insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The nanostation thing
Right. Madwifi ( http://madwifi.org/ )
We have not ran into that yet. But thanks for letting us know.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 3:34 PM
Subject:
Right. Madwifi ( http://madwifi.org/ ) is pretty good but having
trouble keeping up with new Atheros models.
MadWiFi is a sort of reverse engineering.Atheros knows how the chipsets
work and you can buy the documentation, raw code, the secrets of the HAL,
everything, by
But the control point would be at the tower, not remote. I know some WISPs
operate in remote areas, but this is more for a high density urban
deployment, similar to what you would use AirSpan or Alvarion for.
The reasoning behind the FDD style deployment would be to help compete
against
Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
But the control point would be at the tower, not remote. I know some WISPs
operate in remote areas, but this is more for a high density urban
deployment, similar to what you would use AirSpan or Alvarion for.
Right. Makes sense. I re read the original post. My
With some of the Wimax discussions going on I thought I would throw
my hat into the ring.
3.650 Wimax using 802.16d only products provides decent connectivity,
at a higher cost than traditional unlicensed
gear. Performance/coverage is on par, or better than 2.4 that most
of are used to. Pay
Mike you have peaked my interest with the 900Mhz against the 3.65. Were any of
these tests done with hills? My problem is we have hills, and lots of them and
trees too. You can't drive much more than a mile without going up a hill with a
change of 100 - 150 ft in elevation. Anyone tested or
Hi Scottie,
No, all flat ground but Midwest trees. Your scenario would be an
interesting test.
Mike
At 07:59 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:
Mike you have peaked my interest with the 900Mhz against the 3.65.
Were any of these tests done with hills? My problem is we have
hills, and lots of them and
Right, but my point was that Mikrotik doesn't need to be worrying about
virtualization. They need to put some more work into QA and USEFUL feature
expansion, like into 802.11 and 802.16, not Xen.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original
Now this is a 180* of what others have told me, even others offering
traditional, D, and E products.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Mike Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent:
Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for
evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the
performance described.
Regards
Michael Baird
Now this is a 180* of what others have
Many of you have known me for years, some wish they didn't :-). I am
the doubting Thomas type and have to test myself before I recommend
products to a client. Lets just say that Thomas was satisfied. Now
the clients are echoing the same and that is what drives my wagon.
Message-Id: [EMAIL
I believe it.
Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax 3.65.
Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on a
1-story house.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Many of you have known me for years, some
So, how much does this stuff cost?
Brian
John McDowell wrote:
I believe it.
Today we had a 1.5 mile shot through dense trees using Redline Redmax 3.65.
Customer was getting close to 500k upload. Signal held steady at 88db on a
1-story house.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Mike Cowan
I hear RedMax is coming down in price on CPEs when you buy a pallet of 72.
Sub $400.
Mike, I'm interested to know what Alvarion is pricing the 3.65 gear now that
it is available. Have they come down at all?
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So, how much
What about APs?
John McDowell wrote:
I hear RedMax is coming down in price on CPEs when you buy a pallet of 72.
Sub $400.
Mike, I'm interested to know what Alvarion is pricing the 3.65 gear now that
it is available. Have they come down at all?
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Brian
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Mike Hammett wrote:
They just copied someone else's card, though I forget now who.
It's in the FCC docs.
IIRC, the MT cards are relabled Compex cards.
--
*Butch Evans*Professional
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Jim Patient wrote:
Spell checker must have got Dennis. He meant Virtualization (Zen).
Got Jim, too...he meant Virtualization (Xen). :-)
--
*Butch Evans*Professional Network
Yeah. And out here Century Tel gets $60 to $109 per month (depending on who
you talk to) per pots line in USF funds. Gee, I wonder why they require a
pots line for DSL And they can sell DSL at retail rates at or below the
wholesale rates.
Man, what I could do with an extra $100 per
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Mike Hammett wrote:
Right, but my point was that Mikrotik doesn't need to be worrying
about virtualization. They need to put some more work into QA and
USEFUL feature expansion, like into 802.11 and 802.16, not Xen.
