Re: [Vo]:Robert Park laments: "Is there no memory?"

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:23:43 -0500: Hi, I suspect rather that the written symbols function as a form of external memory, allowing one to build a larger construct than one could build in the mind alone. When we think about something we are forced to break it up in

Re: [Vo]:Clem: FE device turns out real

In reply to William Beaty's message of Sun, 8 Nov 2009 21:59:11 -0800 (PST): Hi, Quote from http://www.micro-combustion.com/drscott.html "The issue is the question regarding the original, successful, Clem engine lacking an air source. After careful consideration of this, I postulated that the or

Re: [Vo]:Nanoparticle Warning

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 9 Nov 2009 13:04:08 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Researchers using metallic nanoparticles should take heed: > >http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/nov/06/nanoparticles-dna-damage > >*Nanoparticles could damage DNA at a distance, study suggests* > >Lab tests sho

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion bombs

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:16:45 -0500: Hi, [snip] >And it will melt >locally long before you get multiple generations >of reactions from a large fraction of the total >population of deuterons, because heat conducts >very slowly compared to the timescale of a >n

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion bombs

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:05:15 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Speaking of real demos of CANR chain reactions ... in fact a very old demo >with a high death toll... > >IOW, speaking of nuclear "triggers" in the historical sense ... which could >be exactly on point to this subje

Re: [Vo]:Re: Eagle-Research eNotice

In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:48:14 -0900: Hi, [snip] >I haven't looked at the referenced website yet, as I have little time >at the moment. However, it seems this might be a future topic of >interest on vortex-l, depending on how things go for Eaton, Sokol, >a

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion bombs

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:00:55 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Turn up electrolysis power for 3 minutes. The temperature starts to rise. >Turn the power back down again. Temperature stabilizes, starts to fall . . . >Wait for it . . . Wait for it . . . Minutes later the cell sta

Re: [Vo]:Just how stupid is Al Gore, anyway?

In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Thu, 3 Dec 2009 10:07:45 -0600: Hi, [snip] >Regarding the second comment, what are reliable figures on tapping >into geothermal energy on an economical scale? Why I bring it up is >that we are now technologically capable of drilling miles deep

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion Nuclear Reactions Draft #14

In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:45:21 -0900: Hi Horace, [snip] >I should have noted my favorite stripping reactions: > >D + 10B10 --> 11B + p + 9.21 MeV > You seem to be missing a reaction here. I suspect D + 11B --> 12B + p. (However AFAIK neutron stripping reacti

Re: [Vo]:To deflect and asteroid, try a losso

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:39:59 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Interesting new approach: > >http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/12/asteroid-deflection-tether/ > > > >This proposal has attracted some real

Re: [Vo]:Journal Of Applied Science

In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Sat, 5 Dec 2009 11:02:45 +0100: Hi, [snip] >For instance, the laser >welding nuclear fusion used by Arata and Zhang was only >300 watts and generated about 1019 to 1020 particles per 10 >seconds. ...as I believe I have pointed out previously, this has to be

Re: [Vo]:Tracking the colorful Quark

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 6 Dec 2009 21:16:04 -0800: Hi, [snip] >First - let's begin with any fast neutron > ~7 MeV, as the author's mention >this value range several times. What other source for these than D+T fusion >do you imagine there to be in this situation? Please list the r

Re: [Vo]:Tracking the colorful Quark

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 7 Dec 2009 16:01:20 -0500: Hi, [snip] >On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > >> All in all, I am still of the opinion that the triple tracks are not >> indicative of a three-alpha reaction (12C fission), and that alternatives >> should b

Re: [Vo]:Tracking the colorful Quark

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:40:40 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Robin - I am surprised that you did not mention, as a possibility, some >version of the hydrino - for instance the "deuterino" at very high >redundancy. If in the form of a di-deuterino would have similar properties -

Re: [Vo]:CR-39 and 12C( n,n’)3alpha

In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:43:02 -0500: Hi, [snip] >And, another comment. The triple tracks reported as 10 per chip in >the Naturwissenschaften report were using a silver cathode. It >appears from other work of theirs that neutrons become far more >common w

Re: [Vo]:Tracking the colorful Quark

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:32:56 -0800: Hi, [snip] >your underlying assumptions - then one of them could be this. Al-Najjar et >al. (1986) reported that the threshold energy of the neutron required to >fission a carbon atom (three alpha) is 9.6 MeV. The authors apparen

Re: [Vo]:Millsean triple tracks ?

