The whole argument is scale. You've already agreed that Canopy wins by scale.
I don't disagree with any other statements said below, that isn't my point.
And if you want to go the 5GHz route comparison, it should be only fair to use
the 430 equipment... because you are using the new UBNT
What kind of file is that?
Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Stuart Pierce
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 3:40 AM
To: WISPA General
Never mind, had to change the filename to a .jpg.
Looks like a Pirod to me, not 100% sure though.
Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Being one of the oldest WISP in St. Louis, as well as the oldest WISPA
member, I would be happy to accept whatever placement WISPA require of us.
If you are talking about St. Louis Broadband, you are talking about us!
Victoria Proffer - President/CEO
StLouisBroadband.com
ShowMeBroadband.com
Mark, I would like to thank you for your interesting and obivously well
thought out post.
I am firmly of the camp that USF should be completely discontinued, and
my efforts going forward will be to encourage its disbandment. The
major goals of the original USF program have been completed for
There are actually two there, the lighter color has the wider base and is 60'
high. The darker has a smaller base but is 80-120' ( cause there are two one of
of the picture ).
-- Original Message --
From: Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com
Reply-To: WISPA
It's hard to tell from the end shot. A side profile would help. The larger
one looks like an old windmill tower. It's hard to tell about the smaller
one. Are those cross members angled iron or round?
Friendly Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
I've got a TLink45 radio with integrated 23 dBi antennas. Anyone want to
trade for a connectorized version?
--
Patrick Shoemaker
Vector Data Systems LLC
shoemak...@vectordatasystems.com
office: (301) 358-1690 x36
http://www.vectordatasystems.com
Are you taking the M series into consideration when stating this?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 5/27/2010 4:47 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Ubiquiti will not do 50+ stations. Period.
You might get 25 on low bandwidth rates (2x512).
On 5/27/10,
M Series with AirMax on is marketed to support 100 per Rocket.
-- Original Message --
From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 08:46:12 -0500
Are you taking the M series into
If you can do the in building DSL in multiple buildings, consider PtP
wireless links among the buildings.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 5/27/2010 8:48 PM, finkle dinkle wrote:
Yep, I will look and test ubnt equipment.. I'm in no rush, just
Again before we compare who has the bigger Schwartz, high customer
counts per AP are only relevant if you're selling small bandwidth. You
cannot put 150x 15 megabit customers on a Canopy AP (you can't on UBNT
either, for that matter). People have been clamoring high customer per
AP densities
Hello WISPA,
I'm a lurker on this list that is interested in the WISP industry but still
learning every day (a lot from you all!), so please forgive my ignorance. :)
I run a small community wireless network in a low-income apartment complex;
we're currently using Open-Mesh
FWIW
This is a bind system
first query with no local cache:
;; Query time: 104 msec
;; SERVER: 64.202.224.2#53(64.202.224.2)
;; WHEN: Fri May 28 09:55:51 2010
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 95
After first query the same server has the data in cache:
;; Query time: 0 msec
;; SERVER:
I've always been pro-tax credit, based on my personal agenda.
I think it incourages investment, not only helps reduce an ISP's tax burden.
However, from my experience debating ARRA, I learned there can be some
disadvantages of Tax Credits.
The BIG disadvantage for WISPs is that it helps Large
http://tinyurl.com/39qcu35
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
If you don¹t have LOS you can¹t overcome physics with any type of
equipment. If it¹s a few hundred feet away (as in less than 300) is cat-5
an option? It sounds like the apartment complex is a stink about appearance
so digging a trench might not even work.
Justin
--
Justin Wilson
Hello Shaddi,
We hope you find the technical guidance you seek on here and further
invite you and other non-members to visit our technical forums available
from wispa.org for vendor specific information. You mentioned you are
on a tight budget so I wanted to quickly point out how far the $250
Plenty of free advice on this list, no problem there.
Two general rules are RF does not go through dirt (aka hill), period.
And High frequencies like 5.x Ghz does not penetrate hard surfaces like
brick and cement, and does not really penetrate anything well, so does not
penetrate wood either
Ethernet over power lines?
Greg
On May 28, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Justin Wilson wrote:
If you don’t have LOS you can’t overcome physics with any type of
equipment. If it’s a few hundred feet away (as in less than 300) is cat-5
an option? It sounds like the apartment complex is a stink about
You are correct. I retract that statement.
I have an AirMax AP up servicing business customers in a sector where I would
not be adding more AP's in the same band. works great, latency is low, speed is
high, customers are happy.
this AP makes about $1000 a month
-Original Message-
Nope. But I sure do miss Rickeesha. :(
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 5:51 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp
Is that what you told
And think like the ham radio operators do in condo environments - conceal gear
in everyday objects which pass condo association muster like flower pots, flag
poles, bird feeders, fake bathroom roof vents etc.
Greg
On May 28, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
Plenty of free advice on this
OK, yeah, I'm frustrated
I'm sitting here beside a nice shiny new Dell Power Edge T310 server.
Nothing fancy. Just a good processor, lots of memory, sata, gigE, etc.
Just what a person would normally expect in a new server.
4.9 will load but doesn't see ANY of the ethernet ports.
5.x
Have you tried a netinstall? This always solves my issues when I run
into issues with x86 hardware.
--
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
http://www.mtin.net/blog
Wisp Consulting Tower Climbing Network Support
From: Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List
My favorite is those damn PS3 customers. If the PS3 servers sense even
one time-out or several pings above what they want the customer calls
screaming that we are at fault. It's forced us to follow our network
back until we found a switch causing the intermittent time-outs (about
one every
Been there, done that. Did you check the NIC's against MT's hardware
compatability list before ordering?
-original message-
Subject: [WISPA] Stupid MT tricks
From: Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com
Date: 28/05/2010 5:09 pm
OK, yeah, I'm frustrated
I'm sitting here beside a nice shiny
We use a company called Purespeed for our dialup.
laters,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nationwide POTs Aggregator
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 19:45
We were able to use my Netsapiens adapter with a fax machine lately.
I'm told it worked perfectly.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wu c...@cticonnect.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nationwide POTs
I think the embedded NICs are Broadcom and expansion NICs are Intel in
Dell's world. Could be wrong on that though, it's been some time.
On 5/28/10, Paul Hendry paul.hen...@skyline-networks.com wrote:
Been there, done that. Did you check the NIC's against MT's hardware
compatability list
That's odd...every other mention of consoles includes Xbox problems
and wishing it was as problem free as the PS3 and Wii.
On 5/28/10, Forbes Mercy forbes.me...@wabroadband.com wrote:
My favorite is those damn PS3 customers. If the PS3 servers sense even
one time-out or several pings above
How ridiculous is this thread? Why wouldn't Jack have some fun with
your 'title' name since its obviously false. And for those who act like
we're insulting a new member we're not stupid, his name is Jason
Philbrook not dinkle whatever and if he chooses to use a goofy name he
opens himself up
Xbox live has figured out how to deal with this. I was playing online
with a crappy 900mhz connection at 50%ccq and still could play. PS3 would
never be able to handle that amount of poor quality.
Justin
--
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
http://www.mtin.net/blog
Wisp Consulting Tower
I'm also looking for something better here.
We have our own dns servers.
Who's good at configuring them to run as fast as possible from the
customer's perspective?
thanks,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
To: WISPA General List
Matt,
Although I agree with most of what you say, specifically there are huge
risks that USF will just go straight to the Cellular carriers to build out
more mobile phone towers to deliver broadband. In order to win a battle to
dispand USF, we have to effectively combat other's objections to
Yeah, I can only remember one customer ever complaining about PS3
problems, the Xbox on the other hand, we have problems with all the time
- although those are mainly caused by NAT, which doesn't seem to bother
the PS3.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
DNS tuning is pretty straightforward. One of my guy¹s is awesome at it.
If you are running BIND there are quite a bit of things you can do. We are
running bind in some VM¹s and they are still quite fast. The trick is do it
as close to the customer as you can (duh! You say). Djbdns is
Ubiquiti is coming out with some new 900MHz gear in August. Might be worth
waiting for.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Shaddi Hasan
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 10:48 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA]
Hi Mark,
Thanks for taking the time to present your views is such a well thought
out fashion. I'm learning a lot from the equally constructive
discussion that has followed.
You're right to infer that WISPA's official position(s) will be
discussed and decided by WISPA Members. Those Members
Marlon,
try simpledns from www.jhsoft.com
tony
I'm also looking for something better here.
We have our own dns servers.
Who's good at configuring them to run as fast as possible from the
customer's perspective?
thanks,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett"
Gino,
I'm cross posting this over to the 3650 Members list.
jack
Gino Villarini wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/39qcu35
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
I'm pleased to announce WISPA's plans for participation in the TV White
Spaces Summit http://groups.sdrforum.org/p/cm/ld/fid=92 on June 15th
in Washington DC.
WISPA will be represented by three FCC Committee Members - Alex
Phillips, Rusty Irvin and Tom DeReggi.
Alex will officially
I now have 5 committed registrations from the 9 Board members and 3 verbal
commitments. This may very well be the FIRST event in the history of WISPA
when all Board Members are present in the same place at the same time. I
congratulate my fellow Board members for their hard work and commitment
Tom,
Thank you for asking your questions - I have some awesome answers for
you.
1) Alaska. Alaska does indeed have an infrastructure problem.
Alaska also receives an enormous amount of federal support already along
with substantial revenues from their natural resources, mainly oil
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 01:39:06PM -0600, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
Tom,
Thank you for asking your questions - I have some awesome answers for
you.
1) Alaska. Alaska does indeed have an infrastructure problem.
Alaska also receives an enormous amount of federal support already
I nominate Matt Larsen to serve on the panel for USF at the Regional
Meeting! Wouldn't it be interesting if Tom was on there to? I'd go just
for the debate!
On 5/28/2010 12:39 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
Tom,
Thank you for asking your questions - I have some awesome answers for
you.
I'm glad I asked. Good answers.
So let me ask one more to both you and membership...
Why would we possibly want to lobby to keep USF? Is there one? (That is
realistic and legelly viable to achieve.)
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:15:08AM -0400, Tom DeReggi wrote:
I've always been pro-tax credit, based on my personal agenda.
I think it incourages investment, not only helps reduce an ISP's tax burden.
However, from my experience debating ARRA, I learned there can be some
disadvantages of Tax
While I'm at it Next Quesetions
Im sure the feds will easilly understand why we WISPs want the USF to be
killed.
But, should the feds accommodate the intersts of 1000 WISPs/ISPs or a 100
million rural consumers?
At the end of the day, there is an acknowledged digital divide, and
I'll be there. But if we keep getting all this good feedback from everyone,
there wont be much left to debate :-)
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Forbes Mercy forbes.me...@wabroadband.com
To: WISPA General List
I agree. Most of the questions are too convoluted to clearly
understand. For a survey like this to have any meaning at all, the
questions need to be written clearly so everyone will understand them
the same way.
Leon D. Zetekoff wrote:
On
5/27/2010 12:13 PM, Rick Harnish wrote:
Done
Those companies you fear have always had more money than our ISPs. It's
about customer service and adopting technology, that we survive, not by
financial superiority.
I only partially agree.
The facts are, people with funding can build faster than those that dont and
have to fund their
The NTIA just did a press release today saying they are going to let the
state broadband mapping agencies modify their grants for the mapping efforts
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/press/2010/SBDDNewWindow_05282010.html
Not to sound self serving but to get better WISP participation, and showing
many of
So, speaking of cache tuning,
Who is ready for DNSSEC?
On May 28, 2010 11:44 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
DNS tuning is pretty straightforward. One of my guy¹s is awesome at it.
If you are running BIND there are quite a bit of things you can do. We are
running bind in some VM¹s
Depends what you mean by ready? For being able to answer DNSSEC
queries, i'm all good to go. As far signing domains with it, i have yet
to venture down that path.
On 5/28/2010 8:59 PM, Jon Auer wrote:
So, speaking of cache tuning,
Who is ready for DNSSEC?
On May 28, 2010 11:44 AM, Justin
55 matches
Mail list logo
