Yes, this is covered. On 22 December 2010 I (dpeter...@google.com) submitted the appropriate materials for the grant from Google to Apache (secret...@apache.org). Less than 2 hours later, Craig L Russel (craig.russ...@sun.com) acknowledged receipt.
I'll follow-up on the general thread as well, so there isn't any confusion. Regards, -Dan On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>wrote: > I will ask at the general@incubator list - pretty sure somebody can > look into the documents archive there. > If a code grant has been sent, it must be there > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Ragone <ajr9...@rit.edu> wrote: > > Another random Q: is there a contact at google to confirm any of this? > > > > -Andrew > > > > On Aug 19, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I mean that Google cleared it out that it donates the WIAB code along > with > >>> the Wiki and logo to Apache. Is there anything else that should be > cleared? > >> > >> Please take a look at this report: > >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/alois.html > >> > >> I was confused because the wave project has somehow deleted these action > items. > >> > >> I see there was discussion in december because of CLAs. I assume > >> committers CLAs are all on file. > >> But I cannot find a message on the list that the code grant has > >> actually been sent by google - I guess some of the project can confirm > >> this has actually happened? > >> > >> If this is the case then everything should be fine and the status page > >> can be updated > >> > >> > >> > >>> > >>> 2011/8/19 Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> AFAIK the IP issues were cleared with WIAB. > >>>> > >>>> I am sorry - what does that exactly mean? > >>>> If they have been cleared, there is a need to check the status items > >>>> on the incubation status page > >>>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/wave.html > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> 2011/8/19 Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> Mercurial vs SVN > >>>>>>> Seems like SVN is viewed a legacy and a step back from Hg. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I am not speaking for infrastructure of course, but I have heard > this > >>>>>> dicussion for a while now. People always claim about SVN and want > GIT. > >>>>>> Now you want Mercurial. All valid, but the usual answer from infra > is: > >>>>>> not now. There are many problems with going to git, nobody has > >>>>>> mentioned hg yet. > >>>>>> At the moment there is git readonly support available: > >>>>>> http://git.apache.org/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Project Wiki / Site > >>>>>>> Currently using Google Sites which has a much richer CMS interface > >>>> which > >>>>>> handles images, html tables, sub pages, attachments. The Apache CMS > is > >>>>>> functional, but is not on par with google sites. It also seems like > it > >>>> is > >>>>>> not being maintained going forward due to lack of time. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> other projects use other options. Some use mvn site to create their > >>>>>> site. I think over at openoffice podling Drupal is now being used. > You > >>>>>> are not limited to use this CMS, in fact only a few do. You should > >>>>>> just now that infra usually prefers static html in svn (or has done > in > >>>>>> the past). The Drupal instance - to my knowledge - is not maintained > >>>>>> by asf infra, but they have helped to setup a vm for it. If this are > >>>>>> options, you can ask on the ooo dev list how they made it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> besides that, sites generated with Apache Forrest or Piwi are also > >>>>>> possible. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Reviewboard vs Reitveld > >>>>>>> Many of the wave developers voiced an opinion that the strongly > >>>> preferred > >>>>>> Reitveld over reviewboard. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> So basically, as Yuri pointed out there have been some technical > >>>> issues > >>>>>> in doing the migration, but I think the larger issue is that we are > >>>> simply > >>>>>> not that motivated to do the migration because the end state looks > less > >>>>>> desirable than the state we are in now. So it's been hard to get > people > >>>> to > >>>>>> volunteer their time to move us over. I think some of these issues > are > >>>>>> valid and we should discuss them. If we REALLY feel like these > >>>>>> infrastructure options are hampering the growth of the project then > I > >>>> think > >>>>>> we should start a discussion with the Infra group at apache to raise > our > >>>>>> concerns. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You should. I have been following wave for quite a while now and it > >>>>>> has become quiet. How many people are still -active- on Apache Wave? > >>>>>> How many have become silent because they were unhappy with the > >>>>>> environment? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As I mentioned in another post, it looks like IP has not been > cleared > >>>>>> for Wave yet. Or is it? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> For those who do not know, I am ASF member myself and active on the > >>>>>> incubator project. If can help a little bit please let me know. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers > >>>>>> Christian > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> If anyone would like to help in any regard, that would be great. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ~Michael > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Aug 19, 2011, at 6:11 AM, Yuri Z wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Michael should be following this mail list, so I guess he will > >>>> respond > >>>>>> as > >>>>>>>> soon as he can. In any way his email is > michael.macfad...@gmail.com. > >>>>>>>> Regarding the migration status: > >>>>>>>> Currently the issues migrated to Apache, however the source code > is > >>>>>> still at > >>>>>>>> the old wave-protocol google-code based repository. > >>>>>>>> The code migration got a bit delayed for two reasons as I see it: > >>>>>>>> 1. The technical one. The technical aspect of converting Mercurial > >>>>>>>> repository into Subversion is kind of challenging. There are a > plenty > >>>> of > >>>>>>>> tools that allow to do the transition the other way (from SVN to > >>>>>> Mercurial). > >>>>>>>> I personally investigated this a bit and seems like it would > require > >>>>>> first > >>>>>>>> to convert Hg to Git, the Git to SVN. > >>>>>>>> 2. The convenience. Well, converting from mercurial to SVN is kind > of > >>>>>>>> downgrade, so there's little emotional motivation to do it. > >>>>>>>> 3. The inertial. Currently we have working process to submit > patches > >>>>>> with > >>>>>>>> tested tools and code review integration. Migration to SVN and the > >>>>>> Review > >>>>>>>> Board will have it's learning curve and honestly, possibly won't > be > >>>>>> better. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Also, we will probably have to move most of the Wiki that > currently > >>>>>> resides > >>>>>>>> also on google-code, but that's less urgent. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 2011/8/19 Andrew Ragone <ajr9...@rit.edu> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Ok good to know. Is there a way we can reach out to him? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Matt Richards < > >>>> mricha...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> As far as I recall, I thought Michael MacFadden was taking the > lead > >>>> on > >>>>>>>>>> infra > >>>>>>>>>> related items. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Andrew Ragone <ajr9...@rit.edu > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> So the important questions are: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> 1. Who is the most knowledgeable with the current state of the > >>>>>> project. > >>>>>>>>>>> 2. Who are the primary leaders of the group. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I wanna get the ball rolling on things again. We shouldn't just > >>>> sit > >>>>>> on > >>>>>>>>>>> the sidelines waiting for google or whoever to finish things. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -Andrew > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 18, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Matt Richards < > mricha...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> There was great momentum when Google was actively pushing the > >>>>>>>>>> incubation > >>>>>>>>>>>> status and active on the project as a whole. Now that Google > has > >>>>>>>>>> tapered > >>>>>>>>>>> off > >>>>>>>>>>>> (as I assumed they would), I'm not sure what the status of > things > >>>>>> are > >>>>>>>>>> any > >>>>>>>>>>>> more. Nor who has taken the rains of leading the movement > toward > >>>>>>>>> being > >>>>>>>>>>> fully > >>>>>>>>>>>> on Apache's infra. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro > >>>>>>>>>>>> <zmy...@gmail.com>wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 What parts of the project are where right now? And how > long > >>>>>>>>> will > >>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>> until Apache has everything? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 17:47, Matt Richards < > >>>> mricha...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been kinda wondering the same thing. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Andrew Ragone < > >>>> ajr9...@rit.edu> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems there is a huge lag in migration of the Project to > >>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> incubator. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is the status on this (eg. who has ownership of what) > and > >>>>>>>>> what > >>>>>>>>>>> can > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to help migrate?! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Andrew > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --Matt > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> --Matt > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> --Matt > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> http://www.grobmeier.de > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> http://www.grobmeier.de > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> http://www.grobmeier.de > > > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de >
