shing easy and
> ends up with more evenly distributed usage.
>
> Jake Snyder
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 28, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Mark Duling wrote:
>
> As James said, we use interface groups to select which set of networks to
> put users into based on their ld
As James said, we use interface groups to select which set of networks to
put users into based on their ldap membership within the same SSID. I also
assumed at the time having small nets was better than larger ones as on
wired networks, but I know it's different on wireless controllers so maybe
Wow. I didn't know about the changes to the latest model. Thanks James.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:32 PM James Andrewartha <
jandrewar...@ccgs.wa.edu.au> wrote:
> On 21/06/18 01:32, Mark Duling wrote:
> > Can you elaborate on your comment on how the 4k AppleTV can get stuck in
>
Hi James,
Can you elaborate on your comment on how the 4k AppleTV can get stuck in an
app and need to be RMA'd? I'm not sure what you mean.
"Just don’t get the 4K version, if they get stuck in an app and lose their
connection to the MDM you have to RMA them."
Mark
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:03
* its.syr.edu
>
> *SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY*
> syr.edu
>
>
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Mark Duling
> *Sent:* Friday, March 23, 2018 1:50 PM
>
> *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.ED
Hi Lee,
Your comment "but I need to frequency-coordinate what’s a fairly busy
mounting location" seems to imply you think there are fewer frequency
options with Airfiber than competitors. Could you clarify your opinion on
that? We've also begun to consider future options such as airfiber for
ks individually? If they are different vendors,
> one might be handling MTU differently, which might upset your CAPWAP
> tunnels. Just a thought.
>
> Thanks,
> ---
> Eric Kenny
> Network Architect
> Harvard University IT
> -
Hello all,
Is anyone running two pairs of inexpensive wireless bridges–say ubiquity
AirFiber–and using EIGRP equal cost load balancing over them? It seems to
me that should be an inexpensive way to support reasonably high bandwidth
building over redundant links.
I ask because a while back as a
We're using Pharos. It needs a license for mobile printing that we don't
have yet. But when we get a license sometime in future they have a mobile
app you can use to print. Don't know how it stacks up against Papercut
since I'm not involved with printing at all.
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 3:09 PM,
Thanks for all the replies everyone. Well I'm not used to looking at AP
logs, but I just logged into one AP on the list and on the day it happened
all I see are some of these:
%DOT11-4-CCMP_REPLAY AES-CCMP TSC replays
and two of these for a client:
%DOT11-4-FLUSH_DEAUTH: Consecutive tx
ssues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Mark Duling
> *Sent:* Monday, September 11, 2017 2:48 PM
> *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> *Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] spurious cpi report of mass AP disassociation
>
&
We're using Cisco 8540 on code 8.2.151.0. Last week CPI reported a great
number of simultaneous AP disassociations and then reassociation. CPI shows
all the events had the exact same timestamp right down to the hundredth
second. It was just a single event.
But I can find no event preceding it
It's a good thing it never ends. The stability of many IT lives depend on
it. It's all relative, thank God. I for one am very thankful that
recommending what I think is the best solution all considered for my
employer and having a job aren't mutually exclusive. :)
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 5:53
We upgraded our 8500 series from 8.1.131.0 to 8.2.111.0 Saturday. Haven't
seen any issues yet. We're using n+1 redundancy.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Mathieu Sturm
wrote:
> We’ve replaced our 1130’s last year and are going for 8.2MR next week.
>
> Has anyone done
Hi Eric,
Did you find the LSS (location specific services) tie-in to mdns in later
v7 code inadequate in limiting airplay device lists?
Mark
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Eric T. Barnett
wrote:
> Good afternoon folks,
>
>
>
> I just wanted to give folks a heads-up on
Hi all,
We're running WLC code 7.6.130.0. I thought I had seen recently in the
release notes for WLC code 8.0.110.0 that it had some sort of enhanced
support for Chromecast, but I can't find specifics in the documentation
about it now. I can't find anything about Chromecast in the 8.0 release
compatibility, the more likely it is that vendors will respond and
provide more than simply lip service and political posturing.
Pete Morrissey
*From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Mark Duling
*Sent:* Friday
My thoughts too. I'm not sure how much we an complain about vendors seeking
ways to differentiate their products with a unique value-add. Because a
vendor's value-add is nothing other than their reason for being. If there
is nothing they bring to the table that everyone else doesn't, then they
I've lost track of part of this discussion. Can someone roughly state what
is being called onboarding in this thread?
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Peter P Morrissey ppmor...@syr.edu
wrote:
“Don't assume I'm counter to what we've traditionally been doing in
EDU, but I'm constantly
Is the DHCP proxy feature of WLC unchecked? Controller - Advanced - DHCP
We had a case where it was enabled (perhaps the default in early versions)
and it never seemed to matter until some years later due to reasons I don't
even remember. It probably is off, but you might check it. At the time
On climate change, I think the argument is over whether the change is
cyclical or not, and who has the burden of proof when advocating
shared political and economic changes because of it. I don't think the
argument is over whether change has or is happening or not.
When it comes to scientific
Six resolved caveats listed on one open? Is Apple writing Cisco's
release notes now? :)
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Hurt,Trenton W.
trent.h...@louisville.edu wrote:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn76mr01.html
Reminder its
Read wrong document, but still I see only 8 resolved caveats on 7.6
MR1. What am I missing?
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Mark Duling mark.dul...@biola.edu wrote:
Six resolved caveats listed on one open? Is Apple writing Cisco's
release notes now? :)
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:16 AM
?
Have you never heard of Aruba's AirGroup? The features sound very similar.
Bruce Osborne
Network Engineer
IT Network Services
(434) 592-4229
Liberty University | Training Champions for Christ since 1971
-Original Message-
From: Mark Duling [mailto:mark.dul...@biola.edu
... Cisco going above and beyond to accommodate Apple’s shame.
