Joseph
Now who uses ems for site sizing and what problems are most important?
That's the elastic design I was referring to. A column of, say, 36em is
fixed to that measurement. No amount of browser resizing is going to change
the width of that column. However, changing the text display size via
Joesph:
I get you now...those really annoying scrolly boxes that always try to stay
at the same place on your screen regardless of how often you scroll!
Ignore them - they're Javascript based and, although the concept behind them
is a good one (also I think it's a workaround until our favourite
Cheryl,
Ah! That makes sense. But,no, I never included the flash ads; on my
dial-up nothing much downloaded before I packed them off.
So one last question pre seeing if I can take on the learning curve: is
there a consensus on what is the most usual size of browser view that people
MOU,
Thanks. With Cheryl and you in accord on this I know it's right ;-). Now
I have to just blend this with php/mysql and the redesign should be a
doddle...
Joseph
Joesph:
I get you now...those really annoying scrolly boxes that always try to
stay
at the same place on your screen
Joseph:
is there a consensus on what is the most usual size of browser
view that people actually see?
Not too sure what you mean by this. If you're referring to common or most
used screen resolutions then I have two answers for you:
* If you're planning on working to a fixed size design
Joe wrote:
Might a good starting point for my education be a couple of urls where you
consider this is well done and a good advertisement for the technique?
http://www.csszengarden.com
nuff said.
- Stephen
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 7:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] CSS boxes etc
With Cascade DTP I have just been experimenting with absolute positioning.
My impression is that this forces a very rigid
Their site is excellent for explaining some of the special features found
only in IE.
How politically correct of you drew :P
MOU
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
-Original Message-
From: Ross Clutterbuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: CSS boxes etc
Their site is excellent for explaining some of the special features found
only in IE.
How politically correct
Joseph,
Also google for css columns. That will help you get a foundational
understanding of how css does layouts. I try to shy away from absolute
positioning as much as I can.
Check out: http://www.simplebits.com He has some wonderful CSS designs
and tutorials (although many are advanced).
drew, MOU and Stephen,
I am following through on the urls and will further build my understanding;
zengarden and happycog are excellent sites. I don't argue with that at
all. Positioniseverything offers great clarity. I have no trouble with
the principles of css/box/float, nor the site
See my replies inline.
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:34:11 -0400, William Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joseph,
Also google for css columns. That will help you get a foundational
understanding of how css does layouts. I try to shy away from absolute
positioning as much as I can.
Oh...
/me whipes the sweat from his brow.
Okay...
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:10:38 +0100, Joseph Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
drew, MOU and Stephen,
snip/
Now, whatever size of screen a surfer has his/her viewing experience is
affected by the size of browser as she/he uses it. On the fixed
To add to Stephen's description of what a float is the closes HTML analogy
is align. Basically allows text wrapping.
Another site to look at for CSS layouts but this time featuring current live
sites is http://cssvault.com/
Cheryl D. Wise
Certified Professional Web Developer
MS-MVP-FrontPage
Will,
I saw this after I had sent out my earlier reply. I have Top Style Lite
(from a much earlier recommendation by Cheryl) and I agree it is a great
help. And thanks Cheryl for the further link.
I clicked back to my own (tables) site to check I was talking (and writing)
sense and I find
Joseph
Just a little thing. Don't confuse floats with fluid as they're
different things. All the behaviour you seem to be referring to is fluid
design, whereby the layout of a page flows with the sizing of the browser.
Note however that it's not really common user practice to constantly size
Just to follow up... I had meant to mention earlier that there are
quite a few /benefits/ to fixed width layouts. While you noted they
seem inflexible, until we get a bit better CSS support from IE (namely
min-width and max-width, which will enable us to blend fluid and fixed
width layouts a bit
Hi Joseph
The question you ask is a mighty discussion all to itself! There are so many
things to say, from beginner stuff all the way to super-advanced, I just
don't know where to start.
Best do some reading first I think.
