Same here, I thought it was all marketing hype, if it works like the
poster mentioned, we will need to consider moving up our timetable for
evaluating wimax, 10k a basestation suddenly isn't that bad with the
performance described.
Regards
Michael Baird
Now this is a 180* of what others have
I've been using the Netflix service since June, with the Roku box.
It has 4 different qualities, plus 2 additional for HD which are
supported only on XBox360 until the next few weeks.
500k/1100/1600/2200 for SD
2600/3600 for HD.
Regards
Michael Baird
In case you did not know, recently NetFlix
/encoding-for-streaming.html
Regards
Michael Baird
Did I interpret your data correctly to mean that if you had a sustained
256Kbps it would work?
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 2:42
I'm not sure they have a determined peering policy yet. I've had
discussions with them in this area about an Akamai type relationship,
which isn't typical for them.
Regards
Michael Baird
Since no one answered, I got NetFlix myself and added it to my XBox... the
bandwidth is coming from
Check r1soft.com, it is the best backup software I've seen. It's fast
and and has both windows/linux server/client versions, and has a simple
interface, and is reasonably priced.
Regards
Michael Baird
Check out using Amanda and s3 for backups. Works like a charm.
Sent via BlackBerry from T
a peering arrangement, I am currently in the process of
exploring a peering arrangement with Limelight, I don't know their
criteria for establishing a peering arrangment as of yet.
Regards
Michael Baird
With all the talk of Netflix and other bandwidth-intensive streaming
applications
I need a 5.8 Omni to feed some smaller sites via WDS, looking for some
recommendations was hoping for 16 db but can't seem to find any.
Regards
Michael Baird
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org
Tom,
This would not be serving any customers, all the locations will be at
least 100ft+.
Regards
Michael Baird
I'd be cautious about those Pancake shaped OMNI patterns at 16 DB.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From
What about sectorized omni arrays, any of those out there at 5.8?
An example would be
http://www.netkrom.com/prod_ant_5.1-5.8ghz_vpol_sector_omni.html
Just can't find anybody who sells it to get an idea on pricing.
Regards
Michael Baird
You won't find a 5 GHz omni at that gain, and if you do
that can do 100-250 watts would probably be fine.
Regards
Michael Baird
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA
, hardened, ac/dc psu.
Regards
Michael Baird
Great find one the Inscapedata product!! That's exactly what I'm looking
for!!!
A POE switch and converter modules are definitely an option, but it kinda
defeats my purpose (getting rid of all my POE adapters running up a tower).
-Original
Jayson,
Do you have the model numbers on these? I need 48v output.
Regards
Michael Baird
APC and Cyberpower makes some. 12V or 48V output. Outdoor mounted. AC
power input.
We used them for a FTTH project once.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Scott Parsons sc...@e-zy.net wrote
You don't have to pay property tax on the CPE. You don't have to go pick
up the device if the customer quits. You can charge the customer for
replacement radios. You can offer a value add-on product such as modem
insurance.
Regards
Michael Baird
I've always provided the CPE to the end user
to tell us how they are resolving this AUP violation, and
that is to be noted on their account. If we get another one and see that
they haven't responded to the first one, then we will take a look at the
customers history and either call them, or suspend the account.
Regards
Michael Baird
We
antenna too much downtilt).
Regards
Michael Baird
Hi All,
I tried my first one of these yesterday. It's hooked to an antenna that was
already in place so I know the old system worked though I did not check
signal levels before taking out the old SB radios (they don't give rssi
accurately
Marlon,
I thought about this after you mentioned it, we are using Ubiquity on
the tower also, not MT, vendor readings will vary.
Are you using Bullet2HP's or Bullet2M's? The M series isn't wholly G
compatible at this time.
Regards
Michael Baird
It's an omni...
I think I'm gonna pull
Well the config interface is very clear about which model it is, also it
would be on the unit and the box.
Regards
Michael Baird
No idea.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:40 AM
I've got some extra rocket5M's rocket dishes if anybody is interested,
I'll send them out at cost.
The firmware has improved quite a bit over time on these things, they
will do 100 mbit fine at 20mhz (airmax off for ptp, 5.0.2 firmware, 10
streams).
