23rd. Unfortunately for him (and
for us too) he won't b
On 2011-06-14 08:20, Peter Gluck wrote:
My friend Steve Krivit is in Italy investigating the E-cat
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/06/14/solving-the-mystery-of-the-energy-catalzyer/
The E-cat has more unknowns, hopefully after Steve's visit their number
will be smaller
Krivit posted a prel
On 2011-06-17 04:45, Harry Veeder wrote:
New video in italian with some historical excerpts in english.
As far as I can understand from comments in the blog where the video
originally appeared, a version subtitled in english will be posted at a
later time.
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2011-06-17 04:57, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I'd say, so far, so good. Let's hope he gets some decent answers.
Krivit's preliminary report has been harshly criticized by Rossi:
* * *
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpage=12#comment-46645
Dear Mr Rossi,
Can you respond to
On 2011-06-17 16:22, Mark Iverson wrote:
That's ridiculous... I highly doubt that Krivit did anything like that... What
is more likely is
that Levi misunderstood something that Krivit said due to the language barrier.
Steve mentioned in
his report that he felt Levi had trouble understanding so
On 2011-06-15 00:47, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
A "week of news" is incoming, apparently:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/06/e-cat-settimana-di-novita-in-arrivo.html
More Google-translated info from 22passi:
http://goo.gl/FvMnO
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2011-06-15 00:47, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
A "week of news" is incoming, apparently:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/06/e-cat-settimana-di-novita-in-arrivo.html
More detailed Google-translated info about what happened during
Passerini's visit to Bologna this week. I a
Hello group,
Today Rossi posted on his Blog some interesting info:
* * *
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpage=12#comment-46906
Dear C.Monti:
Thanks for your smart insight.
About the question: in these days we are making tests with zero energy
input, to try to make them safe.
On 2011-06-18 16:07, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Today Rossi posted on his Blog some interesting info:
Some more info:
* * *
Could you please share a few extra details about the experiment?
- The size of the E-Cat (50cc or one liter in volume).
- How high the output went before the test had to
On 2011-06-18 18:27, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Some more info:
* * *
3) What do you consider is the maximum “safe” output level?
4) Do you think the one megawatt power plant being opened by Defkalion
might operate with zero input?
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpag
Hello group,
I'm quite sure I'm playing his game by reporting this here, but I found
this message by Rossi on his blog of interest on many levels and
probably bound to generate many reactions:
* * *
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=96&cpage=1#comment-47000
Dear Paolo:
The 1 MW p
On 2011-06-18 22:22, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
I'm quite sure I'm playing his game by reporting this here, but I found
this message by Rossi on his blog of interest on many levels and
probably bound to generate many reactions:
It turns out that the 300 Energy Catalyzers
On 2011-06-19 00:58, Mark Iverson wrote:
Still, I think they are trying to save some face after this
recent breakthru of 'our reactors now produce a totally dry steam'. That
means that everyone,
including Krivit, who has been questioning them on this issue were spot on...
This is a bit of a
On 2011-06-19 01:24, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Passerini stated on his 22passi blog that without the black cloth the
little steam plume was barely visible) of what I mean:
Sorry, I made a mistake. Actually, he wrote a few posts below the one
containing the video in the forum linked that without
On 2011-06-19 04:06, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
I can't be sure from Krivit's rather murky summary of events whether
Levi was actually lying about it, or was confused, mistaken, or had been
misled by Rossi, but whatever the underlying situation is, Levi comes
across looking very bad here, IMHO.
On 2011-06-18 16:07, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
Today Rossi posted on his Blog some interesting info:
When E-Cats work without a drive, Rossi has to operate alone on them for
safety reasons. However Dr.Bianchini from the University of Bologna had
special permission to witness one
On 2011-06-19 14:08, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
How many reactions, which produce heat, and which may produce runaway
heat, can be quenched by ... *heating them up* ?
To be fair, I don't think this is what Rossi actually means.
Self-sustaining reactors probably operate on a closed loop, heate
...Or at least, this is what Rossi is implying in the comment below
pasted from his blog. It looks like we will know more details about it
after the presentation of the 1-MW plant in October. Rossi paints a grim
picture where LENR researchers backstab each other in order to obtain
research fund
On 2011-06-19 18:05, Terry Blanton wrote:
Anyone have any idea what he means here? I do not recall a diagram.
Is he speaking of a water phase graph?
Yes, I think he's speaking of a water phase graph they (i.e. him and
Levi) have been shown, although privately as of yet. Perhaps the
witnesse
201 - 300 of 632 matches
Mail list logo