Hunt around http://www.alistapart.com for articles on CSS design (but
MOU,
Thanks for the prompt and thorough response. It will take me a while to
fit in your suggestions, though I note your enthusiasm! Might a good
starting point for my education be a couple of urls where you consider this
is well done and a good advertisement for the technique?
Again many
Must be something in your code putting the right most column owe the body
border. Another approach would he to make the body background color black
with padding: 0 10 px; (or whatever width you want the border) then put
white in the div backgrounds or a contains div.
DIV.menuon only sets the fort
Can you post more code or a link?
Riva
Riva Portman, MCIWD
Certified Webdesigner
Star Quality Designs
www.starqualitydesigns.com
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
text-align: center is really only supposed to apply to text and it
works in IE only because IE doesn't interpret it properly.
The CORRECT way to do it is:
body {
text-align: center;
} /* for IE */
div#container {
margin: 0 auto;
text-align: left;
} /* for
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:37:13 -0400, William Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there another solution that I am not thinking about?
Yep. The proper method is to align the containing block by using the
margin attribute. Like so:
#container{
width:600px;
margin:0 auto;
}
The container
Thanks Howard and Stephen! As always, you came through.
Will
Professional Graphics Artist
Certified Web Designer (BCIP)
Stewart and Company
--
www.stewartandcompany.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
W: 304.550.2687
Rt. 1 Box 364
Buffalo, WV
25033
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
Depends on the version of IE and the doctype. IE 6 in standards mode (full
valid doctype of HTML 4.01 Strict or XHTML) will use margin-auto but in any
event unless your content is constrained by a container inside div#container
it will expand to fill the space so there will be no margins.
Whoops!!
That should've been
margin-left: -370px;
I knew I'd mess it up lol
MOU
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To set a personal password send an email to [EMAIL
Rita,
The good news is that the page validates as transitional xhtml.
You have a class: .email{float:right;}. If it floats it needs width,
explicit or implicit. Relying on the absolute position of ppsalogo.gif to
push the email address over can have unpredictable results -- just what
you have.
First off, you have an OPEN / CLOSE brace issue in your #contentbox.
try fixing that first
hAt 5/22/2004 11:41 AM, you wrote:
Hi. I'm trying to build a site using xhtml and css and i'm relatively new
at this, not to mention that the layout is especially challenging.
Here's my situation:
if
your have here as missing, what font tag?
Download TOP STYLE LITE and check your CSS work for error
#bigbox {
20px;
voice-family: \}\;
At 5/22/2004 11:41 AM, you wrote:
Hi. I'm trying to build a site using xhtml and css and i'm relatively new
at this, not to mention that the layout is
Then here is a conundrum for you (in the plural). The css would not work
correctly in td, but does so in font. Since I do this only now and
again I am probably missing something, and I will learn more. But is there
perhaps an imediate reason for this problem?
Also. alas, in triumphing I
When you can send a url so we can see what else might be affecting the
display.
Cheryl D. Wise
Certified Professional Web Developer
MS-MVP-FrontPage
www.wiserways.com
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
713.353.0139 Office
-Original Message-
From: Smile-Poet
Then here is a conundrum for you
-
From: Smile-Poet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 1:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: css not acting
Then here is a conundrum for you (in the plural). The css would not work
correctly in td, but does so in font. Since I do this only now and
again I
PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: css not acting
Then here is a conundrum for you (in the plural). The css would not
work
correctly in td, but does so in font. Since I do this only now and
again I am probably missing something, and I will learn more. But is
there
perhaps an imediate
Cheryl,
It's a local machine activity, so I can't, unfortunately. Now that I am
well on the way to producing a look that I like I am trying to make sure the
script (those parts I will use as the basis of the site) work well, and that
I understand enough to develop it. Then I will go on the
Have you looked to see what size the browser uses for its default? When I've
been testing sometimes I forget to return the browser to medium and get
quite a shock when I was testing something that turned out to have a fixed
px/pt size and later open it to a site that uses relative sizing. Suddenly
David Prowak wrote:
Hi,
I've got a site I built that has links on the left
hand side that are coded as
font-size: x-small
in the CSS.
http://www.felicegc.com/
I've had a complaint that from some PCs the text looks
smaller, while on another PC it looks to be the
default size.
