I was just looking at the vital signs graph for Dutch and noticed that
mobile page views has overtaken desktop pageviews on weekends, which is
pretty cool. Maybe there could be a Wikigame that you could tune per
language that connects items to articles? This wouldn't help with
Wikipedians who
Often I see or make additions to articles & then see hidden categories like
Official Website not in Wikidata or Coordinates not in Wikidata, or the
Authority Control data is in Wikidata but it has an LCCN parameter added in
the template in Wikipedia. Are there any semi-automated tools that would
That is comparing it with wrong examples that are not relevant here.
On Wikipedia we have the guideline that articles an categories should be
added to Wikidata, that originates back to the phase that only manual
interwikis existed.
And we have already received complaints why users do not get a
Hi all,
I think it is time for the next step in the Wikidata development: a better
integration in Wikipedia and her sisterprojects.
Every day thousands of articles are created, and many of those are not
added to Wikidata, even while often an item about this subject exists.
Users forget to add a
Whatever happened to "Wikipedia, the encyclopedia anyone can edit"?
This is adding a layer of complexity and expectation that I don't really
feel comfortable with. We don't expect people to add images to Commons
when they write an article. We don't expect people to include definitions
in
This is where I disagree with you, Romaine. I do believe my examples are
exactly right. We do not expect anyone to add information to any other
project when they create content on the project of their choice. We have a
hard enough time recruiting contributors to any of our projects now, and
Hi Risker,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Risker wrote:
> We do not expect anyone to add information to any other
> project when they create content on the project of their choice.
I'm thinking the Insert Media option in VE: there, we are giving the editor
the option to
If you've had some users requesting such a feature, could it perhaps be
added as an opt-in preference setting? I'd be very annoyed by such a
feature if it couldn't be disabled, and many might just be confused by it.
On Oct 29, 2015 2:08 PM, "Romaine Wiki" wrote:
> That is
I am going to suggest something, but I have no idea of the development that
it will take.
Currently Visual Editor has Template forms. If Template data that has been
inputted into a form can be directed to be stored automatically in Wikidata
instead of Wikipedia, & that data is then pulled back
: 7
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:04:58 -0700
> From: Raymond Leonard <raymond.f.leonard...@gmail.com>
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
> Cc: Wikidata mailing list <wikid...@lists.wikimedia.org>
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Next step in the development
> Message-ID:
>
I think it might just be a question of phrasing, actually.
"Check if your new topic already exists in other languages, and connect it
to those!
Or [click here] to start a new Wikidata item for your article, so other
language editions of Wikipedia can find it more easily!"
For Wikipedians, the
While I agree that there is a necessity to link pages through Wikidata I'm
with Risker such a message would itself become a barrier to the creation of
content, we have enough of those already. We are forgetting that the
people doing the edits do so as volunteers not paid employees, they do so
for
Yes, exactly. :-)
2015-10-29 23:22 GMT+01:00 Magnus Manske :
> I think it might just be a question of phrasing, actually.
>
> "Check if your new topic already exists in other languages, and connect it
> to those!
> Or [click here] to start a new Wikidata item for
: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:04:58 -0700
> > From: Raymond Leonard <raymond.f.leonard...@gmail.com>
> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
> > Cc: Wikidata mailing list <wikid...@lists.wikimedia.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Next step in the development
> > Message-ID:
> >
14 matches
Mail list logo