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 7 Dec 2009 16:23:13 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Oops - cancel the last two paragraphs as a senior moment. What I meant was - >to add a proton and a neutron from one of the deuterinos. > > > >I'll revise this post - one of these days, if I hear that Borated CR-39 w

Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:CR-39 and 12C(n,n')3alpha

In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Mon, 7 Dec 2009 20:27:03 -0900: Hi, [snip] >This is an interesting idea, but as noted above, a 50-50 D-T >experiment produced nominal high energy neutrons. For this idea to >be valid that hot T fusion works in a lattice, and cold T fusion does >not, t

Re: [Vo]:Primary CF reaction and secondary reactions.

In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:09:30 -0500: Hi, [snip] >However, from the >reported excess heat and from strongly correlated helium >measurements, I consider it well established that the primary nuclear >ash is helium, and that the primary fuel, the starting po

Re: [Vo]:Primary CF reaction and secondary reactions.

In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:39:42 -0500: Hi, [snip] > > >On 12/09/2009 03:54 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: >> In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:09:30 >> -0500: >> Hi, >> [snip] >>> However, from the >>> reported excess heat and

Re: [Vo]:Collins, Walker, Norbury article

In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:57:08 -0500: Hi, [snip] >off. But then, wouldn't we expect some really hot alphas? How do you know that there are no really hot alphas? Even really hot ones only have a travel distance of microns in solids and liquids. Hence the nee

[Vo]:De Broglie wave wrapping

Hi, If the H atom electron is seen as a ring and this ring is allowed to vibrate along it's axis, then for small oscillation amplitudes the natural frequency of oscillation is the same as the rotational frequency of the ring. However if the axial oscillation is forced to a sub-harmonic, then the D

Re: [Vo]:De Broglie wave wrapping

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:06:28 -0800: Hi Jones, [snip] >-Original Message- >From: mix...@bigpond.com > >> Matching lattice spacings may be at least one reason why CF is so >temperamental One of the lattice spacings of Zr4.28Zn0.9Ge3 is a very >close mat

Re: [Vo]:The discovery of Hydra-Jinn

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:43:57 -0800: Hi, [snip] >http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/12/16/2152989.aspx I think they're stretching it a bit to call this a water world. You can get the same mass and size figures from a rocky world with a thick atmosphere.

Re: [Vo]:STEORN completes first on-line DEMO

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:50:33 -0500: Hi, >Even if you totally eliminated BEMF you would not achieve overunity. > >Terry You have this backwards. BEMF is what makes electric motors efficient. Were it not for BEMF, they would be a dead short and consume vast amoun

Re: [Vo]:Clusters in LENR

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:57:03 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Shoulder to Shoulder with Chicea: > >http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ChiceaDelectroncl.pdf [snip] Quote: "The total energy produced by the reactions induced by the collected deuterons is not enough to break the e

Re: [Vo]:Clusters in LENR

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:51:57 -0800: Hi, [snip] >For this to happen as a single event, all must be at the same place at the >same time. This condition describes what can be called a super-cluster. For >all members of the cluster to enter at the same time, they mus

Re: [Vo]:Clusters in LENR

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:58:53 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Awkshully, this is more towards Ed's rationale - in that he sees the >deuterium as a quasi or temporary BEC (Bose condensate). That would be more >of an analogy to Faberge eggs, but I presume that Russian Dolls is a

Re: [Vo]:STEORN completes first on-line DEMO

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:11:58 -0500: Hi, [snip] >On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 3:45 PM, wrote: > >> You have this backwards. > >That's not unusual for me. > >> BEMF is what makes electric motors efficient. > >It's what generates torque in an AC motor. Torque is a co

Re: [Vo]:Is pycnodeuterium "below ground state"?

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:20:59 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Stated simply, much of the expected excess energy was already given up prior >to the actual nuclear reaction, via the non-nuclear "shrinkage" reaction >which pushed it below ground state, giving up heat in the form o

Re: [Vo]:Is pycnodeuterium "below ground state"?

