It is my understanding that even quark spin can be aligned in a strong magnetic
field, since a magnetic field can penetrate right through a nucleus. It does
not stop at the boundary by some magnetic stop sign. Thus I would say even
your isospin particles can be polarized in a strong magnetic
Axil--
Note the following conclusion of the Wiki item on neutron magnetic moment:
While the results of this calculation are encouraging, the masses of
the up or down quarks were assumed to be 1/3 the mass of a nucleon,[31] whereas
the masses of these quarks are only about 1% that of
Jones, What is your evidence for your statement:
The Lugano isotope data, even if it could be believed, completely negates
the entire scenario since Li-7 is NOT depleted according to the Lugano
report - but instead is converted to Li-6.
What I drew from the report was the only thing that can
Dear Friends,
Please help me by verifying my raw calculation from:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/04/taking-good-parts-of-cook-rossi-paper.html
please read the rest- you get the opinion of an real expert. Actually two.
Eventually read the last part and support the idea, it can be decisive
Bob,
Axil is correct in that the Be-8 and He-4 cannot project large spin energy
transfer. It does not help that spin can be anti-parallel when it is based on 0
spin particles to begin with (they would not decay if that was the case) …
however…
There is an interesting isotope of helium,
In the one example in which we have a full accounting of the element
percentage in the fuel and also as transmuted in the ash is the DGT
transmutation assay provided in the ICCF-17 paper. In that assay, there
was a large percentage increase in light elements including lithium,
beryllium, and
I am not surprised that He has not been reported from the Lugano E-Cat test
heretofore.
Helium is hard to collect, being an inert gas, and at temperatures it diffuses
rapidly in porous materials. I would have said much of the He in the Lugano
test would have escaped the reactor, either during
I would have said Rossi is the most credible person in the field of LENR and
not desperate for credibility given his apparent RD knowhow.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 11:07 AM
Subject: RE:
Surprise, surprise.
Fresh on the heels of a paper which suggests that lots of helium should have
been found, Rossi suddenly reveals that yes, we found it but are just now
taking the opportunity to reveal that we found it.
From: Bob Higgins
Jones, What is your evidence for your statement:
The Lugano isotope data, even if it could be believed, completely negates the
entire scenario since Li-7 is NOT depleted according to the Lugano report - but
instead is converted to Li-6.
First of all, there is a
May be of interest.
https://fys.kuleuven.be/iks/ns/files/thesis/raabephdthesis.pdf
On
Wed, 8 Apr 2015 10:51:24 -0700, Jones Beene wrote:
FROM: Bob
Higgins
Jones, What is your evidence for your statement:
The
Lugano isotope data, even if it could be believed, completely negates
the
There have been p/Ni lenr with K and no Li.
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015
12:18:36 -0700, Bob Cook wrote:
I am not surprised that He has not
been reported from the Lugano E-Cat test heretofore.
Helium is hard to
collect, being an inert gas, and at temperatures it diffuses rapidly in
porous
Jones, we DO know that there is a large imbalance in the distribution of
7Li in the ash. Look at the difference between the SIMS results which
provide isotopic analysis of the material near the surface, and the results
of ICP-MS which is a bulk analysis of the particle. The surface shows
change
From: Bob Cook
I am not surprised that He has not been reported from the Lugano E-Cat test
heretofore.
Bob – As someone who is dedicated to seeking answers to the most important
problem facing society in the coming decades – how to get off of addiction to
fossil fuel - you should be
Blaze- Disregard previous numbers. I’ll try to calculate the internal pressure
at day 30 another way. The point remains that if lithium fusion is responsible
for the gain, lots of helium needs to have been produced and the reactor
probably could not have tolerated the pressure.
From:
From: Bob Higgins
Jones, we DO know that there is a large imbalance in the distribution of 7Li in
the ash.
I agree with that – as far as it goes.
The problem is that the imbalance is entirely consistent with having mixed pure
Li-6 isotope with LAH containing the natural ratio
Well on second look, at day 32, the internal helium pressure at 1200 C is about
2000 psi if indeed the Lugano excess heat calculation was correct (it wasn’t)
which could arguably have been tolerated by the reactor. About 0.03 moles of
helium would have been produced at 8 MeV per atom to give
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Levi and his team were reportedly paid half a million bucks ...
Do you have a source for this that goes into more detail?
Eric
Jones, it is possible that helium was observed and was originally
discounted as error. That happens.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Surprise, surprise.
Fresh on the heels of a paper which suggests that lots of helium should
have been found, Rossi
From: Blaze Spinnaker
Ø Jones, it is possible that helium was observed and was originally discounted
as error. That happens.
Not when this much claimed energy has been seen.
Think about the implications. The Lugano experiment supposedly generated 2 kW
excess for 30+ days. This is
Amazing that some folks have no trouble accepting 16 MeV is the source of
LENR energy but quickly discount that 500 keV of spin energy can impart
linear momentum due to centripetal disruption of weakly bound particles.
-Spin Cartel
21 matches
Mail list logo
