- Original Message -
From: Matt Larsen - Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Well, it was time to stir the pot for the new year...
Well, lets really spice it up thenI'm going to stir the pot
Patrick, I hope you understand something... I have no animosity towards
anyone... But I really do want to light a fire under people. Too many
companies (even me at times) gets too stuck in the box and we forget to
look beyond.
From our past conversations, you should realize what a large step
And now to stir it in the other direction
If Alvarion is serious about making the VL platform their new standard
bearer for residential, there is a little bit of work to be done. While
I understand the need for non-standard items at times, things like the
special ethernet cable,
I am under the notion that Pacific Wireless/Cush Craft is due some
recognition, serious back patting and an all around ata boy - good job.
Some of us say Trango - some say Alvarion, some say StarOS and some of us
say MikroTik, but I think 90% of us all say PACWIRELESS! We dressed out
another
Matt and Mark (and others),
This is a general rant about posts from the last few weeks.
When I read the posts about who is better and what is missing, it
reminds me of a kid's christmas wish list.
There is no perfect CPE. Everyone has their favorite. And much like
politics and religion you
Mark -
What are you wanting to power, load-wise?
Thanks,
Russ Kreigh
Network Engineer
OnlyInternet.Net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Nash - Lists
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 1:14 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
Matt,
VL CPE ship with the cable, pre-terminated. As for management, you can use
telnet or SNMP with both standard and proprietary MIBs. We do not permit
Web-based for security reasons and you can restrict management access to
specific IP addresses and/or directions (from the Ethernet side or
Hi,
I would have to agree. PacWireless has done a great job with their
antenna products over the past 5 years. We have never had a bad
antenna out of the box, and they have always worked as advertised, and
they are affordable.
However, they are not perfect. Their 5.3ghz 10dbi omni had
Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
Last, they started making a 24V PoE injector for Trango products. It
provided grounding by use of a 3 prong power cable.
Got a url for these?
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
I failed to mention that all 7 of my radios were powered by PACWIRELESS
POE48i POE power supplies!! :-)
George - here is the URL - - scroll to the bottom of that page and choose
24v http://pacwireless.com/products/POE.shtml
Mac
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ahh ok, neither do I or the people I've spoken with about this. In another
post I illustrated the Alvarion VL pin out is simply inverted. Don't see
how that could make any difference in cross talk rejection.
So, can we expect Alvarion will at some point begin to adhere to industry
wiring codes?
No further news on either front. I do what I can to push, but things like the
pinout will never be high on the list since A) they claim to have a good
reason, and B) in the rankings of where it is on an operator's decision list,
it is somewhere between the bottom and the footnotes of the list.
Very nice.
I've been wanting an all in one power supply poe for a while now, just
to keep things tidy.
Wonder if it will work with a non 802.af device and just give me 24v and
ethernet
George
Mac Dearman wrote:
I failed to mention that all 7 of my radios were powered by PACWIRELESS
Well your choice of 75' was a good one. In the past when I used Smart
Bridges or Tranzeo, the 50' was sometimes a few feet too short.
George
Patrick Leary wrote:
No further news on either front. I do what I can to push, but things like the
pinout will never be high on the list since A) they
Happy New Year!
Hey, I've been testing Dual-WAN routers. I've used Xincom, Linksys,
D-Link. The Linksys seems to be most reliable because it has a health
check feature. Has anyone out there tried anything else?
-RickG
Palm Beach Broadband
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
NO EXPERIENCE, BUT AN INTERESTING ARTICLE TO READ AT
http://www.networkworld.com/reviews/2004/0913rev.html
CHUCK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 12:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA]
RickG wrote:
Hey, I've been testing Dual-WAN routers. I've used Xincom, Linksys,
D-Link. The Linksys seems to be most reliable because it has a health
check feature. Has anyone out there tried anything else?
Are you just looking for redundancy (i.e. automatic failover so if one
ISP or
Speaking of RF and the TV bands conversion to digital (and the relevance
to WISPs is at the end of this post)...
I for some reason thought the transition to digital was far off.
Actually, I've learned most all metro areas now have full digital
broadcast availability. And like may, I mostly grew
I may be replacing my SonicWall 2040 with an MT for firewall functions.
I can easily port all of the rules I have created. But how do I get MT
to block things like Port Scans, Syn/Fin packets, etc.?
--
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and
Patrick,
I'm talking about ALL
the CPE on a sector being able to send its que'd voice out before any
CPE can release data into the sector?
Thats pretty cool. But I'd be interested in learning more on how that
protocol method interacts with bandwidth allocation per subscriber.
This is the
If its VL is 56 Volts, I'm wondering if Alvarion will work with all those
left over Metrocom/Richochet 56V Power plants?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
We recently had a really nasty DOS attack that took down a large part of our
network across several cell sites, from the infected client all the way to
the Internet transit.
Take note that we identified the problem quickly and cured it quickly.
But This is the first time that this has
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 17:26:39 -0900
Subject:
[WISPA] SSH DOS Killing Linux
We recently had a really nasty DOS attack that took down a large part of our
network across
Gigabit Ethernet, can pass 1 gbps when it uses greater than a 9600 MTU
frame.
But with a 1500MTU frame, it can barely pass 200 mbps.
The problem is that most Internet and subscriber traffic is using a 1500MTU
or smaller frame.
So in theory, its would be just as efficient and fast to bond two
Tom,
How are the big boys doing it? Surely ATT and others are transporting
more than 200Mbps across their 1GB fiber links.
Travis
Microserv
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Gigabit Ethernet, can pass 1 gbps when it uses greater than a 9600 MTU
frame.
But with a 1500MTU frame, it can barely pass 200
Hello Tom,
First let me saydamn Cowboys...sigh
I'm not sure I follow exactly what you are saying, but we have pushed better
than 800Mbps HDX and more than 700Mbps FDX aggregate between GigE MT
routers. Checking the router Interfaces show a 1500MTU setting. Is that
what you are talking
Nice article! Thx! RickG
On 1/6/07, CHUCK PROFITO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NO EXPERIENCE, BUT AN INTERESTING ARTICLE TO READ AT
http://www.networkworld.com/reviews/2004/0913rev.html
CHUCK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent:
David,
This is for the end user cpe side. I'd like to see both fail-over and
load balancing but fail-over is priority. No need for wireless. I'll
look into the microtik. Thanks! -RickG
On 1/6/07, David E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RickG wrote:
Hey, I've been testing Dual-WAN routers.
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, David E. Smith wrote:
This is for the end user cpe side. I'd like to see both fail-over and
load balancing but fail-over is priority. No need for wireless. I'll
look into the microtik. Thanks! -RickG
Rick, keeping in mind that load balancing where you don't control
both
29 matches
Mail list logo
