The energy gain of about two is based on an energy in of 850J which
gives the appearance of having been typed in rather than measured,
possibly based on information about the voltage and current that was
applied. It would have been nice to have had more details. It would
also have been good
From: Nigel Dyer
The energy gain of about two is based on an energy in of 850J which gives
the appearance of having been typed in rather than measured,
I must have missed something Nigel.
Are saying the COP of this demo is about 2 ?
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
I must have missed something Nigel.
Are saying the COP of this demo is about 2 ?
I vaguely recall this as well. I did not watch through the entire video,
but instead just saw segments. I believe Mills claimed power
The demoed COP was slightly above 2.
The claimed potential COP was infinite.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
I must have missed something Nigel.
Are saying the COP of this demo
They dont explicitly say anything about COP, but it a reasonable
interpretation of the display that is shown at 1:17:32. Energy in top
left, COP in the middle. The figures could of course refer to something
else, but I think that if I was doing the experiment then this would be
the figure I
From: Nigel Dyer
They dont explicitly say anything about COP, but it a reasonable
interpretation of the display that is shown at 1:17:32. Energy in top
left, COP in the middle. The figures could of course refer to something
else, but I think that if I was doing the experiment
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Anyone can claim 100:1 in a theory.
More to the point:
Anyone can claim a theory.
The question is can the theory be experimentally tested? This is and has
always been the problem with cold fusion. Until it is solved,
James I liked your comment.
Why not accept COP of 2. Then you can recirculate that a few times and a
factor 64 will be there in 5 more steps.
OK it is not as fantastic and revolutionary as the many theories indicate
(btw they are way over my pay grade). I often see references to airplanes
and the
While I don't mean to under-celebrate Mills' over-unity success, please
note that this COP of 2 is to THERMAL.
However, In Mills' case, the thermal energy appears to be relatively high
enthalpy and efficient conversion to electrical for feedback to the input
may be possible. With a COP of 2 to
In the second demo, Mills et al are producing an excimer laser effect by
using chlorine in the chemical mix. That type of laser will generate EUV
which produces water cluster detonation.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Nigel Dyer l...@thedyers.org.uk wrote:
On 02/03/2014 02:14 PM, Nigel Dyer wrote:
http://www.blacklightpower.com/whats-new
He sounds so certain that it's hard to believe his theory has serious
errors. I am not qualified to judge it.
Craig
One big problem in LENR reaction analysis is the confusion between cause
and effect.
Many analysts judge an accidental effect produced by the primary cause to
be the ultimate cause.
Mills is confusing symptoms with primary causation.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Craig
One of the critical things that Joe Papp did to enhance EUV production was
to pass his spark through alpha emitters like radium and thorium.
This is a LENR reaction where radioactive decay is accelerated and photon
emissions from isotopes are greatly amplified.
The more EUV that you can be
Does he do any control discharges?
By that I mean: Did he demonstrate what happens if you don't include the
water but send the same electrical energy through the system?
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Nigel Dyer l...@thedyers.org.uk wrote:
http://www.blacklightpower.com/whats-new/
He says he's ready to license the technology, and that there are
companies he's going to meet which may do that. He thinks that a
prototype could be built in a 'lightning fast' period of time, maybe a
couple of months.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig
He says he's ready to license the technology, and that there are
companies he's going to meet which may do that. He thinks that a
prototype could be built in a 'lightning fast' period of time, maybe a
couple of months.
Well this is déjà vu all over
Measurements of the energy output and spectral evidence for the hydrino
theory start at 1:16:25
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Craig
He says he's ready to license the technology, and that there are
companies he's
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Measurements of the energy output and spectral evidence for the hydrino
theory start at 1:16:25
Thanks!
- Jed
Has anyone noticed that in Mills' drawings of the MHD converter that he has
the direction of the coils and the B field wrong for the directions that he
wants his positive and negative ions to travel? At 53:13, he is showing a
slide with an axial B field and presumably with the plasma split and
I agree Bob. He needs to rotate the coils 90 degrees as you point out.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Feb 3, 2014 9:37 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP video is out
Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Feb 3, 2014 9:37 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP video is out
Has anyone noticed that in Mills' drawings of the MHD converter that he
has the direction of the coils and the B field
@eskimo.com
Cc: Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
Sent: Mon, Feb 3, 2014 9:37 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP video is out
Has anyone noticed that in Mills' drawings of the MHD converter that he
has the direction of the coils and the B field wrong for the directions
that he wants his positive
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP video is out
I haven't seen that picture but based on earlier stuff I've seen that axial
magnetic field acts as a guide for the expanding plasma - the plasma first
travels axially and then intersects the transverse field at the ends,
when it hits the transverse field
To me the most interesting part was the q+a toward the end. From about
1:53:00 to 2:05:00 he finally cuts loose from the script and makes a
strong case for the quality and significance of his research. It left me
with a somewhat improved impression of BLP's prospects. The engineering
, Feb 3, 2014 9:49 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP video is out
I haven't seen that picture but based on earlier stuff I've seen that axial
magnetic field acts as a guide for the expanding plasma - the plasma first
travels axially and then intersects the transverse field at the ends,
when it hits
I haven't made it to the QA yet.
Mills talked about there being a 100:1 energy ratio between gasoline and
water. In other words, a car would go as far on 1 gallon of water as 100
gallons of gasoline. He made the case for a microliter of water producing
1000J of excess heat which is about 1
It is interesting to do a little math around this experiment. Presume that
the popper is operating with a fuel of 1 microliter of water and produces a
net excess energy of 1000 joules. Presume Mills to be correct in assigning
most of the reaction is conversion to 1/4 hydrino state that is
27 matches
Mail list logo
