Rogelio
We will have one ready very soon, are you looking for 2.4Ghz or 5Ghz?
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wirel
I debated on whether to put this out there but since Tim did what the heck
:) Demarc has been working on something like this for the past few months
and will soon have a demo site up for people to take a look at our offer.
But to give you the basis:
- Our solutions will have about 95% of what both
Josh
https://www.demarctech.com/products/reliawave-rwr/rwr-hpg-i.htm
We can work with WISPA members at $89.99 for any qty.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subjec
Demarc will be exhibiting at ISPCON, so we will be up for any parties :)
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] O
Had these made for our units:
https://www.demarctech.com/store/catalog/product_info.php/cPath/21_34/produc
ts_id/247?osCsid=4ga5ta6aaupft1nh2pi7b1qkl0
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John McDowell
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 1:52 PM
To: WI
And if you could get then what you do with them?? Wimax mini-pci are client
side only there is no way to use them as a Wimax base stations. The protocol
does not allow for it and there is allot more to a base then a radio and
software. This is not to say someone could not hack a radio and hal to
They are made by compex:
http://www.compex.com.sg/home/products1.asp?20070314532323
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Update from the FCC. This makes is very clear to me what the FCC is looking
for, if there are any questions or comments feel free.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com
"Tony:
Thank you for y
Tom
You are still thinking like an 802.11 only protocol :) I can see you have
your mind set, once things get closer to having real product then this would
be a more valuable thread, until then!
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-667-7583 F
We are looking into this now, it looks like it can all me done in the
MAC/HAL the way the spec is done but it's still a wait and see. We are
looking at ways to do more of a pre-802.11y, as long as it passes the FCC
muster we are good.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless So
Mike
It is a bit too early to say right now, once the MAC is done we will have a
better idea.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai
Crap this was a typo should have been 10Mhz channel. Also right now 802.16m
and LTE are doing 5bits/Hertz that has happen in field tests. Most of what
I am talking about is OFDMA, MIMO with some type of advanced antenna system.
I have seen test of AAS that are very cost effective it's just a matte
I agree with you 100% right now they are not and I should make the point
that what I am talking about is what will be coming down the line in the
next 18-24 months. I understand most WISP are in the here and now :) But
with this said things are in the works.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technolo
Mike
- You really need to read the full 802.22 spec :) There is A LOT more than
just channel bonding that make 802.22 good.
- 6Mhz is more than enough for all WISPs needs when it's used correctly,
again (I know) not 802.11
- 3.65Mhz is just in the startup Wimax was first to hit the street but thi
Mike
- It's not just a single antenna on one channel, I am talking about channel
reuse. Again need to stop thinking 802.11
- It is possible to have 50Mb-60Mb real data in a 70Mb/7Mhz channel with the
right MAC and PHY and in real deployments.
- The only reason a single user could use all the band
Mike
Right now it is in draft but very close to going to the next stage. But
there is a lot more going on here than just a standard.
- The 802.22 is setting a precedence, besides the engineers that are
creating 802.22 also involved are the incumbents that hold the TV channels
and they hav
I clearly understand this, where did you get $50k per AP and $800 per CPE??
Wimax? I would not care if a WISP had the money of a cellular company, these
prices would not make scenes in either case. On top of this, cost of the
equipment was not the point, but I am fully aware this makes a differenc
Mike
I do not agree with this at all. Most WISP are used to using 20Mhz 802.11
devices which are VERY frequency inefficient. With 20Mhz and a radio
designed to make the most use of the spectrum could easily create channels
using 3.5Mhz or 7Mhz in size plus channel reuse and polarizations. I could
Rogelio
Just as an FYI we have had customers install our 630mW indoor AP (119.95)
and get better performance over the MetroFlex unit.
