You can do tag swapping and other fancy VLAN tricks in AirOS by
creating VLAN subints and mapping them to each other using bridge
interfaces.
The Linux bridge interface behaves more like a switch than a bridge
in that you can control mac aging, learning, etc so it doesn't blindly
forward traffic.
to home-run some more cable,
but so is life.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2012 1:44:24 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA
On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 23:16 -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
Of course they fit the networks they're capable of, because
they're capable of so little. ;-) I'm honestly working to
remove all the RB250s from my house's network as they've
become too annoying. I'll have to home-run some more cable,
Hey Fred, we did exactly that with our Hardee County Network, we use licensed
links between MEF switches. Rapid deployment with fiber forward design.
I think we have been through all configurations, bridging, routing and layer2
switching. You could not hit the nail on the head any better
Of Dustin Jurman
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Radios as routers
Hey Fred, we did exactly that with our Hardee County Network, we use licensed
links between MEF switches. Rapid deployment with fiber forward design.
I
Hi Fred,
Could you expand a bit on this? It sounds like you're describing what
I'd refer to as virtual circuits rather than switching. Are you
setting up per-customer VLANs or something like that?
TD
On 10/11/2012 06:35 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
Switching, though, is what Frame Relay and
At 10/12/2012 10:23 AM, Tim Densmore wrote:
Hi Fred,
Could you expand a bit on this? It sounds like you're describing what
I'd refer to as virtual circuits rather than switching. Are you
setting up per-customer VLANs or something like that?
It helps if you think of it as Ethernet-framed Frame
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 10:52 -0400, Fred Goldstein wrote:
There's a real market gap not quite being filled by our usual WISP
vendors MT and UBNT. MT has a new CPE router with SFP support. This
would be great for a regional CE fiber network. Let's say you have a
building (say, Town Hall)
At 10/12/2012 05:48 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 10:52 -0400, Fred Goldstein wrote:
There's a real market gap not quite being filled by our usual WISP
vendors MT and UBNT. MT has a new CPE router with SFP support. This
would be great for a regional CE fiber network. Let's
Being a Technical person, and a visual learner.. I am having trouble
translating what Fred is trying to do with a Mikrotik, which he thinks
it cannot do.
We build our Fixed wireless pop's with a Mikrotik Router doing the
Routing Functions at each pop.
Each of the Sectors are connected on their
At 10/12/2012 07:06 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
Being a Technical person, and a visual learner.. I am having trouble
translating what Fred is trying to do with a Mikrotik, which he thinks
it cannot do.
Actually, I said that I don't know how to do it, not that it can or
cannot be done. It may be a
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Arthur Stephens
arthur.steph...@ptera.net wrote:
We currently use Ubiquiti radios in bridge mode and assign a ip address to
the customers router.
He have heard other wisp are using the Ubiquiti radio as a router.
Would like feed back why one would do this when
Faisal Imtiaz
On 10/12/2012 7:19 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
At 10/12/2012 07:06 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
Being a Technical person, and a visual learner.. I am having trouble
translating what Fred is trying to do with a Mikrotik, which he thinks
it cannot do.
Actually, I said that I don't
NAT at the at a couple of towers, but not at the CPE.
On 10/11/2012 6:52 PM, Sam Tetherow wrote:
Not sure I under stand the no-NAT, so every device on the other side
of the CPE has it's own public IP?
On 10/11/2012 4:53 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
We run MT, not UBNT, CPE, but it doesn't matter
MT has several devices with hardware switches on board and fully
accessible through the GUI. They also have a switch sort of based on ROS.
On 10/11/2012 8:35 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
At 10/11/2012 06:52 PM, SamT wrote:
Not sure I under stand the no-NAT, so every device on the other side
of
What is being described is the default behavior of any standard managed
switch. There is no virtual circuit being built and it still
broadcasts across said VLAN. They are simply only allowing the VLAN to
go from point A to point B. This though can be done at wire speed in the
hardware of any
Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com
To: fai...@snappydsl.net, WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 6:19:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Radios as routers
At 10/12/2012 07:06 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
Being a Technical person, and a visual learner.. I am having trouble
Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 8:16:43 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Radios as routers
NAT at the at a couple of towers, but not at the CPE.