You don't think XEN can be useful? I have it in testing
I think I mentioned last week that we were going to be doing testing with
Aperto gear. We were so impressed that we are finishing up the paperwork to
become a VAR for them (not sure if any of the other VAR's on the list are).
I've been a skeptic of 3.65 WiMAX since the day it was mentioned too
If you needed virtualization of some type, you could install it as the host
OS, then install your Mikrotik or Asterisk or... on top.
I guess I meant things that we can't already get somewhere else. Mikrotik
themselves has to do a lot of things, but we can do Xen on our own.
--
Mike
Hi,
I would have bet any amount of money that I saw "polling" as an option
in the AirOS stuff... but now that I am looking for it, I can't seem to
find it. :(
Travis
Randy Cosby wrote:
Where is the polling you refer to? Is that in the beta firmware or
something? I haven't noticed it.
Maybe you got confused with the OSwave firmware
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, July
I can't say whether I'm interested in your ideas yet or not. But unless you
wanted to develop syncronization or some specific function of a centralized
server for the base stations I don't see the point of adding the additional
complexity. Canopy for example has synconization without the need
I believe we were at 37dbm EIRP at both ends of the link. I agree
that we can't change physics and I expected the same letdown that we
all had when OFDM hit the scenes for 5.8ghz. All the tests I
mentioned were using Alvarions base station with 2nd order
diversity. 2nd order nets a 3db
Anyone know how extensive the Tranzeo / Aperto collaboration is?
http://www.tranzeo.com/investors/press.php?id=82
I wonder if that WAS a Tranzeo CPE you used?
Randy
3-dB Networks wrote:
I think I mentioned last week that we were going to be doing testing with
Aperto gear. We were so
I don't usually agree with Mark's viewpoints, but I agree with this one
100%.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marlon, my friend, that is the wrong viewpoint.
This is the RIGHT one...
Imagine the sales I could make if the taxpayers weren't subsidizing
CenturyTel.
The
Tranzeo and Aperto are not collaborating at all (actually Tranzeo wanted to
rebrand the product their own).
What is going on is they are using the same manufacturer. The PS and Case
are the same, beyond that everything on the inside is Aperto.
Trust me, I was very concerned about this when I
There is nothing wrong with subsidees. Its the only way to level the playing
field, in david vs goliath markets..
The problem is how subsidees are given and the criteria for how one
qualifies.
Subsidees are meant to be taken advantage of.
Its what enables someone to survive, that otherwise would
Which picture matches?
http://www.apertonet.com/products/pmax_subscriberunits.html
-Hal
-Original Message-
From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
The packetmax 100... it looks very similar... the PoE's are identical (not
sure if the power output is the same but they look exactly the same)
The case instead of being flat on the panel does have something of a raise,
but if you have seen a Tranzeo before, the first thing you are going to
think
The 300 looks like the Redline cpe
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Harold Bledsoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Which picture matches?
http://www.apertonet.com/products/pmax_subscriberunits.html
-Hal
-Original Message-
From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: WISPA General
But you really are not harming the subsidized utility. For example, we have
about 900 customer on our public utility. We charge them a little more than
$10 for local service. $9000 per month. But the FUSF, SUSF, and NECA
settlement probably amounts to 2-3 million a year. If you take my
They are made by the same company along with a Moto wimax cpe and a few
others...
-Hal
-Original Message-
From: John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field
Date:
Just got back from a county commission meeting. We appealed conditions
placed on a conditional use permit for a new tower. They wanted us to
provide a full acre of fall protection clearance around the tower (leased
land). That acre would be conveyed to the county. They wanted the parcel
10k is NOT the price for an 802.16e solution-
Try closer to 20-40k per sector
Jeff Booher
Channel Manager, North America
www.apertonet.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
24/7: 206-455-4950
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or work
product for
Brian,
Depends on many factors. The price point of 10k per sector is usually
assuming you are talking about purchasing 1-6 sectors. Most of the MFR's are
able to and willing to come down in price considerably when frame orders or
larger deployments are taken into consideration.