https://www.demarctech.com/products/reliawave-rwr/rwr-hpg-i.htm
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-667-7583
Rogelio
"Disappointment" is only because of the press. People working on the
designs, development and working with it day to day will tell you that it
works very well based on what the true specs are of both the frequencies and
area being testing in. Right now the only option you have for Wimax w
FYI we had a 11-28vDC input to 48vDC output unit made for the wind/solar
power design:
http://www.demarctech.com/store/catalog/product_info.php/cPath/21_34/product
s_id/247
While there is some energy loss in the conversion the overall cost and
quality of a 12vDC works out better than using a pure
I wanted to get input from the WISPA list about a complete design for a off
grid base station design base on a dual and quad radio system. We have been
looking into this and have come up with a design using both wind and solar
power that will keep a unit up and running 24/7/365. The idea is to have
We have not hear of any issues but we had 10,000 made with a stronger
adhesive with better temp specs.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com
This communication constitutes an electronic com
We don't use them that much anymore in the new product lines but we do have
stock they are .25 each less than 100 and 20 each with 100+. You can call
and talk to one of our sales reps to order just reference part number
MF-SLAD250ADH.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireles
Kurt
This is a good point, the CPEs are all sending a signal back to the AP at
random times but as you scale more are hitting at the same time which can
over load the receivers on some AP radios. When you lower the power on the
units that are closer this reduces the total power levels the radio is
Jack
I will give in to your challenge, and focus on outdoors setups :) But first,
I agree with you 100% about your comments; some venders saying "add more APs
will help" as well as " their smart systems will solve all their performance
issues.
We have been watching, talking and helping some of th
Tom
You are calling the Wimax base station an AP, this is not the case they are
true base stations with a large amount of R&D behind them plus most are
licensing code which adds a great deal of cost. I do not think you are going
to see Wimax base stations anywhere near what WISP are used to doing,
Guys
I keep hearing people say 3.65Ghz has more power than 2.4Ghz, I guess I can
see this over all with 25Watt total but because of how the rules are written
this is not the case. The base station in Wimax is 7 Watts EIRP max if you
use the larger channel size, and less if you use the smaller one
Well this is yet to be seen, the noise floor at 3.65Ghz should be very
clean. This means you will be able to make links as much lower signal levels
then with 2.4Ghz. And OFDM will help with NearLOS issues with buildings, but
if are dealing with trees OFDM is not going to help much this will come do
Mike
Standard 3.65Ghz OFDM does not work as well as 2.4Ghz OFDM but it's better
than 5Ghz OFDM. Right now we see 3.65Ghz as a great replacement for areas
that have issues with LOS 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz business level users as well as
PtP back haul links. This is simply because in most areas there is lit
Dennis
OLSRd is open source and used on many devices. While I would not call it
plug and play once you have a basic setup adding nodes is very easy. Also as
there is a windows version of the code one can easily add any laptop or
desktop computer to the mesh. Again this is just one more tool for a
Tim
While I agree with what you are saying in principal, the definition of a
"True Mesh" is every changing :) OLSR is based on the ad-hoc design, and
with the level of processor we are using, a single ESSID and channel with
somewhere in the 75-100 interface range should work very well for most of
Jeromie
On the RWR product line mesh is strictly base on OLSRd, so what it support
so will the RWR. We have been getting many requests from customers for a low
cost high power mesh that would work in campus and school setups, which the
RWR works great for. We do not have multi SSID support but we
Anthony
Our complete RWR HPG product line has Mesh based on OLSRd
(http://www.olsr.org/).
http://www.demarctech.com/products/reliawave-rwr/index.html
http://www.demarctech.com/about-us/demarc-rwr-press.pdf
There is a GUI for olsrd which will run under Linux or Windows:
http://www.olsr.org/index.
I was just on there site and could not find any data about FCC nor could I
find this on the FCC search, can anyone provide a URL for this??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 11:57 PM
To: WISPA General
You also need to certify for CE/UL which is in part the power system.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian
Want to be clear not saying anything about this board yet just units I have
seen in the past. Bottom line is WISP need to do there own testing as will
we and report things as we find them. I am interested to see what everyone
finds.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireles
I can see the need for a clean high power CPE unit with a narrow beam width
because of NLOS issues but for LOS there is no need, also for PtP setups.