On 10/11
All MT switching is junk.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 8:18:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Radios as routers
Mike Hammett duly noted,
Fred, I don't think most of the people here understand what YOU'RE
talking about. They think a switch is just a switch and they're all
the same, but that's far from the truth.
Probably true, which is why I'd like to clarify it. Vendors who sell
primarily to ISPs
My boss just picked up a Rocket M2 and a few PicoStation 2s for a free WiFi
access point situation.
Basically, it's going to be a star grid running WDS from the Rocket to each
Pico with AP access at each location.
My problem is the Rocket doesn't seem to want to do AP-Repeater for some
reason,
? What makes you think the Rocket is acting as a station?
First, can you define a few? The suggestion of what you want to do
is almost certainly a bad idea and will result in poor performance
unless you are only planning to feed the main AP with a meg or two.
None-the-less. If you insist
to point to the Rocket.
I've tried both 5.5 and 5.5.2 firmware without any luck.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 9:51 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti
any luck.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 9:51 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti - quick question
? What makes you think the Rocket is acting
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:09 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti - quick question
With just the rocket on it isn't acting as an AP? You've got something
misconfigured then.
Can you attach a screenshot
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti - quick question
With just the rocket on it isn't acting as an AP? You've got something
misconfigured then.
Can you attach a screenshot of your MAIN Rocket tab as well as the
WIRELESS tab?
On 10/11/12 10:02 AM, Eric Tykwinski wrote:
Not my
We currently use Ubiquiti radios in bridge mode and assign a ip address to
the customers router.
He have heard other wisp are using the Ubiquiti radio as a router.
Would like feed back why one would do this when it appears customers would
be double natted when they hook up their routers?
Or does
Very few customers know any difference.
On 10/11/2012 3:46 PM, Arthur Stephens wrote:
We currently use Ubiquitiradios in bridge mode and
assign a ip address to the customers router.
He have heard other wisp are using theUbiquitiradio as a
Almost all of my customers have NAT'ed Ubnt CPE radios. The handful that
need a static get charged for it (or free if business) and then I do the
port forwrading for them.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at
We run Ubiquiti CPE in router mode and it acts as the NAT router for
the customer. We install a wifi router inside as part of standard
install package, but just run it as a switch+AP. This gives us more
visibility into customer network for troubleshooting and abuse
detection (why does this house
PCS-WIN / RC-WiFihttp://www.rcwifi.com/
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Arthur Stephens
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 3:47 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Radios as routers
We currently use Ubiquiti radios in bridge mode
We do it because it makes customer maintenance a lot easier. They can
replace/remove their router without having to call the office or
changing settings in their computer or router, everything comes with
DHCP enabled default. There are very few places where the customer will
ever know. If
We run MT, not UBNT, CPE, but it doesn't matter what brand it is. We run
them in as routers, but do not NAT. Same benefits others mentioned for
routing, just one fewer NAT. Never have a problem with it this way and
can't see any good reason to NAT there.
On 10/11/2012 3:46 PM, Arthur
I did this for the first time last week. It seems to work fine.
On 10/11/2012 12:46 PM, Arthur Stephens
wrote:
We currently use Ubiquitiradios in bridge mode and
assign a ip address to the customers router.
He have heard other wisp are using
Not sure I under stand the no-NAT, so every device on the other side of
the CPE has it's own public IP?
On 10/11/2012 4:53 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
We run MT, not UBNT, CPE, but it doesn't matter what brand it is. We
run them in as routers, but do not NAT. Same benefits others
mentioned for
At 10/11/2012 06:52 PM, SamT wrote:
Not sure I under stand the no-NAT, so every device on the other side
of the CPE has it's own public IP?
There could be one NAT, at the access point.
My taste, which to be sure I haven't tested at scale in a wireless
network (but plan to), is to follow what
Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 7:35:53 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Radios as routers
At 10/11/2012 06:52 PM, SamT wrote:
Not sure I under stand
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:55:18AM -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
We have had many Ubiquiti radios that if they have more than 100
days uptime, you have to reboot them BEFORE doing a firmware upgrade
or else when they come
Hi all
I see that Ubiquiti is launching a new product, a router.
Well, personally, I do not think that it's a good idea, hard market and
I really do not see a real reason why I should buy the Ubiquiti router
instead of other well knows products
From my perspective the value or a core/edge
They hired the Vyatta engineers, it's basically running Vyatta. It's even
stated as such on their forums...