What could be causing
AT 1164 by 868, it looks fine.
Al
At 3/23/2004 06:59 PM, you wrote:
Hi,
I've got a site I built that has links on the left
hand side that are coded as
font-size: x-small
in the CSS.
http://www.felicegc.com/
I've had a complaint that from some PCs the text looks
smaller, while on another PC it
I thought the IE default size was smaller, not medium?
Al
At 3/23/2004 08:21 PM, you wrote:
Have you looked to see what size the browser uses for its default? When I've
been testing sometimes I forget to return the browser to medium and get
quite a shock when I was testing something that turned
Medium is the default in IE and all other browsers. However the physical
size of medium varies from browser to browser with Netscape/Mozilla
usually being smaller than IE.
Cheryl D. Wise
Certified Professional Web Developer
MS-MVP-FrontPage
www.wiserways.com
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Todd
have moved it to another place which doesn't add messy javascript
url-
http://www.mycgiserver.com/~yousaf/developer/testforweb.htm
Again, if anyone has any comments or suggestions to make these
css/javascript reveal tables better or more accessible then I would be
greatful - minimun
Matthew,
It looks like the geocities code is broken. It fails here:
script language=javascriptgeovisit();/script
- Todd
-Original Message-
From: matthew taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 5:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] css/JavaScript
While one or two class= isn't a big deal if you end up putting
a class on every item on the page it gets almost as cluttered
as a page using a bunch of font tags and bloats file size back up.
that's called classitis
;o)
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk,
Use IDs to structure your site. Then use contextual selectors to avoid
having to put a class in every item in that section you want different from
the default. For example you could use:
a.nav:link
a.nav:visited
a.nav:active
a.nav: hover
And in every link in your navigation section you have to
Thanks Cheryl and Andrew-
This is obviously a complex issue and it will take me some time to fully
absorb all the information provided and to work my way through the linked
document! Right now I am just trying to learn how to create a totally CSS
page. I have no need (at the moment) to address
Had this saved in my snippets but haven't used it yet
Filter: Shadow(Color=Hex color of the shadow, Direction=Degree of the
shadow)
hth
jac.
Is there a way in CSS where we can have a shadow behind a table?
Amrit
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join
Is there a way in CSS where we can have a shadow behind a table?
Amrit
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To set a personal password send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a quick note--successful has two cs.
Cheers,
Scott
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Macdonald-Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 6:55 AM
Subject: [wdvltalk] CSS Drop-Down - My solution
All,
Following on from the discussion we
This is an interesting one. Three things happening: floats, inline and the
3px jog.
Put a border around your 2 nav headings and you'll see the problem. Floats
sit on top of the normal flow of the document with content sliding out
from underneath the float. This is what happens in your second text
:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: css lineup!
This is an interesting one. Three things happening: floats, inline and the
3px jog.
snip
drew
--Ignore this:
First thing to remember is that floats are out of the flow of the document
but acknowledged by the document. This means
::snip::
Funny - no NS7 users ever emailed to say how crap the site looked. I
guess
anyone who uses NS7 is used to seeing weird looking sites by now
::snip::
They were probably both on holiday. ;-)
Cheers,
Scott
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send
Im not up on NN 7 myself,but older Netscape needed the css file reffered to
absolutely, not relatively, try that.
Also, do dthe body background gif in the CSS file, not the body tag
Let me now if it works.