We have a bunch of our new RWC units in the field now which will come in
5Ghz and 2.4Ghz 400mW designs and thus far they are doing very well in
testi
Guys
I want to point out we have NOT see this board I do not know for sure what
it is, I thought at first it might be a so called 400mW Senao which is
really about 250mW (they are really pushing the -/+3dBm with this one) but
looking at the images its not any design they have.
Also lets talk abou
I am sure Charles and some are you are thinking the same thing I am on the
400mW unit, something just does not add up when manufactures are doing the
same power and the cost of the card is the more then the cost of the full
unit! I have not see this exact board but I have see a RTl8186 design that
Yes they are, you have to ask for them but AT&T offers these services to
business.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 8:38 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP as a service offering - Sk
Rich
In general I would agree with you expect for two features, one is video.
Phones like the Grandstream GXV-3000 have are low cost with all the features
one would need. I am not saying this is there yet as its not plug and play
but it's a step in the right direction.
Also the second is incoming
Marlon
We are looking at this now for Demarc and I can tell you the cost is less
vs. pots if setup correctly . We have 5 standard pots lines coming in now at
a basic cost of $220 after you add in all the taxes and fees. The we pay
about $40 a month for long anywhere, any time, unlimited distance w
Brad
I am glad I was able to clear this up. Also which company
where you referring to with a $300 WiMax CPE at 5GHz??
Sincerely, Tony MorellaDemarc
Technology Group, A Wireless Solution ProviderOffice: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008http://www.demarctech.com
This communication constitut
Brad
- My point with issue was not about the contention it was
just a general statement where any one doing or looking at manufacturing WiMax
is not doing anything today with 3.65Ghz. I am sure this will
change.
- Again my comments where about RF, the same power limits
are there and no mat
Few things of info:
- 3.5Ghz is not not license free in the, 50Mhz at 3.65 is
but there are issue with using this with WiMax
- WiMax does NOT do any more at 2.4Ghz or 5Ghz then
the products on the market today in reference to RF not
protocol.
- The WiMax protocol has many cool features but a
Blair
What price points are you looking at for this setup? For now we are looking
at these more for a back haul where you can get 2.4Ghz into a an area that
is otherwise hard to reach. We are working on a 900Mhz CPE design also and
hope to have is ready by Q2 using a lower cost design but still ne
Blair
We have received samples and the cards are working well, UB wanted to make
sure these radios are 100% before releasing 900Mhz is much more difficult
then 2.4 or even 5Ghz. It will be worth the wait.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-66
George
>From what we have seen most of the unlicensed WIMAX will come into its own
in the first half of 2007. The limitation for low cost units comes down to
the chipsets, we have tested prototype mini-pci WIMAX radios (5Ghz) but they
are far from ready for prime time.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
De
Blair
I think this will do what you need tell them Tony front Demarc sent you:
http://www.remotedatacom.com/pages/KABU.html
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-244-9068 Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com
-Original Message
Brian
Just and FYI Demarc has know about this for some time and as soon as its ready
to go we will have CPE and base units that will
support it. The CPE will come with 10dBi or 12dBi options as well as the 250mW
or 1 Watt output options. While not locked down we
should be able to do 4, 2 or 1 O
Dan
There is a small picture on the store, this is the one without an antenna
and two connectors.
Sincerely, Tony MorellaDemarc Technology Group, A Wireless
Solution ProviderOffice: 207-244-9068 Fax: 207-433-1008http://www.demarctech.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.demarctech.com/store/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=169&osCsid=a5da77ed9858bf632d691e2d970cb6c8
Sincerely, Tony MorellaDemarc Technology Group, A Wireless
Solution ProviderOffice: 207-244-9068 Fax: 207-433-1008http://www.demarctech.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EM
No. Its no possible for anybody to create a TC compatible system because of the
patents.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-244-9068 Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E
Blair
- We are working on a software upgrade to our RWO product line which will have
polling.
- The cost is from $139.95 to $289.95 depending on models.
- We have N connected versions.
- We are coming out with a 400mW 5Ghz RWO CPE and Base in the next 1-2 weeks
which will have polling.
Keep an
55 matches
Mail list logo