Regards,
Chuck
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Paolo Di Francesco
paolo.difrance...@level7.it wrote:
Hi all
I see that Ubiquiti is launching a new product, a router.
Well,
Are people going to be able to tolerate the bleeding-edge cycle of
bugs/firmware updates that has been the history with their wireless gear?
Once again they're breaking new ground, this time with low cost/high pps
throughput. Will they be able to make it powerful (rich feature set) *and*easy?
Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Chuck Hogg
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 11:14 AM
To: paolo.difrance...@level7.it; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
They hired
My comments? Why would I *NOT* buy a Ubiquiti router? Ubiquiti
equipment is pretty rock stable once the infantile bugs get worked out.
Right now I use MikroTik routers and I find their lack of support, and
ignoring of bugs to be a HUGE problem. Have you frequented the forums?
Try posting
...@level7.it; WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
They hired the Vyatta engineers, it's basically running Vyatta. It's
even stated as such on their forums...
Regards,
Chuck
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Paolo Di Francesco
paolo.difrance
Greg,
I don't ever recall seeing bleeding-edge firmware with bugs released
from Ubiquiti unless you mean the betas? But that's what they
are... betas. Since 5.3.3 up to the current 5.5.2 release I haven't
had any problems with the final releases of software.
I can't count the number of
Hi Matt,
As an edge/border router? Will it take full IPv4 and IPv6 tables? Has
anyone seen what it takes to tip one over with PPS? I'm not sure about
these answers for Tiks, either, but positioning a software-based gui-box
as an edge router seems like a recipe for disaster to me. I want to
Sorry... I don't agree that Ubiquiti is in the same category as Cisco or
Motorola. I have Cisco switches and routers with 5+ YEARS of uptime. My
main Cisco switch is moving over 1500Mbps of graphic daily and has been
up for over 2+ years.
We have had many Ubiquiti radios that if they have more
It's a good idea to reboot ANYTHING that has been up that long before doing a
firmware upgrade.
On Sep 14, 2012, at 11:52, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
Sorry... I don't agree that Ubiquiti is in the same category as Cisco or
Motorola. I have Cisco switches and routers with 5+ YEARS
That's only with a Linux Kernel used before Airos 5.5. That's gone now.
Also I don't believe it has anything to do with firmware upgrades, least
not that I saw.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:52 AM,
It doesn't have to be GUI driven. You can configure it via CLI just like any
other router. To that argument a Cisco can be setup with a GUI - but most
people don't.
I don't have the numbers handy but there was a Tolly report that came out
showing the PPS I believe.
On Sep 14, 2012, at
I must live on a different planet, but there are products that Ubiquiti has
failed on over the years and has EOL'd the product as a result. Look at
GPS Sync in the RM5/RM2 product lines. Look at ToughCable L1/L2. Look at
LiteStations. Wonder why they are EOL? I give praise to UBNT when praise
So there have been a few lemons. They got or are getting resolved. Don't focus
on the few failures. Look at all the products and the huge success!
The EdgeRouters are already being used by a few people and the reviews are
great.
On Sep 14, 2012, at 12:01, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com
At 9/14/2012 11:38 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
They are focusing on their core product (wireless). The team there has
not been taken to any other projects. Rather, the income from the
wireless has generated enough profits that they can hire NEW teams in
order to be able to expand their product lines.
The war started 5 years ago in Orlando when Mike Ford was removed from the
MUM and was told that MikroTik had no interest in a working relationship
with UBNT. At that time UBNT was only focused on miniPCI radios and trying
to have an open/working relationship with MikroTik/StarOS. I think after
The GUI wasn't meant to be the focus of my question, sorry if it was a
distraction. I see that they're comparing the edgemax to the 3900 now,
so nevermind. Edge means something different to me than it means
other (marketing?) folks, apparently.
Positioned against the 3900, especially
Have you seen the Tolly testing reports?