Cisco is overjoyed at the opportunity to provide themselves a
competitive advantage. Users are overjoyed at the capability. I
suppose most IT workers are happy to have the job security that
solving visible user-centric problems
Ditto on blocking DCMA. We're using ASA-CX module to do it and it seems to
do the job well. I'm curious as to what other devices/methods y'all are
using that have been effective in blocking bittorrent.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Byron Sayres sayre...@ab.edu wrote:
We block all P2P and
A long time ago I increased the interval for this up to a pretty high
setting from the default (I think it was 10 min) at the suggestion of
TAC engineer to stop them from changing channels so frequently.
802.11x RRM Dynamic Channel Assignment (DCA)
I have no evidence that there is any issue
Well there are things worse than waiting, such an less work for us to do.
AppleTalk was introduced in 1985, and zones came along in AppleTalk Phase
II in 1989. Networks at the business level were very new then. Now
networks are such a competitive market that vendors are competing to solve
Airplay support is a work in progress and there is no location control. I
don't know if the RFC will bear fruit, but I think individual vendors will
try to come up with their own solutions to gain a competitive advantage.
Aruba has announced some location-based advertisement thing but it is
Update on 7.4.100.0 stability.
We increased our license count on our 5508s running 7.4, and so we pulled
our old WiSMs out and put the APs that were on the WiSMs associate and
upgrade to 7.4 on the 5508s. We have a mix of 1131, 1242, 3500, and 3600.
Once the 5508s were more heavily loaded we
7.4.100.0 has been very stable for us with failover pairs. We're enjoying
the AirPlay support too, which seems very solid.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Joe Roth jr...@binghamton.edu wrote:
Has anyone else seen stability issues with 7.4? We had to downgrade from
7.4 to 7.3 due to our
** **
*From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Mark Duling
*Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2013 3:50 PM
*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WiSM2 7.4 stability issues
are getting advertised like that.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Mark Duling mark.dul...@biola.edu wrote:
Hi Lee,
The have a new document based on 7.4:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/technology/bonjour/Bonjour_DG_Guide.pdf
It is as simple as it could be now. Doesn't require
Nedi has a function so assist with finding stolen laptops. I've never
actually used it, but it is great at discovery and node lookups on mac
address and other criteria.
http://www.nedi.ch/
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Alexandra Frincu
alexandra.fri...@unil.chwrote:
Hello,
** **
Oops. I haven't had coffee yet. You wanted to know the location on a
wireless net after you know it's back. Nedi can't do that on a controller
based network.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Mark Duling mark.dul...@biola.edu wrote:
Nedi has a function so assist with finding stolen laptops
As Anders hinted, the mac hashing feature to solve dhcp exhaustion
introduced in 7.2 was backported to later versions of 7.0 code (7.0.220.0
perhaps). We're running vlan select happily on 5508s on 7.2 and WiSM-1s on
7.0 and it works well on both.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Hurt,Trenton
I've never tried it but ISC dhcp server at some point added a one lease
per client feature where the server terminates existing leases associated
with a given MAC when it assigns a new address. Infoblox in its most
recent release supports this but I've not tried it. Theoretically at least
if you
The question isn't whether one is cynical, but what one is cynical about
and why. The expression The nice thing about standards is that there are
so many of them to choose from was a pretty cynical statement of the
benefits of having them.
The only standards that work well are so brutally simple
Necessity is the mother of invention. This has probably been mentioned
before, but this reminds me of AppleTalk zones. All that had to be worked
out in advance to gain acceptance in business, but now IT is being
consumerized and so the process is reversed once demand reaches critical
mass.
And
In our environment (Cisco WLC) I could never get Wii's on our wireless
working anyway and recommended using a wired adapter so there were no
clients that we ever reported to be effected by turning off lower data
rates.
I never understood why I couldn't get Wii's to work on an unencrypted
network,
Luke, it looks like that presentation isn't public. Can you say more about
Cisco's recommendations on that? Or are they simply saying /21 is the
maximum recommended size? I'd also be interested in anything they said
about mcast as it relates to size.
I've setup vlan select on a test WLAN with
But Avahi is a current product, and Cisco has a current document describing
how to use it as a Bonjour gateway. I was wondering if anyone had done
that yet, and even if not whether it would obviate the need for a single
designated vlan for downstream traffic with vlan select and provide
multicast
I have some questions about the multicast info in the Apple Bonjour
Deployment Guide. Here is my understanding from reading the Cisco docs
referenced on this list and please confirm or correct me where I'm wrong.
1) You can use vlan select with multicast to use bonjour/airplay by using
the
+1 on AnyConnect. L2TP/IPSec are lower layer protocols, and I wouldn't bet
on them supported natively on mobile devices indefinitely if the vendors
want to push the platform forward. I presume Apple partnered with Cisco
and built it into iOS at v1 so it would be a commercial success, but five
Hi Adam,
My personal opinion is that NAC as a generic term has gotten almost too
ambiguous to be useful. The Wikipedia entry for NAC says this:
Initially 802.1X was also thought of as NAC. Some still consider 802.1X as
the most simple form of NAC, but most people think of NAC as something
We started to look at PacketFence but before even getting to test it Cisco
released ISE and then we switched to kicking the tires on that. Though I
know some universities use PacketFence quite successfully, for all the
strengths of the open source way the hassles of it in a product like that
This is the first I have heard of this issue, but v5 of the Cisco Wireless
LAN Controller Configuration Guide says that world mode = DTPC
---
Enabling Dynamic Transmit Power Control
When you enable Dynamic Transmit Power Control (DTPC), access points add
channel and transmit
47 matches
Mail list logo