Shafty really? How much are they charging for the event? Zero, except
that you need to book through them, and they derive some revenue through
the booking. How much was registration to Wispapalooza? How much is
registration to Animal Farm?
The policy seems fair to me.
I suppose they could
Hi Gino,
It can be done. It isn't well-documented, however.
On Mikrotik, for example, you put a management IP address on each router's
ethernet interface, used for speaking vrrp only, and then put the IP
address(es) that deal with customers on the vrrp subinterface. For example:
rtr-1
; On 12/16/2010 3:39 PM, Carl Shivers wrote:
>>> I'm running v6.2.4.3 on the SMs and System Release e2.0.1 on the APs.
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>> Behalf Of David
released and the product gains upper 25mhz approval we can
> then run ABCD channel plan in 10mhz. Until then, we're stuck.
>
> -Eric
>
> On 12/16/2010 3:39 PM, Carl Shivers wrote:
>> I'm running v6.2.4.3 on the SMs and System Release e2.0.1 on the APs.
>>
27;re stuck.
>
> -Eric
>
> On 12/16/2010 3:39 PM, Carl Shivers wrote:
>> I'm running v6.2.4.3 on the SMs and System Release e2.0.1 on the APs.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behal
The current firmware works very well. If you haven't done so already,
upgrade to the latest firmware, as it resolves tons of RF link
stability problems.
If that's not your issue, please post details. We have PMP320
deployed and are happy with it.
Dave
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Justin
Huh? That's like saying you don't agree with stealing but don't like
the government arresting shoplifters...
Dave
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
> Homeland security also shut down sites they think have "no commercial
> benefit except to allow copyright infringement." I
There's a hack somewhere out there that I think converts BAM requests
to RADIUS requests, so whoever made that must have figured it out.
However, RADIUS authentication support will be in 11.x, which I
believe is due out Q4 2010 or Q1 2011...
Dave
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Marco Coelho
Have you or has anyone here been able to buy from Comcast? Comcast in
our area says we are a competitor and that they don't sell to
competitors
Dave
.
==
MERCURY NETWORK CORPORATION
David Sovereen
989-837-3790 x 151
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Justin W
a
terrible idea that I should run away from.
Dave
==
MERCURY NETWORK CORPORATION
David Sovereen
989-837-3790 x 151
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Robert West wrote:
> Sadly. My last UPS I built was from parts pulled outta the
> dumpster behind t
Have you looked at Platypus? Costs less, does more, scales big, and is a
proven solution (I've been using for 13 years, since 1997).
Dave
On Aug 22, 2010 7:50 PM, wrote:
> I have been using Quickbooks memorized transactions since 2001, I
> added a JFFNMS monitoring server in 2004, a Scrutinizer
Minor note: Moto uses 8MHz channels and the middle channel for maximum
separation is 915.
Dave
Jerry Richardson wrote:
I did not realize this was the wireless list and not the Moto List
Moto uses 9MHz channels so the 3 non-overlapping are 906, 914, and 924
- CH1 = 902-910
- CH2 = 911-919
- C
If you are a subcontractor, you pay the entire 15% yourself. Subcontracting
does not eliminate or reduce any social security tax obligation. It only
alters who pays it.
Dave
RickG wrote:
If I understand correctly, social security tax is 15%. In an
employment situation, an employee pays 7.5%
Quickbooks can spit them out for you easily and automatically. Sure, it will
take some time to collect TINs the first year it's in effect, but after that,
the work is only incremental and highly automatable.
Dave
MDK wrote:
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2010/04/26/costly-irs-mandate-slipped
To be clear, unemployment insurance is paid by employers, NOT employees.
The "you" in those sentences is the company you work(ed) for. There are
no deductions from employee paychecks for unemployment insurance.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-bou
send me the e-mail, I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks,
Dave
==
MERCURY NETWORK CORPORATION
David Sovereen
989-837-3790 x 151
http://www.mercur
stems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of David Sovereen
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 10:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
We measure and record each subscriber's usage (easy
We measure and record each subscriber's usage (easy to do with Mikrotik
"HotSpot" functionality and RADIUS accounting data).