Best
Eric,
How can it be possibly legal to use a 36dbm sector in 3.65ghz, unless you
are talking about using a 3dbi antenna at the base?
Jeff Booher
Channel Manager, North America
www.apertonet.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
24/7: 206-455-4950
This email may contain material that is
You are correct. Don't shoot the messenger.
-Eric
Jeff Booher wrote:
Eric,
How can it be possibly legal to use a 36dbm sector in 3.65ghz, unless you
are talking about using a 3dbi antenna at the base?
Jeff Booher
Channel Manager, North America
www.apertonet.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Mike Hammett wrote:
If you needed virtualization of some type, you could install it as
the host OS, then install your Mikrotik or Asterisk or... on top.
It's not that it was something I needed, but am using it since it
is already installed. In order to get the particular
Mike,
This does seem to good to be true. Could you provide more details on
these links (for instance, tower heights, or maybe even coordinates
that I can look over the path)?
I was at a roadshow earlier this year. A Redline rep was there, he
said that 3650 wasn't all that great thru trees.
Nice victory Chuck. That guy was out of control. In all the zoning hearings
I have ever participated in around the US, never had they gotten as
restrictive as that guy tried to be!
Thank You,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of
John Valenti wrote:
Mike,
This does seem to good to be true. Could you provide more details on
these links (for instance, tower heights, or maybe even coordinates
that I can look over the path)?
I was at a roadshow earlier this year. A Redline rep was there, he
said that 3650
Good job!
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:26 PM
Subject: [WISPA] A glorious victory
Just got back
Which is not your average WISP...
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in
That's probably EIRP, not radio power.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Eric Muehleisen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:54 PM
Subject:
Mike I hate to say it but I don't think WiMax is intended for the average
WISP... lots of carrier grade functionality that the WISP market doesn't
need, but really drives up the price (I think its supposed to do 6 9's for
availability?)
It sucks that its going to limit the WISP's with small
Guys and Gals,
To help prepare for a planned FCC trip, I would appreciate your input on
the following question.
In your opinion, what is the average number of CPEs deployed per
independent WISP?
I'm not looking for the number of CPEs that YOU have deployed unless you
believe that your number
A 4-5 dBi antenna gets you to 10 watts which would be legal in theory with a
10 MHz wide channel ;-)
Wind load would be very small for that sized sector --- heeehhe
John Rock
Wireless Connections
Director of Operations - Senior Engineer
ACCessing the Future Today!!
ofc. 419.660.6100
cell
I would disagree. WiMAX should be a goal for most WISPs to get into their
networks over the next 1-3 years.
Why??? Roaming!!! It will be the real deal and the WISP market, if they do
the right things, will be able to setup roaming agreements to exist with
each other all over the USA.
CPE will
Because many WISPs operate as part-time or shoe-string type operations, I
would venture to say that the average WISP has less than 1000 CPE deployed.
On the other hand, if you were to ask the question in a different manner...
perhaps frame the question:
Of those WISPs that have at least one
I agree 100%... every WISP should really look at 3.65. The problem is the
base station cost... I don't know many small WISP's that will be able to
afford a 10k base station. Many have a hard time deploying say Canopy AP's
that cost $1200 or so.
My point is, unlike Canopy, Tranzeo, Ubquity,
John,
From what I understand all manufactures are required to use the same GPS
sync, so all WiMax gear with the appropriate timing settings equal can be
timed together. Apparently the FCC is requiring it for the equipment to be
certified.
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
-Original Message-
I agree with you. Being a small WISP, we really took a risk investing in
RedMax gear for the simple fact that we are so rural. Selling Business
Internet and Voip bundles with a small PBX phone system is the only way
we're really going to see a decent return on this system in the near
future.
The
I'm looking for scripts (perl, python, etc) that turn Netstumber (or
equiv) data into the KML files necessary for Google Earth.