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:01:18 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Maybe I am not explaining it well, but it makes sense to me, so far. It is >essentially equating the strong magnetic alignment you mention as providing >the same effect as ultracold - IF and only if there is a group

Re: [Vo]:Is pycnodeuterium "below ground state"?

wo days, then at that point in time 90% of the >excess heating might be coming from apparent fusion, due to the documented >helium content, and due to a working population of pycno having been >present. > >In fact the excess heat at any given point in time would be a mix of both >

Re: [Vo]:Trend Alert !!

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:20:10 -0800: Hi, [snip] >A recent trend that is "gaining traction" in the LENR world is what can be >called the pycno-IEC reactor. It is really more than a trend, and may soon >be approaching 'paradigm shift.' > >It will likely be the first

Re: [Vo]:BLP advertising for a Senior Mechanical Engineer

In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:09:12 -0600: Hi, ...and they expect all this in one person? >BlacklightPower is advertising for a Senior Mechanical Engineer, $98k - >$120k. > > > >http://careercenter.aiaa.org/jobdetail.cfm?job=3253851 > > > >ht

Re: [Vo]:Falsifiability of cold neutrons in LENR

In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:29:37 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Some of the alphas, >statistically, would be hot enough to induce secondary reactions as >well. (Which comes first, the photon emissions or the fission?) [snip] Be8 has a very short half life. I would expec

Re: [Vo]:Falsifiability of cold neutrons in LENR

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:03:53 -0800: Hi, [snip] I think the main problem here is that there is only a significant cross section for alpha emission when the neutron is fast. In fact, alpha emission upon absorption of a slow particle is a form of fission, and only s

Re: [Vo]:Falsifiability of cold neutrons in LENR

In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:36:31 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Takahashi gives very strong arguments as to why >the hypothesis of direct d-d fusion to He-4 is implausible. [snip] It is implausible unless the energy can be disposed of by fast electrons. (I must confess

Re: [Vo]:"Pycnodeuterium" under a different name?

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:52:47 -0800: Hi, [snip] >http://www2.chem.gu.se/staff/leif_holmlid.html [snip] No it isn't "Pycnodeuterium" under a different name. It's Mills' (ian). Pycnodeuterium comprises intermeshed tetrahedrons of nuclei and electrons. Mills model uses

Re: [Vo]:"Pycnodeuterium" under a different name?

In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:55:57 -0600: Hi, [snip] >Jed sez: > >> That's astounding if true. Someone should acquaint Prof. Holmlid with cold >> fusion and the claims of Arata and others who have reported high loading of >> nano-particles. >> >> I nomi

[Vo]:(fwd) Re: Inverted Rydberg states

Response from Prof. Holmlid, On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 23:35:24 +0100, Leif Holmlid wrote: >Dear Mr. Spaandonk, > >I am well aware of the studies and results of Mills. > >The model we use to understand our results does not require any new >quantum mechanics or similar devices. The results are rather s

Re: [Vo]:Re: Inverted Rydberg states

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:05:00 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Robin, > >> Response from Prof. Holmlid > >Wow. Given the time difference, he is apparently a night owl. > >When he says "The results are rather simple and multiple energy levels are >not involved, only one level exis

Re: [Vo]:Just When You Thought It Was Safe . . .

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:22:31 -0500: Hi, [snip] >http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/6940111/Earth-to-be-wiped-out-by-supernova-explosion.html > >Earth 'to be wiped out' by supernova explosion >The Earth could soon be wiped out by the explosion of a star more

Re: [Vo]:Google's problem in China

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:19:24 -0500: Hi, [snip] >http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http://baike.baidu.com/view/1391655.htm%3Ffr%3Dala0_

Re: [Vo]:Google's problem in China

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:45:23 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Soylent? ;) Computers frequently have problems translating because the very concept of "understanding" isn't part of their "mind set". > >On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:58 PM, wrote: >> In reply to  Jed Rothwell's

Re: [Vo]:Will 2010 be the Year of Zero Point Energy?

