+1 keep commons-logging
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Yes,
and that's why commons-logging is the only viable solution. Although
commons-logging apparently has its problems, those problems might be fixed
in newer versions. There are people specifically thinking about the logging
problem in the
wcn- wicket is also has a +1 for me (then the name wicket is more
open and visible in all the html pages :))
BUT i am only +1 IF it happens before 1.0!
We can't do such a change after 1.0... That would be really horrible...
johan
Jonathan Carlson wrote:
I'd support the change to
p.s. could someone ask wouter what he thinks of this idea too?
We (eelco and i) will discuss this with wouter. But he is on vacation
currently
But maybe tomorrwo.
johan
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest candid
i can be wrong but [autolink] is not a component you create in the
javacode
It is created for you. So saying autolink=true as a attribute.. What
does that mean?
You don't want to specify it because then it must be in a specific
hiearchy and that is
just what we want to circumvent with
So we are going to test every a href to see if it points to a wicket page
(you try to get a page constructor for the given href i take)
If this doesn't take to much resources (memory and cpu) then this looks
good to me.
johan
Gili wrote:
Jon and I would like to propose a replacement for
- How are we going to support absolute package-path?
we should.
- I recall Jon talking about an alias map (Admin.html =
administration/Home.html) to be set through AppSettings
not preferred by me.
- The currenlty implementation works with admin.Home.html. I propose
the new one will ONLY
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 20:57:58 +0100, Johan Compagner wrote:
normally (if you don't set a sourcepath in the ApplicationSettings)
the html must be beside the class.
So in the package.
But a href to something in a page can contain this: Xxxx.html
That thing could be a normal (no wicket component html
no it is not really a generic thing.
Then i have to look more deeply into the Menu structure i use.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
I made one. But Johan made a better one.
Johan, is your tab-thingy re-usable yet? Generic enough to e.g. put in
contrib?
Eelco
Jonathan Carlson wrote:
Has anyone started a
yes this is also a thing that i don't like very much currently.
With links you can add a link and then implement linkClicked()
It would be nice that buttons also work this way..
johan
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Is there a more elegant way to determine which button was clicked when
the onSubmit
I have found the problem in our code.
Will fix this for example this kind of piece is going wrong:
java.net.URL url = new java.net.URL(file://C:/Program
Files/Putty/putty.exe);
String test = url.toExternalForm();
java.io.File file = new java.io.File(new java.net.URI(test));
will look at it.
for the error page problem (so
don't fix that part).
the fix below was something gili talked me into. if you change it, be
sure to read the sun bug first.
Johan Compagner wrote:
I have found the problem in our code.
Will fix this for example this kind of piece is going wrong:
java.net.URL url = new
hmm... writing out games that you will win youreself! nice!
:)
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Maybe we should write out a competition: who builds the best
high-level reusable wizzard component :)
Eelco
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I have put this on the wiki
please add a bug report for this.
Should/must be fixed for the next rc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a previous message I mentioned a problem with the back button and
the examples I should have mentioned that it was the displaytag paging
and sorting examples. If you click on the last page (2)
to be a real component.
A lot of times I just use input type=submit.. instead of making
this a Wicket component, and I am quite happy with that. Furthermore,
you will have problems with form submits that are triggered by
Javascript.
Eelco
Johan Compagner wrote:
If it where me then just this happens
not get encrypted whereas the header
does. Firewalls, load balancers etc. not able to read the header
(because it is encrypted) can not do what they are intended to.
Juergen
On 4/23/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that is strange yes
It smells like that jsessionid should
This one is already fixed by me I didn't close it (was planning to)
So there is no need to do this patch.
Now Components State can be tracked in our version manager so the idx
will never be wrong anymore.
johan
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
Paul,
I just checked the latest cvs head and I'm
that is strange yes
It smells like that jsessionid should be reversed... the href should
have a jsession id and a img src not. (at least a static resource not a
completely dynamic one is session bound)
Gili wrote:
Another thing I noticed. The URL generated for img tags contains
a
see the IChoice interface.
With this you can let the DropDownChoice now what is the display and
what is the id where the DropDownChoice can identify what object is
selected.
johan
Joe Toth wrote:
Thanks, I understood that, but my mind keeps having
flashbacks of
struts. I don't have to worry
Do you have a testcase where you see this happening?
There is a problem yes with this if the ListView model that holds the
list of objects that are displayed
is not restoreable to a previous state.
I think we should handle this error more gracefully because if you have
a detachable list
that
onAttach is called whenever the object is needed
so if it is called then somehow it is asked for.
johan
Jonathan Carlson wrote:
I'm working from CVS HEAD a couple of weeks back. I am going to upgrade
to CVS HEAD today and I'll get back to you.
Thanks!
Jonathan
that is puzzling!
What happens if you do REDIRECT_TO_RENDER ??
Then also it should go wrong. Because there is not really a difference...
Is then the redirect not sending the same encoding it wants then the
first time??
johan
wrote:
When i change default render strategy from
But i thought you only had it with RC3 and not RC2?
Because RC2 the default is REDIRECT_TO_RENDER
we changed it to REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER
so it is somehow something else.
johan
wrote:
Johan Compagner,
yes, the result of EDIRECT_TO_RENDER is the same as REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER
=== 2005-05
ok you where first saying something else so i was confused:
yes, the result of EDIRECT_TO_RENDER is the same as REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER
But you only have a problem when you use to_buffer the other 2 are
working fine.
I will test this.
johan
wrote:
Johan Compagner
emm
Can't you do that on a much lower level? (ip filtering)
like tomcat or even apache.
Gili wrote:
Say I wanted to secure an entire application such that none of its
pages could be accessed outside a certain IP or user authentication,
how would I do it? I believe in classic JSP one would
ok this goes only wrong when the last should get bigger i guess?
Because if it gets lower then the setCurrentPage will handle that if i
am not mistaken
But you are right last should recalculated when pressed but gettting the
page count then.
Can you open a bug report?
Ari Suutari wrote:
Hi,
We (eelco and i) are trying to reproduce/test it.
But we can't get it currently to go wrong.
Can you test some more for us?
for example do you have it under IE and under FireFox?
In firefox you can see the in the View-Character Encoding what the
encoding he uses for the page
Also with Page
if you don't want to have to synchronize yet another boolean then you
could do how wicket does it in a few places more
just introduce only the getOpenCloseTagRendering()
and if people want to strip it they have to override it and return
false; (default is true)
johan
Juergen Donnerstag
i agree that we need to make that error page a bit more clean
Only say the name which didn't render not all its childs etc.
Gustavo Hexsel wrote:
Hi gentlemen,
how do I find out which component is not being rendered correctly? I've
mostly copied and pasted from different parts of the
assumed).
So, that Hibernate model that I return should stick around for as long
as the user is looking at it. Is that right?
-Phil
On 6/23/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in youre own model that you create you can store a variable where you
can identify youre real object.
When
That's because of the url
When an url stays the same it will not go into history.
but there is a bug there.
The counter should also reset on the serverside.. To see how page
versioning/back button works
johan
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
It is even simpler.
1. Pressed 5
how do you go back to that page?
but saying: setResponsePage(new MyPage());
then you will have a new instance of mypage with the link instead of
label.
if you are having MyPage1 and MyPage2 (where you go to from mypage1
that has the link replaced)
and if you want to go to the same instance
- Some general question, not limited to Wicket: I'm using Tomcat as
development environment. Every little change (since wicket html pages
are in the classpath, even when a html page is changed) triggers a
full application reloading cycle, which can take some time
(especially if there's
If you use separate windows/frames just different pagemaps for it.
So that frames/window pages will not expire.
In a normal single window/frame app a page expire is not very common
(you have to go back 9 pages or something, you can configure that)
And that looks fine to me (i think 4 levels is
hi,
this could work (i could search over all the page maps there are to see
if a page map had a specific instance of that Page class) and then get
the latest version.
But in a page map there could be more then one page instance of the same
class. For example you could have 2 pages of the
i could think of one thing that you go to a page that has Frames or
IFrames with all bookmarkable start pages or maybe those are dynamically
set by for example a form or link or javascript
that has target=x
Jonathan Locke wrote:
yes, you should not call setPageMap. design of
if you do / then it is the root of youre webapplication.
(just print out a log line of that root it should show you that)
johan
Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
So is this supposed to work in order to customize the lookup paths in
1.0:
protected void init() {
String root =
Please give us pointers in how we should fix that example!
So that others don't step into the same kind of thing..
Having very good examples is a good thing (the thing people are first
looking at...)
johan
Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Got it! And I also got it to work. I do think, though,
But how do you know that the list is changed?
The model behind the listview can change at any time at anyplace..
If you are having that kind of models (mostly selects from a database
where also inserts and deletes can occur on)
then you have to implement youre own ListItemModel anyway (so that
Do you have a small example (html/java) so that i can build up quickly
an example?
(And look at youre problem)
johan
Dan Gould wrote:
I'm having some issues getting RadioChoice to work. I can't find any
examples, so if there is a good one, please let me know (wicket-library
has examples of
I checked forminput example where also a radiochoice is used.
And i think i know what goes wrong at you're place
Is the value that is set the same as the Choice.getId() (which is by
default a toString of the index)
You have to override that in you're own Choice object so that the getId
== the
that is just what eelco means with implicit behaviour i guess.
javadoc:
Called when a null model is about to be retrieved in order to allow a
subclass to provide an initial model
So that initModel is only called when there is no model yet.
And the default behaviour is then the find a
I have couple of questions:
1. Why there is the redirect? Why one more client-server round trip?
This redirect is the default redirect strategy that we use
You can set yours if you want to something different see
ApplicationSettings RenderingStrategy
We use default the REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER
how can we made that reliable ??
Because utf-8 can be 8 bits or 16 or i think 24 per char. Depending on
what it really needs..
What does for example a JSP do it its servlet generated form if you use
UTF-8??
Or doesn't he set anything?
johan
Jan Bares wrote:
I see what you mean. The
, but this must be easy.
Jan
"Johan Compagner" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
how can we made that reliable ??
Because utf-8 can be 8 bits or 16 or i think 24 per char. Depending on
what it really needs..
What does for example a JSP do it its servlet
i am a bit afraid for using that method that way...
Because that could be pretty heavy.. Encoding is not a cheap operation
and it will generate a byte array that also can be very big.
And then suddenly if we still use PrintWriter we are encoding it twice...
Maybe we should do this:
byte[]
it though?
Eelco
On 7/9/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If i get 2 wars of an app that does some big rendering (like listviews,
dynamic images and that kind of thing)
So i don't think hangman
request or
session?
That's my idea, but I have no idea how you plan to test it, so
something else may be more appropriate.
I think it would be nice to have a special performance test
page. Where
should we put it though?
Eelco
On 7/9/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL
what kind of exception?
Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to Wicket and I have a question. I need to generate and display
a List of DropDownChoices. This is the scenario:
I have different room types and for every room type I have certain
vacancies. So I need to have something like this:
you could use a List and then take one object from index 0 or a map and
then take it from an name 'object1
you need to look how the ognl _expression_ should be.
Als you can hold those 2 objects in one object:
ObjectWrapper
{
object1
object2
}
and then put that wrapper object as youre
Hi,
I rewrote the Choice implementation (All the variations of the select tag)
We had a IChoiceList and a default implementation where you had to
create IChoice wrappers around youre objects.
These 2 interfaces and default implementations are all gone now.
So this is a pretty big api change
yes this can happen if the markup can't be parsed and the old one is
removed (i believe)
we should check this out.
Please look when it is exactly happening..
johan
Nick Heudecker wrote:
Sometimes when I make a change to a Java or HTML template, I get a
blank page displayed in my browser
you could also create: mypage_de.html
which would be completely german then.
The problem is that you then have to maintain 2 pages if the component
structure changes.
johan
Nick Heudecker wrote:
Okay, new problem. I need to retrieve localized messages for the HTML
pages. Things like
with Wicket 1.0 you have to create 2 Choice object for the IChoiceList
imlementation.
In wicket 1.1 (the current cvs) you could do this:
new DropDownChoice(gender,new Model(),new
ChoiceRenderer(name,id),list);
and in that list you have 2 pojo's that have a getId() and a getName()
johan
you could encrypt every url then all urls look like this:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/forminput?s=xdfadfljkasdfhasldfh
that null point should be catched some how but what would you like to do?
return to the calling page?
that interface=xxx is needed because that is the action
the proper html template based on the locale
automatically? like the example below: Locale is german - wicket
looks for mypage_de.html, if not there falls back to mypage.html?
thanks
andi
On Jul 12, 2005, at 22:22 Uhr, Johan Compagner wrote:
you could also create: mypage_de.html
which
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 22:37, Johan Compagner wrote:
with Wicket 1.0 you have to create 2 Choice object for the IChoiceList
imlementation.
In wicket 1.1 (the current cvs) you could do this:
new DropDownChoice("gender",new Model(),new
ChoiceRenderer("name","id&q
you say, that i have to change my pojo to have 2 fields ?
/Frank
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 23:09, Johan Compagner wrote:
why would you change the pojos?
what do they look like now?
They have a name i take?
frank bengtsson wrote:
Problem is, i cant change the pojo's. So i
web island. You can jump only between islands only. Why do you need
to have 5 login attempts, and then click Back 5 times, and see stale
pages with your attempts? This is *one logical page*, a login page. A
web island ;) You do not need to see all stale pages for it.
Yeah, I could live
I don't want to disable the back button
Back button should work that is how a browser work. How all people that
have used browsers are used to.
Matej Knopp wrote:
Well, I
once wrote a servlet filter for use with wicket that can conceal the
whole URL. Actually, it was inspired by your wizard
- or :
where can it be used/output to now or maybe in the further?
For example urls/javascript? Should we look if there are pit holes there?
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
We have plans to replace the current dot ('.') seperator in component
paths by another character. The main reason for wanting
is limited to the component's state. But what
about the actual data? Should I track every data manipulation and be
able to reconstruct it? I'm affraid that the complexity would be
enormous.
Johan Compagner wrote:
I don't want to disable the back button
Back button should work that is how
Why do you need it *after* action was performed and redirect was made?
When I load forminput example for the first time, it is loaded with
GET and URL is clean:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/forminput
After I submit a form, the following stuff is added to URL:
behaviour you want
(back button shouldn't work because there is no new page/url)
johan
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
On 7/12/05, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/12/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to disable the back button
Back
Btw. I tried another thing - add these headers to hangman
Cache-Control: must-revalidate
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: -1
but it didn't help. No page reload on back button (using firefox).
Does anyone know what else might help to force browser reload the page
on back button?
Do you know an
cool i can send myself mail :)
You have to validate the email adress (to) you now get a nasty exception
page.
bin zhu wrote:
hi all,
in the last couple of days i wrote an sample wicket
web app to demonstrate to the ease of using wicket. it
incorporates alot of the wicket examples, like:
if i look at the Call Hierarchy of PageMap.put(Page) then pages are only
added in there init()
or in the callComponentListener() this is wrong. A Page should be put
when it is rendered. (when it is the response)
I think that Page.init() isn't needed. A page only has to go in the
pagemap when
are you really sure?
Because i looked again (after i saw you're reply) through every code
where the PageMap is called
And it doesn't seem to add pages to the pool. Except when you make a
Page (new XxxPage() or when
a page is hit by a outside request.
johan
Matej Knopp wrote:
Well, it
is put at front of the stack when it
is accessed. So, this should allways work. In fact when you look at
the name of the collection, it was a bug that it didn't until recently.
Eelco
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Sounds logical, yes.
Eelco
Johan Compagner wrote:
if i look at the Call Hierarchy
hmm :)
look what Matej is saying:
Seems like tomcat hadn't properly reloaded my application code
tomcat reloading application code?? I think he is into the i deploy
constantly when i am developing :))
That is not workable in my eyes.. Eclipse or better said the JVM should
reload code
. redirectTo) should explicitly put
the page into to the pagemap?
-Matej
Johan Compagner wrote:
yes but still i could hold a page somewhere. that i use as a response
page. some time in the further.
Then that page is rendered then can be out of the pagemap already
(if there are already make other pages
can you see in the debugger what it tries to cast to what?
It seems that you're own newChoice() method is doing something wrong
(it expects a different kind of object???)
But if you are really working with Choice components please upgrade as
soon as you can to 1.1 (when the first beta
.
johan
James wrote:
Johan Compagner jcompagner at j-com.nl writes:
can you see in the debugger what it tries to cast to what?
It seems that you're own newChoice() method is doing something wrong
(it expects a different kind of object???)
But if you are really working with Choice
Dzenan Ridjanovic wrote:
Could you give us the stracktrace you got?
I have changed the code this afternoon and could not reproduce the error.
However, I have done something similar and it works:
public class UrlsPage extends WebPage ...
public UrlsPage(PageParameters pageParameters) {
i agree.
When you have a IPage object there should be able to have multiply Page
implementations.
But this is not really possible because the internals of page are pretty
importand for wicket to let it work
If you have a full blown page with all kind of components on it. I don't
think
from what i can see that redirect is a HARD redirect to a page. So not
checking what it should do
because setResponsePage(Page) doesn't have to do a redirect.. (or you
also have to set setRedirect(true))
And i think in some cases like logon you really want a redirect.
So it could be removed i
yes this is because the homepage is set as a reponsepage
AND you are redirecting to another page.. in the
Look
this is what happens, this is a piece of code that handles the homepage:
Page newPage = newPage(homePage);
setResponsePage(newPage);
first line the homepage is constructed
second
arrghh :)
in the onBeginRequest() you are already responding a page... !
You shouldn't redirect in that one.
If you want to stop responding a page you should override checkAccess()
There is as far as i know the only place where you should call
redirectTo() or redirectToInterceptPage()
return ACCESS_DENIED;
}
On 7/16/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think i have the solution
youre homepage can do redirectTo()
but don't do it in the constructor
do it in checkAccess()
and let checkAccess() return false.
johan
josh lim wrote:
Hi I am new
as matej is saying in 1.0 you have to implement youre own ChoiceList
and Choice.
but if you jump on the 1.1 (first beta release will be this weekend)
then it is much simpler:
new DropDownChoice(test,youreModel, youreChoices, new
ChoiceRenderer(name,id))
And the last part new
That one is not configureable yet.
We could make it configureable i think
We just have to define a IExceptionPage interface.
that has one method:
setThrowAble(Throwable theError,Page thatHadTheError)
Then every body could implement his own if needed.
We do need to supply 2 anyway i think in 1.1
+1 by me
that should is strange
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Do you want it changed in 1.1?
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote:
Wow. Now that's what can be called lack of perception :)
Thank you. Actually, if it was called setEscapeModelStrings maybe I
wouldn't miss it :)
-Matej
Phil Kulak wrote:
I'm also trying to find out how I can let dynamically reloading code
work better. It would be awesome to start Wicket like this and then
be able to just change code and introduce new pages (and other code)
without having to restart the servlet engine ever again.
Does't support IDEA
hmm encoding is largely rewritten. (i think that is a bit to big for 1.0.1)
But maybe a simple fix should be applied to 1.0.1
If you could go for 1.1b1
Jan Bares wrote:
Hi,
I just looked into the 1.0.1 version, but it seems that bug in WicketServlet
as mentioned in the Wicket serious bug with
redirect to the same page as you where on?
So the just directly redirect to the invoker page if a component that is
invisible (or one of the parents)
But maybe developers or users get completely confused then..
And how is it possible that you get a url to an invisible component?
Who generated
current code.
Eelco
Johan Compagner wrote:
redirect to the same page as you where on?
So the just directly redirect to the invoker page if a component that
is invisible (or one of the parents)
But maybe developers or users get completely confused then..
And how is it possible that you get
not sure if I've written it cleanly enough, but hope it's obvious
that it's a clean security problem.
-Matej
Johan Compagner wrote:
redirect to the same page as you where on?
So the just directly redirect to the invoker page if a component that
is invisible (or one of the parents)
But maybe
just set youre mailer in threaded mode and you can say mark as read for
a complete thread.
Gili wrote:
I think this mailing list is getting out of hand. There are simply
too many messages being posted back and forth and although their
content is good, the medium they're posted in is
remember if you don't set the visible state (but just return true or
false depending on a other thing)
you do override the back button support a bit.
Because we can't track the visibility bit then.
Don't think it really matters but i just wanted to point that out.
johan
Phil Kulak wrote:
I
where does an implemenation of IFilter really come from?
It has to be different for specific locale's?
So that you can have one markup file and filter it with X filters for X
locales?
johan
Matej Knopp wrote:
Okay, small update.
New interface
public interface IFilter {
public abstract
is the resourcekey for such a validator always the same?
Because now you have extracted out the formcomponent but introduced the
resourcekey.as a variable
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
How does this look (see attachement)?
Eelco
/could/
lead to non-thread safe behaviour. My guess was that that would be
clear enough? Maybe we should get rid of the singleton required
validator just to be sure... cheap enough to create such objects anyway.
Eelco
Johan Compagner wrote:
is the resourcekey for such a validator always
Is there some documentation somewhere describing how Wicket solves the
Back button problem? My co-worker using JSF has been running into
lots of back-button problems, which makes me realize that I really
don't understand how best to use Wicket to avoid some or all of them
myself.
No docs
are properties files not really read in by the default system encoding?
So if you have youre system encoding on iso8859-2 then it should read
properties files like that.
in eclipse you can set the default encoding for youre properties files
if you want (see General - Content Types)
johan
In 1.0 you have to override/implement the IChoiceList and make youre own
IChoice objects for the TerminDetails class.
In 1.1 you can do this:
item.add(new DropDownChoice(zimmerart, new PropertyModel(person,
aktArtikelZimmerart), person.getAktArtikel().getSelectedTermin().getTerminDetails()),
so these 2 constructors:
public PageableListView(final String id, final IModel model, int
rowsPerPage)
{
super(id, model);
this.rowsPerPage = rowsPerPage;
}
public PageableListView(final String id, final List list, final int
rowsPerPage)
{
super(id,
i also like the idea that you have one html file, X number of property
files and then at load time of the markup file
for a specific locale the property file for that locale is merged in to
the html. And that html is stored for that locale in the cache.
At least i think tht is the complete
Matej Knopp wrote:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Looks nice. It doesn't break the API, right?
No, it doesn't break anything. I wanted to make it as transparent as
possible.
Do you think this should be something that Wicket supports
out-of-the-box, or something that you can use as an add-on (in
DetachableChoiceList just helps you more in the attach./detach cycle
that you had to do if you want to
attach/deattach youre list (if it was for example a database list)
You just have to implement the onAttach and onDetach if needed (mostly
only the onAttach onDetach calls clear() on youre
there is a way
The List can implement IDetachable and then detach will be called.
But this is a bit hidden currently and the attach cycle must completely
be programmed by the developer
(on List.size() or List.get(xx) attach check must be done...)
So on the developer list i just posted a
why doesn't a List work in a ListView exactly?
I do get that a List in a PageableListView could be a bit improved so
that you have method like
getList(start,count). But in a ListView a List could work fine. If
wrapped in a Model for attach/detach
If we encapsulate that ListViewDataSource in
1 - 100 of 2057 matches
Mail list logo
