On 11/04/2011 16:04, Alison M. Wheeler wrote:
- Gordon Jolygordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:
All prospective and current Directors of the Company should be
asked to
reveal Wikipedia and related identities (e.g. Commons) . And
perhaps all
others (e.g. Twitter). It should be made part of the
On 13/04/2011 00:34, Andrew Turvey wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Andrew Westandrewcw...@gmail.com wrote:
Totally agree. I think it is reasonable that candidates should be
asked to reveal their wikimedia user names (I'm not sure it should be
made compulsory though), but demanding
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Andrew West andrewcw...@gmail.com wrote:
Totally agree. I think it is reasonable that candidates should be
asked to reveal their wikimedia user names (I'm not sure it should be
made compulsory though), but demanding that they reveal all their
multifarious
On 10 April 2011 23:03, Andrew Turvey andrewrtur...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think it would probably sit better in the election rules - these have been
entrenched so have the same status as the articles.
I'm not sure that's true. I believe the entrenchment stops the Board
from modifying them, it
- Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:
All prospective and current Directors of the Company should be
asked to
reveal Wikipedia and related identities (e.g. Commons) . And
perhaps all
others (e.g. Twitter). It should be made part of the fabric of the
Company, which should be
I think it would probably sit better in the election rules - these have been
entrenched so have the same status as the articles.
I'm happy to assist anyone who wants to have this change debated at the agm.
Andrew Turvey
This message was sent from my mobile
On 9 Apr 2011 13:23, Thomas Dalton
On 8 April 2011 10:48, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:
On 08/04/2011 10:31, Andrew Turvey wrote:
Would you like to ask that question in the candidate QAs?
All prospective and current Directors of the Company should be asked to
reveal Wikipedia and related identities (e.g. Commons)
Yes.
Gordon
On 08/04/2011 10:31, Andrew Turvey wrote:
Would you like to ask that question in the candidate QAs?
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meetings/2011_election:_Candidate_questions#Questions
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Gordon Jolygordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:
On 06/04/2011 12:36,
On 08/04/2011 10:31, Andrew Turvey wrote:
Would you like to ask that question in the candidate QAs?
All prospective and current Directors of the Company should be asked to
reveal Wikipedia and related identities (e.g. Commons) . And perhaps all
others (e.g. Twitter). It should be made part
May I suggest that candidates are allowed to answer Q3 on this mailing list,
rather than on the WMUK wiki, should they so desire?
I understand that candidates should disclose their usernames if they want to
refer to their on-wiki experience. However, I don't think it's necessary to
do so on a
On 6 April 2011 13:39, Deryck Chan deryckc...@gmail.com wrote:
May I suggest that candidates are allowed to answer Q3 on this mailing list,
rather than on the WMUK wiki, should they so desire?
I understand that candidates should disclose their usernames if they want to
refer to their on-wiki
On 4 April 2011 23:36, James Farrar james.far...@gmail.com wrote:
This message contains the following information pertaining to the
election of Directors of Wiki UK Limited (Wikimedia UK):
(1) Statement of Persons Nominated
Not all candidates provided their wikimedia/wikipedia user name. I
This message contains the following information pertaining to the
election of Directors of Wiki UK Limited (Wikimedia UK):
(1) Statement of Persons Nominated
Not all candidates provided their wikimedia/wikipedia user name. I
happen to know who Roger Bamkin is, and can guess who
On 5 Apr 2011, at 14:15, Michael Peel wrote:
On 5 Apr 2011, at 11:18, Andrew West wrote:
On 4 April 2011 23:36, James Farrar james.far...@gmail.com wrote:
This message contains the following information pertaining to the
election of Directors of Wiki UK Limited (Wikimedia UK):
(1)
: [Wikimediauk-l] Election of Directors - Candidate statements
and ballot paper
2009/4/8 andrewrtur...@googlemail.com:
I've been bold and set up a page on the wiki for this at
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meetings/2009_AGM/Candidate_questions
Can I ask that people keep questions to all
James et al.,
Thanks for sorting all of this out. What's the best way for people to
ask questions of the candidates? Should it be done privately, or
should we have a page for this as we did for the last elections?
This is something that was overlooked in the writing of the election
The best way is to turn up to the AGM! :)
Seriously, I am willing to act as an intermediary for questions, or for a
page to be set up on the wiki. I'm about to go to sleep now, though, sp I'll
get back to you mid-afternoon.
As ever, flaws in regulations generally only occur in beta testing...
need to ensure provisions for this in all future elections.
Seddon
-Original Message-
From: Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net
Sent: 08 April 2009 09:07
To: wikimediau...@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Election of Directors - Candidate statements and
ballot paper
2009/4/8 andrewrtur...@googlemail.com:
I've been bold and set up a page on the wiki for this at
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meetings/2009_AGM/Candidate_questions
Can I ask that people keep questions to all candidates to a minimum?
While a couple may be good, they tend to get extremely boring
Message -
From: Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2009 15:08:21 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland,
Portugal
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Election of Directors - Candidate statements and
ballot paper
2009/4/8 andrewrtur
20 matches
Mail list logo