Al
At 1/1/2004 01:10 PM, you wrote:
I have a Web site at www.realhhg.com which looks
I have a Web site at www.realhhg.com which looks OK in IE,
but in NS7 the pages ignore the CSS
perhaps it could be that the first line of the style sheet is not valid
css --
?php header(Content-type: text/css); ?
rudy
p.s. in ie6, which (perhaps incorrectly, but let's not go there)
perhaps it could be that the first line of the style sheet is not valid
css --
?php header(Content-type: text/css); ?
further to the above, a linked style sheet should not have these tags
either --
style type=text/css
!--
--
/style
rudy
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
I've tried a few things now:
Changed the link (as you suggested) to /realhhg.css and even
www.realhhg.com/realhhg.css
Added an .htaccess file to say .css files are text/css
Tried renaming stylesheet from .css to .php and adding a header() to set
mime type to text/css
Tried using a single body tag
- Original Message -
From: rudy
perhaps it could be that the first line of the style sheet is not valid
css --
?php header(Content-type: text/css); ?
That was a failed attempt - gone now...
further to the above, a linked style sheet should not have these tags
either --
Hmm
This might be a clue. When I use the back button the background
shows up in Netscape 7.1
AuntySpam, SLP Coordinator, pspug.org
http://www.pspug.org/edu/edu.shtml
http://www.pspug.org/edu/slp/assign.shtml
http://www.pspug.org/edu/slp/slpparticipants.htm
Bj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I have a
- Original Message -
From: rudy
further to the above, a linked style sheet should not have these tags
either --
style type=text/css
!--
--
/style
Darn those caches. Yes Rudy - taking those out (even though they never
bothered IE) lets NS7 do the right thing.
Funny - no NS7
Also,
When I use this
http://www.realhhg.com/index.php
instead of this
http://www.realhhg.com/
the background shows up.
AuntySpam, SLP Coordinator, pspug.org
http://www.pspug.org/edu/edu.shtml
http://www.pspug.org/edu/slp/assign.shtml
http://www.pspug.org/edu/slp/slpparticipants.htm
Bj
(just think I could be the first person helped by Rudy in 2004!
...but surely far from the last...)
thanks for the kind words, Bj
yes, you are the first -- on this list, anyway
my kids have taken over the tv today, so i cannot watch the bowl games, so
i've been fairly active on several other
In your link to the stylesheet you can put in the text/css in the link.
link href=wiserways-a.css rel=stylesheet type=text/css /
You need to make the background image url absolute because it isn't showing
up in NN 4.8 either.
Cheryl D. Wise
Certified Professional Web Developer
MS-MVP-FrontPage
Bj,
I gather you have sorted it now, but if it helps it looks as you
describe it should in my netscape 7.1.
Joseph
I have a Web site at www.realhhg.com which looks OK in IE, but in
NS7 the
pages ignore the CSS and display a white background (which is a
problem
since some of the text is
Thank you Jure,
Sorry it took so long to get back to you...the holidays
have me running around in circles!
I appreciate the time you spent looking over my work. The
reason I asked about the comment in the code about HTML
emails is because this is a previous template that I just
recoded. The
Displays as a black bordered box with vsd centered, which is what the
css says it should be. For consistency you should put 'centriraj' in
double quotes centriraj.
Flush the cache.
drew
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL
Rita, you haven't defined a class for honorbox. If I insert a simple
.honorbox{float:right; width:50%;} it works fine.
Validates nicely for css and html.
drew
-Original Message-
From: Rita Crisafi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rita, you haven't defined a class for honorbox. If I insert a simple
.honorbox{float:right; width:50%;} it works fine.
Validates nicely for css and html.
drew
Drew, I wish it were that simple, but it /is/ in the stylesheet, here
it is excerpted:
#peachbody P
{
color:#133a6a;
}
, it does seem to validate and work. Or do
as Cheryl suggested and let the browser find the height.
drew
-Original Message-
From: Jan Major
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 8:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: css problem
Drew
No, I didn't know that we have to now put units
--- Rita Crisafi wrote: ---
: Drew, I wish it were that simple, but it /is/ in the stylesheet,
: here it is excerpted:
snip/
: .honorbox
: {
: width=50%;
: font-size:11px;
: line-height:14px;
: font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;
Jan, sorry to have been so cryptic. If you've worked things out skip this.
By sizes I meant your images need units of measure as well. So it should
be height=200px. You've probably seen that in your validation attempt.
