Hi Mark,
When reading through your email I realised that this is quite nicely
summarising my thoughts on this topic. I hear other people on the list talking
about the past, but this is about the future. Since Apple now has a large
installed base of iOS devices, it would be worth a try again
Precisely what I was trying to express, just done much for elegantly.
Too many years in management.
I guess my code factoring skills are rusty.
Thanks for saying it so clearly.
--
Joel M. Benisch CPCU,
+1, whole heartedly.
Universal medical records.
Does anyone know of a better server side engine or tool set available to handle
all the disparate types of data that the inevitable national health records
data base will house? I don't.
I'm in the Insurance Business.
WO rocks for our
go ahead and store anything you want into Mongo DB and it dumps whatever rats
nest of data you put in there without a care in the world.
is that a good thing? you decide.
my world is mobile, and the web counterparts need a rational routing, and
presentation navigation standards to help the
Been doing iOS work at a Big Health Tech Company.
They use a big Hadoop database for storing everything and then use various ETL
type systems to move, clean, organize, etc, back into a SQL database.
Most of the iOS stuff talks with Rest to RubyOnRails, hence, my desire to maybe
start learning
Once you realize javascript has more in common with LISP than Java you will
like it more.
Javascript *can* be programmed in a Java-like manner and the syntax shares many
similarities when you treat it that way. That does not mean that you *should.”
You’ll gain a deeper understanding when you
Thanks Aaron,
I'm going to keep this email front and center during the Fluent conference.
Been awhile since my LISP, but I do remember it being very slick. I'm just
not sure how good it would be for large projects. My mind is definitely geared
toward OO, and I don't recall there being
Please please please... Someone went as far as asking for support by talking to
an Apple Senior VP, and the answer was: NO! Stop thinking that Apple will help
us after 5 years without any help from Apple. They even stopped contributing to
Wonder 3 years ago.
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le
Am I right or what? WO is an elite “gentleman’s club” There are those “in the
circle” and those outside.
If Mark wants to send a note of praise to someone, why not? Even if it is Tim
Cook. Will anything bad come of that? It may fall on deaf ears but that’s ok.
Mark, I’m glad you love WO.
Le 2014-03-07 à 19:21, Aaron Rosenzweig aa...@chatnbike.com a écrit :
Am I right or what? WO is an elite “gentleman’s club” There are those “in the
circle” and those outside.
For the record, I’m not the one who contacted a senior VP.
If Mark wants to send a note of praise to someone, why
Interesting issue/discussion.
On the one hand, WO does not have the potential critical sales mass to warrant
selling it as a supported product.
On the other hand, WO has so much strategic value that Apple can't afford to
release it into the wild ?
WTF.
I know some economists who
Le 2014-03-07 à 19:57, Joel M. Benisch jo...@paperfree.net a écrit :
Interesting issue/discussion.
On the one hand, WO does not have the potential critical sales mass to
warrant selling it as a supported product.
On the other hand, WO has so much strategic value that Apple can't
On 2014-03-07, 4:57 PM, Joel M. Benisch wrote:
Interesting issue/discussion.
On the one hand, WO does not have the potential critical sales mass to warrant
selling it as a supported product.
On the other hand, WO has so much strategic value that Apple can't afford to
release it into the
Em 07/03/2014, às 21:46, Pascal Robert prob...@macti.ca escreveu:
Le 2014-03-07 à 19:21, Aaron Rosenzweig aa...@chatnbike.com a écrit :
Am I right or what? WO is an elite “gentleman’s club” There are those “in
the circle” and those outside.
For the record, I’m not the one who
I know you guys are right and I loathe to involve myself in this discussion
but here goes nothing...
Does Apple make a lot of money selling XCode? It seems to me that WO is
another tool that Apple could support that enables developers to make great
applications for their platform. After all,
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 2014-03-07 à 21:05, Jonathan Miller jlmil...@kahalawai.com a écrit :
I know you guys are right and I loathe to involve myself in this discussion
but here goes nothing...
Does Apple make a lot of money selling XCode?
They make money by selling laptops to
It's all about iPhone and iPad sales and one of the things that makes
Apple's devices the best is the quantity and quality of the applications in
the platform. And the application server is an essential component to many
iOS and Mac applications with the prime example being iTunes.
On Fri, Mar
Like Chuck, Apple got out of that business (real server software, XServe, WO).
If they are going to offer something on the server-side, it will probably be a
Apple-hosted solution that they will control.
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 2014-03-07 à 21:31, Jonathan Miller jlmil...@kahalawai.com a
Sounds great to me! Here is your laptop, dev tools and apple hosted OS X VM.
Well one can dream.
Have a nice weekend!
On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:34 PM, Pascal Robert prob...@macti.ca wrote:
Like Chuck, Apple got out of that business (real server software, XServe,
WO). If they are going to
Unlike iOS and OS X, Apple does not own the server platform. Communication is
via standard protocols. And Apple is no longer in the server market. Bringing
back WO as a product is NOT going to sell more iPhones. It is NOT going to
make more money for Apple. Making a really good SDK and
Does that make Google dumb?
https://cloud.google.com/developers/articles/how-to-build-mobile-app-with-app-engine-backend-tutorial
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 7, 2014, at 6:06 PM, Chuck Hill ch...@global-village.net wrote:
Unlike iOS and OS X, Apple does not own the server platform.
I can put it more succinctly than Chuck by saying that Chuck seems to me to
have this right, front-to-back.
Three comments:
1. There was a time when WebObjects fit Apple's business model as did, e.g.,
the Xserve product. That model changed, a lot, many years ago now.
2. I don't think the
22 matches
Mail list logo