Our TOS has an "Excessive Usage" policy which defines excessive usage as
six times the average. Each month, our system calculates the average
and excessive and sends an e-m
Meant to send off-list... sorry.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "David Sovereen"
To: ; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] AP using Mikrotik Routerboard
> Huh? Why haven't any of my orders ever come assemb
Huh? Why haven't any of my orders ever come assembled free? Whenver I want
it assembled, you charge me something called "Assembly Charge for Kit Units"
at a cost of $6.00 each. See invoice 29306.
Dave
- Original Message -
From:
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2
Have you considered Verizon's TAP number? We've had no problems with it.
The number is 866-823-0501. You need a modem, but its very reliable.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Shoemaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 3:23 PM
Subject
787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of David Sovereen
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:48 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Billing suggestings (Plat Wireless
Wireless stuff)
> Dave, got a eta for 7.0?
>
> Gino A. Villarini
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of David S
Platypus by nature is very extensible and expandable. We have it control
every aspect of our wireless broadband service, having it talk so Mikrotiks,
Canopy Prizm, and the like, permitting access, controlling bandwidth,
assigning static IP addresses, etc.
Much of this capability is there out-o
I thought it was excellent. He's a very interesting speaker and I
thoroughly enjoy what he has to say, as he has a very comprehensive and
cohesive view of the market that provokes a lot of thought.
Memorable insights:
1. There are too many backbone providers out there. Back in the day, ther
I'm not an RF guy, but I've been told that any frequency that divides into
the frequency you are using evenly has the potential to interfere.
For example, if you are using 900MHz, then 450MHz, which divides into 900MHz
evenly could interfere. Same for 150MHz.
Dave
- Original Message ---
Alltell is all CDMA. They have acquired a couple companies that were GSM,
but they pretty quickly migrate custoemrs to CDMA handsets and replace the
equipment at the towers.
Alltel/Verizon/Sprint = CDMA (no SIM cards)
AT&T Wireless/Cingular and T-Mobile = GSM (SIM cards)
Dave
- Original
One of my employees has the HTC Mogul. He's got Sprint (who we left because
I got tired of dropped calls and the limited coverage). They had it in
stores starting last month. Our company is on Verizon, and Verizon hasn't
released it yet, so I'm still waiting, but that is definitely going to b
Platypus can do this. Based on your Zip+4 requirement, your match rules may
be lengthy to make sure you get 48640-1039 and 48640-1041 but not
48640-1040. Hopefully, they are more along the lines of 48640-0XXX,
48640-1XXX, etc.
But definitely, Platypus does this.
Dave
- Original Message
We use SBE DS-3 cards and have had zero lockups. Currently on MT 2.9.41.
Been running with them for about 6 months, knock on wood. We have them on
SuperMicro hardware, which tends to be pretty stable. I mention that only
in case it is an issue of card and motherboard combination.
Dave
Not all owners are fortunate enough to be able to get their own service. I
have to use Charter cable because I cannot get my own service's signals. I
would switch in a heartbeat if I could.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Se
I disagree completely.
The choice to use MT or StarOS has nothing to do with the hardware. My
decision to use MT was entirely based on the software features. Some of my
MTs run on Routerboards, others do not. If the Routerboard hardware meets
my needs at a price I like, I use it. If it doe
www.midwestunlimited.com. The Elk River Eagle LE or LX harnesses are good
and comfortable at a good price-point. I would highly recommend NOT buying
a used harness. Your harness is to keep you from falling to your death and
you don't want to rely on a used harness that you don't know the comp
How many VoIP calls does BreezeACCESS VL support at MOS ~ 4.0 in a noisy
environment, such as when SNR is <= 10? How about <= 3?
Yes, I already know the answer to these. Maybe it was unfair for me to ask.