Regards
Michael Baird
I think it's
Ubiquity does not have any licensed 3.65 gear for the US, they have
XR3/Nano3's but they are for overseas customers.
They have announced they will be coming out with 3.65/900 mhz airmax
gear 2nd Quarterish next year.
Regards
Michael Baird
UBNT has fully licensed and approved 3.65 gear
Same here, although we never had any troubles with Tranzeo NAT either
(we run PPPoE/NAT on all w/client isolation on AP).
Regards
Michael Baird
Kurt,
Have you tried Ubiquiti? We have about 140 of them installed. At least 100
are set as routers doing NAT. So far results have been positive
.
Regards
Michael Baird
Just placed my first order for Ubiquity NS2's 5 minutes ago...
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mark
It was promised at the end of November, beta should be out this week.
Regards
Michael Baird
Bullet M2's won't do WEP until the release of firmware version 5.1 which
has been in just a couple of weeks for at least the last two months.
Jayson Baker wrote:
UBNT Bullet M2?
On Thu, Nov
I've got a new deployment going forward and their seems to be a backup
on the Tranzeo TR-24H-120-16 antennas. I need two, if anybody has a
couple of these laying around they want to get rid of, please let me
know and how much you need out of it?
Regards
Michael Baird
What happens if you use a 2.4 lightning arrestor on a 5.8 radio? Will it
cause degraded signal or incorrect lightning protection.
Regards
Michael Baird
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org
if this would be a symptom, what does the frequency range
actually mean on those I suspect it would make my noise floors go out of
whack like that. They aren't in use and I will replace them before going
into production, I'm just curious.
Regards
Michael Baird
I second that. Most ARE rated for up to 5.8
I've got an extra set, I don't need right now, never deployed will sell
for my cost.
Regards
Michael Baird
I would not concern yourself with this option because you can't buy one if
you wanted to right now.
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
Been using this one for quick lookups, requires an account to be
established though.
http://www.ligowave.com/linkcalc/main.html
Regards
Michael Baird
Yeah, I'd have to get quite a few more customers to pay for such a thing. I
can certainly see the value in it but value versus food.. Uh
, but I'm aware of ISP's who have created a local zone in their
resolving DNS for Netflix's streaming mirrors. If you check the Roku
player forums you will find this advise coming from their engineers as well.
Regards
Michael Baird
I am looking at the Ars article now.
http://arstechnica.com/tech
From the Washington Post also.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/30/AR2009073002816.html
Regards
Michael Baird
From the NY Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/05/us/05doctors.html?_r=1
Regards,
Jeff
Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106 (US
The post office is bankrupt, not self supporting.
http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/08/18/the-next-bankruptcy-the-u-s-postal-service/
Regards
Michael Baird
On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Andy Trimmell wrote:
Kinda like when I was home schooled as a kid and my parents had to pay
school taxes
It can depending on antenna height/customer antenna/LOS condition.
Regards
Michael Baird
We want to put up an M Rocket in 5gig frequency range and have four
customers between 6-8 miles. Will our 17dbi 120 degree antenna reach
them
Agreed, it's long since ceased to be a debate anyway and turned into a
propaganda session.
Regards
Michael Baird
Matt-
Please consider taking your insurance debate to another list.
When you pop in, you just make the discussion hotter and more active.
Some of us are here for wireless
worth, that sort of thing.
Regards
Michael Baird
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless
Make sure you have the latest firmware on it, also verify your Ethernet
negotiated properly.
Regards
Michael Baird
Yesterday we installed a RocketM5 radio on a 120 degree antenna, since
it's on a tower that shares with a powerful FM radio station we used
insulated Cat5. Today the pings
Yes, but he's accessing it via a backhaul which should take the wireless
bits out of this equation, since he can ping the other AP's served by
the same backhauls fine.
Regards
Michael Baird
On 12/11/2009 2:03 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote:
Yesterday we installed a RocketM5 radio on a 120 degree
Rick,
I read something about guys complaining about high rates of failure with
the connectors on the latest batch 10/22/2009 or something.
