Hoi,
Given that it is pathetically easy to opt out of the MultimediaViewer, the
amount of vitriol spouted by some is way out of proportion to the problem.
If you do not want it, opt out. But thermonuclear was was threatened,
people were to lose their job over this.
No the excuses are too little an
The issue is not just that individual users may want to opt out, it's
whether it should be activated by default for readers. There is also the
matter of licensing information.
I'm not aware of where "thermonuclear was was threatened". There were, and
continues to be, discussion about forking. MV i
Mike et al
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Michael Peel wrote:
> I've swapped it for a CC-licensed file that does allow for commercial
> reuse. Problem solved?
>
GFDL is a free licence. You can licence under the free GFDL licence and
also licence it under an -NC licence. So long as one licence
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, at 13:19, Pine W wrote:
> I have heard very few people say "don't ever change the interface." I have
> heard people say "don't force an interface change on me that I don't think
> is an improvement."
>
> VE was a good example. The sentiment of the community wasn't that VE''s
>
Hi,
On Monday, August 25, 2014, svetlana wrote:
>
> A first step here, I believe, is have the Teams track bugs in the open;
> from my own experience, the Flow and Multimedia folks track bugs somewhere
> else where I can't even view or comment (and even if I could, it being
> different from Bugzi
I tried to make the PDF of
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Canada_DHC-6_Twin_Otter
It credits "File:WinAir De Havilland Canada DHC-6-300 Twin Otter
Breidenstein.jpg Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:WinAir_De_Havilland_Canada_DHC-6-300_Twin_Otter_Breidenstein.jpg
>
> from my own experience, the Flow and Multimedia folks track bugs somewhere
> else where I can't even view or comment
>
Bugs and tasks are public for the Multimedia team. If you mean "bugs" in
the bastardized sense of the term which is "things filed in bugzilla", then
yes, the Multimedia team d
On 8/25/14, 3:06 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
As a metric, pageviews are probably not very meaningful. One way we can
observe whether we're fulfilling our mission is to see how ubiquitous
our content has become. An even better metric might be the quality of the
articles we have. Anecdotal evidence sugges
Thanks James for addressing such a crucial issue. It is a vital matter but
being discussed far less than other topics, in offline or offline programs,
activities. Among measures fore retaining editors, there were some banners
that appeared on top of articles viewed by new editors or readers. I've
h
Wikimedia ch is doing a big investment in supporting communities.
There are three community liaisons (a third hired recently) to support the
three national languages which are also within the biggest linguistic
communities.
Anyway there is not a unique solution to be adapted easily in user
retent
Perhaps the best way of doing this is the admittedly laborious method of
personally communicating with new editors who seem promising and
encouraging them and offering to help them continue. The key word in this
is "personally". It cannot be effectively done with wikilove messages ,
and certainly
Started a proposal here about it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Adding_a_link_to_.22authors.22_in_Wikipedia.27s_by-line
And have created a mockup of what it would look like here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heart_failure
Wondering peoples opinions.
--
James He
James Heilman wrote:
>And have created a mockup of what it would look like here
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heart_failure
This isn't really a mock-up... it's probably best to use
test.wikipedia.org or another dedicated test wiki for tests.
>Wondering peoples opinions.
The mobile team somewhat
Yes I agree that mobile is a little much. I am just proposing a simple
linked word (either author or contributors) in the by-line. It is important
to have this information in the by-line rather than to the left as this is
where people expect to find the authors / contributors.
Not attached to were
14 matches
Mail list logo
