I have a small (6U or so) wall mount rack I would let go for a
song. I have had it on the floor for the past year or so. I can send pics
if interested.
Justin
--
Justin S. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Access - WISP Consulting - Tower Climbing
Web: http://www.mtin.net
Web:
All,
I recall there was some interest in a German manufactured handheld
spectrum analyzer last summer(cost about 1K). Some on the list were
going to pool their resources to make a overseas order.
Did that ever happen? Does anyone have one of those units?? How does it work?
--
WISPA Wireless
On Mon, November 27, 2006 11:43 am, rabbtux rabbtux wrote:
I recall there was some interest in a German manufactured handheld
spectrum analyzer last summer(cost about 1K). Some on the list were
going to pool their resources to make a overseas order.
You're thinking of the Spectran analyzers,
If you're speaking of the Spectran, I have one and it doesn't seem to
work too well for me. The issue for me is that there seems to be not
enough resolution to be working with the reletively low power
unliscensed systems as we do. I'm sure for paging and gsm it's great but
after trying
http://www.sda-asia.com/sda/features/psecom,id,764,srn,2,nodeid,4,_language,Singapore.html
Wi-Fi Faces New Patent Woes
A federal judge in Tyler, Texas, ruled last week that an Australian government
agency holds the rights to patents on the underlying technology used in two
Wi-Fi standards
Peter R. wrote:
The question remains why the Australian organisation is deciding to
pursue this patent at this stage in the market. While companies must
be able to reap the rewards of their own research and development,
there also must be consideration for the positive effects that low
Wireless broadband security issues have now officially led to my
business being put into a bad light due to perceived lack of security. I
am a member of a regional broadband planning group that is working with
health care and other industry sectors to help deliver broadband options
to all
I've been wonderin about this same thing. I've always blown it off
and won the argument but
Where's the HIPAA cert stuff to be found ?
Like, exact checklists ?
R
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Monday, November
US Distributors,
Are any of you planning on stepping up to stock/carry WAR533 boards
w/embedded StarOS V3, for better US availabilty?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
I can expand on this, but would that be considered a vendor pitch ?
(discussion will include product capabilities, etc)
-Charles
---
WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
Coming to a City Near You
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Well said!
Dennis Burgess, MCP, CCNA, A+, N+, Mikrotik Certified
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.2kwireless.com
2K Wireless provides high-speed internet access, along with network
consulting for WISPs, and business's with a focus on TCP/IP networking,
security, and Mikrotik routers.
-Original
HIPAA is NOT your responsibility. It is the responsibility of the
hospital/health care entity to make sure that they are HIPAA compliant
at the point where they connect to the Internet. If they are unable to
make that distinction, then doing business with them is asking for
trouble because
Looks like there are some in Ca.
http://cgi.govliquidation.com/auction/view?auctionId=1051228convertTo=USD
laters,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)
John, this is a common question of a vastly misunderstood issue. And
while I do not purport to be an expert on HIPAA, I have encountered the
question many times.
There is no such thing as being HIPAA compliant from a hardware
standpoint. Rather, HIPAA addresses how information is handled as it
Great questions, Marlon!
You are correct that it is application/data encryption needed, not
transport security.
Every hospital has a HIPAA Officer. Talk to that person. By 2009, they
all have to have EMR and HIPPA compliance, along with some EDI with
health insurance payers.
- Peter
Good luck Rick. Last I looked there was no clear outline
Bob
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Rick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:23:15
To:'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Wireless Security biting you in
John
To the best of my knowledge there are no HIPPA compliant solutions that are
actually approved
We have installed a ton of links for hospitals and other medical facilities an
this issur comes up from time to time. We pretty much tell the customer that we
are just a carrier and we encrypt
I think its important to understand where the client's fear comes from. Its
thinking that they are opening their network wide up.
HIPPA is making a client process compliant not the hardware itself, as just
mentioned by someone. But one of the processes is what network policies does
the
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HIPPA compliance should beUp to the network administrator. Not the
carrier IMHO.
This is not a matter of opinion. It is factual.
--
Butch Evans
Network Engineering and Security Consulting
573-276-2879
http://www.butchevans.com/
Mikrotik
I have a customer who works from home transcribing mammogram notes from
doctors into their system. Their IT department put a Cisco VPN router at
the client side to connect to their VPN at the imaging center. We discussed
HIPPA, and they were not worried about my side at all as they were
I have a few hospital employees working at home across my wireless system.
They vpn into the hospital and we don't do anything special for them.
One reason that they tell the employees to use us is because we service
them quickly when they have an issue.
I will agree that we've lost work
Are you suggesting single DES? I wouldn't recommend that. Go with 3DES or
AES.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - 2K Wireless
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 5:33 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Wireless
BTW, we're going to try to work out something with the local hospital for
data storage. We want to do off site backup for them. Via a dedicated link
to a server that never touches the internet!
I'll be working on physical security of the server as well as the transport
needs. Issues like
Travis,
What's the illegality?
Are they using 5150 - 5250 (indoor use only)?
Are they exceeding + 30 dBm EIRP on either the AP or the SM?
jack
Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
Curious to everyone's thoughts about a regional WISP installing illegal
CPE units? They are using Last Mile Gear
There are two very distinct issues in thos post...
One is using a third party antenna, with a radio, that it is not certified
with, and installing an uncertified system.
Two is running a equipment above allowable EIRPs.
As for one, as you have mentioned to me before, installing a StarOS or
It does not matter if the responsibility is the network admin or not
when it comes down to purchase time. It comes down to perception. Right
now perception of the hospital corporate officers is that wireless = not
secure. I have been told by people who order circuits that they are not
allowed
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HIPPA compliance should beUp to the network administrator. Not the
carrier IMHO.
