sfully on in the recent
past? Who would be best to approach with such a request?
Thanks any and all for any advice you can offer.
Anthony
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
advice on managing this?
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 1:36 PM Legoktm <legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
+cc pywiki...@lists.wikimedia.org
On 12/22/2016 03:55 PM, Anthony Di Franco wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm doing some renovations on recitation-bot and running into trouble
when
>
sun grid engine, so I suspect that the login state might not be making
it into the container - can anyone advise on where the login state is
maintained and whether this will be transferred into the kubernetes
container?
Thanks,
Anthony
___
Wikitech-l
omments
from the Word document into the wiki table will be a small chore. The wiki
table pastes easily into Word with highlighting and formatting intact, but
not vice versa. (I've also asked at Village pump (technical).)
Any thoughts on making this easier or smarter would be much apprec
. Will it enable patrollers to add a comment to
the edit summary? Does anyone know if it works on en.Wikipedia?
1.https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2014-November/079418.html
Anthony Cole http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anthonyhcole
___
Wikitech
Ignore my last post - I appended it to the wrong thread.
Anthony Cole http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anthonyhcole
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Yusuke Matsubara whym at whym.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l wrote:
* On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Amir E. Aharoni
** amir.aharoni at mail.huji.ac.il
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l wrote:
** I tried looking
with a comment? Would it interfere
in any way with the normal practice of other editors who don't have that
permission?
Anthony Cole http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anthonyhcole
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com
wrote:
W dniu środa, 12 listopada 2014
are discussing this at the moment,
and we see it as a very effective step toward safeguarding and improving
our medical offering. If you could do this for us, it would be very much
appreciated.
Anthony Cole http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anthonyhcole
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Federico
I wouldn't think any of those other than perhaps media.wiki would
implicate a WMF trademark. As far as MediaWiki, WMF does claim a trademark
on that.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:17 AM, addshorewiki addshorew...@gmail.comwrote:
en.wiki
data.wiki
meta.wiki
media.wiki
en.books.wiki
If you're going to use xz then you wouldn't even have to recompress the
blocks that haven't changed and are already well compressed.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Randall Farmer rand...@wawd.com wrote:
Ack, sorry for the (no subject); again in the right thread:
For external uses like XML
Which websites are you planning on hacking into?
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
There is a plan for a worldwide round of Aaron Hackathons, on the upcoming
Nov 8-10 weekend.
http://aaronswartzhackathon.**org/ http://aaronswartzhackathon.org/
It wasn't really a joke.
On Oct 11, 2013 5:34 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
That's not a funny joke...
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Anthony o...@theendput.com wrote:
Which websites are you planning on hacking into?
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Quim Gil q
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Jeremy Baron jer...@tuxmachine.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
Does rapid key rotation in any way make a MITM attack less detectable?
Presumably the NSA would have no problem getting a fraudulent certificate
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:59 PM, George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.comwrote:
The second is site key security (ensuring the NSA never gets your private
keys).
Who theoretically has access to the private keys (and/or the signing key)
right now?
The third is perfect forward security with
I guess the viewpoint and perspective from the more experienced users may
be different. The veterans may start to take some knowledge for granted, as
a given knowledge that they may thing people would already know.
For example, the underlying concept of git commit is something that I now
take for
Anthony,
interesting feature. How would the system handle cases in which the
content originally pointed at when making the initial inline comment
has been changed?
Daniel
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Anthony cs3245...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I have applied for the Prototyping
Dear all,
I have applied for the Prototyping Inline Comments for the Google Summer of
Code.
Essentially, the project is an extension that allows any wiki user to
select text and then make an inline comment or a reply to an existing
inline comment. Imagine: a user lands in a Wikipedia article,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 3:00 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I mean, you could redefine something that doesn't block all spambots
but does hamper a significant proportion of humans as successful,
but it would be a redefinition.
It's not a definition, it's a judgment.
And whether or
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Marcin Cieslak sa...@saper.info wrote:
You *DON'T* want to
renumber your whole home network every time your ISP changes your IPv6
prefix.