In reply to Frank's message of Sun, 17 Jan 2010 07:15:25 -0500: Hi Fran, [snip] >Jones > > Thanks, will start editing today - but still need to address this >criticism I received from a friend at Sunnyvale, "Remember proof of a >physical phenomenon has to be correlated with a theoretical physic

Re: [Vo]:OT: US Supreme Court lifts campaign finance limits

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:02:06 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Making graft legal. > >Woe are we. [snip] On the bright side, at least now you will know who is paying off the pollies. ;) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html

Re: [Vo]:Spam has been eliminated? Robin posts considered spam (was Re: OFF TOPIC "Davos predictions: predictably wrong?")

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:05:35 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Ironically, this was the only VO message in my spam folder of about 30 >total in the past month. > >Hey Monteverde, the Food Network says Hawaiians love spam, like spam >omelette's, etc. > >Terry SPAM - SPurious A

Re: [Vo]:new Infinite Energy combustion engine using inert gases

In reply to froarty...@comcast.net's message of Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:40:18 + (UTC): Hi, [snip] >There was mention of a combustion engine in new IE issue using inert gases. Is >this what >SPICE is based on? could one gas act like an electrolyte while compressing >"bubbles" of >the other gas?

Re: [Vo]:Spam has been eliminated? Robin posts considered spam (was Re: OFF TOPIC "Davos predictions: predictably wrong?")

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:09:31 -0500: Hi, [snip] >On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:13 PM, wrote: >> SPAM - SPurious Advertising Material. > >Also SPiced hAM: That was the original definition before the advent of the Internet. [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http

Re: [Vo]:new Infinite Energy combustion engine using inert gases

In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:19:56 -0500: Hi, [snip] >http://www.rohnermachine.com/ > >http://www.pappengine.com/ [snip] Thanks for these, I was unaware of the Rohner involvement. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html

Re: [Vo]:Doing the Bosenova

In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:05:14 -0500: Hi, [snip] >> Could be. Any experimental data? Specific to Rubidium-85? >> > >Nope. That was just a snap judgement based on the binding energy curve, >which has iron at the extremum. In general, elements heavier than

Re: [Vo]:Doing the Bosenova

In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:25:46 -0500: Hi, [snip] Note also that Rb87 (~27%) is a beta emitter with a very long half life. Perhaps shrinking the BEC causes an acceleration of the beta decay? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Proj

Re: [Vo]:CF in Physics Today

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:59:03 -0500: Hi, [snip] >That's remarkably positive. Good! > >- Jed [snip] I don't really agree. They are trying to explain away CF results with comic ray muons, which is utter nonsense. That would explain energy production at the level of

Re: [Vo]:CF in Physics Today

In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sat, 06 Feb 2010 09:00:36 +1100: Hi, [snip] According to http://www.cosmicrays.org/ the muon flux at the surface is about 200 / m^2 / sec. Assuming each muon catalyzes 120 fusion reactions, and each such reaction produces 23.8 MeV, we get a "power" outp

Re: [Vo]:CF in Physics Today

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:10:01 -0500: Hi, [snip] Diurnal variations could come from many other factors such as the influence of light on the reactor. Just because such variations may exist, doesn't necessarily imply that muons are the primary cause CF reactions. T

Re: [Vo]:Doing the Bosenova

In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:00:10 -0900: Hi, Neutron exchange reactions have been mentioned before, but perhaps proton exchange is also possible. In which case you might have been right the first time, since that reaction only requires the exchange (more accurately

Re: [Vo]:CF in Physics Today

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 5 Feb 2010 21:09:14 -0500: Hi, [snip] >I did not say muons. I said extraterrestrial particles, presumably high >energy. Muons perhaps . . . > However the original article was about muons, and that's what I said was ridiculous. (Neutrinos may also play a

Re: [Vo]:comment on Violante data as covered by Steve Krivit

In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 7 Feb 2010 05:52:36 -0900: Hi, [snip] >No, most of the 4He reactions occur sub-surface. What do you think >produces a "volcano"? A surface reaction? The typical 4He produced >by CF does not have MeV kinetic energy, and is not surface produced.