I suggest you take a look at the comparison to Mikrotik, Cisco, and Juniper.
http://tolly.com/ts/2012/Ubiquiti/Ed...VsMikroTik.pdf
http://tolly.com/ts/2012/Ubiquiti/Ed...erformance.pdf___
Wireless mailing list
That's PPS per dollar. When I spend $100 or $200 for a router at each
tower site, I'm not worried about the PPS per dollar, I want the feature
set of Mikrotik. Otherwise I would just put in a mini-itx board with Linux
and some static routes.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct:
You don't upgrade firmware on your Ciscos? :-p
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson t...@ida.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 10:52:32 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA
Densmore tdensm...@tarpit.cybermesa.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 10:45:59 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
Hi Matt,
As an edge/border router? Will it take full IPv4 and IPv6 tables? Has
anyone seen what it takes
...@midwaynet.netmailto:jbows...@midwaynet.net
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 11:33 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
That's PPS per dollar. When I spend $100
Did you look at both documents?
It also compares a whole lot of performance.
And don't forget that it is comparing the Lite version which will be the
smallest unit they have.
I agree on your feature set comment, but
features can be added, it's Vyatta with a Debian base, UBNT custom GUI, and
Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 11:06:32 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
At 9/14/2012 11:38 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote
@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 11:33:03 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
That's PPS per dollar. When I spend $100 or $200 for a router at each tower
site, I'm not worried about the PPS per dollar, I want the feature set of
Mikrotik. Otherwise I would
I will say we've had a higher instance of lightning problems with ubnt gear
than our moto gear.
Time will tell...
- Original Message -
From: Matt Hoppes
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
Sorry... I don't agree that Ubiquiti is in the same category as Cisco or
Motorola. I have Cisco switches and routers with 5+ YEARS of uptime. My
main Cisco switch is moving over 1500Mbps of graphic daily and has been
up
very true.
+1
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Hogg
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
I must live on a different planet, but there are products that Ubiquiti has
failed on over
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 11:01:33 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
I must live on a different planet, but there are products that Ubiquiti has
failed on over the years and has EOL'd the product as a result. Look at GPS
Sync in the RM5
How many of you remember how long it took the Mikrotik product to become
truly stable? I didn't feel 100% comfortable with wired routing until
version 3.x. Wireless was kinda flaky until 3.x as well. 4.x really
improved things.
It's all about software. At least UBNT has a great knowledge base to
hah, agreed.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 12:13:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another
Not to mention nstreme and WDS would associate but upon ANY load would
drop. Boy was I pissed that they let you configure it in a way that was
never actually possible. At least Ubnt doesn't let you select things in
the GUI that absolutely won't work.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct:
Date: 9/14/2012 9:32:18 AM
To: WISPA General List; paolo.difrance...@level7.it
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
Hmm lately they (UBNT) seem like a sidewalk salesman selling anything from
show cones to tennis shoesÂ… IMHO they should focus on the core products
Its
, 2012 12:19:23 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
The thing that amazes me is that they have a hit with their wireless gear and
surveillance line. They can not even keep up with production on either
line..
Why UBNT is determined to sell
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
They are focusing on their core product (wireless). The team there has
not been taken to any other projects. Rather, the income from the
wireless has generated
and
actually taking down Canopy FSK to replace it with UBNT 2X2
~Doug
---Original Message---
From: Matt Hoppes
Date: 9/14/2012 9:42:32 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
Greg,
I don't ever recall seeing bleeding-edge firmware
and would rather UBNT put all
their efforts into developing faster radio technology.
Best,
Brad
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Doug Clark
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 12:30 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product
Just had a RocketM5 running 5.5.2 hang up and need a powercycle to come back
to life two days ago. Maybe it has something to do with Utah
---Original Message---
From: Brad Belton
Date: 9/14/2012 11:41:59 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product
up and need a powercycle to
come back to life two days ago. Maybe it has something to do with Utah
*---Original Message---*
*From:* Brad Belton b...@belwave.com
*Date:* 9/14/2012 11:41:59 AM
*To:* 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next
Clark
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 12:30 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product
another router
...@level7.it mailto:paolo.difrance...@level7.it
/*Subject:*/ Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
Hmm lately they (UBNT) seem like a sidewalk salesman selling anything
from show cones to tennis shoes… IMHO they should focus on the core
products
Its like the VC approach
to come
back to life two days ago. Maybe it has something to do with Utah
/---Original Message---/
/*From:*/ Brad Belton mailto:b...@belwave.com
/*Date:*/ 9/14/2012 11:41:59 AM
/*To:*/ 'WISPA General List' mailto:wireless@wispa.org
/*Subject:*/ Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product
] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 12:47 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
Probably a PEBKAC =)
Are you putting them on batteries? Are you regulating the voltage?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
You know it! All my towers are easy to get to and within 20 minutes of my
office. I know better than to put towers on top of 9000 ft mountains like
you guys.
---Original Message---
From: Matt
Date: 9/14/2012 11:58:33 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 11:20 -0400, Greg Ihnen wrote:
Once again they're breaking new ground, this time with low cost/high
pps throughput. Will they be able to make it powerful (rich feature
set) and easy?
Of course it will be easy! It says right on their page that the
Advanced UI
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
Matt, Have to disagree with you here. UBNT equipment does not just run..
It locks up for no reason and requires a power cycle in order to come back.
If you want equipment that JUST
] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 11:46 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
I want the feature set, but I also want performance. Neither company has
approved 10Gigabit systems out yet.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent
/---Original Message---/
/*From:*/ Matt Hoppes mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com
/*Date:*/ 9/14/2012 9:42:32 AM
/*To:*/ WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org
/*Subject:*/ Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
Greg,
I don't ever recall seeing bleeding-edge firmware
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
Matt, Have to disagree with you here. UBNT equipment does not just
run..
It locks up for no reason and requires a power cycle in order to
come back.
If you want equipment that JUST RUNS and requires
: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
** **
Matt, Have to disagree with you here. UBNT equipment does not just
run..
It locks up for no reason and requires a power cycle in order to come back.
If you want equipment that JUST RUNS and requires no baby
.
---Original Message---
From: Gino Villarini
Date: 9/14/2012 9:32:18 AM
To: WISPA General List ; paolo.difrance...@level7.it
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
Hmm lately they (UBNT) seem like a sidewalk salesman selling anything from
show cones to tennis shoes
/---Original Message---/
/*From:*/ Matt Hoppes mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com
mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com
/*Date:*/ 9/14/2012 9:42:32 AM
/*To:*/ WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org
mailto:wireless@wispa.org
/*Subject:*/ Re: [WISPA
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
** **
They hired the Vyatta engineers, it's basically running Vyatta. It's even
stated as such on their forums...
Regards,
Chuck
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Paolo Di Francesco
paolo.difrance...@level7
+1
---Original Message---
From: Chuck Hogg
Date: 9/14/2012 12:18:10 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
Let's take a look at the SR2. It was poorly designed to have a rf switch
chip that changed between u.fl and mmcx
they are
the largest disto in the US.
Streakwave.
*---Original Message---*
*From:* Ben Moore benjahmo...@gmail.com
*Date:* 9/14/2012 12:50:15 PM
*To:* WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
Hi Doug,
Which
.
*---Original Message---*
*From:* Ben Moore benjahmo...@gmail.com
*Date:* 9/14/2012 12:50:15 PM
*To:* WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
Hi Doug,
Which products are you having a hard time finding?
Thanks,
Ben
On Fri
...@mtin.net
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
I've never seen encryption issues when using UBNT gear to UBNT gear.
Regardless, you should run it because it limits the paths where someone
COULD sniff your customer's traffic. Even if your upstream isn't
encrypted, you
Cc: Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
I've never seen encryption issues when using UBNT gear to UBNT gear.
Regardless, you should run it because it limits the paths where someone
COULD sniff your customer's traffic. Even if your
] On
Behalf Of Ben Moore
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 1:49 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
Hi Mike,
Definitely more work to be done on the cameras...They are being used
successfully, but there is definitely work to be done and hardware
:49 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
** **
Hi Mike,
Definitely more work to be done on the cameras...They are being used
successfully, but there is definitely work to be done and hardware added.
Thanks,
Ben
On Fri, Sep
...@gmail.com
*Date:* 9/14/2012 12:50:15 PM
*To:* WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
Hi Doug,
Which products are you having a hard time finding?
Thanks,
Ben
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Doug Clark d...@txox.com wrote
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 1:08:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti next product another router?
We have a dual port 10GigE module for the Powerouter 2200 series.
Thx,
Jim Patient
Link Technologies, Inc.
314-735-0270 x102
http://wlan1.com
http://towercoverage.com
http://www.linktechs.net
201 - 300 of 739 matches
Mail list logo