If only they had some service which converted easy to remember names
into IPv6 addresses.
Just because some people
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 2:28 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 June 2012 21:51, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
Here at BestISP, we assign you a unique number that you can never
change! We attach this unique number to all your Internet
communications, so that every time you go
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Daniel Friesen
li...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 03:49:01 -0700, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Do this now, please. Even I can see how easy it ought to be to replace
the last
three digits of an IPv4 address with XXX in publicly viewable
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Strainu strain...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/6/8 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
No one has to break the loop. The loop will break itself. Either
enough people will get sick of NAT to cause demand for IPv6, or they
won't.
That one way of seeing things, but I fear
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Strainu strain...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/6/8 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
No one has to break the loop. The loop will break itself. Either
enough people will get sick of NAT to cause demand
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Strainu strain...@gmail.com wrote:
Risker, I think you're over-reacting here. Yes, there are risks
associated with IPv6. No, they haven't been addressed completely
before IPv6 day (apparently because of the very late moment the
decision to participate was
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Leslie Carr lc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2 June 2012 13:44, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Daniel Friesen
li...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
On 11-09-19 06:39 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com wrote:
That's probably the simplest solution; adding a new empty table will be very
quick. It may make it slower
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, okay. I remember that's what happened in MyISAM but I figured
they had that fixed in InnoDB.
InnoDB has optimized path for index builds, not for schema changes.
No support for built-in function-based indexes,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Happy Melon happy-me...@live.com wrote:
It may or may not be an architecturally-better design to have it as a
separate table, although considering how rapidly MW's 'architecture' changes
I'd say keeping things as simple as possible is probably a virtue. But
Thanks for the explanation. I guess I see what you're getting at now.
Sorry I didn't see it sooner.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Happy Melon happy-me
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com wrote:
That's probably the simplest solution; adding a new empty table will be very
quick. It may make it slower to use the field though, depending on what all
uses/exposes it.
Isn't adding a new column with all NULL values quick
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Russell N. Nelson - rnnelson
rnnel...@clarkson.edu wrote:
It is meaningless to talk about cryptography without a threat model, just as
Robert says. Is
anybody actually attacking us?
You mean, like Grawp?
___
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Ariel T. Glenn ar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Στις 17-09-2011, ημέρα Σαβ, και ώρα 22:55 -0700, ο/η Robert Rohde
έγραψε:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
snip
For offline analyses, there's no need to change the online database
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
If collision attacks really matter we should use SHA-1.
If collision attacks really matter you should use, at least, SHA-256, no?
However, do
any of the proposed use cases care about whether someone might
intentionally
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Russell N. Nelson - rnnelson
rnnel...@clarkson.edu wrote:
It is meaningless to talk about cryptography without a threat model, just as
Robert says. Is anybody actually attacking us? Or are
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Russell N. Nelson - rnnelson
rnnel...@clarkson.edu
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
There's also a
description at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Grawp , which does
not do justice to the mad hacker skillz of this individual and his
intent on finding bugs in mediawiki and exploiting them.
(and/or the Grawp
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
Now I don't know how important the CPU differences in calculating the
two versions would be. If they're significant enough, then fine, use
MD5
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:07 PM, bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com wrote:
Anthony wrote:
The pages you link to seem to indicate he's nothing more than a
willy-on-wheels type vandal, who at worst tricked an admin into doing
a delete
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a good reason to prefer SHA-1?
Both have weaknesses allowing one to construct a collision (with
considerable effort)
Considerable effort? I can create an MD5 collision in a few minutes
on my home computer. Is
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Anthony wikim...@inbox.org
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
Linking has no special status in the GPL -- it's just a question of
what
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
You can still link it with proprietary code as long as you don't
distribute the result, so it would be fine for research projects or
similar that rely on proprietary components.
What happens if one of your
piping to/from gzip, and I don't think anyone argues
that *that* creates a derivative work.