Regards
Michael Baird
Anyone having issues with flaky Bullet2HP units? The last batch I got wont
connect to my StarOS/WRAP's. Actually, I discovered
Tom,
Try again, Ubiquity AR71xx based stuff (all the M series) supports a
hardware watchdog fine.
from dmesg via OpenWRT.
Atheros AR71xx hardware watchdog driver version 0.1.0
Regards
Michael Baird
A hardware watchdog timer, typically, watches only one thing - is the
software and/or CPU
I'm looking for opinions on 5.8 dishes, if you've got any extra you are
looking to dump message me, I've got a 28db dish and some 26db/30 db
grids, neither of the grids work as well as 2 foot dish. Would like 32
db on up, I just need one to compare to my existing dishes.
Regards
Michael Baird
in the radio rather then as an external gateway
device. If any dealers out there would like to chime in or hit me off
list I would appreciate it.
Regards
Michael Baird
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http
Gino,
Where can I find detailed info on the product there doesn't seem to be
much available in regards to it's routing features. I'm also concerned
about the CPE cost/licenses that's what drove us from Canopy before.
Regards
Michael Baird
Wait for q1 release of the Canopy 320, all
Michael Baird
Self install won't work in 3650 beyond 1/4 mile, maybe 1/2 mile. Patrick
has elaborated on this many times.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com
Sent
but
they aren't available for 3.65 yet). I was supposing that the SI with a
multiple antenna array and higher transmit would perform similarily to a
radio sitting flat on the seat of a truck, maybe it was a bad supposition.
Regards
Michael Baird
Are you (Michael) talking about self install or outdoor
Back seat of truck facing the roof, not truck bed.
Regards
Michael Baird
Good information.
Keep in mind customer self installs != radio in truck bed.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
The secret to creativity is knowing how
infrastructure and make a large investment in gear we want to be as
future proof as possible.
Regards
Michael Baird
Why is your basic criteria .16e with MIMO (or .16e at all)?
All .16e gets you in 3.65 GHz is much more (30% more) latency, less
throughput per MHz, higher overhead and more
world it's a joy.
Regards
Michael Baird
On 2009-07-13 20:08, Don Grossman wrote:
It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
box that after several attempts to work with Barracuda can not be
resolved
at Wimax. Ubiquity doesn't play in
3.65 yet and it won't for a while and we need to move quickly, leasing
loops from the LEC's is killing our wireline profit.
Regards
Michael Baird
Ubiquiti's move into the large scale market, whether it will work or
not, is just happening now with AirMax
to swap the radios out at this tower for BulletM series
radios in non-airmax mode as they have 3 times the CPU horsepower, and I
should be able to get close to 100 per sector on my legacy towers I believe.
Regards
Michael Baird
Let me throw a couple devil's advocate arguments into the mix
Gino Villarini wrote:
You need to take in consideration that the Ubnt AirMax true data
thoughtput is about 70 Mbps in highest modulation and under very low
noise scenario
Ok, well that's probably a good estimate w/20 mhz channel width.
Now take on consideration that it uses dual pol to
I police via radius attributes to my redback, how are you handling
network access/termination?
Regards
Michael Baird
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:19 -0500, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
We are currently looking at a way to make sure the bandwidth is
allocates more fairly amongst our (~300
Not sure if anybody else has posted about receiving funds, we just were
informed yesterday that our middle mile funding was approved. Still
waiting our our last mile application.
http://www.mlive.com/business/west-michigan/index.ssf/2010/01/333_million_federal_grant_to_h.html
Regards
Michael
Robert,
I'm not sure if anybody has these. They have a USB version and a normal
POE version, I believe the POE version comes with the injector and it's
their 24 volt POE.
Regards
Michael Baird
Okay, okay... I ordered a few of the UBNT AirGrids from Jerry over at
Pasadena Networks. Says
better grids too (Andrews are expensive).
Regards
Michael Baird
Just looking to see what everyone else is using. I'm in the test phase
of a 5.8Ghz AP roll out.
TIA
Pat
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http
No PPPoE or Routing support either I believe.