Re: [Vo]:comment on New Energy Times' editorial about MeV/He-4

In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:44:23 -0500: Hi, [snip] >This was not an MeV/He-4 chart, actually, and it was not, contrary to >Krivit's assertions, used to "prove" the 24 MeV correlation. What the >paper was asserting was that there was a correlation between exc

Re: [Vo]:CNN iReport on BLP

In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:39:20 -0600: Hi, [snip] >This is kind of interesting. I didn't realize the fact that CNN has a >procedure in place to allow for independent reporting. > >See: > >http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-402579?ref=feeds%2Fhighestrat

Re: [Vo]:SRI Experiment HH

In reply to Steven Krivit's message of Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:51:23 -0800: Hi, [snip] >http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/SRI-Expt-HH/SRI-Experiment-HH.shtml > >Vorts, > >I have deliberately not provided any explanation, analysis or interpretation. > >Instead, I'd like to hear your thoughts first

Re: [Vo]:Extraordinary Error -- no electric field exists inside a conducting liquid in an insulated box with two external charged metal plates, re work by SPAWAR on cold fusion since 2002 -- also hot

In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:32:24 -0900: Hi, [snip] >Bockris' text on electrochemistry >states that ion motion in the electrolyte between the interface >layers is not primarily due to electric field, because most all the >potential drop occurs across the two m

Re: [Vo]:Sea Power News

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:44:28 -0500: Hi, [snip] >http://www.oceanpowermagazine.net/2010/02/13/tidal-energy-turbine-exceeds-1000-hours-of-operation-feeding-to-the-grid/ > >Tidal Energy Turbine Exceeds 1000 hours of Operation Feeding to the Grid > >SeaGen, the worl

Re: [Vo]:Sea Power News

In reply to Nick Palmer's message of Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:41:31 -: Hi, [snip] >Robin linked to the wiki article on the Rance tidal plant. That's just >across the water from here and I've driven over the barrage numerous times. >I suppose the novel feature of the new plant is that the turbines

Re: [Vo]:Windy Iowa

In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:32:33 -0600: Hi, [snip] >http://www.wqad.com/news/wqad-study-iowa-wind-production-growing-030310,0,5316702.story >http://tinyurl.com/ycc6hu > Quote: "The study found that wind energy produces 3,670 megawatts of electricity

Re: [Vo]:relativistic Casimir effect

In reply to Francis X Roarty's message of Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:05:14 -0500: Hi Francis, [snip] >http://www.byzipp.com/animaTime.htm Quote:- "Normal QED theory states that the displaced longer wavelength fluctuations are replaced with shorter wavelength fluctuations." I don't think they are actu

Re: [Vo]:simulation of fractional hydrogen ashless

In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:47:17 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Jones, >The large spheres outside the cavity are monatomic hydrogen which > occasionally collides to form h2 and give off a red photon, I thought it was a well recognized fact that monatomic Hydr

Re: [Vo]:OU demonstrated ( with no secrets)

In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:09:15 -0700 (PDT): Hi, [snip] > > >video of Self Runner >(a variation of the Solid state generator) > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sicsnUq_a4 He states that it must be OU because the output voltage goes above the battery voltage. How

Re: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi patent

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:52:14 -0400: Hi, [snip] >the same mass can produce. (I believe Mills once told me the upper >limit based on his theory is ~100,000 times ordinary chemistry, but >perhaps a hydrino-theory aficionado can verify that.) The maximum he can th

Re: [Vo]:Transporter Malfunction

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:39:17 -0500: Hi, [snip] >http://www.ghosttheory.com/2010/03/09/paris-car-crash-occupants-dissappeared-momentarily > >"This is just bizarre. I really would not think much of news like this >one, but the fact that multiple witnesses were say

Re: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

In reply to Steven Krivit's message of Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:05:04 -0800: Hi, [snip] >"Journal or Nuclear Physics"? Really??? Can someone please tell me >something about this? >http://whois.domaintools.com/journal-of-nuclear-physics.com [snip] I note that there is another paper on the site (http://

Re: [Vo]:Iron-nitrogen compound forms strongest magnet known

In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:17:42 -0700 (PDT): Hi, [snip] >Iron-nitrogen compound forms strongest magnet known > >March 22, 2010 by Lin Edwards >Fe16N2. Image credit: Kikkawa >Laboratory > >(PhysOrg.com) -- A group of scientists from the >University of >Minnesot

Re: [Vo]:Krivit vs. ENEA

In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:21:56 -0400: Hi, [snip] >>How Does Hagelstein Explain >>Energetic Alphas? > >>Theoretical Speculations on “Upper Limits”: >>“The alpha particle must be born with an >>energy less than 20.3 KeV.” >>(Pay no attention to Lipson et al. 2