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
From: Anthony wikim...@inbox.org
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Aryeh Gregor
You can always *use* GPLd code however you like.
Does use
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Bryan Tong Minh
bryan.tongm...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we stop discussing this issue? I believe that most MediaWiki
developers are in fact not interested in changing the status quo with
regards to licensing, so there is no point in discussing it.
That there isn't
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Dynamic linking implies we have something to dynamically link in the first
place. A parser library consisting of compiled PHP in this particular case.
Let's just cross this hypothetical bridge when we come to it,
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com wrote:
I'd like to respectfully ask that this thread be taken offlist, perhaps to a
wiki page or a private thread among those who are interested.
There's no active
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
Linking has no special status in the GPL -- it's just a question of
what legally constitutes a derivative work. If a C program that
dynamically links to a library is legally a derivative work of that
library,
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
The reasons why many programmers prefer GPL to BSD -- to keep the work
they've invested long hours in for free from being submerged in someone's
commercial project with no recompense to them -- which GPL forbids and
BSD does
Anthony Ventresque (Dr) wrote:
Hi,
I've found something strange in some files. The maximum ids for a page are:
latest
pages-articles.xml: 29189922
page.sql: 28707562
categorylinks.sql: 28705949
(15,684 categories and 135,521 articles are missing
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Anthony Ventresque (Dr)
aventres...@ntu.edu.sg wrote:
I was indeed suspecting something like that, but the difference in number
of pages is large while we are talking about a relatively short delay
(minutes?).
Depending on what site you're talking
: [Wikitech-l] categorisation issues in dumps
Anthony Ventresque (Dr) wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build an offline version of the wikipedia categorisation tree.
As usual with projects on wikipedia, I've downloaded dumps (actually the
interesting one here is pages-articles.xml). And I found that none
page.sql: 30480288
categorylinks.sql: 30479519
Any idea why these numbers are different?
Thanks for your help,
Anthony
CONFIDENTIALITY: This email is intended solely for the person(s) named and may
be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient
:1960 which is
present on the web page. And it is the same for a lot of categories I tried:
many links are missing in the dump, but are present in the web. Any idea why is
that so?
Thanks for your help,
Anthony
CONFIDENTIALITY: This email is intended solely for the person(s) named and may
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com wrote:
Front-end proxies need to speak IPv6 to the outside world so they can accept
connections from IPv6 clients, add the clients' IPv6 addresses to the HTTP
X-Forwarded-For header which gets passed to the Apaches, and then return
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:10 PM, River Tarnell r.tarn...@ieee.org wrote:
In article AANLkTi=nsymtrlv7dwrpixj-wnrpjkvgwyixs+zjc...@mail.gmail.com,
Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
Is there a standard for using IPv6 inside X-Forwarded-For headers?
There is no standard for X-Forwarded-For at all
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:20 PM, River Tarnell r.tarn...@ieee.org wrote:
In article aanlktim3ht9hxau3sgwmfu9mph9gb2rx2misg3vmc...@mail.gmail.com,
Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoeks...@gmail.com wrote:
So what are exactly the implications for blocking and related issues
when we will start to see ISP
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
But, supports IPv6 could be as simple as having an http proxy server
which sends (fake) IPv6 XFF headers.
By fake, I mean that there's not even a need for the client to
actually use that IPv6 address, so long as each user
revisions to
delete/oversight, that's still a viable solution.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
It wouldn't be trivial, but it wouldn't be particularly hard either.
Most of the work is already being done. It's just being done
inefficiently.
I'm glad to see
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
Why isn't this being used for the dumps?
Well, the relevant code is totally unrelated, so the question is sort
of a non sequitur
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Happy-melon happy-me...@live.com wrote:
Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote in message
news:AANLkTi=uk+uf3y_b+zld57wcfuef_7rf-bt8tnvtg...@mail.gmail.com...