Regards
Michael Baird
Not yet for 3.65 GHz, though do not use it for other bands. With few
exceptions, the CPE has performed fine, but it is not the most
attractive that is true. For this market, our intent is to enable CPEs
to be very low priced
What did you use to bulk process the census track info?
Regards
Michael Baird
So I have all my info, census track, speed, etc., my FRN and I go to the FCC
site: http://www.fcc.gov/formpage.html#477The information page says that I
should click on the form in the left hand column
had an example they were willing to share, of what
information they provide to the municipality, or what to pay attention
to when trying to get space on the tower.
Regards
Michael Baird
WISPA Wants You! Join today
Tom,
Thanks this is just the sort of information I was looking for. I was
also looking for maybe some notes or documentation from someone who's
done the presentation dance in front of the municipality.
Regards
Michael Baird
The goal is to learn what the muni's objective is. Their objective
Sure, but what if the 3db radius is at the horizon, on the
wisp-router.com site, it has a sweet spot, what does that mean exactly,
where the main lobe falls? Should you try to downtilt enough so the
outer radius is not at the horizon?
Regards
Michael Baird
http://www.wisp-router.com
that your beam is focused half-way to your recommended
coverage.
3). Downtilt so that you reach the furthest customer in your projected
coverage area.
These all seem mutually exclusive, unless I'm missing something.
Regards
Michael Baird
I disagree, Precise Tilt does matter quite a bit with Tiltek
Tom, that's option 1, which I think you suggested earlier, and why I put
it on my list.
1). Downtilt enough so all customers fall within the main lobes -3db mark.
Regards
Michael Baird
I'd argue none of the 3 above.
For 900Mhz and 2.4Ghz (because of wider Verticle beamwidths) I'd advise
Take a look at SkyPilot gear, it seems to have all the advantages of
Wimax, plus some benefits.
28 W PTMP in the 5+ Ghz bands, TDD, low cost cpe's. Only thing it really
lacks, and is also a downfall of Wimax is the radio as a Demarc
(Routing/Nat/PPPoE).
Regards
Michael Baird
Good
I'm researching these two technologies and Wimax in general, does anyone
have any firsthand experience with the two current different types of
Wimax, or references to the differences in the two different types of
technologies for broadband fixed rural deployments?
Regards
Michael Baird
. What's the
magic that makes 802.16d work better then 802.11 variants as far as
coverage, with essentially the same power but at a higher frequency?
Regards
Michael Baird
Here is the quick answer:
802.16d is a fixed only technology (no mobility) which performs quite
well for delivering broadband
that and establish technical reasons why one or the other is superior.
Regards
Michael Baird
So the recent thread on Wimax was quite interesting. I need to read up
on the different technologies involved. I believe that a fixed
deployment is sufficient for many many many needs and markets (wireless
before we are mounting the gear on the tower, and reading
marketing info from Alverion/Tranzeo/Aperto certainly doesn't help clear
up the differences and advantages to the technology.
Regards
Michael Baird
Those of us operators who actually have experience in the field with
the gear tend
of either tech. We
don't want to make the investments (we will run fiber to each tower) and
replace our existing deployments with it. We do want to do voice as well
(we have a switch and are a CLEC).
Regards
Michael Baird
John,
My boss has field tested Aperto's gear to 15miles at full modulation
are describing, have you used them?
Regards
Michael Baird
Any AP data as you are showing below
Josh Luthman wrote:
What is it you have not found?
On 4/25/09, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net wrote:
Where is that? I've not found it...
jree...@18-30chat.net wrote:
What do you mean lack
higher is because of
the additional 20 degrees between them. These AP's are on channels
1/6/11, I'm wondering if I should worry about seeing the other AP's with
such a hot signal, and if so what are some good ways to isolate them better.
Regards
Michael Baird
I can try that, can you tell me why that would make a difference though
with the AP's seeing each other at such signal levels? Will changing to
10mhz channel width's cause the AP's to see each other at a lower RSSI?
Regards
Michael Baird
Use 10mhz channels instead of 20mhz.
Kurt Fankhauser
ways to do it, I have no noise problems to clients, and my
channels on the 3 AP's are 1/6/11, none overlapping, and all with -100
noise floor's.