The p tag is probably not the actual error. That kind of error message
/edu.shtml
http://www.pspug.org/edu/slp/assign.shtml
http://www.pspug.org/edu/slp/slpparticipants.htm
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 4:03 AM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: css problem
Jan, sorry to have been so cryptic
I believe it is of the container in the same way that a pixel set of
dimensions fits the picture in.
-Original Message-
From: Brewnetty (AuntySpam) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: css problem
That brings up
Matt,
Thought I would let you know that IE doesn't display drop-down (or side
out) menus using css. If you notice:
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/popups/demo.html
this demo does work in IE, but it doesn't have drop-down or even side out.
Opera should show it though, just like Mozilla
Yes, I use percentages 100% for the width (the logo is in a table) but
it doesn't work well for the height. I just recently changed my home
page so that when the screen is taken from 800x600 to 1024x768, the
width expands the logo and the bottom part (similar to logo) perfectly.
But looked
Drew
No, I didn't know that we have to now put units of measure for images.
My page validated without them, but I will definitely add the px to all
image code. Do you know where I can find out that images require units
of measures now. I know I can search through W3C, but am hoping that
you
- Original Message -
From: Jan Major [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 2:37 PM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: css problem
: Drew
: No, I didn't know that we have to now put units of measure for images.
: My page validated without them, but I
I don't think images are required to have a height and width but it is best
practice to do so. Have you had to wait for a page then suddenly have it
pop or had the page shift around when the images finished loading? That's
because the browser either refused to guess the size of the images until
Hi Matt,
http://www.interactwiththe.net/css/
No joy in Opera or IE 6 on Windows - you just get the first-level menus and
nothing happens when you hover over them.
Works a treat in Firebird though :-)
Cheers
Jon
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An
Matt,
Complete blank on IE5.
Joseph
I've tried altering Eric Meyer's code, and come up with the page
available at http://www.interactwiththe.net/css/ which works in
Firebird
0.6, but I don't know about the others, any chance someone could try
it
out for me?
The links don't work (just as
On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 15:17, Joseph Harris wrote:
Matt,
Complete blank on IE5.
Joseph
Joseph,
Was it a completely blank page, or did it have the list as an outline?
I've changed a few things, so if you could check it again for me?
Cheers,
Matt
--
+--+
:
www.smilepoetryweekly.com
For cricket lovers everywhere:
Batty Balls and other Wicket Wit
www.ah-mah-son.com
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Macdonald-Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 3:46 PM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: CSS Menus (was Re: menu advice)
On Sun
Works fine in IE 6.0.2800.1106 on my machine (Win98SE). Hover turns
selection background grey, if that was your intention.
Cheers,
Scott
- Original Message -
From: Jon Haworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 9:22 AM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: CSS
Cheryl
Great post.
I hope you don't mind me asking you these questions : which Mozilla do
you use and why did you recently remove NS 6.2 and do you intend on
installing NS 7.1 (or NS 7.2 if you can find it)?
I'm asking because I would like to somewhat update my browsers for testing
purposes
Elisa Butler wrote:
snip
I have NS 4.77, IE 5, Opera 5 6 and Mozilla 0.9.5. I do want to
upgrade to Mozilla 1.5 but given that one must purchase it and I do want
it on a CD-Rom, it's not going to happen until I go home (they don't
seem to want to ship it to France). I gapped out buying it last
-
From: Elisa Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 9:06 AM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: css problem - ( concerning browsers)
: Cheryl
:
: Great post.
:
: I hope you don't mind me asking you these questions : which Mozilla do
: you use and why did you
Jan,
I'm even less help. I can read the blue of white at the bottom, but
they do look out of place when everything else has a coloured
background. If you still have the problem, what shuld we be looking
at/for?
Joseph
Chacha Joe
For a site of laughs and a FREE ezine:
Several points. Neither your xhtml nor css validate. The xhtml issues
have to do with tables in css. Tables do not behave exactly the same way
when css designed. The validator indicates you have an element a p tag
where one is not allowed.
