Ok good to know. Is there a way we can reach out to him?
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Matt Richards mricha...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I recall, I thought Michael MacFadden was taking the lead on
infra
related items.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Andrew Ragone ajr9...@rit.edu
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro
zmy...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 What parts of the project are where right now? And how long will it be
until Apache has everything?
It is always good to look at the incubation status table:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/wave.html
Michael should be following this mail list, so I guess he will respond as
soon as he can. In any way his email is michael.macfad...@gmail.com.
Regarding the migration status:
Currently the issues migrated to Apache, however the source code is still at
the old wave-protocol google-code based
Yuri basically hi the nail on the head here. The two main thing that we would
probably want to be working towards is the code migration and the web site
migration. However we have largely lost steam in both these regards. I don't
in any way mean to disrespect the had work of the apache
Mercurial vs SVN
Seems like SVN is viewed a legacy and a step back from Hg.
I am not speaking for infrastructure of course, but I have heard this
dicussion for a while now. People always claim about SVN and want GIT.
Now you want Mercurial. All valid, but the usual answer from infra is:
not
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK the IP issues were cleared with WIAB.
I am sorry - what does that exactly mean?
If they have been cleared, there is a need to check the status items
on the incubation status page
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/wave.html
I'm certainly biased toward starting a discussion with the people at
apache. We should be looking at more efficient and productive
code/project management and be trying to upgrade their systems to
reflect this. If anyone else thinks this is a good strategy, I'd be
curious to hear your thoughts.
Another random Q: is there a contact at google to confirm any of this?
-Andrew
On Aug 19, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com wrote:
I mean that Google cleared it out that it donates the WIAB code along
I will ask at the general@incubator list - pretty sure somebody can
look into the documents archive there.
If a code grant has been sent, it must be there
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Ragone ajr9...@rit.edu wrote:
Another random Q: is there a contact at google to confirm any of this?
I would like to note that the ASF is not only around tools. The ASF is
around community. There are certainly benefits you can get from an ASF
environment which are not possible when working at googlecode.
See: http://www.apache.org/foundation/foundation-projects.html
There are Apache related
Yes, this is covered.
On 22 December 2010 I (dpeter...@google.com) submitted the appropriate
materials for the grant from Google to Apache (secret...@apache.org). Less
than 2 hours later, Craig L Russel (craig.russ...@sun.com) acknowledged
receipt.
I'll follow-up on the general thread as well,
Thanks Dan!
I'll add that information to the status page now to avoid confusion in future
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Dan Peterson dpeter...@google.com wrote:
Yes, this is covered.
On 22 December 2010 I (dpeter...@google.com) submitted the appropriate
materials for the grant from Google
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Andrew Ragone ajr9...@rit.edu wrote:
So the important questions are:
1. Who is the most knowledgeable with the current state of the project.
2. Who are the primary leaders of the group.
I wanna get the ball rolling on things again. We shouldn't just sit on
It seems there is a huge lag in migration of the Project to the incubator.
What is the status on this (eg. who has ownership of what) and what can I do
to help migrate?!
-Andrew
I've been kinda wondering the same thing.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Andrew Ragone ajr9...@rit.edu wrote:
It seems there is a huge lag in migration of the Project to the incubator.
What is the status on this (eg. who has ownership of what) and what can I
do
to help migrate?!
-Andrew
+1 What parts of the project are where right now? And how long will it be
until Apache has everything?
--Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 17:47, Matt Richards mricha...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been kinda wondering the same thing.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Andrew Ragone
There was great momentum when Google was actively pushing the incubation
status and active on the project as a whole. Now that Google has tapered off
(as I assumed they would), I'm not sure what the status of things are any
more. Nor who has taken the rains of leading the movement toward being
So the important questions are:
1. Who is the most knowledgeable with the current state of the project.
2. Who are the primary leaders of the group.
I wanna get the ball rolling on things again. We shouldn't just sit on
the sidelines waiting for google or whoever to finish things.
-Andrew
On
As far as I recall, I thought Michael MacFadden was taking the lead on infra
related items.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Andrew Ragone ajr9...@rit.edu wrote:
So the important questions are:
1. Who is the most knowledgeable with the current state of the project.
2. Who are the primary
19 matches
Mail list logo