Regards
Michael Baird
Right now channel 1 uses channel 1, 2 and 3. Channel 6 uses 4-8. When
you go to 10MHz channels 1 will use 1 and 2. 6 will use
either a) defective antennas with too much leakage
or side/rear lobes) or b) antenna proximity.
Greg
On May 3, 2009, at 7:13 AM, Michael Baird wrote:
I think I didn't explain my problem clearly. 10mhz/5mhz channel sep
makes no difference on how each AP see's each other on a site survey
They are ubiquities now, but they were tranzeo's previously and
exhibited the same behavior. The AP's are physically located next each
sector antenna, w/only the 1 card in each, with the water tower
(w/water) in between.
Regards
Michael Baird
Michael
What hardware are you using for your APs
in relation to
the sector's I should be down -24, not -2.
Regards
Michael Baird
Let me try to clear something up. Just because you did an AP scan on one
antenna and it can see the other two in the -30's doesn't mean that you are
getting a full -30 signal 20mhz higher or lower. All that says is you
.
Regards
Michael Baird
I would agree with Michael that he's hearing the other AP radios to hot.
I saw beamwidths and positioning on radius posted.
Not sure if I missed it in earlier post, or not stated yet, but please
clarify
1. What brand/model APs and Antennas
2. What type structure mounted
in the whole town, population about 800 folks. The
land is as flat as a pancake, no hills or great obstructions, minimal
treelines.
Regards
Michael Baird
Whats the lenghs of the cables? They could be acting as antennas themselves.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
our customers happier, and also saves us from some
angry telephone calls. If it's a wireless client, we turn them off after
10 days, and schedule a radio pickup.
Regards
Michael Baird
It has reached over $1k from 4 subs over the past 6 months. Do you just
cut your losses and move on or what
applied our previous methodology to wireless
when we redid the wireless network we aquired (they were previously DHCP
based, mac address list, no automation, poor records). Any decent
billing system should allow external scripting for different events.
Regards
Michael Baird
What billing system do
For next time, check http://www.geocode.com/, it cost about $35 per
1000, and does all that you need to do to submit the data.
Regards
Michael Baird
I know and feel your pain there. Luckily we do not have that many customers
but 75% of our customer addresses does not geocode and we are doing
Garbage in, garbage out, sorry didn't read enough of the thread, I
thought it was about the FCC filing process being to much of a burden,
not about record keeping issues.
Regards
Michael Baird
Unfortunately, this doesn't resolve anything for me. NONE of the
geocoding engines have the data
with what? Will the gel filled type overheat in the sun? Should i run
all of this in conduit, at least for the AP's at the towers?
Regards
Michael Baird
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org
that gel will want to move though. Down vertically to base, then up
to patch-panel at base.
Regards
Michael Baird
I think you missed my question. I mean if one was to put a snug wire
tie around the cable a few inches back from the connector on the lower
end of the cable would it prevent the goo
I need a replacement omni and probably a backup, anyone know where these
are in stock, or have some used laying around they might part with. Just
around 13db and Horizontal, bigger is fine too.
Regards
Michael Baird
, the attenuated portion is still too
strong and messing up the RSL's badly on the AP's.
Regards
Michael Baird
What sort of ubiquiti APs? You'll have serious loss on anything
but a bullet, and I wouldn't put one of them 145' up a tower.
Also see that the firmware is up to date. They've had some
at the CPE is great, RSSI at the AP is poor often different by
16-20 db.
I also mentioned the RFLinx Qwave lightning arrestors, this is the first
tower we've used them on.
Regards
Michael Baird
I don't think that this would be an antenna location issue.
What antennas did you use and where
Gino,
145', 15 degree VB, 7.7/7.8 puts my -3d at ~5 miles. If my downtilt was
wrong, I would think it would impact the receive on my CPE's, much more
then on the tower AP's, maybe that's a poor assumption on my part though.
Regards
Michael Baird
I think your downtilt is too much, whats your
All 3 AP's are displaying this characteristic, they transmit wonderfully
though. My CPE's are working fine on another tower, so they are good.
Regards
Michael Baird
Is this just on a single AP you are seeing this problem? We have seen
blown radio cards display a 20db difference on just one
told him 7.8, but I'm sure he didn't get dead on, just the best he
could with his inclinometer.