Re: [Vo]:Peter L Hagelstein 2D --> He4 + 24 MEV in fractal Pd or Au nanovoids, with 2-stage spin boson model for energy downshifts to 2 MEV to optical phonons: Lomax: Murray 2010.03.24

In reply to Rich Murray's message of Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:16:42 -0600: Hi, [snip] >www.NewEnergyTimes.com/v2/library/2010/2010HagelsteinP-ConstraintsOnECP.pdf [snip] There is a typo in formula 1. The value between parentheses is always 1. Does anyone know what was actually intended? Regards, Robi

Re: [Vo]:Transportation energy

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Mon, 9 Jan 2012 19:19:07 -0500: Hi, [snip] >A cold fusion hybrid >would probably not need as many batteries as the Prius plug-in or Volt. >Just enough to bring the turbine up to full output. If that could be done >in 6 minutes, or ~8 miles at highway speed, th

Re: [Vo]:LENR & 'Proliferation' was: US DOE alters its stance on LENR and Rossi?

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:28:38 -0800 (PST): Hi, [snip] >The monitor used by Rossi's team in January is specifically designed to detect >positrons, which must be there if there is to be H+H fusion. None were >detected. There is a bit of a problem with this. The de

Re: [Vo]:LENR & 'Proliferation' was: US DOE alters its stance on LENR and Rossi?

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 30 Dec 2011 01:59:19 +0100: Hi, [snip] >Well finding deuterium would be definitive proof of 'something anomalous' >but not fusion, since they can absolutely rule out ALL varieties of hydrogen >fusion now. You absolutely have to get rid of a positive charge

Re: [Vo]:On Widow Larsen theory, need vulgarization, and critic

In reply to Alain Sepeda's message of Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:54:31 +0100: Hi, [snip] >thus the mass is simply caused by all the lattice/wave around, slowing the >electrons when it tries to move... Personally, I can't see this contributing to it's ability to form a neutron, however it might solve a di

Re: [Vo]:LENR & 'Proliferation' was: US DOE alters its stance on LENR and Rossi?

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:52:17 -0800: Hi Jones, Actually I largely agree with your position. I too think that fusion reactions are unlikely in this case (though not impossible). I'm trying to keep an open mind here. Note also that I think the H+H->D reaction is ver

Re: [Vo]:Dick Smith will give to the charity group $200,000 if e-cat work as claimed by rossi

In reply to Alan J Fletcher's message of Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:52:48 -0800: Hi, [snip] >At 01:37 PM 1/12/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote: >At 12:46 PM 1/12/2012, Jones Beene wrote: >> Hmmm ... why all the Ausie eCat Interest? Where's OUR GUY? >Maybe he *is* Dick Smith...(Need to check on his yachts

Re: [Vo]:Interesting link at NASA

In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:17:50 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Craig, >The purifier should be a vast improvement over electrolytic > cell since you don’t need to electrolyze hydrogen out of the water although > the “impure” gas being fed in obviously coul

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Vs. NASA!

In reply to Mary Yugo's message of Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:11:08 -0800: Hi, [snip] >If NASA's theory is wrong, how are they any form of competition? This >"doesn't compute". It does if they use the same method and get similar results, even with the wrong theory. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http

Re: [Vo]:Rossi : customer can refill

In reply to Energy Liberator's message of Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:04:56 +: Hi, [snip] >I agree. This changes things significantly. It will be interesting to see how >this is achieved. It's simple enough to change a cartridge with the nickel >powder but how is the hydrogen taken care of? Perhaps

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Vs. NASA!

In reply to Mary Yugo's message of Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:42:59 -0800: Hi, [snip] >On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:18 PM, wrote: > >> In reply to Mary Yugo's message of Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:11:08 -0800: >> Hi, >> [snip] >> >If NASA's theory is wrong, how are they any form of competition? This >> >"doesn

Re: [Vo]:Preparata's Intra-Cathode Current?