The issue that you conveniently side-step is that service providers
operating in unlice
I have equipment that I need installed on about 20 towers throughout Central
Michigan and Northeast Wisconsin. We have one tower company that we really,
really like, but they are booked up solid for months (we've already waited a
month in hopes something would open up, but no luck). Does anyon
t; survive on a reasonable profit margin and not be flooded by over
production
> creating too much product for not enough demand...?
>
> :)
>
>
> On 8/9/06 8:57 AM, "David Sovereen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Since when do the people on this list s
Since when do the people on this list support taxation, waste, and
government subsidies? Why should the burden of providing high-speed
Internet to people in underserved (typically rural) areas fall on the
shoulders of taxpayers? I don't want my taxes to pay to expand your network
or for Joe User
Title: RE: [WISPA] frame size and fps - was OT: about 70Mbps for under $ 6K
While it may sound great to have a "double standard
law," it isn't realistic. Recent FCC ruling trends tell us
that.
For years, telephone companies have been heavily
regulated while cable companies have not.
DSL
I respectfully disagree and think that WCA's
position of less regulation and allowing network operators operate their
networks how they want is the right approach. Net neutrality legislation
opens the door for content companies and your subscribers to force open and
equal access to all cont
I'm interested in a unit, but haven't got a
response. Is [EMAIL PROTECTED] the
right address?
Dave
989-837-3790 x 151989-837-3780 fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.mercury.net
129 Ashman St, Midland, MI 48640
- Original Message -
From:
Patrick
Shoemaker
To: WISPA Genera
ching is done at a hardware level
> but in Mikrotik I believe both switching and routed is done in software.
> What have you seen?
>
> P.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of David Sovereen
> Sent: 13 June 2006
Hi Matt,
Actually, our testing and real-world experience shows that convergence is
faster in bridged RSTP network than it is in a routed OSPF network.
We ran OSPF on our wireless network, and still do on our wired network.
With default settings of a hello interval of 10 seconds and a dead router
We just completed converting our network from routed to bridged. Where each
AP (we run Mikrotik) used to do its own DHCP and PPPoE to customers and
speak OSPF to the network, the APs (still Mikrotik) now bridge traffic to a
regional Mikrotik that handles PPPoE and DHCP for that region. We are
er been
> around.
>
> Marlon
> (509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
> (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
> 42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
> 64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
> www.ode
ivided we fall. Are those who haven't joined uniters or dividers?
>
> That help?
> marlon
>
> Marlon
> (509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
> (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
> 42846865 (icq)And I run my own w
have pro RBOC on almost every issue.
> Verizon sits on your board! (http://www.usiia.org/about/board.htm)
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
> RAD-INFO, Inc.
>
> David Sovereen wrote:
>
> > Many of you seem to be of the belief that the proposed bill requires
> > you to keep
I agree with your sentiments completely.
One needs to ask, though, "why aren't ISPs supporting WISPA?" The answer is
more than likely the same answer most small businesses give when asked why
they don't join industry associations: it's not worthwhile... it costs more
money than the benefits of me
Many of you seem to be of the belief that the
proposed bill requires you to keep records of the content of subscribers.
Simply put, that is NOT THE CASE. While I do not know the specific
details of the various proposals, I do know that none of them are expecting ISPs
to keep copies of cont
PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Mikrotik Virtual AP
I'm using NStreme on both the AP and client devices. Would these figures not
reflect the same thing in an NStreme environment and if not why not?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Sover
al Message -
From: "David Sovereen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Virtual AP
> There isn't much you can do; we're not given controls over settings at
that
> low layer.
>
the number of retransmits can be adjusted or if there
are any other tweaks to make the impact minimal?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Sovereen
Sent: 03 June 2006 14:46
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Virtual AP
Hi Paul,
It's an RF problem. 802.11a/b/g and Nstreme all have packet acknowledgement
in the protocol. Every packet your AP sends needs to be acknowledged by the
client. When a packet is not acknowledged, the AP retransmits it. Because
of poor RF conditions (NLOS), RF/wireless ethernet packets
52 matches
Mail list logo