So far, I've only found the following googling.
http://code.google.com/p/ns2kml/
Has anyone found any others that work well?
http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/map?form=wifi
Ryan
On Jul 23, 2008, at 12:34 AM, Rogelio wrote:
I'm looking for scripts (perl, python, etc) that turn Netstumber (or
equiv) data into the KML files necessary for Google Earth.
So far, I've only found the following googling.
I'd say the average WISP is close to 300 - 400.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org;
Motorola Canopy User Group [EMAIL
just remember cpe count is not a reflection of customers served, unless
talking about residential single family homes.
Enabling business activity and commerce is just as valuable as getting
residents served.
I average 5 businesses per CPE currently, and have the ability to serve an
average of
We had a bad storm that killed my last spare Karlnet base station this
week and I have about 35 client systems I don't want to change out yet.
My distributor said Proxim quit selling the license keys this year. The
last board I have is loaded with SG4200 software and I wouldn't mind
keeping it
Good point, maybe circuits per WISP?
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:44 AM
To:
Hey, looking for some input here..
We have a single 100 Mbps Ethe Uplint to the net, with another one
turning on in some weeks. Currently we have a Cisco 7240 handling the
single Eth Circuit, but we need to upgrade to a beffeier unit.
Would it make sense to put a Cisco L3 Switch instead of a
Yep - I'm keeping it in mind.
Tom DeReggi wrote:
just remember cpe count is not a reflection of customers served, unless
talking about residential single family homes.
Enabling business activity and commerce is just as valuable as getting
residents served.
I average 5 businesses per CPE
Once I have average CPE per WISP I can scale a percentage of those CPE
up to account for the total number of end-users taking into account some
CPE serve households, some serve businesses, some serve MDUs, etc. But I
have to start somewhere and that somewhere is average number of CPEs per
Jack, how are we supposed to know?
The only way to find anything approaching an average is to get those 500
responses and average them.
And t hen you still gotta define what a WISP is. Is it the guy who covers
an area the size of two city blocks and has backhauled in DSL from 3 miles
away?
:: laugh ::
Jack, it happens even in the best of regulated families :)
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:28 AM
Subject:
Jack Unger wrote:
Once I have average CPE per WISP I can scale a percentage of those CPE
up to account for the total number of end-users taking into account some
CPE serve households, some serve businesses, some serve MDUs, etc. But I
have to start somewhere and that somewhere is average
Has anyone used the PacWireless 48v POE injectors? I hear they also provide
surge protection?
The good the bad, the ugly?
--
John M. McDowell
Boonlink Communications
307 Grand Ave NW
Fort Payne, AL 35967
256.844.9932
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.boonlink.com
This message contains information
What is it?
How do I activate the buzzer?
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
i think its something like
set Buzzer 1
Do you have any manuals?
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is it?
How do I activate the buzzer?
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax
We use the 48, 24, and 18v and they have worked great for us. They have
surge protection. Just be sure the ground in the 110 plug is actually
grounded.
Jim
John McDowell wrote:
Has anyone used the PacWireless 48v POE injectors? I hear they also provide
surge protection?
The good the bad,
awesome, thanks
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Jim Patient [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use the 48, 24, and 18v and they have worked great for us. They have
surge protection. Just be sure the ground in the 110 plug is actually
grounded.
Jim
John McDowell wrote:
Has anyone used the
Tried that, no workie
-Original Message-
From: John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 3:35 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Redline SUA buzzer command?
i think its something like
set Buzzer 1
Do you have any manuals?
On
yeah, i tried it to...no workie
I look through some of the manuals and see
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tried that, no workie
-Original Message-
From: John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 3:35 PM
To: WISPA
Anybody need some? I'm trying to get rid of them and buy something with
built in surge protection.
HIt me off list if interested
--
John M. McDowell
Boonlink Communications
307 Grand Ave NW
Fort Payne, AL 35967
256.844.9932
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.boonlink.com
This message contains
ON: set boardConfig Buzzer 1
OFF: set boardConfig Buzzer 0
They are not very accurate. I would still recommend that you have
someone on the remote end giving you a verbal.