No, that's not the question. The question is why are you
uncompressing and undiffing (from DiffHistoryBlobs
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se wrote:
Many articles are soo long, and have been edited so many
times, that the history view is almost useless. If I want
to find out when and how the sentence Overall, the city
is relatively flatin the article [[en:Paris]] has
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Alex Brollo alex.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/17 Bryan Tong Minh bryan.tongm...@gmail.com
Difficult, but doable. Jan-Paul's sentence-level editing tool is able
to make the distinction. It would perhaps be possible to use that as a
framework for
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
And to recognize what's going on when a sentence changes *and* is
moved from one paragraph to another, requires an even greater level of
natural language understanding. Again though, you can probably get it
right most
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Magnus Manske
magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
A quick update on WYSIFTW, my augmented wikitext editor. (Please see
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WYSIFTW for details.)
Shouldn't it be WYSIFWT?
___
Wikitech-l
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Ariel T. Glenn ar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Στις 01-01-2011, ημέρα Σαβ, και ώρα 16:42 +, ο/η David Gerard
έγραψε:
On 31 December 2010 17:09, Ariel T. Glenn ar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'd like all the dumps from all the projects to be on line. Being
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, I emailed to Anthony how he can upload it.
Transfer is in progress. ETA about 10 hours. md5sum is
30c9b48de3ede527289bcdb810126723
Hopefully there aren't any problems as I'm not quite sure how to
resume upload
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Ariel T. Glenn ar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Anthony:
We would like to get copies of any of these dumps as well. This
includes any of the other files: stubs, tables, the lot.
If you have them for other languages or other time periods, that would
be great
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
Would be nice having an additional md5sum file for the uncompressed dumps.
Yes.
Here's what I found on my SATA and USB drives. I haven't had a chance
to go through my IDE drives - that would take a while as I don't yet
File transfer is done. Thanks for helping with the transfer.
Anthony
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote:
If it fails i can give you access on others ways, its a dedicated
server that doesn't have a job right now...
2010/12/31, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org
...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I think they are the same!
Is there any method to download it?
Thanks very much!!
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
You talking about enwiki?
I have enwiki-20080724-pages-articles.xml.bz2. Nothing for 20080726.
On Wed, Dec 29
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
I just asked Dreamhost if they would give me permission to violate
their TOS for this one time one file.
And the person who responded just told me that he's not authorized to
give me permission to do that.
So, any volunteers
You talking about enwiki?
I have enwiki-20080724-pages-articles.xml.bz2. Nothing for 20080726.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Monica shu monicashu...@gmail.com wrote:
@_...@...
Thanks any way:)
Anyone else hands up?
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
A:
It's easy to get fast results if you don't care about your reads being
atomic (*), and I find it hard to believe they've managed to get
atomic reads without going through MySQL.
MySQL upper layers know
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Nikola Smolenski smole...@eunet.rs wrote:
I have recently encountered this text in which the author claims very
high MySQL speedups for simple queries (7.5 times faster than MySQL,
twice faster than memcached) by reading the data directly from InnoDB
where
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Andrew Dunbar hippytr...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way I'm keen to find something similar for .7z
I've written something similar for .xz, which uses LZMA2 same as .7z.
It creates a virtual read-only filesystem using FUSE (the FUSE part is
in perl, which uses pipes
a day.
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org wrote:
You can find all the md5sums at
http://download.wikipedia.org/enwiki/20100130/enwiki-20100130-md5sums.txt
--tomasz
Anthony wrote:
Got an md5sum?
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Tomasz Finc tf
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Q overlo...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 4/8/2010 4:28 PM, Anthony wrote:
I'd like to add that the md5 of the *uncompressed* file is
cd4eee6d3d745ce716db2931c160ee35 . That's what I got from both the
uncompressed 7z
Got an md5sum?
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I love lzma compression.
enwiki-20100130-pages-meta-history.xml.bz2 280.3 GB
enwiki-20100130-pages-meta-history.xml.7z 31.9 GB
Download at http://tinyurl.com/yeelbse
Enjoy!