This is not a matter of opinion. It is factual.
I never doubted this. I just need to find someway to make the corporate
people believe they can use my wireless
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, John Scrivner wrote:
I never doubted this. I just need to find someway to make the
corporate people believe they can use my wireless transport to
deliver an end to end solution that will be HIPAA compliant with my
service located in the center. Passing the buck is not the
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, John Scrivner wrote:
Wireless broadband security issues have now officially led to my
business being put into a bad light due to perceived lack of
security. I am a member of a regional broadband planning group that
is working with health care and other industry sectors to
Do a google search for wwwlook at the first link...
;-)
--
Butch Evans
Network Engineering and Security Consulting
573-276-2879
http://www.butchevans.com/
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
(http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html)
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Yahoo?
Butch Evans wrote:
Do a google search for wwwlook at the first link...
;-)
--
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
You'd think google would be first
Butch Evans wrote:
Do a google search for wwwlook at the first link...
;-)
--
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
W3c ? 2nd came yahoo ...
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 10:06 PM
To: Wispa List
It is HIPAA - The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
It covers way more than just encrypting data. Like Pat said, it is a
process. Even paper records have to have a chain of command and
security. So when you see the files in the reception area at your
doctor's office, unless
Hmm, my page came with yahoo 1st and w3c 2nd. here's what I got:
Web Results 1 - 100 of about 4,030,000,000 English pages for www
[definition]. (0.24 seconds)
Yahoo!
Welcome to Yahoo!, the world's most visited home page. Quickly find what
you're searching for, get in touch with friends and
You're right. Perception is everything. So I picked up two things from this
thread. One, why is the onus on me to prove my network is secure? Break into
it or you're just passing on hot air from uninformed or biased sources. Two,
I can offer transport on a private network that doesn't touch the
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Gino A. Villarini wrote:
W3c ? 2nd came yahoo ...
When I accidentally did that search, Yahoo was the first.
--
Butch Evans
Network Engineering and Security Consulting
573-276-2879
http://www.butchevans.com/
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
IMO it comes down to if/how they are affecting you and what you want
them to do about it? You could persuade or force them to move everything
to another freq. which may/may not end up being in your favor. If your
trying to get them to give-up and shut the doors...I can't forsee that
pursuit
Funny. But then again maybe the perception was, if they were already using
google, why would they need to find it?
Whats interesting is that if you do a Yahoo search for www Google still
doesn;t come up :-)
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
-
Of course they aren't going to vounteer to shut down. But the FCC will
inforce the rules, and shut them down, if they are illegally operating, and
causing harm.
They just have better things to do than go on wild goose chases, so you have
to deliver proof. I don;t know about you, but if the FCC
Private network
Great point. Its one of our biggest selling points for multi-location
businesses. It like having their own private network engineered for them.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: cw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
George Rogato wrote:
Hmm, my page came with yahoo 1st and w3c 2nd. here's what I got:
(yahoo being first)
Google tries to provide results that will be relevant to their users,
and Yahoo! is one of the biggest and most popular sites on the Web.
Honestly, it just looks like Google is doing
I drove through Pahrump the day before yesterday on my way from Lake
Havasu to Death Valley for the last night of my vacation. Don't
worry, we're safe.
LOL
;)
At 07:27 PM 11/20/2006, you wrote:
http://andyabramson.blogs.com/voipwatch/2006/11/att_hooking_wim.html
We've done it two ways:
1. Electric - Power converter/charger -12V Batteries - DC regulator
- DC radios: no AC power adapters
2. Electric - Power converter/charger -12V Batteries - DC regulator
- DC-to-AC converter - AC power adapters
so we use the DC setup to isolate AC lightning
What I have seen is that if you ping google.com, your results will vary
based on your DNS server. The results (especially the order) seem to
vary slightly between
72.14.203.104 (www.google.com) [returns yahoo.com]
64.233.167.99 (www.google.com) [www returns w3.org] and
72.14.203.99
Back to your problem: Wireless = Unsecure.
You have a Marketing problem.
The onus is on you to get him to tell you why your network is unsecure.
Objections are made to be hurdled, after all.
Explaining that cable and DSL are LAN based topologies is not going to
help you.
You need describe
Me? I'd make a few calls about it.
First to them. It's amazing how often management doesn't know the rules.
If that won't fix it, I'd call Motorola.
If that doesn't work, I'd call the FCC.
The last thing this industry needs is people screwing with the one thing
that the FCC has been a
Scriv,
I carry 2 hospitals and 4 clinics in N. Louisiana and are their primary
internet connections. We had this discussion last year and a simple VPN from
their router to my core router was more than sufficient to meet HIPPA
guidelines. HIPPA compliance is a very vague area!
Mac Dearman
funnier thing is, the view source' pages of those top 10 returns hardly
have ANY www solo keywords in them...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 9:51 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
That's what I'm saying. They would likely end up moving to another
frequency of which may pose more harm to Travis's current network. Not
that he should be scared because Trango kicks Canopy's butt right?! :-)
Jon Langeler
Michwave Tech.
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Of course they aren't going to
I had another ISP borrow a trango radio to do a training session at the
local college
for their hosted medical application. They connected the trango to the
network, and then
ran a Cisco IPSEC connection over it using PIX firewalls. That was enough
to satisfy
the HIPAA requirements.
R
Only one warning in that advice. If the FCC takes any interest which they
ususally don't (think CB) the first one they will require testing on is you.
We had a person running 40 watts and a quick call around found that the FCC
likes to make sure the complaintant is also above board. We've
52 matches
Mail list logo