-Eric
John McDowell wrote:
yeah, i tried it to...no workie
I look through some of the manuals and see
On Wed, Jul
set boardConfig Buzzer 1
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tried that, no workie
-Original Message-
From: John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 3:35 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
lol...3 at once
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
set boardConfig Buzzer 1
-Matt
On Jul 23, 2008, at 4:14 PM, John McDowell wrote:
yeah, i tried it to...no workie
I look through some of the manuals and see
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:05 PM,
I prefer to use PacWireless PoE over any other.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Motorola Canopy User Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Sent:
I prefer to use PacWireless PoE over any other.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Motorola Canopy User Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Sent:
I use them occaisionally and find they work ok. I once ran a box on them
that ran them close to full power, and it fried them within 2 weeks. I went
through two of them rapid fire before I found a different solution. Other
than that, they've been good for me.
What is your other solution? I haven't had too many problems, but we do
occasionally have the POEs go bad so I'm interested in other options.
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use them occaisionally and find they work ok. I once ran a box on them
that ran
If the WISP filed their for 477 truthfully, the FCC should already have an
idea of what the average is out of the WISPs that filed. Considering how
many do or don't file them, I am not sure how accurate their data will be.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks to all
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John McDowell
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 4:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
I agree with that.
But, reality being what it is
marlon
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:00 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Just what we need.
Marlon, my friend, that is the wrong viewpoint.
This is
Been so long what is the Sg4200 license? We are decommissioning a large
amount of Karlnet and will be selling them off. We have down some kn205 base
stations with the license for base station mode.
Michiana Wireless, Inc.
John Buwa, President
http://WWW.MichianaWireless.Com
574-233-7170
Lose
lol
coolness
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 3:26 PM
Subject: [WISPA] A glorious victory
Just got back from a county commission meeting. We appealed conditions
placed on a
It's not possible to know that for sure.
But if I had to guess I'd have to say 500 to 1000 these days.
But there are getting to be a LOT of wisps with 1000+++ subs these days. I
remember reading about one that's 25k subs.
I think that a more important number would be the number of homes
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/080723/20080723006177.html?.v=1
I got a couple of these in my hands to sample yesterday. Haven't had a
chance to experiment with them yet.
George
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
We have an official definition of a wisp. It was part of what we had to
define in order for a person/company to be a principal member.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:35 AM
Subject: Re:
Thought the community should be aware of this one. A rather lengthy blog
detailing the exact mechanics of DNS cache poisoning got leaked
yesterday.
-Eric
http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/security/showArticle.jhtml?
articleID=209401195
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113
The
While searching for pipes for myself, I found a great deal on bandwidth.
The requirements are that you're in LATA 358 and have ATT as your LEC. If
you're not sure, let me know and I'll check for you, but it's up to say 60
miles from Chicago in IL and IN.
There are always variables and
You rock!!! It isn't often when you are able to out do the planning dept.
Crow...Man...Crow!!!
--- On Thu, 7/24/08, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WISPA] A glorious victory
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date:
That is what they make Dragonwave for .
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Deal
Delivered to your door, no matter where that door is?
--
heh, yes, but you're not going to cost effectively get bandwidth from a
downtown carrier hotel 60 miles away through suburbia for that difference.
Well, at least not around here.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From:
Delivered to your door, no matter where that door is?
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:48 AM
Subject:
We have 60 mile Dragonwave systems out here. Saving 2-3K per month pays off
a Dragonwave pretty quickly.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Deal
heh,
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
We have an official definition of a wisp. It was part of what we had to
define in order for a person/company to be a principal member.
Without knowing what Jack's up to, I imagine the more important part
would be how does the FCC define a WISP. They probably have
That is pretty high compared to the good deals we are seeing. We have BW
from $6 to $14/meg in this area.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 8:07 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Bandwidth Deal
While searching
Single or multiple hop(s)?
Is a 60 mile single hop possible?
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 10:14 AM
1 - 100 of 62388 matches
Mail list logo
