. I am pretty sure that the Sodium-Hydroxide processed Raney Nickel- the
stuff
. that is good to go, is pretty safe, especially since it is packed in a
liquid
. that limits oxidation and must actually be dried out to use.
. Actually, they treat a very fine powder. Of course for LPD, I
With a printable cell which does not use tellurium nor indium:
http://www.physorg.com/news185093054.html
As controversial as the subject is, the Wiki article is balanced, if not
leaning towards the minority viewpoint:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expanding_earth
Here is what is said about Adams:
One prominent present day advocate of an expanding Earth is comics artist
Neal Adams,[34] who
My point is that the Growing Earth thing is not so farfetched if we have an
actual mechanism whereby more matter than antimatter arises from many
Mini-Bangs just as we attribute to the Big-Bang.
I think the Growing Earth thing is pretty compelling---you can tear as many
pieces of paper in
Scott,
One thing I meant to add to the previous - about the methodology for an
expanding earth - and it is not mentioned in the Wiki piece - is the
assertion of Dr. R. Mills of large scale hydrino T formation in the solar
corona.
Side note: Due to trademark concerns, we are usually
I am not certain if matter can actually leave the “present” or just does a 4D
transformation where one spatial dimension trades places with time such that a
different inertial frame simply means the “present” is wider or thinner than
our frame. This gets into a weakness I have always had
Jones,
On the surface (no pun intended) this is an absolutely absurd hypothesis.
...and yet, I love it!
Well shoot! We know stars expand and shrink during their epic life times.
So... why not planets too? What mechanism has been theorized that would make
planets like our Earth (and Mars)
OK Steven - first, let's be clear that I do not espouse this theory as it
stands now.
However, it deserves a fair hearing. It may not fly, but it has not been
shot down effectively by the mainstream. In fact, the counter arguments are
lame.
In fact, there are parts of it that might fit quite
Earlier nuclear catalytic reactions in LENR were defined here:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/dfRpt
specifically in regards to Reports C and D.
Report C, including 288 reactions in 20 pages, 44 kB, demonstrates 3-
body nuclear catalytic LENR reactions, which can more simply just be
be
On Feb 14, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
The lead isotopes and natural abundances are:
El.Abundance
204Pb 1.4% (1.4x10^17 y half-life)
206Pb 24.1%
207Pd 22.1%
208Pd 52.4%
Note: pd above is a typo, and should be Pb.
Unfortunately, of the above isotopes of
I finally recalled where I recently heard speculation about muons causing
cold fusion. It was Duncan's lecture at ICCF-15. Slide 19:
http://iccf15.frascati.enea.it/ICCF15-PRESENTATIONS/S1_O2_Duncan.pdf
QUOTE:
Muon-catalyzed Ignition?
•Muons shower us at the rate of one per cm2per minute, with
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Strong suggestion, Jed: don't send large files or serious graphical data or
even tables requiring much formatting by email to a mailing list.
There is no point to using any HTML formatted tables, because
mail.archive.com squashes the life out of the tables, as Horace
I was really hoping for more comment on the Theory of Little Pops. To me, part
of the appeal is this: If one Big Bang can get around such annoying
difficulties such as the creation of mass and energy---and (why not?) Spacetime
itselfwhy not endow the
Little Pops of the Quantum-Flux with
Strong suggestion, Jed: don't send large files or serious graphical data or
even tables requiring much formatting by email to a mailing list.
The totally-free Open Office 3.1.1 allows you to EXPORT not save your
documents as PDF files which display really nicely on a computer screen.
14 matches
Mail list logo