Regards
Michael Baird
Where are you running the calcs? I use
http://www.wirelessconnections.net/calcs/AntDowntiltCalc.as
With your input, I get main lobe 0.2 miles / -3db @ 7
Gino A. Villarini
Travis,
I will try that too, but do you think that would cause poor RSL at the
AP? I would think the downtilt would cause more issues with the CPE's RSL.
Regards
Michael Baird
Hi,
I have to agree with Gino here... even at 7 degree downtilt, you are
cutting it very close. You may want
Michael Baird
Michael Baird wrote:
Gino, wisp-router.com, would the downtilt affect the AP RSSI level?
Antenna Height
ft
Downtilt Angle
°
Vertical Beamwidth
°
Results
Inner -3dB Radius0.1 Miles
Sweet spot 0.2 Miles
of the
equation, unless the other two sectors are reflecting on each other
badly, because of their close proximity.
5). Change out a radio, and see if somehow all of my radio's got fried.
Regards
Michael Baird
Michael
If you can reduce the TX power on 2 of the sectors and see if the third has
RSL
The only other things on the tower according to the owner, is at 150mhz
and 450 mhz.
Regards
Michael Baird
Could there be any other source of interference? What else is on the
tower?
Greg
On Jun 16, 2009, at 8:37 AM, Michael Baird wrote:
I actually shut the radio's off on the two
apartment complexes and hotels that are in the focus of the main beam at
that downtilt. When I get the guy up on the tower, I am going to try
uptilting it first for sure, maybe with that tilt they are picking up
more noise then they should be.
Regards
Michael Baird
It sure seems like
,
and a nice fit.
Regards
Michael Baird
You can't check with a spectrum anylyzer at the base! You have to climp the
tower and plug each antenna in to the spectrum anyalyzer.
Also there is no black magic involved. Wireless can all be explained with
laws of physics. There are too many wireless
Marlon,
Yea, it's ok, we wouldn't have learned anything if it worked properly
the first time. This tower is not in production, it's our first build
out, we will learn. We aren't using gas-powered lightning arrestors,
they are RFLinx quarter wave type arrestors.
Regards
Michael Baird
I don't
in RSL at
the AP.
Regards
Michael Baird
We use them commercially. I think we have replace. 2 of them over the past
18+ years
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Israel Lopez-LISTS ilopezli...@sandboxitsolutions.com
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:23:20
Same OS, same chipset, same radio ns2/ps2, only difference is the
antenna size and case.
Regards
Michael Baird
I'm hearing to avoid the ns2 and go with the ps2/5. Less issues.
What do folks say?
I've been putting some decent load in both a hotspot and point to point
configuration
then the range because of the
antenna.
NS2 - AR5315 - http://www.atheros.com/pt/AR5006AP-G.htm - no SuperG.
PS2 - AR5316 - http://www.atheros.com/pt/AR5006AP-GS.htm
BulletHP - AR5317 - http://www.atheros.com/pt/AR5007AP-G.htm
Regards
Michael Baird
NS2 has an ethernet port, sma jack and a reset
monitored.
Regards
Michael Baird
They have for me. I suppose they wouldnt if it were obvious such as
with burn marks, etc. I will say one thing, their RMA process is slow.
They must be busy.
-RickG
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:44 PM,
jree...@18-30chat.netjree...@18-30chat.net wrote
with this antenna, or these scenarios?
I expected this bigger, more expensive antenna to gain all across the board.
Regards
Michael Baird
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org
the teletronics VSWR is 1.1:4, vs 1.5 on the Tranzeo. The
Teletronics is down about 6db on the CPE side for all the clients on the
test sector, on the AP side it's the same. I tested multiple tilt's as
well, between 0-1 degree was the best on the CPE side.
Regards
Michael Baird
First thing
it, it cost a lot more and should be a better antenna, as I believe gain
not only comes with narrowing coverage (sector width), but antenna design.
Regards
Michael Baird
Gain only comes from narrowing coverage with antennas.
If there are both 120* antennas you can't have HIGHER gain with GREATER
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