--tomasz
Tomasz Finc
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Nevertheless - a process isn't the same process when it's going at 10x
the speed. This'll be interesting.
not 10x. I did concurrent benchmarks for API requests (e.g. opensearch) on
modern boxes, and saw:
HipHop:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.comwrote:
It showed that there was quite a bit of bathwater thrown out. And at
least
one very large baby (Google translation), which was temporarily
resurrected. We still don't know how many other, smaller, babies were
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.comwrote:
It showed that there was quite a bit of bathwater thrown out. And at
least
one very large baby (Google translation), which was temporarily
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi!
from now on specific per-bot/per-software/per-client User-Agent header is
mandatory for contacting Wikimedia sites.
Domas
Hi,
Whose decision was this? Were Erik, Sue, or Danese involved?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi!
Whose decision was this?
Mine.
Were Erik, Sue, or Danese involved?
No.
Cool. Who's your boss, and who's your boss's boss? Sorry, I couldn't find
you in the org chart or I'd just have looked that up
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Cool. Who's your boss, and who's your boss's boss? Sorry, I couldn't
find
you in the org chart or I'd just have looked that up myself.
Nobody?
Really? Were you doing this work as a contractor, or as a
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.comwrote:
No idea. For ages you've been able to just go onto the Wikimedia servers
and change whatever you feel like, and answer to nobody? You must be
misunderstanding my question or something.
Kind of. Isn't that a good
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Ariel T. Glenn ar...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
In fact some WMF paid employees (including me) were in the channel at
that time and agreed with the decision. It seemed then and still seems
to me a reasonable course of action given the circumstances. I
understand
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Presumably some percentage of that 20-50% will come back as the
spammers realize they have to supply the string. Presumably we
then start playing whack-a-mole.
Yes, we will ban all IPs participating in this.
Anyway, you probably are missing one important point.
We're trying to make Wikipedia's service better.
I'm sure you are. But that doesn't mean I agree with your methods.
Probably everything looks easier from your armchair. I'd love to have that
view! :)
Then stop volunteering.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:47 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Probably everything looks easier from your armchair. I'd love to have
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:18 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
With this solution, it is now possible to determine how much of the
traffic was from valid services. i.e. google translate and other
useful services will identify themselves
And what separates google translate from
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
I think it's common knowledge among people who have been reading these
lists for a long time, that Anthony has a serious deficit in his
sarcasm detection department, and often gives inappropriate responses
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org wrote:
New snapshot ready.
http://download.wikipedia.org/enwiki/20100116
And the history dump, which had run for a month and a half and looked like
it was going to actually complete for the first time in years, is now
broken.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Steve Sanbeg ssan...@ask.com wrote:
After the last batch of problems were fixed, enwiki was getting dumped
almost weekly. But there was no dump in December, and since it seems to
be held up dumping the full history with an ETA of Jan 22nd, it seems like
it
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.comsimetrical%2bwikil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
Isn't that what the system immutable flag is for?
No, that's for confusing the real roots while providing only
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.comsimetrical%2bwikil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
Depends on the machine's securelevel.
Google informs me that securelevel is a BSD feature. Wikimedia uses
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.comsimetrical%2bwikil...@gmail.com
wrote:
The sensible bandwidth-saving way to do it would be to set up an rsync
daemon on the image servers, and let people use that.
The bandwidth-saving way to do things would be to
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
Yea, well, you can't easily eliminate all the internal points of
failure. someone with root loses control of their access and someone
nasty wipes everything is really hard to protect against with online
systems.
Isn't
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Why do people treat regular capacity planning as problems.
Well, your original post implied that lack of new hardware could hold things
up.
Still, we need new hardware, and as long as it is procured and deployed,
we'd
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:22 AM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Please read my comment over again: I can't imagine this is a query
you want to run over and over again. If it is, you'd probably want to
use partitioning.
Which would make sense if no other queries are being
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane g...@endpoint.com wrote:
I'll resist the urge to say too much more on this thread right now, and
go back to watching from the sidelines.
I'm probably done myself. I just wanted to point out a few factual
errors in Mr. Mituzas' email. I'm
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