Also you failed to specify units for sizes. This is a
Joseph
For some reason, my pages in IE 6.0 are weird. The index page looks
fine, but all other pages are messed up. I'm going to see if I can fix
it, but I sure don't know why it's acting up.
Jan
Joseph Harris wrote:
Jan,
I'm even less help. I can read the blue of white at the bottom, but
Drew
This is a mess. I validated both my xhtml and css. Even though div
align=center is not accepted in the strict doctype, it is tolerated
in transitional, and since I'm not tableless in my design yet, I am
still using it [bad me :o( ]
I'll validate them again and fix any problems. I already
Hi Drew
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several points. Neither your xhtml nor css validate. The xhtml issues
have to do with tables in css. Tables do not behave exactly the same way
when css designed. The validator indicates you have an element a p tag
where one is not allowed.
I see what the problem
Jan,
While I applaud using percents so people can adjust sizes but 73% on my
laptop in its default configuration isn't readable. Nor will it be readable
on a Mac which renders text smaller than with IE on the PC. While many
designers love small font sizes from my informal survey (students where I
At 09:59 PM 11/20/2003, you wrote:
For some reason, my page is looking lousy in IE 6.0 and I can't figure out
why it's not reading the style sheet default.css. Can someone please
check out this page using IE only and tell me if there is a problem on
your browser too.
Deb
The page shows properly in NS. The valid buttons are not supposed to be
visible unless the mouse is over the name, so that part is right.
I believe that IE 6.0 is not interpreting the style sheet default.css
can anyone tell me why it isn't?
puterbug wrote:
At 09:59 PM 11/20/2003, you wrote:
I just answered a question about links on another list. You seem to
be making some of the same mistakes the other fellow I responded to
did. Just below I'm appending my answer to him.
If you want to see some complex links working correctly, take a look
at this site I'm developing [ignore red
: [wdvltalk] Re: CSS Problem
Galatek Webmaster wrote:
Ok guys, ive got an annoying issue. CSS based I guess. Im putting my site
http://www.galatekinc.com/ to a major revision, and while testing it I
noticed that a small menu I have on the left hand side has a problem. When
the cursor goes over
try display: block; for nav menus, just off the top of my head.
www.WellingtonLive.co.nz
- Original Message -
From: Galatek Webmaster
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:37 AM
Subject: [wdvltalk] CSS Problem
: Ok guys, ive got an annoying issue. CSS based I guess. Im putting my
Galatek Webmaster wrote:
Ok guys, ive got an annoying issue. CSS based I guess. Im putting my site
http://www.galatekinc.com/ to a major revision, and while testing it I
noticed that a small menu I have on the left hand side has a problem. When
the cursor goes over the Generator Gawl link, it
Anitha
Here are some urls re css
http://w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/
http://bluerobot.com/
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/
http://www.alistapart.com/stories/journey/
http://www.webreference.com/authoring/style/sheets/layout/advanced/
http://www.westciv.com.au/style_master/academy/css_tutorial/
On July 30, 2003 at 13:38, Anitha Paruchuri wrote:
Can anyone suggest me some good example websites which have used CSS
for formatting. Or any sites which talk about this giving examples? I
am looking for examples of CSS which include graphic positioning.
Heavy use of graphics/css on this
Anitha--
www.alistapart.com
and about a dozen other sites I don't have at hand.
Working on my laptop through dialup and haven't updated my Favorites on this
computer. I miss my DSL and cordless keyboard/mouse! I feel so slow.
;^)
-- Don
- Original Message -
From: Anitha
snip /
:My point was that
:tables have unique css properties not found in other elements.
:Making it worthwhile to spend time studying the extended
:properties of tables rather than just styling td and tr.
Ah, well, in that case, I have to agree. As well as using more
semantically correct
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: CSS
Ok, somehow this is confusing me. What is best to use for tables,
columns or box model?
Jan
http://www.wdvl.com ___
You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