In reply to Alan J Fletcher's message of Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:34:23 -0800: Hi, [snip] >At 12:24 PM 1/12/2012, Jones Beene wrote: >From: James Bowery >Google-books has one of Preparata’s most popular books on QED online. There is >a chapter on LENR >http://books.google.com/books?id=u-MvobTFGLEC&pg=

Re: [Vo]:video from NASA about lenr (cold fusion)

In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:00:57 -0500: Hi, [snip] >The underlying posit of this video is that NASA believes Enhancement of >Surface Plasmon Polaritons will initiate and sustain LENR in metal hydride >systems. I have followed Plasmon articles as they relate to

Re: [Vo]:Kiplinger Letter, Jan 6 2012, Topic: ENERGY

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:20:46 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Alain Sepeda wrote: > >> >> I was assuming time to switch on of about 5 minute, taken from defkalion >> (most of my computation are from defkalion hyperion) >> > >I do not know whether we should call this "switch o

Re: [Vo]:Kiplinger Letter, Jan 6 2012, Topic: ENERGY

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:20:46 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Turbines are kind of slow to respond to controls. Jet engine aircraft are >less responsive than propeller-driven ones. There was a gas turbine >automobile prototype in the 1970s. I do not know what it was like to dr

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's pricing mismatch is really gross

In reply to Mary Yugo's message of Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:54:16 -0800: Hi, I think the price of the 10 kW modules is just a projected price, and is probably more likely to be a manufacturing cost price than what he can really sell them for. Furthermore, I think that when the factory for the small un

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion Economic Effects

In reply to Mauro Lacy's message of Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:59:31 -0300: Hi, [snip] >Maybe the solution is what Fidel Castro proposed recently: replace the >US president with a robot. They already did that decades ago. ;^) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's pricing mismatch is really gross

In reply to Aussie Guy E-Cat's message of Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:04:53 +1030: Hi, [snip] >In the interview, Rossi said the customer price would be $500 for a 10 >kW E-Cat. > >AG I sincerely hope it is. :) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Re: [Vo]:Nicholas Moller and MAHG

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:04:14 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Speaking of, I have been searching for the molecular dissociation >energy of deuterium on the web and have not found it readily >available. I would think that it is greater than 4.8 eV and there >seems to be a go

Re: [Vo]:Nicholas Moller and MAHG

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:12:39 -0500: Hi Terry, [snip] >On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:10 PM, wrote: >> In reply to  Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:04:14 -0500: >> Hi, >> [snip] >>>Speaking of, I have been searching for the molecular dissociation >>>e

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:'Quiescence' – a detailed causation speculation.

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 15 Jan 2012 01:02:42 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Recrystallization temperatures for different metals… > >Nickel---600C, > >Iron---450C, > >Copper---200C, > >Aluminum---150C, > >Zinc---Room Temperature, > >As depicted in the table above, even if copper can be used as

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:'Quiescence' – a detailed causation speculation.

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:14:05 -0500: Hi Axil, [snip] >Thanks Robin for responding… > >My theory of operations regarding the Rossi powder requires that the >metal(s) must be paramagnetic at the operating temperature of the reactor. > >This comes from Dr. Kim who state

Re: [Vo]:LENR G & Silver & Currency

In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:29:56 -0800: Hi, [snip] >In addition, if currencies are based on the petro$, then that's going to >collapse like a tons of bricks when the financial industry realizes that >LENR just made petroleum obsolete. Then, currencies will

Re: [Vo]:Cooper pairing of protons

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 8 Jan 2012 02:35:02 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Where N can be 1 to very many, N identical waves are said to be coherent. >These many waves have the same waveform; they are all in fact the same >wave. Since particles are matter waves, N particles that are identical a

Re: [Vo]:LENR G & Silver & Currency

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:57:36 -0800: Hi, [snip] >What if you could >take something like uranium-238, which is relatively abundant, add >sufficient neutrons to it and then let it alpha and beta decay to >uranium-235? Since any amount of U235 created would be small,

Re: [Vo]:LENR G & Silver & Currency

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:43:26 -0500: Hi, [snip] >By the way, fusion of protons with transuranic elements is very unlikely. >But if somehow a proton(s) got inside a super heavy nucleus, fission of the >new transmuted element would almost certainly happen instantaneous

Re: [Vo]:Opponents should please go away and form your own group

In reply to Alain Sepeda's message of Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:03:57 +0100: Hi, [snip] >for Ni+H LENR there does not seem to exist a reversible negative feedback, >so like any engineer will know you have to stabilize the system with an >outside control loop. You can keep it starved of fuel and let it

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >