Quiddity,
Thank you for your reply!
On 3/19/19 9:06 PM, quiddity wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 3:58 AM Svetlana Belkin
wrote:
Hello all,
I know there is a FOSS portal
Links/examples almost always help!
I'd guess you mean this page or the pages it links to:
https://meta.wikimedia.org
and have
them in one place- which is Wikipedia. Would this idea be worth it for
the other movements?
Thank you.
--
Svetlana Belkin
https://senseopenness.com/
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
. (The English = people from the UK = not American).
--
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
UploadWizard lacks path from it to
other sister projects
- https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78525 UploadWizard lacks gallery format
output
--
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
is a great opportunity to ask
readers, users, and contributors for feedback).
--
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
whether the timestamp I see is UTC or
not. Please consider fixing it.
--
svetlana
Frieda Brioschi ubifri...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Wikimedia community,
As the two Board Representatives on the Funds Dissemination Committee
(FDC), we want to publicly acknowledge the appeal that was submitted
set up an easy
keyword/tagging system, having users help us sort and tag media would be
amazing.
We already have such system. It's called categories. If we would like to build
a prettier interface for it, I'm all ears (although I wouldn't call it a game).
--
svetlana
have a say (?) in what the Chapters do. There is no Wikimedia
membership, however.
--
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
Hi,
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, at 17:35, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
svetlana, 03/12/2014 23:20:
It is already co-owned. It is just that people haven't bothered to try
talking to the Fundraising Team.
{{citation needed}}
Go look at the number of people who tried on fundraiser
It is already co-owned. It is just that people haven't bothered to try talking
to the Fundraising Team.
Is it time to rename Teams to something else, something that suggests that they
don't work in a cave on the Moon?
--
svetlana
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, at 08:32, Lodewijk wrote:
Hi Lila
approachable and was (and am!) a tiny bit
happy with it).
--
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
Hi,
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, at 12:30, John Mark Vandenberg wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:46 AM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
John Mark Vandenberg wrote:
i.e. specifically asking
previously highly productive volunteers who have stopped contributing
whether they feel
it early).
--
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ
of communicating it early
--
svetlana
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, at 14:47, svetlana wrote:
Hi all.
I can see clear interest in everyone on this thread wanting to figure out the
right way to do it. Let's not jinx it by painting WMF Fundraising as the
guys who break and community as the gwho rage. Both
. It is probably a good one (although it
lacks geometry specs or any kind of time or statistics suggestions or past
analysis results). That's a wiki. It is just waiting for you to touch it and
put it in better shape.
--
svetlana
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, at 15:34, Ryan Lane wrote:
svetlana svetlana
Not research, but it is a brief intro:
http://www.plos.org/open-access/
http://www.plos.org/resources/
--
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
I maintain that I would love to have a formal universal feedback channel for
Chapters work. It has to be drama-free, but transparent, and not moderated.
Feedback is occasionally not negative, and may contain thorough project ideas.
--
svetlana
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, at 18:03, Gerard Meijssen
, with an appropriate disclaimer: If
you need help or have a problem with Firefox, please visit Firefox Support. We
could be able to customize it for each project to fit our needs. (Include
aggressive pointers to OTRS queues and village pumps for each project, as
appropriate).
Thoughts?
--
svetlana
On Tue, 25
I disagree, the question raised is relevant to the Wikimedia movement as a
whole.
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, at 02:37, Austin Hair wrote:
Fae,
Please do not drag this list into whatever trouble you've found
yourself in on another. Wikimedia-l is neither a court of appeals for
Wikimedia-related
(such as, providing inadequate
support to the Wikimedia movement).
This feedback channel is probably not here, but I feel this list could be an
appropriate place to discuss how the above could be implemented.
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, at 08:28, svetlana wrote:
I disagree, the question raised is relevant
way - with the
Chapter supporting outreach and similar activities - for another while.
--
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
Kirill Lokshin wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Affiliations Committee has recognized Wiki
Project Med [1] as a Wikimedia User Group [2].
Could be a good idea for wikiproject folks to work on a RSS feed of recent
changes (and recent new page creations) within a category and its
Thanks Anthony for sharing your ideas!
Anthony Cole wrote:
Svetlana, presently we have
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChangesLinked/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Lists_of_pages/Articles
which reports all changes to articles tagged on their talk page as of
interest to WikiProjedt
language sisters, and do some proper statistics, as EN.WP ≠ WP...
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
the problem?
svetlana
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Musings_about_unregistered_contributors
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gryllida/DraftsReview
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Artistintown
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:128.194.3.84
[5] https
).
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014, at 07:02, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:53 PM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
An undo with appropriate edit summary would also avoid a need in
escalating the issue - local sysops would consciously hold off their edit.
If they went
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014, at 07:02, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:53 PM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
An undo with appropriate edit summary would also avoid a need in
escalating the issue - local sysops would consciously hold off their edit.
If they went
Hi all,
I'm sorry to repeat, but I would like to hear some thoughts on this question.
Also added a clarification for one of the lines.
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, at 22:26, svetlana wrote:
Hi all.
I understand the Engineering folks used superprotect instead of /undoing/ the
edit and adding
they forgot to do it, but it doesn't mean that doing it wouldn't've been
a good idea.
I might perhaps even suggest going and removing superprotect, and actually
going and using an edit summary /instead/, now. It's late, but better late then
never.
svetlana
still possible where superprotect only affects a single page and not a
namespace. Or can entire namespaces be protected and this new user right was
intended to be able to prevent that easily?
Svetlana.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https
removes superprotect from the wiki. Get local
consencus on installing that.
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
BTW you should all love this idea:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Engagement_%28Product%29/Process_ideas#Get_local_consencus_for_your_changes
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki
a comparatively very small organization
to a standard that can't even be met by IT giants.
Risker/Anne
No comment on this one.
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l
a comparatively very small organization
to a standard that can't even be met by IT giants.
Risker/Anne
No comment on this one.
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l
it your good axe
--
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l
fullscreen is a misleading redundant step.
It was not implemented.
What more interest could I have?
It's not like I care about this too much, but I'm curious as to what you expect
me to be able to do to display my interest.
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, at 09:47, svetlana wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, at 23:35, David Gerard wrote:
On 14 August 2014 13:56, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be more sensible to let contributors participate in the tech
roadmap in more formal and empowered way than now
that?
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, at 12:01, Romaine Wiki wrote:
2014-08-13 2:46 GMT+02:00 svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au:
[..]
[...]
instead of talking properly
then the superprotect wouldn't exist at all
you seeing the problem there? whose problem is it?
desire to act out of the blue
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, at 20:36, svetlana wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, at 12:01, Romaine Wiki wrote:
2014-08-13 2:46 GMT+02:00 svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au:
[..]
[...]
instead of talking properly
then the superprotect wouldn't exist at all
you seeing the problem
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, at 00:50, Pete Forsyth wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:27 AM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
[...]
Surely this issue can be solved by talking without force: if you don't
think so, you get force applied to YOU; you started a fight, and lost it.
I have
edit override user preference in the first
place?
I would expect user preferences to run after global.js, and set the onClick
event back to what it should be (such as, something meaningful where a user has
MV enabled).
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, at 23:42, Romaine Wiki wrote:
That the community reacts the way it does now, is because they care very
much about the site and they notice something is terrible going wrong on
WMF side and too less is done to fix those problems/issues!
if the community was not so willing
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, at 10:46, svetlana wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, at 23:42, Romaine Wiki wrote:
That the community reacts the way it does now, is because they care very
much about the site and they notice something is terrible going wrong on
WMF side and too less is done to fix those
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, at 08:42, Tomasz W. Kozłowski wrote:
Someone is definitely forgetting that Wikimedia wikis are not the
Foundation's personal playground.
It is becoming one for a long time now.
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines
One more option: wait for WMF to make wiki unbreakable and scriptable
*properly*, using something like Firefox's jetpack (which is fool proof)
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, at 04:07, Tomasz W. Kozłowski wrote:
Philippe,
the patch is not for the MediaWiki software but for the configuration
of Wikimedia wikis (it's in the operations/mediawiki-config repository
on Gerrit).
It has been merged and deployed on the production cluster. The user
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014, at 11:47, MZMcBride wrote:
[...]
For comparison, we now have MediaViewer, which moved through as a beta
feature. They say MediaViewer may one day be as feature-ful as the file
description pages we've had for a long time (editing capability, oh my!).
[...]
MZMcBride
On Sat, 9 Aug 2014, at 23:11, James Forrester wrote:
[..]
https://imgur.com/a/JFN9y
404
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
is flat and two-color again which is a pain:
http://icons.iconarchive.com/icons/dakirby309/windows-8-metro/256/Apps-Notepad-Metro-icon.png
can we please go away from flat one- or two-color icons in web design?
svetlana
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, at 15:44, Steven Walling wrote:
The community liasons
put in a lot of blood, sweat, and tears to advocate not only *to *the
community, but *for it* within the Foundation.
This activity should be redundant. If someone in the Foundation fails to see
the community, it should
out if they start doing rubbish and fail to hear the said feedback). --
This is very unclear and unspecific. I would expect others to come up with a
specific mechanism for such cases.
Svetlana.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https
54 matches
Mail list logo
